General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDoes anyone else have a problem with children saying the Pledge of Allegiance?
I don't know if it's still being done now, but when I was in highschool in 08 the Pledge was still said daily over the intercom and when I was elementary school the teachers would lead the class. Does anyone else have a problem with it? Children pledging their allegiance to the state before they are even old enough to understand what they are saying seems like a bad thing to do. It seems like it could foster strong and sometimes dangerous nationalist sentiment in later years. I know it isn't actually mandatory in schools, but you aren't ever told you don't have to do it and the pressure to conform is strong.
Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)lamp_shade
(14,826 posts)earthside
(6,960 posts)... in school.
A lot of good it did.
I am most decidedly not a U.S.A. nationalist or a super-patriot in any way, shape or form.
Now, my preference is for children not saying the Pledge of Allegiance, and even more for schools to make clear that reciting it is a matter of personal preference and that nothing negative should be drawn from folks who choose not to say the Pledge.
But, in the end, I'm not so sure it matters much.
By the way, I also watched a lot of 'Combat!' and 'Rat Patrol' on TV when I was young ... I must have killed another gillion imaginary Germans when I was little, too. And now, I'm a dedicated anti-war activist. So, one can never tell how a child will turn out by what they are expected to do when in their formative years.
white_wolf
(6,238 posts)I don't really think it will cause children to grow up to be nationalists. I just find the whole concept of children pledging loyalty to the State to the kind of creepy.
left on green only
(1,484 posts)The only thing that I can add is that I can remember in later school years, after I started to become aware of all of the hypocrisy that was prevalent in our country, how I used to just pantomime and lip sync the act every morning. In my own cynical way, I figured that it was the best thing to do in order to fit in with the hypocrisy that was being shoved down my throat as a part of my education.
Response to earthside (Reply #3)
aikoaiko This message was self-deleted by its author.
ejpoeta
(8,933 posts)but I have never said anything.
bluestate10
(10,942 posts)Happyhippychick
(8,379 posts)It feels wrong and indoctrinating, for lack of a better word. I hate it.
Warpy
(111,237 posts)southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)"under god" because it wasn't in the pledge at the time. I lived on military bases overseas and in school we always said the pledge. Why even in the movies (on base) you had to stand up before the movie started and listen to the Stars Bangle Banner play then we sit down and watch the movie. I don't know if they still do it today. I doubt it. It's kind of sad really because that is one thing that unites the country.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)That's the funny thing about these repetition exercises that begin before we're old enough to know what we're saying -- they become meaningless as all hell and we usually have half the words wrong.
white_wolf
(6,238 posts)I can never understand it when it's sung out loud. I don't know why.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)written after the Battle of Baltimore (1814), by Francis Scott Key, who witnessed the bombardment of the American Fort McHenry from aboard a British ship. Basically, the first verse of the poem states that the American flag over the fort that Key had seen as twilight fell was lit up by the bombs coming from the British ships during the night, and then Key asks if the flag is still flying, metaphorically, over the country.
Javaman
(62,515 posts)Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)but I still can't remember it
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)is the old English university drinking song.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)The 101st time is a charm?
southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)come from a military environment growing up. My dad and my husband both retired from the military along with my father-in-law. I never mind saying that because my dad was in WWII, Korea and VN before the built up. He was wounded in WWII. I think saying the pledge honors him and his fellow soldiers who died. I feel it unite the country.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)That said, the little buggers don't have a single clue what they're saying or what it means, so the oath has no significance whatsoever in their minds. Perhaps by making it a mindless exercise in robotic mantra-ism all the harm is sort of washed out?
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)Hi Codeine.
whathehell
(29,065 posts)but I fail to see where "all the harm is" in it. .
I would bet other nations have similar types of "pledges"
My father stood in HIS OWN LIVING Room when the Star Spangled
Banner played, and he was an ass-kicking union organizing FDR Dem!
Raine
(30,540 posts)it didn't effect my ability to think for myself.
RiffRandell
(5,909 posts)I think most kids just zone out during it anyway. I know I did.
GoneOffShore
(17,339 posts)Or at political events or sporting events.
It's creepy. Didn't used to think so, but do now.
I will not recite it, I will not sing the Star Spangled Banner and I will not stand for "God Bless America".
Codeine
(25,586 posts)It's not an easy song to sing, really. It would be more disrespectful for me to mangle it than it is for me to stay quiet.
The hand-on-heart thing is goofy -- won't do that either.
greytdemocrat
(3,299 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)It reeks of extreme nationalism/jingoism. Plus, the kids don't have much of a choice. They will be ostracized if they refuse.
SoutherDem
(2,307 posts)I didn't know why or what I was really saying. I didn't even think of what the words meant until I was an adult.
I can't say I have a problem with it but it is a bit nationalistic and we do have a larger number of non-americans in our school now than when I was in school.
Also the under god part was added in either 1954 or 56, when publicly admitting you were an atheist might get you beat up as quick as admitting you were gay. For an atheist this might present a problem.
As to voluntary? Volunteering is helping hand out something for the teacher. To be told the pledge would be voluntary is asking for ridicule from the child of a right winger when someone choses not to do so.
It might be time to reconsider the pledge in school beyond part of history.
LaydeeBug
(10,291 posts)Tell them to video the school in question's morning announcements and FUCKING PROVE THEY ARE NOT SAYING THE PLEDGE.
It is as fake an outrage as the welfare queen, and every bit as dangerous.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)We don't believe in god, and I find it ridiculous that that is forced down kids' throats at public schools. "Liberty and justice for all" is a complete joke. It's more like "liberty and justice for those who can buy it." I think the pledge is ridiculous. It's worshiping a rectangle of material and it teaches children to not question, just go along, put up and shut up -- the exact opposite of our supposed "democratic" ideals.
Enrique
(27,461 posts)hopefully they will be upset when it falls short. Hopefully when they see some injustice, they will think, hey what about liberty and justice for all?
abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)Space: the final frontier. These are the voyages of the starship Enterprise. Its five-year mission: to explore strange new worlds, to seek out new life and new civilizations, to boldly go where no man has gone before.
Every time I watch star trek I remember the pledge:
"I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."
RZM
(8,556 posts)'I pledge allegiance, to the flag, of the United States of America. And to the republic for which it stands, one nation, under god, who art in heaven, hallowed by thy name. Thy kingdom come, they will be done, on earth as it is heaven, with liberty and justice for all. Amen.'
bluestateguy
(44,173 posts)and not just voluntary in name only.
In other words, none of this: "oh, OK, little Johnny, you can be an un-American, unpatriotic, communist, terrorist loving little shit and NOT show your love for our country. While we say the Pledge of Allegience, you can go stand in the corner."
Raine
(30,540 posts)nationalistic brainwashed RW tool.
rug
(82,333 posts)Skip Intro
(19,768 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Not at all. Neither does The President.
"In order to recognize the American spirit of loyalty and the sacrifices that so many have made for our Nation, the Congress, by Public Law 85-529 as amended, has designated May 1 of each year as "Loyalty Day." On this day, let us reaffirm our allegiance to the United States of America, our Constitution, and our founding values.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, do hereby proclaim May 1, 2012, as Loyalty Day. This Loyalty Day, I call upon all the people of the United States to join in support of this national observance, whether by displaying the flag of the United States or pledging allegiance to the Republic for which it stands.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this first day of May, in the year of our Lord two thousand twelve, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-sixth."
white_wolf
(6,238 posts)It's May Day,I international Worker's Day, not Loyalty Day.
whathehell
(29,065 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Then write The President and tell him how you feel.
May 1. Loyalty Day, as proclaimed by President Barack Obama.
Learn it. Live it. Love it.
white_wolf
(6,238 posts)May Day is a lot older. Besides if the President was listening to my advice, I would have far more important issues to discus with him than a holidays. However, since I'm not a millionaire donor I'm not on the list of people he goes to for policy advice.
whathehell
(29,065 posts)Sorry 'bout you not being one of those "millionaire donors".
daaron
(763 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)Guess I'm a traitor now!
whathehell
(29,065 posts)For all the fuss being raised by some here, do we really
imagine other countries don't have similar declarations?
independentpiney
(1,510 posts)because of the 'under god' and 'liberty and justice for all' parts. The first of a series of problems I had with that school administration. My parents were pretty supportive of me but in hindsight should have probably sued the district for some of the things they tried.
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)The teacher tried to make her stand - practically begged her to because it embarrassed her. But she held firm and the Principal informed the teacher that she had the right to stay seated.
Ship of Fools
(1,453 posts)when I began to refuse to recite it. I didn't know why then, but
I well remember feeling VERY uncomfortable reciting, en masse,
"One nation, under God."
CK_John
(10,005 posts)or Hail Mary's.
I believe most ed theory believes in a consistent mantra to start the school day and it gives the kids comfort in a world of caucus.
LeftofObama
(4,243 posts)Did something happen between yesterday morning and this morning that made people have to re-recite the pledge of allegiance? I figure if I say it once and I don't change my mind or pledge allegiance to another country in the meantime, what the heck is the point in saying it again?
Sorry for the rant. It's just something I've always wondered about.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)TBF
(32,043 posts)but have never told my kids not to do it because it's bad enough living in Texas as it is.
They say the both the Pledge of Allegiance to the US and Texas every day.
The2ndWheel
(7,947 posts)It's brand loyalty. Any organized effort that plans on surviving over the long term has to nurture that, especially with children, and the younger the better.
surrealAmerican
(11,360 posts)... has always bothered me. It seems like the antithesis of what should happen in school. Once they are old enough to understand it, it's coercive even when not technically required.
That said, it is not particularly influential to the children who recite it. When I was in school (this was the late 60's and 70's), they had us recite the pledge, the creed, and sing the national anthem. Apart from it being a waste of time, and painful to listen to (in the case of the anthem), we tended to take no message at all from any of it.
RedCappedBandit
(5,514 posts)and I stopped reciting it the moment I finally thought about what it actually was they wanted me to say.
hack89
(39,171 posts)MadrasT
(7,237 posts)And I stopped reciting it in the 3rd grade.
Loyalty oaths are B.S.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)was inserted by the crazies during their last great uprising in the 50's.
I'm not sure whether the Pledge is a good idea or not. Surely, instilling a sense of pride in the ideals of and community within the U.S. is a good thing, but as pointed out elsewhere, it is a short trip from there to the jingoistic nationalism that invariably leads us down roads better left untraveled.
aikoaiko
(34,165 posts)I like the original best:
"I pledge allegiance to my Flag and the Republic for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."
Someday I'll explain to my son that some people consider God a real entity, but I consider it a cultural metaphor.
Common version:
"I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."
The only part I don't like is the under God part.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)obamanut2012
(26,067 posts)FSogol
(45,472 posts)"It seems like it could foster strong and sometimes dangerous nationalist sentiment in later years." - Did all of the sophomore political science classes get out early this year?
obamanut2012
(26,067 posts)I consider it nationalistic and it really bothers me. I have refused to say it since 10th grade, which was quite a while ago, alas.
I am an American, and should not be required to take what amounts to me as a loyalty oath.
Also: the "Under God" addition is beyond unconstitutional.
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)Be thankful for small victories. I agree though, I have always thought that the pledge had a militaristic group think character to it and have always been somewhat surprised that the small government folks seem to have no problem with a federal government imposition of a uniform pledge for all school children albeit supposedly voluntary but of course it isn't really.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Generic Other
(28,979 posts)with liberty and justice for some.
treestar
(82,383 posts)What's the point of it? DUers from other countries, how is the school day begun? Surely we can find countries that successfully educate the youth without this sort of thing!
lynne
(3,118 posts)- my children are all 20+ years but they said it daily at school and haven't suffered any dangerous consequences as a result. Given that it's been said daily in most schools for about the last 50 years, I'm not sure there's any evidence to support your concerns.
randome
(34,845 posts)There are larger battles to fight.
datasuspect
(26,591 posts)taught us old woody guthrie songs.
there'd be a bunch of us wee'uns singing "this land is your land" and stuff like that.
Vidar
(18,335 posts)raouldukelives
(5,178 posts)Really? Were under Christian values? That explains the wars for peace and depleted uranium and drone strikes and the grinning millions who profit off war, sickness and climate change through investments in the markets.
Claiming that we are doing Gods work and then doing the exact opposite might not sit well with our omnipotent lord if one does exist.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)which was written by a socialist. My mom, born in 1922, told me kids recited it in school in her small northwest Minnesota town when she was a girl. Not so crazy about the added "under god" part though.
Dragonbreathp9d
(2,542 posts)And it's basically forced upon them
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)At worst, it's benign. At best, it's benign. Worse things being said are justified daily.
cliffordu
(30,994 posts)I said it every goddamned day I was in school.
And then, in 6th grade, while the girls were in "health class",
(learning about menstruation, 'cause their parents were too disgusted with biology to explain it themselves...)
We boys were taken to the Gym and indoctrinated into the "domino theory"
(Chinese and Russian commies killing and raping kangaroos after sodomizing the entirety of southeast asia)...
AND THEN:
A mere 6 years later (!!!) I volunteered to go to Viet Nam.
I boarded the plane like a medicated cow, comforted in the idea that I was going to live up to the Pledge.
*******************
"Blood. A necklace on me all my life."
(Michael Ondaatje, Memoirs of Billy the Kid.)
***************
Fuck the Pledge. Spill your blood where you will.
But don't do it on MY account.
And don't do it over some bullshit pledge to a flag that means exactly dick these days.
Maybe that's all it ever meant.
YMMV
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)jp11
(2,104 posts)and as I got older it reminded me of the body snatchers, then other countries where people were showing their loyalty or forced to pretend to do so.
I don't think it serves any real purpose for kids, if you want kids to understand the country/patriotism teach them about it in history. There isn't any need to have little kids recite an oath when they don't know jack about what it means, and when I started I didn't know anything about it other than we all had to do it period.
I don't quite agree about it alone fostering dangerous nationalist sentiment I think it might contribute to that if there were other forces at play in fanning that fire like parents who were really high up on patriotism, american exceptionalism, etc.