Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWealth redistribution needs a new name - Responsible Wealth maybe?
Wealth redistribution sounds like we take money from the Walton family and send everyone a check for $1.58. In fact, wealth redistribution means taking the cap off Social Security contributions to keep the fund solvent forever. It means raising Social Security benefits with inflation to support the elderly. It means decent retirement ages with decent benefits. It means investment in infrastructure and education. It means that the minimum wage is a living wage.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 858 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wealth redistribution needs a new name - Responsible Wealth maybe? (Original Post)
hedgehog
Sep 2015
OP
We've always had wealth redistribution. It's just always been flowing up, rather than down. nt
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
Sep 2015
#3
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)1. New Deal? Fair Deal? Great Society? It's not like we haven't done it before.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)2. Taxes? :)
It could catch on.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)3. We've always had wealth redistribution. It's just always been flowing up, rather than down. nt
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)4. Solidarity? n/t
Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)5. Let's call it Reagonomics
Let's see Republicans try to fight against something with Reagan in the name.
OneGrassRoot
(22,920 posts)6. That's actually the name of a network...
http://faireconomy.org/responsible_wealth
Responsible Wealth is a network of business leaders, investors, and inheritors in the richest 5% of wealth and/or income in the U.S. who believe that growing inequality is not in their best interest, nor in the best interest of society.
As beneficiaries of economic policies tilted in their favor, Responsible Wealth members feel a responsibility to join with others in examining and changing the corporate and government policies that are widening the economic gap. As wealthy and upper-income individuals, members speak out in Congress, in the media, and in corporate boardrooms for progressive taxes and greater corporate accountability.
Responsible Wealth is a network of business leaders, investors, and inheritors in the richest 5% of wealth and/or income in the U.S. who believe that growing inequality is not in their best interest, nor in the best interest of society.
As beneficiaries of economic policies tilted in their favor, Responsible Wealth members feel a responsibility to join with others in examining and changing the corporate and government policies that are widening the economic gap. As wealthy and upper-income individuals, members speak out in Congress, in the media, and in corporate boardrooms for progressive taxes and greater corporate accountability.