General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWe need to propose bold ideas like reducing SocSec to age 50.
This will generate a heated response and force the GOP to produce a jobs program.
Take a look at Europe and tell people that will be us if we don't try new things. A new TVA progran, a CCC program.
A big gamble but without some bold no Nov fun.
Comrade_McKenzie
(2,526 posts)CTyankee
(63,901 posts)I would say 55 or maybe 60. But not 50.
Certainly, I would LIKE to say 50 but that is not going to happen.
We have to be somewhat realistic....even 60 is pretty unrealistic at this point, don't you think?
annabanana
(52,791 posts)You always start out aiming high... even astonishingly high..
Watch "American Pickers" sometime. It's a great lesson on the art of barter...
CTyankee
(63,901 posts)annabanana
(52,791 posts)Couple of guys drive around the country buying "junk" off of eccentrics and other interesting people way out in rural America..
http://www.history.com/shows/american-pickers
CTyankee
(63,901 posts)Not at all my cup of tea...but, thanks, for the information!
limpyhobbler
(8,244 posts)It's that reality show in a pawn shop. They buy stuff and negotiate prices. Same concept.
CK_John
(10,005 posts)It will be 10-15 yr before population catches up with the jobs. If you over 50 and unemployed, your only hope is Mc Jobs, at least a soc sec check will give them some dignity and let them move on with their life.
Also we can give 50% of graduates jobs, so we need to stop having freshmen classes for at least 5yrs.
karynnj
(59,501 posts)That would be incredibly unfair to them. How do you tell the top student in a competitive school that he/she needs to do something else because there will be no college for 5 years? Also, what do you do with all the suddenly unemployed professors and other school employees. (Consider that by year 4, there will be very very few students left - only those who took more than 4 years to complete. This would kill most private colleges.) Not to mention, the government does not control the class sizes. At most they can influence the size by cutting back on aid. What that will do is make it so fewer people not born wealthy can attend.
gkhouston
(21,642 posts)RKP5637
(67,102 posts)a rut. Bold ideas need to be brought forth by all parties to help the majority of citizens, otherwise, we will definitely be Europe. "A new TVA program, a CCC program" would definitely be starters. This, is the country that used to be able to innovate and move forward, now, for several decades, we've been backsliding IMO.
CK_John
(10,005 posts)fall. Just doit with executive orders if need be. They will yell and scream(GOP) but so what. Bold is good.
RKP5637
(67,102 posts)worried about what the R's might think/say/do. It doesn't matter what the R's might think/say/do, if we start moving forward people will see the results and the R's opinion and smears will be meaningless.
CTyankee
(63,901 posts)For all the press given Germany Americans don't know how socialistic that country is. It ain't Alabama. Think universal health care, child care, education all the way through either university or trade school. There are social safety nets in place there that would blow the minds of most Americans.
Don't believe this shit about how Germany is some capitalistic paradise! Plenty of socialism there for their people!
Oh and BTW, Socialist Sweden is now now running a budget SURPLUS!
Go figure, republicans!
RKP5637
(67,102 posts)but with the mix of money and power, greed and all those on the take in politics with the corporate revolving doors I really don't see how it's going to come about. And SCOTUS is of little help, with their inane Citizens United decision. All they did was add fuel to the fire.
muntrv
(14,505 posts)CK_John
(10,005 posts)slipslidingaway
(21,210 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)Vote the Rethugs out of office before they kill us all. And give their media sources, both print and televised, major hell for propagandizing against Social Security.
xtraxritical
(3,576 posts)for all employee income, with no rise in the employees share. Get some real Democrats in Congress!
NNN0LHI
(67,190 posts)SS alone is barely enough to keep someone from living under a bridge. For a while any way. Because the increasing cost of living will eventually send most people depending on just SS under a bridge to live if they live long enough.
Be better off to unionize and negotiate a real pension. And a 401K is NOT a real pension.
Don
RKP5637
(67,102 posts)401K which lost much of its value.
DavidDvorkin
(19,473 posts)Pensions have largely disappeared. Even the companies that still offer them tend not to keep individual workers employed long enough to earn pensions.
Because of the way the economy has changed, Social Security must be expanded to become a true national pension.
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)Your healthcare should not be dependent on an employer any more that having and living wage in retirement. We should not be left to the whims or incompetence of our employers. These basic human needs should be guaranteed by the taxes you've put in all your working life. We need single payer healthcare and SS at 55.
limpyhobbler
(8,244 posts)Seems like obvious common sense. And so of course we'll be told it's impossible. People deserve to retire with dignity, even if they aren't part of the country club crowd.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Negotiating a "real" pension is a joke. Ask employees of North West Airlines and many, many other companies. Ask GST steel workers how their "negotiated" pensions worked out. They ended up in Rmoney's Caman account.
Pension plans are an easy target for pirates.
Get the private businesses out of pensions.
Vincardog
(20,234 posts)It has not kept pace with the increase in the top incomes.
We need to lower the retirement age to 45 if that is the age BIDness decides they will no longer hire after.
WE also need to automatically raise the COLA every time Congress raises their own pay.
If you are waiting for America to get strong unions back before doing anything about senior economic security you will be waiting a long time. I can not afford to wait.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I think on many issues they have set their starting point where the would like to be at the end. They must start the negotiation at a more preferable position than where they want to end up.
Instead of discussing the need for changes to SS, do as you have said. Start the conversation with the benefits of lowering it.
Instead of starting the negotiations with support for a public option, begin by educating the populace on the benefits of single payer.
Instead of supporting tax cuts in a stimulus package, tell the people why straight spending will benefit them much sooner.
xtraxritical
(3,576 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)limpyhobbler
(8,244 posts)of supporting New Deal style policies? If he was going to be FDR's clone wouldn't he already be advocating those kinds of policies?
hughee99
(16,113 posts)Too many people in congress have to answer to people, and I don't mean "the people".
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)SS and Medicare for everyone over 50 would flat out make this a great country.
Do that and so many jobs will open up it will make china spin.
This is a job for Occupy. Next GA.....
TrollBuster9090
(5,954 posts)MEDICARE FOR ALL.
Three words. It works. It's catchy. It has traction.
They can start by simply bringing all federal government employees (especially the military) under the administration of Medicare. Screw all the other government health care programs. Just erase the other agencies in the name of 'government efficiency.'
Medicare has an overhead of 3% compared to an overhead of 20% or more for private HMOs. And that 3% overhead is the cost of insuring THE MOST EXPENSIVE clients (the elderly) compared to a 20% gouge to provide (or often DENY) health care to the most healthy clients.
unkachuck
(6,295 posts)tinrobot
(10,893 posts)Lower the age by 5 years every year until everyone is covered.
That'll give health insurance companies a decade to find other work.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)I think people should be able to retire, while they still have their health and stamina to follow a dream, perhaps launch a new career or even to volunteer at something they like doing.
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)every citizen regardless of employment status. We're a wealthy enough nation that it can be done, we lack only the will to date.
Godhumor
(6,437 posts)So I can actually retire the way I want to do so when it really is time. I have no intention of depending on social security regardless of the retirement age.
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)you currently become eligible for it at 62.
Likewise, under this OP's proposal, there would be no requirement that you or anyone else be required to take SS beginning at age 50.
Your opening word 'Sorry' implies that you cannot support the proposal because you fear it would somehow cut into your peak earning years. Now that you know that no one proposes to take those away from you, what say you to the OP's proposal?
Godhumor
(6,437 posts)Pay out benefits at 50 for those who want to retire? What would be the point? The contribution one would receive would be miniscule and further drive down the benefits of those who retire later in two ways: money being spread in a wider pot, and less contributions coming in due to the early retirees.
All around, I don't think it is a winner of an idea.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)I guess if one never found their calling, or can't find a way to be productive, retiring would be somehow acceptable.
I don't know anyone who's done it with integrity AND happiness and fulfillment.
Godhumor
(6,437 posts)I want to travel and maker a real go at knocking some items off my bucket list. To do that, I am depending on my last 15 years or so in the corporate world to be damned good compensation. Retire young to a fixed income just doesn't seem like a good idea to me.
dkf
(37,305 posts)The people who can afford to retire at 50 are the people who don't need social security.
The benefit reduction in taking SS at 62 vs 66 is around 25%. Take that down another 12 years and that isn't going to get you very far.
CK_John
(10,005 posts)you have slotted for dust bin.
The new corp model is work'em till they drop and toss'em after 50.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)Am I in the minority for loving my job and not being able to imagine having nothing productive to do?
What are the millions of people over 50 supposed to do with themselves?
Play golf?
Go Vols
(5,902 posts)Beats working.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)Or maybe your travel is in the betterment of mankind...
What's your carbon footy print?
Can you honestly say that wherever you go you...
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_NFyPQFPnDnQ/TA4B-8zrP7I/AAAAAAAABLc/rPHICdlk1So/s1600/mountaineer%27s+motto.JPG
Go Vols
(5,902 posts)Not sure what you mean by the "betterment of mankind" as I cant heal people or such.
But I do help US mankind by patronizing local business even when it means paying more,I rent out land to those that keep crops local as best they can.
Not gonna apologize for doing well and wanting to ride around and look at the US.
ErikJ
(6,335 posts)Most economists say that they most likely never will find another job.
You have to be pretty boring to think that working a regular job is the only option in life.
The chioices are endless. Go back to school and get a degree, travel and teach english anywhere in the world, start a new business or develop a new prioduct, write a book, create art go full time into politics, volunteer for the homeless hungry etc etc.
Go Vols
(5,902 posts)is what good unions provided.
Tis a shame the rich keep that money today.
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)limpyhobbler
(8,244 posts)Some how that makes sense to me.
Can't explain it but I like it.
just1voice
(1,362 posts)There should be a 4% govt debt bill as well, offering everyone a way out of usury from corrupt banks. War criminals should be tried in a court with actual evidence presented as well. Anyone with a job history in banking should be banned from govt as well.
Ideas are great but worthless in our corrupt country; it's still fun to share them with other 99%ers. I wouldn't expect the GOP to produce any ideas of their own though, other than new ways to beat protesters or take money from criminals.