General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWall Street Journal - "Obama spending binge never happened" (GREAT CHART!)
Tue May 22, 2012 at 12:09 PM PDT
Wall Street Journal - "Obama spending binge never happened"
by NewDealer
...From the Wall Journal's Market Watch column today comes this.
Of all the falsehoods told about President Barack Obama, the biggest whopper is the one about his reckless spending spree. (snip) Almost everyone believes that Obama has presided over a massive increase in federal spending, an inferno of spending that threatens our jobs, our businesses and our childrens future. Even Democrats seem to think its true. But it didnt happen. Although there was a big stimulus bill under Obama, federal spending is rising at the slowest pace since Dwight Eisenhower brought the Korean War to an end in the 1950s.
Even hapless Herbert Hoover managed to increase spending more than Obama has...
SNIP
...Over Obamas four budget years, federal spending is on track to rise from $3.52 trillion to $3.58 trillion, an annualized increase of just 0.4%.
There has been no huge increase in spending under the current president, despite what you hear...
SNIP
MORE AT: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/05/22/1093932/-Wall-Street-Journal-Obama-spending-binge-never-happened-
Zalatix
(8,994 posts)President Obama is also responsible for what happened in 2008. So those job losses and spending increases are his fault, too!
Mariana
(14,859 posts)Why, it happened just about the time that Obama started leading in the polls! So there!
cui bono
(19,926 posts)magical thyme
(14,881 posts)Despite all the wall streeters whining about Obama, they know Vampire Capitalism overreach and Morman dominionism will suck them dry too.
The 0.01 percenters are trying vacuum up little crumb, including the 1 percenters.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)goclark
(30,404 posts)and Very Good News!
safeinOhio
(32,712 posts)you get radical right wing agenda. God, guns and teh gay issues go back a century and the economy takes a dump. Just look what the House has passed the last couple of years.
emulatorloo
(44,164 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Hoover-like results.
And here we are.
xtraxritical
(3,576 posts)PatSeg
(47,555 posts)<img src="" border="0" alt="">
Amazing how the FACTS somehow don't match the rhetoric on the right.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)for dividing everything into 3 year segments?
Mariana
(14,859 posts)(Obama '10, '11, '12, and '13, Bush II '06, '07, '08 and '09). And the first fiscal year they are responsible for is the one following their inaugurations.
PatSeg
(47,555 posts)they inherit the previous president's budget.
Mariana
(14,859 posts)kentuck
(111,106 posts)tclambert
(11,087 posts)Dubya's. Specifically, the TARP bailout started under his regime.
underpants
(182,860 posts)PatSeg
(47,555 posts)We need as many visuals as possible.
supraTruth
(496 posts)ErikJ
(6,335 posts)Romney/Republicons are now focusing more and more on the Obama deficits and that he is to fault for them.
This will kill Obama in November if we dont have the facts.
supraTruth
(496 posts)ATTENTION & REPORT IT!
Here is a list to begin with:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002715818
zbdent
(35,392 posts)I remember the "liberally-biased media" going "what press conference?" when John Kerry said that Bush had said he wasn't that concerned about Osama bin Laden.
No tape, no mention in the "l.b.m." about how that specific day was no longer available on the White House site ... one of the few times George W. Bush had a press conference where he fielded QUESTIONS ...
DiverDave
(4,886 posts)As would-be president Mitt Romney tells it: I will lead us out of this debt and spending inferno.
Almost everyone believes that Obama has presided over a massive increase in federal spending, an inferno of spending that threatens our jobs, our businesses and our childrens future. Even Democrats seem to think its true.
I never thought he was throwing money around, but less than anyone back to Ike.
I wasnt aware of that.
We HAVE to make sure he is re-elected
Great ammo for the screamers that say he is "bankrupting us"
God, the comments on THIS story.
Most of those guys have drunk deep of the kool-aid.
With FACTS staring them in the face they still yell lies,
incredible...
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)marketwatch and WSJ are.
DiverDave
(4,886 posts)the other day on the CATO institute site, of all places.
http://www.cato.org/publications/white-paper/overkill-rise-paramilitary-police-raids-america
And was VERY surprised that any sort of police criticism was allowed there.
But it is a very insightful paper and gives
damning evidence that SWAT units are being used incorrectly and they are frequently
killing innocent people by mistake.
From the CATO institute??!!
it'd rather old, but nevertheless...
onlyadream
(2,166 posts)My conservative friends have trouble with these tho, since facts and data aren't emotional issues to get all upset over.
Johnny2X2X
(19,095 posts)I've been posting numbers just like these on boards for over a year, glad to see it in the press. I hope it gets a ton of play now that it's out there.
tallahasseedem
(6,716 posts)Thank you!
EC
(12,287 posts)What does Rupert want Romney to lose? This is one of his main campaign speeches, that Obama is out of control with his spending - an inferno - yada, yada, yada.
I'm beginning to think that the really right wingers want him to lose so they can run a real right winger in 2016. If Romney wins they won't be able to run a different candidate...so, I wonder if Santorium and Paul and some others are sabotaging Romney quietly and under the radar?
Amonester
(11,541 posts)they've figured out they're gonna go bankrupt because, after Medicare and Social Security' massive cuts, nobody except the 1% is gonna be able to afford paying for their products.
And not only theirs...
cr8tvlde
(1,185 posts)and Santorum and Newt have really big campaign debts and ended up looking like idiotic dolts...again.
I'm still thinking Jeb and, please be kind and I don't care how old she will be and how many times she's said NO but if her party calls and they might, Hillary will do her duty in 2016.
Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)kentuck
(111,106 posts)that Obama is increasing Federal spending at a record pace. After all, the debt has increased by about $5 trillion since he took office. Doesn't that mean he is spending more than anyone in history? No, not necessarily. We have the deficit and the increased debt because we don't have the revenues to pay for the present spending, not that we have increased spending that much. In fact, Federal spending is increasing at the slowest rate in almost 60 years.
spanone
(135,857 posts)yankeepants
(1,979 posts)5X7s or 8X12s and discreetly post them everywhere republicans will see them.