General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCan You Name the Last Two Presidents who Were Elected with A Business Background?
Herbert Hoover, (1929-1933): The President who ushered in the "Great Depression".
George W. Bush (2001-2009): The President who ushered in the "Great Recession".
I'll pass on electing businessmen as President.
jsmirman
(4,507 posts)I forgot about Georgie because I guess I really don't consider him a businessman - more of a political favors processor than a businessman.
Hoover, I've been studying tangentially (I'm covering his period of influence from Sec'y of Commerce to dismal Pres) these last few months.
Initech
(100,063 posts)trotsky
(49,533 posts)It can't - and SHOULDN'T - be done. Government does things that will never, and SHOULD NEVER, turn a profit. That's not what government is for. Running it like a business will ruin it. But then of course, that's what the modern conservative appears to want.
TrollBuster9090
(5,954 posts)because there is no profit in it. Libertarians, of course, foolishly believe that the free market can do EVERYTHING, and if it fails to do so it's because the market wasn't de-regulated enough. A very convenient 'no true Scotsman' fallacy. But we all know that if Libertarians were left to run things they'd STILL be waiting for the free market to end SLAVERY.
PA Democrat
(13,225 posts)is to "promote the general Welfare" of the people of this country.
Corporations exist solely to make money for the privileged few and have NO obligation or interest in promoting the general welfare of the people of this country. In fact, without regulation, corporations will destroy this country from an economic and ecological standpoint.
aristocles
(594 posts)George Washington built a whiskey distillery on Mount Vernon the year he left office, which eventually became one of the largest distilleries in the country.
Herbert Hoover started a mining consulting firm with offices in London, San Francisco, New York, Paris and Petrograd.
Warren Harding bought a newspaper that was nearly bankrupt and made it so successful that it provided his income for decades, including while he was running for office.
Franklin Roosevelt founded the Roosevelt Warm Springs Institute for Rehabilitation as a hydrotherapy and healing spa for polio victims.
Harry Truman opened a clothing store in Kansas City, which was initially successful but eventually went bankrupt.
Jimmy Carter took over his familys peanut farm and eventually grew it into a multi-million dollar business that included warehouses, a peanut-shelling plant, and farm equipment supplies.
George H.W. Bush founded the Bush-Overby Oil Development company and co-founded the Zapata Petroleum Corporation; business ventures that made him a millionaire.
George W. Bush invested $800,000 in the Texas Rangers baseball team and later sold that share for $15 million.
jsmirman
(4,507 posts)I was going with Hoover and Harding. Two spectacularly crap Presidents.
louis c
(8,652 posts)Last edited Wed May 23, 2012, 06:51 PM - Edit history (2)
First off, the question was the last two.
FDR, Truman, Carter, and H.W. Bush never touted there business accomplishments. Hoover and W. did.
Running the government like a business is wrong headed.
A business exists to make a profit. Buy at cheaper prices (including labor) and sell at higher prices to maximize those profits.
An example I use is, let's say the U.S Government has to contract a call center for citizens to have questions answered about Social Security, Veterans' Benefits, IRS, etc. And let's say the lowest bid in the United States calls for employees to make $14 and hour. In India, the bid is lower by half, because the workers there are making $2 an hour. By using just a strict business formula, the US Government should be outsourcing our own jobs. That's running government like a business. And I don't like it.
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)Including whether it was a CIA front.
louis c
(8,652 posts)thucythucy
(8,045 posts)was not a business, it was a foundation, presumably not-for-profit.
NYC Liberal
(20,135 posts)Bush specifically used his business background during the campaign to illustrate how he was going to be "The MBA President"
AnnieK401
(541 posts)Gman
(24,780 posts)Just say government does not have Owner's Equity on the balance sheet and watch the puzzled look. It's priceless.
Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)The ROI is massively negative.
A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)...and capital investment as a "savings", though. Suddenly everybody would want a ton of transportation infrastructure spending.
Gman
(24,780 posts)The average freeper hasn't a clue. Ask 'em what they would value under Good Will and why. That's my favorite (IMHO) bogus asset category. I stayed away from Clear Channel stock several years ago because over half the value of their assets was under Good Will.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)AKA, "we lost (or embezzled) the money, but in the magic world that is double-entry, it had to go somewhere, so..."
And then you can really get heads exploding if you point out to them that "assets" includes "things you owe to other people"...
Gman
(24,780 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)Assets = Liabilities + Equity
Gman
(24,780 posts)Debit to the asset for the lease, then amortize the lease which gets passed on to the income statement.
CanonRay
(14,101 posts)TrollBuster9090
(5,954 posts)"Name three presidents" at the 11:40 mark
Romulox
(25,960 posts)yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)Harry Truman the haberdasher
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)Jimmy Carter on his peanut farm.
badtoworse
(5,957 posts)If we are going to deal with the high unemployment we currently have, then we will need to substantially expand the private sector. It seems counterintuitive to me that having no experience in business would be an asset.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)did you cross-post this to freeperville? Enjoy your brief stay, dear Limbecile
badtoworse
(5,957 posts)Last edited Wed May 23, 2012, 08:08 PM - Edit history (1)
I note though that you didn't answer my question.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)A vulture capitalist like Rmoney has one objective and one objective only: to extravagantly increase the wealth of a small, minuscule group of already-wealthy investors. And history has shown that he - and anyone else with "business experience" - will screw over anyone and everyone in his path to succeed in that objective: men, women, children, students, workers, unions, bread-winners, homeowners, the old, the sick, the disadvantaged. ANYONE, as long as they're not RICH.
Obama said it the best: A CEO has to worry only about helping his shareholders succeed. The President has to worry about helping everyone succeed.
This is what "business experience" gets you:
badtoworse
(5,957 posts)My point is that a president with no business experience may not be as effective in growing the economy as one who has experience in the business world and understands its needs. The need for the right motivation is so obvious I didn't think it needed to be pointed out.
Gman
(24,780 posts)And does not make decisions in a vacuum.
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)Technically they were owned by his wife Ladybird Johnson but that was mostly a smokescreen. LBJ called the shots on that as with everything else.
FailureToCommunicate
(14,012 posts)I can't find it...but it was a good one... 'The leader of the country can't only be looking at the bottom line' (or similar)
badtoworse
(5,957 posts)He should be worried about the bottom lines of the private sector. We are not going to reduce unemployment here if the private sector is hurting.
xtraxritical
(3,576 posts)as in American corporations are not in the slightest pain. Small business and the American people are. These big name corporations sitting on trillions hire for minimum wage and no benefits all the part time workers they want, if they don't offshore. Sure we can reduce unemployment with "right to work" no pay, no benefit jobs and unlimited right to fire workers. Bottom lines are not hurting, real people are. If you can join a union and vote a straight Democratic ballot.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)he's a freeperville loser who has brought a few talking points from FoxNation.
badtoworse
(5,957 posts)How would you increase jobs in the US? We compete in a world market for jobs and that is not gpoing to change - how would you deal with it? Those are fair questions.
barbtries
(28,787 posts)unless being a peanut farmer doesn't count.
RZM
(8,556 posts)Carter did pretty well in the peanut business.
eallen
(2,953 posts)His "business background" was largely manufactured.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)He's a classic post turtle.
RogerShuler
(11 posts)Thanks for showing us that history can repeat itself in disturbing ways.
How many GOP candidates get elected by promising to run government like a business. Be careful what you wish for, voters.