General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow ‘Hobby Lobby’ Launched a Right-Wing Crusade
(The Nation) Perhaps the most highly charged case of the 2013 term began life as a series of modified corporate personhood jokes. Does the postCitizens United notion of corporate personhood include the right of a corporation to have and practice a religious faith? Can a craft store go to church? Where does it park? Does it quilt its own hat?
By the end of the term, nobody was laughingespecially not women. In Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, the Supreme Court held, by a 54 vote, that the Affordable Care Acts contraception mandate violated the religious-freedom rights of corporations.
The ACA required that many employers provide comprehensive insuranceincluding pricey birth-control coverageto their workers. The pill can cost upward of $25 a month, and the onetime cost of an IUD can reach $900, not including the cost of the doctors visit to have it insertedsums that can be hugely consequential for most women workers. For some, these benefits can mean the difference between life and death, and theyre essential to economic parity and professional autonomy for most others. As Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg noted in her dissent: [T]he cost of an IUD is nearly equivalent to a months full-time pay for workers earning the minimum wage. But the craft-store chain Hobby Lobby and a cabinetmaker called Conestoga Wood Specialties argued in their pleadings that providing female workers with certain birth-control devices (specifically the IUD) and morning-after pills violated the business owners religious convictions because these things were used to cause abortionsa claim belied by medical science and the Food and Drug Administration, but deeply felt by the corporations owners.
In an unprecedented extension of religious freedom, the Supreme Court did two remarkable things. The majority recognized closely held corporations a term left undefined in the ruling, but which, by some estimates, encompasses the vast majority of US corporationsas persons capable of exercis[ing] religion. The Court then determined that under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, the religious rights of the employers ultimately outweigh the rights and economic needs of the women who work for them. In so doing, the Court allowed these companies, based on the asserted religious objections of their owners, to withhold basic health-insurance coverage from women. .....................(more)
http://www.thenation.com/article/how-hobby-lobby-launched-a-right-wing-crusade/
cascadiance
(19,537 posts)Hobby Lobby just provided "Muslim businesses" the ability to enforce shariah law on their employees, whether or not those employees are Muslim or not. Or, are they proposing that the only religion that a business can have here in America is "Christianity" that can use "Hobby Lobby rights"?
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)This is too important an issue to be overlooked during the Pope-a-palooza.