Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Doonesbury nailed Romney (Original Post) FSogol May 2012 OP
My local newspaper carries the waste of newsprint Mallard Fillmore in its comics section but also libinnyandia May 2012 #1
Ugh. "Mallard Fillmore" is just illustrated RW talking points. FSogol May 2012 #2
that's who Romney reminds me of! wial May 2012 #4
Could be, but... WinstonSmith4740 May 2012 #15
Press Enterprise? What a rw fish wrapper. xtraxritical May 2012 #11
Mallard Fillmore takes Words that Rush Limbaugh said yesterday MattBaggins May 2012 #3
Because conservative rank-and-file view "nuanced" as dishonest. ieoeja May 2012 #5
I would like to xxqqqzme May 2012 #6
Only because ducks have more credibility with the audience ....... marble falls May 2012 #18
The last panel is incomplete. Jim Lane May 2012 #7
We could go on forever..... The Wielding Truth May 2012 #13
Just be assued that he stands by his position, whatever it was, though he doesn't remember, exactly. Scootaloo May 2012 #16
Trudeau has been on fire this week. hifiguy May 2012 #8
Yup, Trudeau is a national treasure. n/t FSogol May 2012 #9
K & R Scurrilous May 2012 #10
No wonder Romney can say...I don't know what I said, but whatever I said is what I believe. Auntie Bush May 2012 #12
ROMNEY IS A WORTHLESS, LYING, OUT-OF-TOUCH WITH THE AVERAGE PERSON THROWBACK TO THE '50S NoMittens May 2012 #14
Hey, there was proof on golden plates, GOLDEN! . . . but, the guy lost them in a move. tclambert May 2012 #17
Oh man, I'm not even going to touch that one. JoeyT May 2012 #19

libinnyandia

(1,374 posts)
1. My local newspaper carries the waste of newsprint Mallard Fillmore in its comics section but also
Thu May 24, 2012, 10:05 AM
May 2012

has Doonesbury. One can easily tell who is the more intelligent and better cartoonist.

FSogol

(45,480 posts)
2. Ugh. "Mallard Fillmore" is just illustrated RW talking points.
Thu May 24, 2012, 10:11 AM
May 2012

My paper (Washington Post) carries the puke-worthy "Prickly City" which is RW projection of political issues.

MattBaggins

(7,904 posts)
3. Mallard Fillmore takes Words that Rush Limbaugh said yesterday
Thu May 24, 2012, 11:25 AM
May 2012

and has them coming out of a cartoon ducks mouth.

 

ieoeja

(9,748 posts)
5. Because conservative rank-and-file view "nuanced" as dishonest.
Thu May 24, 2012, 11:44 AM
May 2012

The only reason they view nuanced as dishonest is because they can't understand it. And the only explanation for that is: they're stupid.

I really do hate that kind of wide brush painting. But what other explanation can there be?

Ayn Rand was so incapable of making her point that she had to end her book with a hundred page long monologue to explain it.

The original Cheaper by the Dozen would interupt the story every half hour or so while the Father or Mother gave a speech as the kids looked on wide-eyed with lots of "gosh" and "I didn't know that". After a couple minutes it would resume the story like nothing happened.

These authors either were too stupid to embed their messages in the story, or knew their target audience was too stupid to understand an embedded message. Heck, I've seen elected GOP congress-critters on CSPAN on several times talk about how their voters were too stupid to understand what they are doing. Show that to a GOP voter, and they'll laugh assuming the elected official must be making fun of all the liberals in their district.


marble falls

(57,077 posts)
18. Only because ducks have more credibility with the audience .......
Fri May 25, 2012, 06:51 AM
May 2012

they aim for. For the most part, Mallard is quacking to the choir.

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
7. The last panel is incomplete.
Thu May 24, 2012, 12:03 PM
May 2012

Romney has also changed his position on No Child Left Behind and on whether he would have sent the military into Pakistan to get bin Laden.

With a little research I could probably augment the list still further, but I realize that Trudeau had already pretty much filled the space he had available. To get in all of Romney's flip-flops, he'd need to use really teeny-tiny lettering.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
16. Just be assued that he stands by his position, whatever it was, though he doesn't remember, exactly.
Fri May 25, 2012, 01:51 AM
May 2012

Words you stand slightly to the side of, in a somewhat rearward direction, almost a behind-ish nuance there, if you will...

Auntie Bush

(17,528 posts)
12. No wonder Romney can say...I don't know what I said, but whatever I said is what I believe.
Thu May 24, 2012, 01:55 PM
May 2012

Boy is that playing it safe! With all his flip flopping...who the hell knows what he believes or what he stands for or what we'd get if (God forbid) he should win the election.

NoMittens

(27 posts)
14. ROMNEY IS A WORTHLESS, LYING, OUT-OF-TOUCH WITH THE AVERAGE PERSON THROWBACK TO THE '50S
Thu May 24, 2012, 09:57 PM
May 2012

Hopefully, voters won't be stupid enough to vote for him; besides, I could never vote for someone who believes in a religion with ABSOLUTELY NO HISTORICAL OR ARCHEOLOGICAL BASIS IN FACT (i.e., no evidence whatsoever...it's all made-up stuff).

tclambert

(11,085 posts)
17. Hey, there was proof on golden plates, GOLDEN! . . . but, the guy lost them in a move.
Fri May 25, 2012, 06:44 AM
May 2012

Who hasn't had a box of dishes go missing when moving to a new house? See? Entirely plausible. QED.

JoeyT

(6,785 posts)
19. Oh man, I'm not even going to touch that one.
Fri May 25, 2012, 08:45 AM
May 2012

Too easy of a setup.

I'm just going to say people probably shouldn't mock his religion too much, lest they/we/whoever find our own ox being gored.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Doonesbury nailed Romney