. . . and in America, I'M the "radical nutjob" . . ..

[HughBeaumont]

[randys1]

1. Whole lotta stupid in that rambling nonsense.

[daleanime]

4. +1

[Scootaloo]

2. Start with a pascal's wager, end with a homophobic slippery slope

That downwardly accelerated quickly

[Shrike47]

3. Paragraphing, God loves paragraphing! God wants you to breathe!

[HughBeaumont]

5. BUT I HAVES A LOTS TO SEIGHHHHHH!!

Paragraphs are Satan's separators.

[JHB]

18. That could be a technical issue. Facebook replies are not paragraph-friendly....

In replies to someone else's post, hitting the Enter key won't start a new paragraph, it will send what you've written thus far.

[HughBeaumont]

21. I always have to remember to hit Shift+enter.

Often I don't

[lpbk2713]

6. Well isn't that special.

[hifiguy]

7. People who believe in the absurd concept of original sin

have long ago chugged around the last bend of sanity. Their little red choo-choo has jumped the tracks. That is a very difficult amount of teh stoopid to even attempt to quantify.

[HughBeaumont]

8. I wish the Rapture WOULD happen.

Then we'd be free . . . .

[hifiguy]

9. Ain't it the truth. You'd think there would be some nice sports cars

and houses to be liberated after all the dumbasses are ruptured up to hebbin. Bet their liquor cabinets are pretty well stocked, too.

[Kalidurga]

10. Well that was painful and breath taking in all it's block type glory.

She needs to accept Kali as the one true god as well. Because if I am wrong (I don't really worship any god just sayin) there is no risk to me when die, if I am right then I become worm food and will be reborn eventually and eventually transcend time and space.

[joeybee12]

11. You can't reason with someone that intensely stupid...nt

[HughBeaumont]

14. Her page is even worse.

It'd make Mike Huckabee happy in his pants. This person is quite strung out on the hope dope.

[MisterP]

12. lying's the 8th Circle: where do the smarmy go?

[WiffenPoof]

13. Well...

...that's five minutes I'll never get back.

[YabaDabaNoDinoNo]

15. yet again another post proving that religion keeps people ignorant and frightened

[KG]

16. i've found, in my dotage, that not only can i no longer a read a 'wall of text',

there's rarely anything worth reading in one

[Crunchy Frog]

17. Never mind the vast community of divorced people who remarry.

All adulturers according to the Bible. (And annullment is not Biblical, so doesn't count.)

It's not like those people don't have huge, fancy weddings, newspaper announcements, and parade their lifestyle in front of everyone else. When are we going to see the appropriate condemnations there?

[JHB]

19. She's even wrong about her beloved Kirk Cameron...

Never "said anything nasty about anyone who is in sin"?

His "Growing Pains" co-workers can tell what a lie that one is.

[treestar]

20. God's plan at one point was one man, many wives

How can they say with a straight face it has always been 1 to 1?

"Even sex" that's interesting. It highlights how sex is the only thing they think about. Otherwise why not be just as upset at people doing the other things the OT says are wrong, like wearing material of more than one thing or eating whatever it is that was wrong then. Why isn't she sitting out in a hut during her period? Does she go through the proper ceremonies after giving birth?

It is the only thing prohibited in the OT they care about, and even that they don't follow or they'd allow a man to have more than one wife.

[Cal Carpenter]

22. Uh, no. And bananas.

All I can think of when I see reference to Kirk Cameron is bananas.

[HughBeaumont]

24. Or crocoducks.

Take Comfort: The "Science" is There.

The crocoduck is a perfect example of the straw man fallacy of over-simplifying the opponent's argument (here, the existence of transitional forms) to make it easier to "refute". Crocodiles and ducks have not had a common ancestor for 245 million years; their closest fossil common ancestor, Archosaurus[wp], was far more like a crocodile than a duck, but both crocs and ducks have a mix of primitive and advanced features from their common ancestor, the basal ruling reptile. Transitional forms need not be chimaeras of two of their descendants.

The crocoduck and other chimaeras actually hold an interesting place when considered as possible evidence. Creationists purport that chimaeras would be evidence of evolution, yet if such a chimaera were actually found to exist, then it would actually serve as evidence against evolution as it is understood by modern biologists. Hence, the crocoduck argument demonstrates that creationists do not understand the actual claims made by the theory of evolution.

[PowerToThePeople]

23. not. even. gonna. try. to. read.