Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

villager

(26,001 posts)
Fri May 25, 2012, 12:01 PM May 2012

Utility Says It Underestimated Radiation Released in Japan

Utility Says It Underestimated Radiation Released in Japan

TOKYO (Reuters) — The amount of radioactive materials released in the first days of the Fukushima nuclear disaster was almost two and a half times the initial estimate by Japanese safety regulators, the operator of the crippled plant said in a report released on Thursday.

The operator, the Tokyo Electric Power Company, said the meltdowns it believes took place at three reactors at the Fukushima Daiichi plant released about 900,000 terabecquerels of radioactive substances into the air during March 2011. The accident, which followed an earthquake and a tsunami, occurred on March 11.

The latest estimate was based on measurements suggesting the amount of iodine-131 released by the nuclear accident was much larger than previous estimates, the utility said in the report. Iodine-131 is a fast-decaying radioactive substance produced by fission that takes place inside a nuclear reactor. It has a half-life of eight days and can cause thyroid cancer.

It is difficult to judge the health effects of the larger-than-reported release, since even the latest number is an estimate, and it does not clarify how much exposure people received or continue to receive from contaminated soil and food. Experts have been divided on the health impacts since the disaster because the studies of assessing radiation risks are based mainly on a different type of exposure — the large doses delivered quickly by the atomic bombs in Japan in 1945.

Although people who lived closest to the plant were evacuated, many people remain in areas with significantly higher radiation levels than normal.

<snip>

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/25/world/asia/radioactive-release-at-fukushima-plant-was-underestimated.html

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Utility Says It Underestimated Radiation Released in Japan (Original Post) villager May 2012 OP
Time for the Nnewcuelur apologists to shift into overdrive. DCKit May 2012 #1
WHO RobertEarl May 2012 #2
 

DCKit

(18,541 posts)
1. Time for the Nnewcuelur apologists to shift into overdrive.
Fri May 25, 2012, 12:31 PM
May 2012

By the time we know the truth about Fukishima, they're going to have worn their fat little fingers down to nubs working the social media sites.

2.5x or 500x more than we were told is (still) just not that big of a deal, right?

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
2. WHO
Fri May 25, 2012, 12:51 PM
May 2012

The World Health Organization's - WHO, just a few days ago, released a report saying every little things is gonna be alright.

That report came out just before this report from the plant manager - Tepco.

That WHO report used the previous numbers that are now known to have been minimized.

It is curious that both reports are delivered at almost the same time. Eh?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Utility Says It Underesti...