Man charged with arson in blazes at two St. Louis churches

[pocoloco]

http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/30/us/st-louis-church-fires/index.html

[Travis_0004]

1. I guess the people blaming it on a white supremacist need to apologize.

[Jake Stern]

2. Whoopsie!

Natch, It must be white folks burning these churches.

I remember how Muslims were blamed for the OKC bombing. It just had to be a Muslim terrorist, no doubt about it.

Then it was announced that the bomber was a white dude.

This is why I refuse to jump on the outrage bandwagon until the facts come in.

[NobodyHere]

3. Guilty here

I still wonder what his motives were.

[B Calm]

9. Don't hold your breath.

[romanic]

4. What a fucking loser!

Burning churches in an area with so much racial tension. I don't think he's connected with anyone or had any motive aside from your typical cowardly arsonist who "ohhs and ahhs" at his "work".

[Democat]

5. Why do you think he didn't have any motive?

Is there any evidence yet? He could very well have a motive of causing political unrest or getting revenge or something else.

[romanic]

6. It's just first impressions.

I surely hope this guy didn't do this to incite some kind of riot or stir up racial tensions, but again I HOPE - I don't know.

[pintobean]

7. I think he's just a nutcase firebug.

He once set fire to a relative's house.
And, check out the neck tattoos.

[EL34x4]

8. Maybe he was angry that he couldn't get a job?

On a related note, if you are going to engage in criminal activity, perhaps facial tattoos aren't the best idea.

Witnesses tend to remember those.