General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe compassion and hospitality of our fellow Americans
Last edited Tue Nov 17, 2015, 08:16 AM - Edit history (1)
This was posted on one of my town's unofficial "community" FB pages:
Predictably, it was met with a chorus of support, all justified by the exact bigotry that you'd imagine. I'm horrified and embarrassed, and I'm not candy-coating my replies.
What a bunch of sick, ignorant fucks. Right in here in my town, and probably in every town.
FSogol
(47,623 posts)Orrex
(67,111 posts)But it's quite striking to see it out in the open. My small town has a sizable Syrian population, too. I wonder how they feel to have their fellow Syrians identified en masse as potential terrorists.
Thor_MN
(11,843 posts)Orrex
(67,111 posts)Here's the exchange that followed:
BIGOT: Yeah, but you know that they found the mastermind in Syria, right?
ORREX: So you're saying that he's not a refugee?
BIGOT: He will be soon enough.
ORREX: You're confusing "refugee" and "fugitive."
BIGOT: I'm not confusing anything, junior.
Well played, sir. Well played.
Lifelong Protester
(8,421 posts)I'm not sure if what upsets me more is that we have to live with Snotty Wanker or that a majority of people must think he's ok. It's sort of the same thing....
Orrex
(67,111 posts)I'm explicitly calling these people out as false Christians as they beat their drums of hatred and fear rather than urging compassion.
With this kind of thinking so widespread, we could easily see an overnight rebirth of internment camps. Sad times.
Lifelong Protester
(8,421 posts)Sorry to say it. And my spouse, who is 25 years older than me, is really depressed by it all.
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)It is a sad day indeed. What have we become?
http://www.thegazette.com/subject/news/government/branstad-concerned-about-syrian-refugees-but-not-ready-to-close-iowa-border-states-may-not-have-authority-to-refuse-resettlement-under-federal-program-20151116
Nineteen governors, including Iowas Gov. Terry Branstad, on Monday said they would not allow Syrian refugees to settle in their states, joining Alabama and Michigan and contending it is too dangerous to let in people from that war-torn country following Fridays deadly Paris attacks.
The Republican governors of Arkansas, Arizona, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Maine, Mississippi, Massachusetts, Nebraska, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Texas and Wisconsin along with New Hampshires Democratic governor, Maggie Hassan, said their states would no longer help support the Obama administrations goal of accepting 10,000 Syrian refugees in the coming years.
Texas cannot participate in any program that will result in Syrian refugees any one of whom could be connected to terrorism being resettled in Texas, Gov. Greg Abbott said in an open letter to U.S. President Barack Obama on Monday. Neither you nor any federal official can guarantee that Syrian refugees will not be part of any terroristic activity.
In a late-afternoon statement, Branstad said, We have welcomed refugees from around the world into Iowa. We must continue to have compassion for others but we must also maintain the safety of Iowans and the security of our state.
Orrex
(67,111 posts)But it will play very well when GOP governors run for reelection, because they'll claim that they fought to make their states safer but were held back by the Obama administration.
This is a rare opportunity for the US to act as a world leader in a good way, demonstrating compassion for the oppressed and desperate. We should recognize it as an honor to help these refugees rather than as yet another excuse to beat up on the powerless.
Orrex
(67,111 posts)But I took a peek this morning and found that they've changed tactics a bit. Since their concerns about sneaky terrorists have been thoroughly debunked, they're claiming that we need to "help our own first" before we worry about "them."
Of course, any time there's actually call to "help our own," such as with foodstamps, housing assistance or access to medical care or contraception, they shriek about the nanny state, and when it's pointed out that the military swallows 55% of our budget, they insist that we need to "fight them there" and "our troops deserve the best."
Inspiring.
uppityperson
(116,020 posts)after I asked them. I don't think they liked my multi paragraph reply. It is sickening