General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCurtEastPoint
(19,981 posts)Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)believes you (if you say that about the general) when you make such a statement, you can be banned for it.
Dunno if you get unbanned when Bernie becomes the nominee, though.
Response to Erich Bloodaxe BSN (Reply #2)
Post removed
Xipe Totec
(44,547 posts)TheBlackAdder
(29,981 posts).
Regardless of how you feel aboutyour 'position or view of Hillary,' your statement and proposed actions are noting a true Democrat would profess.
I guess you would be happy with a Trump or Carson in office.
.
my vote is my own
TheBlackAdder
(29,981 posts).
The whole 'shrill' comment is also a political tactic used by the Republicans to marginalize female candidates.
I assume you are a woman, based off of your handle, which makes that type of sexist comment even more jarring.
But, then again, 45% of the women voted against the ERA.
.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Matariki
(18,775 posts)Calling her that is just plain sexist. Argue your reasons for not supporting her like an adult.
Thx.
TSIAS
(14,689 posts)Probably 7-0 or 6-1. Showing that the idea that Sanders supporters never get a thread hidden is a complete myth.
one_voice
(20,043 posts)..and it's news to you that it's against the TOS to do that?
w0nderer
(1,937 posts)no offense
i'm for B
i really am a lot
but TOS says 'stating you won't vote for democratic primary winner representative' can get you 86ed really fast
Theoretically i can sorta kinda get away with it
because it would be a federal crime for me to vote in any federal election for congress, senate or president
thus, i can't, thus they can 'waah' but US LAW makes it illegal for me to vote
(legal permanent immigrant) (greencard)
instead i try to get the vote out for B and if B fails (hope not) then D