Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwmom

(108,973 posts)
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 06:18 PM Nov 2015

Do you want your state to try single-payer, like Colorado???? I DO. Absolutely.

Last edited Wed Nov 25, 2015, 09:33 PM - Edit history (1)

PLEASE NOTE: THIS IS NOT A PRIMARIES DISCUSSION. IF YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT CANDIDATES, PLEASE GO TO GDP INSTEAD.


So in my state I'm pushing for a state single-payer plan, like they're going for in Colorado. AND I'm doing everything I can to support the ACA for now, because ANY state can use ACA funds to institute single-payer instead.

If we lose the ACA because a new Rethug administration comes in with a Congress similar to what we have now, then that's the end not only of the exchanges, the Medicaid expansion, the subsidies, and the Essential Benefits, but also of any Federal funds helping states work out single-payer.

What do we get by constantly highlighting the flaws of the ACA? We increase the public perception that we should listen to the Rethugs and toss the whole law out.

Don't delude yourself that if that happens, we'll get single-payer instead. We won't. Not a chance in hell if the Rethugs take control.

And it will be hell.

P.S. And if you don't believe single-payer could happen state by state, then you haven't been paying attention. Ten years ago a single state approved gay marriage. Now it's the law everywhere in the country. I believe the process of change could be much quicker if a handful of states had successful single-payer programs. Please let this happen. Don't help the Rethugs tear down this chance.

29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Do you want your state to try single-payer, like Colorado???? I DO. Absolutely. (Original Post) pnwmom Nov 2015 OP
I congratulate your decision on supporting single payer and working for it at the state level. think Nov 2015 #1
Florida can't even get ok for healthcare or expanding Medicaid FloridaBlues Nov 2015 #2
Then you're stuck supporting the states who do want to try single-payer. pnwmom Nov 2015 #4
We don't have a chance in hell for Single Payer if Hillary gets elected. bvar22 Nov 2015 #3
Thank you. LuvNewcastle Nov 2015 #5
This is in the General Discussion forum, not the primary forum. pnwmom Nov 2015 #6
+1,000,000 Andy823 Nov 2015 #10
I don't think there is any profit in single payer SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2015 #8
....which means the Risk Pool in Vermont was too small. bvar22 Nov 2015 #13
Yes, the risk pool is too small SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2015 #14
Correct. WE need a national push for Single Payer, Universal Health Care. -none Nov 2015 #29
CO will. joshcryer Nov 2015 #18
+1 leftstreet Nov 2015 #26
I totally agree with you. Andy823 Nov 2015 #7
I support HCAO.org. n/t Ron Green Nov 2015 #9
Here is a link for Washington state Andy823 Nov 2015 #12
I'm for single payer, but I think it will be hard to make it work in Colorado SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2015 #11
Are you working with an Organization in your state? HuckleB Nov 2015 #15
At least a couple of them are friends of mine and they Ron Green Nov 2015 #16
Nice. HuckleB Nov 2015 #17
Yes; I'll be with one of them Saturday in a parade, representing HCAO. Ron Green Nov 2015 #19
Awesome! HuckleB Nov 2015 #20
It's the local Christmas parade. We'll have some walkers and a vehicle with a sound system. Ron Green Nov 2015 #21
KICK! Hekate Nov 2015 #22
My prediction is SP can't work without changes to how providers work Recursion Nov 2015 #23
Sometimes I think that's the only way it's going to happen ismnotwasm Nov 2015 #24
I have a question about single-state single-payer Jim Lane Nov 2015 #25
Some state needs to do it, but getting it on thr ballot doesn't mean there is enough suppprt for it. Hoyt Nov 2015 #27
Info about Colorado's plan: madamesilverspurs Nov 2015 #28

FloridaBlues

(4,007 posts)
2. Florida can't even get ok for healthcare or expanding Medicaid
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 06:43 PM
Nov 2015

Let alone single payer. If you have a republican Governor forget about it!

pnwmom

(108,973 posts)
4. Then you're stuck supporting the states who do want to try single-payer.
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 09:21 PM
Nov 2015

But if they prove it can work, it will be harder and harder for the Rethugs to keep fighting it.

This is already happening with the Medicaid expansion, with some red states finally getting on board now. Better late than never.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
3. We don't have a chance in hell for Single Payer if Hillary gets elected.
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 07:22 PM
Nov 2015

The ONLY chance we have for Single Payer is to elect Bernie, and a bunch of Liberal Democrats on the down ticket.


I really, REALLY hope that your single state Universal HealthCare Plan is successful,
but you will run into the same problems that happened in Vermont., the Risk Pool was too small for a viable insurance system. It couldn't pay for itself.

If I'm not mistaken, I remember the amendment to the ACA added by Bernie Sanders allowing states to opt for their own system. (NO other Democrat added an amendment to do so) Also, IIRC, a poison pill amendment was added by (?) dictating that a State Run Single Payer System must show a profit the FIRST year. That, and a small Risk Pool is what killed the Vermont Single Payer System.

BTW: If you are cheering for State Run Single Payer,
then you are cheering FOR Bernie Sanders.
HE is the one responsible for the inclusion of this into the ACA...
and had a bitch of a time fighting the "Centrist" Democrats to get it.
If it was Hillary, you wouldn't have this opportunity.

pnwmom

(108,973 posts)
6. This is in the General Discussion forum, not the primary forum.
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 09:25 PM
Nov 2015

Bernie and Hillary both supported the ACA. Bernie also supports single-payer, but he doesn't complain about the ACA on the campaign trail. He acknowledges that this was a Democratic accomplishment, that he was part of, and has improved health care for millions.

His supporters should stop denigrating Obama's achievement. Doing so won't make more people vote for the Democrat instead of the Rethug in the general. It will encourage more ignorant people to think the ACA is worthless and to listen to the Rethugs who want to toss it out. And the Rethugs, if they win, won't be replacing it with single-payer. They'll replace it with the nothing we already had.

Andy823

(11,495 posts)
10. +1,000,000
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 09:35 PM
Nov 2015

I and my wife have been healthy over the years, but this year we would have ended up paying over $40,000.00 for medical bills if not for the ACA. My daughter had a pre-existing condition that would have hurt her chance of getting insurance, she now has it. I don't really listen to those who say the ACA is worthless, even if they are democrats. Sure some of the plans have high deductibles , but I know from experience this year that the deductible was nothing compared to what we would have had to pay out of pocket for the medical care we received this year.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
8. I don't think there is any profit in single payer
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 09:31 PM
Nov 2015

at least there shouldn't be.

Vermont didn't do it because the tax increases would have been too high.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
13. ....which means the Risk Pool in Vermont was too small.
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 09:45 PM
Nov 2015

Believe me when I tell you that the people who wrote the ACA KNEW this well in advance.
I don't believe ANY state (perhaps Calif or NY) has a sufficient Rick Pool to enroll enough members to "break even" the first year.

Only a National Public Option would have a risk pool large enough to make it worthwhile,
and expanding MediCare would have a Risk Pool of 330 MILLION members...
now THAT is where the savings would occur.

Bernie was able to keep Universal Health care ALIVE with his amendment.

Thank YOU, Bernie!!!
Did Hillary help you?
.
.
.
.
Didn't think so.



-none

(1,884 posts)
29. Correct. WE need a national push for Single Payer, Universal Health Care.
Thu Nov 26, 2015, 06:13 PM
Nov 2015

This state by state is a doomed, money wasting path to failure.
Why should we give our money to big insurance companies, so they can screw us over when we need health care the most? Eliminate them. They are parasitic middle men bent on profits for themselves over your life.
We still need health care, not health insurance.

Andy823

(11,495 posts)
7. I totally agree with you.
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 09:29 PM
Nov 2015

A lot of things can, and do, get accomplished at state levels. Washington state increased their minimum wage, because they put it on the ballot. Washington sate also has legal marijuana, because they put it on the ballot. The only way to start doing things that can't be done as long as republicans control even one branch of congress, is to get them started at state levels. When the people get to vote on things, they can get a lot done. I hope Washington state also tries a single payer system, and if the people have a chance to vote, I think it would pass.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
11. I'm for single payer, but I think it will be hard to make it work in Colorado
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 09:39 PM
Nov 2015

Federal employees and military members make up about 1.7% of the population, and that's a fairly significant percentage that won't be paying into the system.

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
15. Are you working with an Organization in your state?
Wed Nov 25, 2015, 09:48 PM
Nov 2015

Is "Mad As Hell Doctors" still together? Weren't they from WA?

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
23. My prediction is SP can't work without changes to how providers work
Thu Nov 26, 2015, 01:27 AM
Nov 2015

and more specifically that payment mechanisms don't work in American politics as a way to do that (Google "Medicare doctor fix&quot .

That said, data are always better than models, so, I'm all for as many states as can figure out a way to do it to try it.

ismnotwasm

(41,975 posts)
24. Sometimes I think that's the only way it's going to happen
Thu Nov 26, 2015, 01:33 AM
Nov 2015

If one state successfully models single payer, it's only a matter of time before another state does. In my state of Washington, the ACA has been very successful, and nursing unions and organizations are very involved. They recognize where it can improve, but the bottom line is that in Washington state there are 1.6 million people who have insurance through the ACA. Nursing organizations are pushing for more Nurse practioners to take up the slack primary care docs are leaving. They see the ACA as an opportunity for the nursing profession which means better health care delivery, and improved stress on preventative medicine

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
25. I have a question about single-state single-payer
Thu Nov 26, 2015, 05:00 PM
Nov 2015

Wouldn't it run into the problem of reverse cherry-picking?

Suppose a large number of healthy young adults living elsewhere select the cheapest possible Bronze plans under ACA or maybe even choose to pay the penalty for being uninsured. Then one of them gets a cancer diagnosis and another is in a bad accident, being discharged from the emergency room in stable condition but needing multiple surgeries. Depending on their employment situation and other factors, they might be able to move to Colorado to get the expensive medical care they now require. (If you're a welder in Florida paying for much of your medical care, taking a pay cut to be a sales clerk in Colorado might leave you with higher net income.)

The result is that the risk pool is distorted. The way it's supposed to work is that all those healthy people pay premiums and that money is used to provide care for the few who need it. If the healthy people are all outside Colorado, then they're not contributing to the fund that has to pay for the new arrival's chemotherapy.

Granted, not everyone facing big medical bills would be able to move. Nevertheless, if a significant number could and would move, the result would be to make single-payer look unfeasible.

I know that Canada moved to nationwide single-payer by starting in one province. I don't know whether this problem arose there or how it might have been addressed.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
27. Some state needs to do it, but getting it on thr ballot doesn't mean there is enough suppprt for it.
Thu Nov 26, 2015, 05:19 PM
Nov 2015

I think we'll see a public option long before true single payer.

madamesilverspurs

(15,800 posts)
28. Info about Colorado's plan:
Thu Nov 26, 2015, 05:30 PM
Nov 2015

State Senator Irene Aguilar M.D. is the driver on this. Still a practicing physician, she got into politics with the intent to open the clinic doors for everyone.

http://coloradocareyes.co/

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Do you want your state to...