Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

uawchild

(2,208 posts)
Sun Nov 29, 2015, 10:58 AM Nov 2015

Supreme Court Halts Historic Hawaiian Election

by Chris D'Angelo, Associate Editor, HuffPost Hawaii

The U.S. Supreme Court has temporarily blocked a historic and controversial election from moving forward in Hawaii.

Native Hawaiians are currently nearing the end of a month-long election to select delegates for a constitutional convention, but on Friday, Justice Anthony Kennedy issued an order blocking both the counting of votes and the certification of any winners "pending further order" by the court.

The election is seen by many as a first step for Native Hawaiian self-determination. The elected delegates would attend a constitutional convention and recommend a form of self-government, deciding what -- if any -- relationship that government should have with the United States.

But opponents of the election say the process is unconstitutional and racially exclusive.

A group of native and non-native residents is challenging the election, arguing Hawaii residents who don't have Native Hawaiian ancestry are being excluded from a vote that affects the state. They also argue that the election is racially exclusive and therefore unconstitutional.

Attorneys representing Hawaii have argued that the state isn't involved in the election -- an argument that a federal judge agreed with last month. In October, U.S. District Court Judge J. Michael Seabright said the election was legal since it was a private poll being conducted by the private nonprofit Nai Aupuni.

Nai Aupuni said in a statement Friday that Native Hawaiian self-governance has been discussed for over two hundred years without tangible results. And despite the recent ruling, the group remains confident that the election will ultimately be ruled legal.

"Reorganizing a government is not easy and it takes the courage and will of the candidates to take the first step in this historic process," Nai Aupuni said.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/supreme-court-halts-hawaiian-election_5658c6e8e4b08e945feb3ecc

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court Halts Historic Hawaiian Election (Original Post) uawchild Nov 2015 OP
Wow. Imagine that. The Supreme Court getting involved in shutting down an election. CincyDem Nov 2015 #1
If this were to happen then every state could make rules stating yeoman6987 Nov 2015 #2
Basing eligibility to vote on skin color or ancestry? Nye Bevan Nov 2015 #3
Not sure that the United States needs "racially exclusive" elections in 2015 Democat Nov 2015 #4
As they should. GGJohn Nov 2015 #5
Last few posters missing the point... It's about aboriginal rights, like Indian tribes have uawchild Nov 2015 #6
Well explained... EndElectoral Nov 2015 #7
^^^THIS^^^ 2naSalit Nov 2015 #9
I agree with you some what. gladium et scutum Nov 2015 #10
Its amazing this story has come up... yuiyoshida Nov 2015 #8

CincyDem

(6,351 posts)
1. Wow. Imagine that. The Supreme Court getting involved in shutting down an election.
Sun Nov 29, 2015, 11:31 AM
Nov 2015


I'm sure they're basking in the success of their last foray into the realm of electoral politics.

Sheesh
 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
2. If this were to happen then every state could make rules stating
Sun Nov 29, 2015, 12:03 PM
Nov 2015

Only people born in Pennsylvania could vote in Pennsylvania for example. Or only Irish can vote in Massachusetts. The Supreme Court got this one right so far.

Democat

(11,617 posts)
4. Not sure that the United States needs "racially exclusive" elections in 2015
Sun Nov 29, 2015, 12:08 PM
Nov 2015

There are enough problems without going back to the past.

uawchild

(2,208 posts)
6. Last few posters missing the point... It's about aboriginal rights, like Indian tribes have
Sun Nov 29, 2015, 01:10 PM
Nov 2015

The issue is that native ethnic Hawaiians are just trying to get rights similar to those of other Native Americans, like the Navajo tribal nation for example. Currently, they are the only aboriginal group of people in the US denied those rights and benefits, I believe.

The election is question is about ethnic Hawaiians organizing themselves and selecting representatives to argue their case with the US Federal government. People complaining it's some how racist are missing the point, that would be akin to saying non-Navajo's should be allowed to vote in Navajo tribal elections.

gladium et scutum

(806 posts)
10. I agree with you some what.
Sun Nov 29, 2015, 03:49 PM
Nov 2015

But only Navajo tribal members on the Navajo reservations vote in their elections. Does a person of Navajo ancestry get to vote in Reservation elections if they reside in New York City? Is there a reservation for Native Hawaiians or an Island populated exclusively by them, I don't know. If there is a type of reservation, by all means all who reside there should be eligible should be able to vote. From the way this issue sounds the election was to be across all of the islands, regardless of residency, but restricted to those claiming native status.

yuiyoshida

(41,831 posts)
8. Its amazing this story has come up...
Sun Nov 29, 2015, 01:25 PM
Nov 2015

I just viewed a video documentary about How Hawaiians came to Hawaii, and the history about Hawaii up and until statehood, in 1959. I am part native Hawaiian.. so this is very interesting to me, thanks for posting.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Supreme Court Halts Histo...