General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWillyT rocks.
Too tired to expound on why... but if I have to explain it to you, you wouldn't agree anyway. So @#$& it.
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
wildbilln864
(13,382 posts)
Nite Owl
(11,303 posts)
BuelahWitch
(9,083 posts)
H2O Man
(79,293 posts)If I could recommend this OP a thousand times, I would.
yuiyoshida
(45,892 posts) 
Skittles
(173,050 posts)HE IS ONE OF MY PAYING CUSTOMERS 
pacalo
(24,857 posts)
Skittles
(173,050 posts)I WILL SHOW HIM WHO IS BOSS
Octafish
(55,745 posts)In every way that's good.
pacalo
(24,857 posts)Both of you rock.
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)Thank you WillyT for all you do...thank you Manny for bringing it up.
JEB
(4,748 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)hugs.
Pastiche423
(15,406 posts)
Generic Other
(29,083 posts)No question about it.
Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)K&R
OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts) 
CentralMass
(16,994 posts)99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)
longship
(40,416 posts)R&
malaise
(298,256 posts)Rec
merrily
(45,251 posts)Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)K & R thousands times. I LERVES ME SOME WILLYT!!!!!!!
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
Scuba
(53,475 posts)tularetom
(23,664 posts)I click on every WillyT post I see.
Ya done good, WillyT!!
panader0
(25,816 posts)Kick for WillyT.
KG
(28,798 posts)
joshcryer
(62,536 posts)...where they double down on seriously misguided race related issues, I suspect that a lot of the AA participators here would disagree.
And by extension, for those AA posters here, they only see your OP as a reiteration of that hatred.
And even you, who I consider a reasonable intelligent fellow, would recognize that. But fuck it, right? Easy rec's on the backbone of AA posters and an easy comforting circle of support. Who gives a fuck.
Fuck me.
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)I just chalk it up to their own feelings of inadequacy and the white guilt they suffer as a result of their own bigotries.
In other words- they try way too had to disprove their own racist attitudes by working overtime to point out other's.
I guess my mother was right. It does take one (bigot) to know one.
joshcryer
(62,536 posts)...the self aggrandizing sycophantry.
The idea that white people only care about "the blacks" because of white guilt bigtory is rephrensible.
raouldukelives
(5,178 posts) 
marmar
(80,120 posts)
mmonk
(52,589 posts)
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)
hifiguy
(33,688 posts) MissDeeds
(7,499 posts)I always read his posts.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)^(Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery!)^
Loves ya WillyT!!!
Uncle Joe
(65,607 posts)
Thanks for the thread, MannyGoldstein.
That slogan still goes through my mind. And I can still hear Bob Dole saying it! 
Hepburn
(21,054 posts)...and so is Manny!
to both of you!
Tarc
(10,602 posts)Now the "I like people who like Bernie!" ones do, too.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)
murielm99
(33,101 posts)someone must have handed him his ass. So now they have to rehabilitate him.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)I weeps.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)we love you too.
Jackilope
(819 posts)When I had a newbie question, I reached out to WillyT who had an explanation and was really helpful.
cheers to WillyT!
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)And so do you, Manny!
ejbr
(5,892 posts)but k & r because YOU rock Manny!
The Polack MSgt
(13,823 posts)Held hostage long enough to truly identify with his goals and to sympathize with his motivations.
Marty McGraw
(1,024 posts)A Prized Rock added to my Rock Collection
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)I'm series!!
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts) 
Trajan
(19,089 posts)If he wasn't so Third Way about shit ...
You can work on that ....
hunter
(40,885 posts)... but it's complicated. Very complicated.
I'm pretty sure I was born in this U.S.A., this planet Earth, by some kind of freakish horrible accident, maybe the same that cost me my left testicle.
In my true home world I'm living thirty centuries plus of sustainable mackerel fishing.
randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]"There is a crack in everything. That's how the light gets in."
Leonard Cohen, Anthem (1992)[/center][/font][hr]
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)You know, those folks who scream bloody murder when people talk about economic justice, because they don't need it anymore?
For all I know, WillyT might have millions socked away - certainly, I do know wealthy people who work hard for economic justice. But he doesn't act like economic justice ain't no big thing, a privilege that may only be taken by those with high incomes. WillyT cares just about justice. All justice.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Wait, you keep correcting me ... he's a "call Black people and the LBGT community Stockholm Syndrome Sufferers" kind of Democrat PROGRESSIVE.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Let me guess... you'll pull up something different and claim it says what you claim. You know, the same stuff you pull with what I write quite often.
Let's see what you got.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)There should be a penalty for DU members who purposely fabricate lies about other members.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Fof example, He'll attack me for my famous "chicken and watermelon" joke that I never made on DU, and never be able to produce the thing - just posts of mine that refer to other posts, and he claims that somehow that the reference is to a chicken and watermelon joke, yet it can never be found.
It's really, really nasty and low stuff.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)never heard such slurring jokes ever existed! I clearly recall wondering if you'd been living under a rock.
You joked about gefilte fish as if that was comparable- and later apologized. Pretending it never happened shows how phony that apology was.
And yes, the "stockholm syndrome" OP happened, unfortunately. Search for it. Willie himself stands by it, so ask him if you need help.
Can't unring that bell.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)
Take yer pick.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)OK if I swipe 'em sometime?
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)They've been posted on DU before and are easy to find on teh Google. Go for it.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)I know ... I know ... The question mark changes EVERYTHING!
SidDithers
(44,333 posts)Sid
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)He will just deny that it was written at all.
randys1
(16,286 posts)acted as if you were making it up.
A casual observer would assume you made it up, that you were lying
That pisses me off, since we both know you did not make it up
Fuck this, I am done with them
SidDithers
(44,333 posts)The thread has been on the front page of GD: P for the better part of 2 months.
Sid
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)baiting to get people hides, as far as I can tell. Same as it ever was.
Flypaper for people who do not hate the majority of the Dem party.
betsuni
(29,329 posts)Whatever the condition is, it sure is unpleasant. Thank you for your comments, bettyellen.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)like peek a boo! and who me?
I broke down and posted the links elsewhere. Fuck the games.
And you are welcome, always.
betsuni
(29,329 posts)Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)Sort of like Hillary.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)SidDithers
(44,333 posts)Not surprised.
Sid
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)You may feel entitled to use your own rules for our language, but language doesn't work that way.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)I don't think they are consciously lying.
SidDithers
(44,333 posts)Why else would Willy have posted an apology?
It's the fan club that can't see the words that are right there in front of their face.
Sid
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)That started this sub-thread ... he DOES have a history of posting the outrageou, then denying that he said what he apologized for.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)
joshcryer
(62,536 posts)There was zero sincerity in the language. There could have been a substantive post about why AA posters support Clinton. Dyson wrote a really long article in The Republic giving some reasons. It resulted in a lot of discussion on "black twitter." Not everyone agreed, of course. Some even called Dyson out for being a shill, etc.
And you called the New Republic a center right neoliberal publication.
So if we're not going to actually discuss the issue and dismiss black opinions, fuck it. It's pointless.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)I think the OP did exactly what he/she intended ... use inflammatory language, in an empty OP, to piss off Black (and LGBT) DUers; thereby, guaranteeing him/herself a spot on the Greatest Thread page ... and, subsequent "He/She Rocks" threads ... I can think of two other (while others try, with less success) that do/did the same thing with timed regularity, earning them "Pillars of DU" status.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)That would be because it is.
Peretz ownership and eventual editorship, 1974–1979[edit]
In March 1974, the magazine was purchased for $380,000[12] by Harvard University lecturer Martin Peretz,[16] from Gilbert Harrison.[12] Peretz was a veteran of the New Left who had broken with that movement over its support of various Third World liberationist movements, particularly the Palestine Liberation Organization. Peretz transformed TNR into its current form. Under his ownership, TNR has advocated both strong U.S. support for the Israeli government and a hawkish U.S. foreign policy.[12] On domestic policy, it has advocated a self-critical brand of liberalism, taking positions that range from traditionally liberal to neoliberalism. It has generally supported Democratic candidates for president, although in 1980 it endorsed the moderate Republican John B. Anderson, running as an independent, rather than the Democratic incumbent Jimmy Carter.
Kinsley and Hertzberg editorships, 1979–1991[edit]
Michael Kinsley, a neoliberal (in the American sense of the term), was editor (1979–1981; 1985–1989), alternating twice with Hendrik Hertzberg (1981–1985; 1989–1991), who has been called "an old-fashioned social democrat".[citation needed] Kinsley was only 28 years old when he first became editor and was still in law school.[12]
Writers for the magazine during this era included neoliberals Mickey Kaus and Jacob Weisberg along with Charles Krauthammer, Fred Barnes, Morton Kondracke, Sidney Blumenthal, Robert Kuttner, Ronald Steel, Michael Walzer, and Irving Howe.[12]
During the 1980s the magazine generally supported President Ronald Reagan's anti-Communist foreign policy, including provision of aid to the Nicaraguan Contras. It has also supported both Gulf Wars and, reflecting its belief in the moral efficacy of American power, intervention in "humanitarian" crises, such as those in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kosovo during the Yugoslav wars.
The magazine also became known for its originality and unpredictability in the 1980s. It was widely considered a "must read" across the political spectrum. An article in Vanity Fair judged TNR "the smartest, most impudent weekly in the country," and the "most entertaining and intellectually agile magazine in the country." According to Alterman, the magazine's prose could sparkle and the contrasting views within its pages were "genuinely exciting". He added, "The magazine unarguably set the terms of debate for insider political elites during the Reagan era."[12]
With the less predictable opinions, more of them leaning conservative than before, the magazine won the respect of many conservative opinion leaders and 20 copies were messengered to the Reagan White House each Thursday afternoon. Norman Podhoretz called the magazine "indispensable", and George Will said it was "currently the nation's most interesting and most important political journal." National Review described it as "one of the most interesting magazines in the United States."[12]
Sullivan editorship, 1991–1996[edit]
In 1991, Andrew Sullivan, a 28-year-old gay conservative from Britain, became editor and took the magazine in a somewhat more conservative direction, though the majority of writers remained liberal or neoliberal. Hertzberg soon left the magazine to return to The New Yorker. Kinsley left the magazine in 1996 to found the online magazine Slate.[12]
Sullivan invited Charles Murray to contribute a controversial 10,000-word article that contended blacks may be, as a whole, less intelligent than whites due to genetics. The magazine also published a very critical article about Hillary Clinton's health care plan by Elizabeth McCaughey, an article that Alterman called "the single most influential article published in the magazine during the entire Clinton presidency". However, this article was later shown to be inaccurate and the magazine would later apologize for the story. Sullivan also published a number of pieces by Camille Paglia.[12]
Ruth Shalit, a young writer for the magazine in the Sullivan years, was repeatedly criticized for plagiarism. After the Shalit scandals, the magazine began using fact-checkers during Sullivan's time as editor. One was Stephen Glass, who would be found to have made up quotes, anecdotes and facts in his own articles, while he served as a reporter years later (later dramatized in the feature film Shattered Glass).[12]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_Republic#Peretz_ownership_and_eventual_editorship.2C_1974.E2.80.931979
..... and on to the present day. neoliberal economics, frequently neocon foreign policy positions, forays into right wing social policies, yes indeed very much in the DLC Third Way Whathefuckevahtheycallthemselves New Democrat mold.
I was around for the sea change in '74.
joshcryer
(62,536 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)So there, LOL!
Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #72)
merrily This message was self-deleted by its author.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)or at least post a cogent rebuttal.
I saw absolutely nothing wrong with the post.
...and the question mark makes ALL the difference in the World.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)I prefer to let DUERS show what they are.
I didn't post a rebuttal because by the time I saw the post, there really was nothing left to say. Other DU expressed the outrage that I felt.
I am completely unsurprised that you would find nothing wrong with the post ... completely.
And, no ... the question mark does nothing to change the offensiveness of the post.
See? The question mark did nothing g to change the ugliness of the excerpt.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)On earth it doesn't work that way. As SBM has shown you.
brush
(61,033 posts)Last edited Wed Dec 2, 2015, 11:48 AM - Edit history (1)
upset and alienated many POCs on this board.
Surprised you don't know about it and the fact that he doubled down on his insult.
joshcryer
(62,536 posts)He knows what he's doing.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)I beg you to reveal to us what Manny's doing. No doubt, it's big and it's bad, full of tension and fear.
joshcryer
(62,536 posts)For no real reason. That drunk me couldn't distinguish doesn't say much.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Last edited Fri Dec 4, 2015, 11:12 AM - Edit history (1)
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)No one's biting, huh?
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)According to himself, he has missed a great deal of discussion among AAs, here as well as out there.
brush
(61,033 posts)Pls explain.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)posts that discuss the line itself.
So, there were 2-3 busy threads one February- about a menu made for black history month where a school served fried chicken and watermelon, and people discussed the racial or racist implications in GD.
So they made an OP in response mocking the issue (apparently having no desire to actually read and learn from the POC discussing it) and joking about how he doesn't care if people make "gefilte fish" jokes. Yep. And many fans on that mocking OP had no idea- thought it was context free rambling about gefilte fish (and dutifully applauded it as more evidence of genius!).
So basically, he was telling POC to get over it- while claiming later, somewhere below the pseudo apology, that he didn't know what "it" actually was. Not aware of the connotations. Maybe he could have perused a thread or two- for the sake of Black History Month, that would have been wise.
Jury- please note, embarrassed parties actually asked for the links to be provided further up in this thread:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4472335
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024478358#post11
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)
GitRDun
(1,846 posts)Way to go! 
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Plural possessive.
bvf
(6,604 posts)in "self-confirming."
I hit one error and I didn't even bother to finish the sentence. I never expected two in on title.
bvf
(6,604 posts)in a post. That has to be a record of some kind.
kwassa
(23,340 posts)He is great at baiting a hook.
bvf
(6,604 posts)Lots of good WillyT lately!
Spirochete
(5,264 posts) 
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)bvar22
(39,909 posts)DURec.
Punkingal
(9,522 posts) DamnYankeeInHouston
(1,365 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)helping me fill up my ignore list.
Thanks, Manny. Another public service done.
SidDithers
(44,333 posts)The "Stockholm Syndrome" thread crossed a line that can't be uncrossed.
Sid
randys1
(16,286 posts)fuck this
Karl Rove is rolling in laughter
SidDithers
(44,333 posts)
Sid
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)SidDithers
(44,333 posts)that goes beyond "wrong" and crosses way over into something else.
Sid
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)Disruptive meta?
A call out?
Wrong forum?
Autumn
(49,025 posts)Manny posted it.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)
Agony
(2,605 posts) Autumn
(49,025 posts)
City Lights
(26,049 posts) 
dflprincess
(29,428 posts)
And to Manny G!
another
LiberalElite
(14,691 posts) Thespian2
(2,741 posts)Always read WillyT...and MannyGoldstein...
marym625
(17,997 posts)I love Willy! Always have, always will.
Can't believe I almost missed this!
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)He's a good friend of mine.
hay rick
(9,740 posts)Plus I'm a Willy T fan.
mother earth
(6,002 posts) as do you! MaggieD
(7,393 posts)The Stockholm syndrome insult to every POC and LGBT person was abhorrent to me. I will never consider another thing he posts to have any credibility. Period.
akbacchus_BC
(5,830 posts)I thought it was a political site and if you wish to be mushy about a topic, you take it to the lounge! That's what I have been told when I wanted to chat about the Walking Dead.
senz
(11,945 posts)I've liked WillyT from the start. Knew he was a good guy.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)Good for you, Wilbur, (((WillyT)))
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Was this before or after he accused gays and Blacks of having Stockholm Syndrome?
sibelian
(7,804 posts)It's an entirely ordinary thing that happens to real people all the time. There's no "accusation". The entire mess around his post about Stockholm Syndrome flushed out all the stupidest people on this website, the flatulent, petulant, hypocritical morons. The people whose attention is spent on farcical misinterpretations of things in order to take offense at them. It. Was. Bullshit.
Yes. It was bullying. The whole thread was. And the reason it was bullying is BECAUSE WillyT is so positive.
So, yeah. That's the way it ACTUALLY is.
I bet there's a small subthread about it here. I can't see it as I put most of the whiny fuckwits on ignore ages ago. Good riddance. Let them rot. Let them post "yawn."
Anybody with two brain-cells to rub together can see perfeclty well for themeselves EXACTLY what was happening.
Emote away, petal. Bring out your most carefully selected smilies.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)on the alert jury are the 'stupidest people on DU"? (your own words, not mine)
That those presumably Sanders supporters are "flatulent, petulant, hypocritical morons" (your own words, not mine)
That they are "whiny fuckwits"?(your own words, not mine)
That is YOUR terminology, not mine.
Everyone who voted to leave your post should have had the GUTS to post their names so everyone could see just how inexcusable and offensive a certain band of Sanders supporters are.
And apparently you don't know what bullying is:
It's calling African Americans and GLBT people mentally ill with Stockholm Syndrome for having a political opinion and supporting a particular candidate other than your own.
And then doubling down on it several days later with a follow up thread.
HERE IS THE EVIDENCE OF A FAILED JURY SYSTEM WHEN THIS SITE IS OVERRUN BY SANDERS SUPPORTERS:
What a thoroughly nasty post directed at DU'ers. This kind of hateful invective needs to stop. Seriously.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Wed Dec 2, 2015, 10:26 AM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Stockholm Syndrome is NOT something that ordinarily happens to people all the time. Many Sanders supporters had the good sense and grace to decry that thread. It was deeply offensive to many and recognized as such. WillyT decided to not only keep that ugliness intact, he doubled down on it several days later.
To say that those who were offended by that are "the stupidest people on this website" and all the other nasty attacks that follows in his post means Sibelian is also including all the many, many Sanders supporters who recognized how offensive that WillyT thread was.
And to top it all off with "whiny fuckwits". If this comment doesn't get hidden, it says volumes about those giving this DU'er a pass. -Kittywampus
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: "Emote away, petal?" I think it's imperative for all DUers to not be assholes. This post doesn't meet that standard. It probably won't be hidden but it's not the only post in this awful thread that should be.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Sibelian speaks the truth! Leave it.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Shameless hate mongering against Dems. The primaries can't be over soon enough.
kwassa
(23,340 posts)Based on their ethnicity, or sexual orientation?
That sounds more like bigotry, to me. The large sweeping brush of bigotry.
bigot
noun big·ot \ˈbi-gət\
: a person who strongly and unfairly dislikes other people, ideas, etc. : a bigoted person; especially : a person who hates or refuses to accept the members of a particular group (such as a racial or religious group)
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/bigot
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Maybe it already is!
The stuff people read into stuff, or simply fabricate, is astonishing. All to prove agenda.
kath
(10,565 posts)And sickening.
kwassa
(23,340 posts)Fabrication, indeed.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Rhymes with:
I thought something on this thread should actually ROCK.
kwassa
(23,340 posts)way back when they were all young and skinny. Thanks for posting it.
Much gaslighting going on these days.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)I need to get a recording of that show.
kwassa
(23,340 posts)One of my great concert regrets.
merrily
(45,251 posts)The fact that someone posts something does not necessarily mean he or she believes it. Neither does echoing someone else's bs.
It's not to worry.
This thread has over 200 recs.
Rex
(65,616 posts)They say imitation is the highest form of flattery!
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)but you know, manny on the thread didn't realize they were mocking POC for not laughing heartily about being sterotyped.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4472335
It's fascinating the heads it flew over, no?
Rex
(65,616 posts)how many threads I don't see, such flame wars and all over Bernie and HRC. The lows people will go to then turn right around and want you to believe they are moral and never say a nasty thing here on DU. Sorry...I quit buying that load years ago.
I wish GD-P would stay around forever, it gives folks a place to waste their time getting nothing done but feel better about themselves.
merrily
(45,251 posts)"Pavlovian reaction" is certainly one term for it.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Makes me lmao at how silly this place has become. 'I am sooo moral!!!' 'I am way more morals than yous! Can I get a crown and a throne! I am so better than all! I am so smrt! And betterer and way more liberals!' Blah blah blah...on and on with these folks. Year after year.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)Then they can roll out the list of heretics to be placed in the banned zone. I am so good and awesome and great person number one morally pure mega badass but humble to the lesser people that do bad things that I point out and plot with my crayons and water colors on the wall!
merrily
(45,251 posts)DU's left was berated about it a lot. But then, when members of DU's left began supporting Sanders, we were told we weren't pure enough on the gun issue, even though his ratings from the NRA were F and I think one D-. It was then that I realized that I had no clue what purity trolling meant.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Actually it is night here and I need to get some sleep. I hear ya, today I decided it is pointless to talk to people paranoid the govt is coming for their guns. No matter what you say, they cannot help but feel insecure all the time and need a gun to feel better about life. Oh and the govt is coming for their guns!
There are several topics here that are pointless to discuss, but people do with a passion in epic sub-thread fashion.
Gnight and good morning to you merrily!
merrily
(45,251 posts)
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Octafish
(55,745 posts)My feelings were hurt when my post was compared to "Gish Gallop," as one poster who didn't need to read to know put it.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)
TheUnspeakable
(1,005 posts)Willy T is great!! He's what I'd call
a pure soul
bvar22
(39,909 posts)unless someone has passed,
but I will be glad to march in WillyT's Parade.
PARTY!!!!
Weekend at Willy's!
and I'm up for a party!
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)Especially when you see the same 3 or 4 people posting in them!
yuiyoshida
(45,892 posts)omedetou!
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)I have to add this. Fluttershy speaks for me, Willy!
Octafish
(55,745 posts)
For a great DUer and Democrat!
Rex
(65,616 posts)copycats are so cute.
Octafish
(55,745 posts) 
ozone_man
(4,825 posts)He makes DU much more progressive.
Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)Rock on, WillyT!