General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBBC News uses 'Iraq photo to illustrate Syrian massacre'
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/bbc/9293620/BBC-News-uses-Iraq-photo-to-illustrate-Syrian-massacre.htmlBBC News uses 'Iraq photo to illustrate Syrian massacre'
The BBC is facing criticism after it accidentally used a picture taken in Iraq in 2003 to illustrate the senseless massacre of children in Syria.
the propoganda machine spins away
the News Media has lost all credibility...they are handed the news
there are very few real LIVE reporters left in the world
lovuian
(19,362 posts)Photographer Marco di Lauro said he nearly fell off his chair when he saw the image being used, and said he was astonished at the failure of the corporation to check their sources.
The picture, which was actually taken on March 27, 2003, shows a young Iraqi child jumping over dozens of white body bags containing skeletons found in a desert south of Baghdad.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)and they are not the only news media on the propoganda machine list
George Orwell had their playbook
liberal N proud
(60,334 posts)If it from one place or another, the story they are trying to tell is all that matters....
to them!
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)Finding the truth in this mess is becoming more and more difficult.
lovuian
(19,362 posts)instead of getting sheep ...they get wolves
We are living in a Paranoid civilization and that means it will destroy itself
Sea-Dog
(247 posts)in this case mouthpieces for the Brittish state
tabatha
(18,795 posts)Mistakes happen.
redgreenandblue
(2,088 posts)lovuian
(19,362 posts)putting an Iraqi massacre up for a Syrian massacre
and thinking you could get away with it
whats one more massacre...it is the use of the photo to instill emotions from the reader
and the irony is that Britain participated and helped bring the Niger documents to Bush regime
so the Iraqi War could be started against the dictator Hussein
Hussein dictator ....has a certain ring to it
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,306 posts)It was lazy to use it, but it wasn't an attempt to 'get away with it'.
malaise
(268,930 posts)bawling about the Syrian deaths.
Yesterday the BBC completely ignored the protester who called BLIAR a war criminal - they are pretending that didn't happen.
We do not intend to forget
Sea-Dog
(247 posts)in the highlights
Dokkie
(1,688 posts)is why would Assad in the face of international pressure and UN visitation carry out the massacre. I know most people think he is a mad man but even mad men tend not to do things that will get em killed and sodomized ala Gaddafi. I am sorry to say this but I don't believe a word about this massacre cos all I know they could have used actor and just dead babies from the morgue to stage this.
And just lets assume he actually committed all those killings, why leave the evidence for the opposition to video tape? they are just infants, just put em all in a nap sack and take em out with your pickup truck. This is babies in incubator all over again and lets all hope the world doesn't fall for it once again
Selatius
(20,441 posts)He is probably thinking all those dead women and children will act to demoralize the opposition.
Dokkie
(1,688 posts)I am sure they would know if a couple dozen of their women and children got missing, he didnt need to leave gorey evidence like that. Leave the dead children to be video taped is just about the same as signing your death warrant. If a lot of people believe this story, the world is going to descend upon Assad like you cannot imagine. Killing women(raping em too) and children is just about the 2 worst things you can do to turn pacifist into war hawks and when pacifist turn into hawks, your arse is toast.
yurbud
(39,405 posts)until the are removed from office.
You can't depend on a dictator to commit big enough or creative enough atrocities to catch the attention and spark the outrage of Americans & Europeans, so they've got to gild the lily. Even more likely, the propaganda campaign was rolling well ahead of any current atrocities, so they just roll out what they had scheduled in any case. Sort of like Bush saying Saddam wouldn't let the weapons inspectors back in even after he did.