Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWWF Helps Industry More than Environment
from Der Spiegel:
The WWF is the most powerful environmental organization in the world and campaigns internationally on issues such as saving tigers and rain forests. But a closer look at its work leads to a sobering conclusion: Many of its activities benefit industry more than the environment or endangered species.
Want to protect the rainforest? All it takes is 5 ($6.30) to get started. Save the gorillas? Three euros and you're in. You can even do your part for nature with only 50 cents -- as long as you entrust it to the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), which is still known by its original name of the World Wildlife Fund in the United States and Canada.
Last year, the WWF, together with German retail group Rewe, sold almost 2 million collectors' albums. In only six weeks, the program raised 875,088 ($1.1 million), which Rewe turned over to the WWF.
The WWF has promised to do a lot of good things with the money, like spending it on forests, gorillas, water, the climate -- and, of course, the animal the environmental protection group uses as its emblem, the giant panda. ................(more)
The complete piece is at: http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/wwf-helps-industry-more-than-environment-a-835712.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1048 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WWF Helps Industry More than Environment (Original Post)
marmar
May 2012
OP
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)1. Earlier thread
freshwest
(53,661 posts)2. From the link:
Experts estimate that in Africa alone, conservation efforts have created 14 million "conservation refugees" since the colonial era. In this model, some of the indigenous people, if they were lucky enough, could work as park wardens, preventing their relatives from entering the protected zones.
Do we wonder why people are poaching and refusing to listen to the cries of those who want the animals and their habitat preserved? When they see the royal families of Europe (Juan Carlos) and America (Romney's boys) going into such areas to kill for sport?
In the case of the Romney's, of course they'd enjoy hunting and killing animals, getting ready for bigger game, on two legs. Mitt's business practices had the thrill of the hunt, as people's lives were destroyed. It's a characteristic of royalty to indulge themselves in blood sport to prepare their sons for wars on lesser peoples.
Most believe in preserving parks, wilderness and wildlife. Often times, though, we don't take into account the 'lesser people' in other countries or here in the USA, either. It is not the poor who are stealing habitat, it is the rich. They are taking away the spiritual places that people need to be in to rejuvenate and connect to the Earth, for their own profit and power.
For a long time, people in Africa have seen the western wildlife preservation organizations as part of colonialism. But many love their natural heritage and want to preserve it, as well. This story is a reminder of my disappointment with a number of what I call phony foundations used to hide the money of predators and steal the commons from all of us.
Because we want good things to happen and we sacrifice many things to make that so. They feed on our good intent. They get their lackeys to cut the funding to keep the parks in the USA as a haven for Americans to enjoy, then as they close them, they call them vacant land and give them to their buddies for pennies on the dollar. I've see the non-profits put on the pretty face of doing something good when all they are doing is getting our consent and turning the land over to corporations with no respect for life.
Really, the worth of these lands is beyond the value of money. And they were stolen from the native people, and if the American government cannot afford to maintain them, they should return them, not sell them to destruction. Just a few ideas, not necessarily on point with the article but I feel we need to confront this.
Do we wonder why people are poaching and refusing to listen to the cries of those who want the animals and their habitat preserved? When they see the royal families of Europe (Juan Carlos) and America (Romney's boys) going into such areas to kill for sport?
In the case of the Romney's, of course they'd enjoy hunting and killing animals, getting ready for bigger game, on two legs. Mitt's business practices had the thrill of the hunt, as people's lives were destroyed. It's a characteristic of royalty to indulge themselves in blood sport to prepare their sons for wars on lesser peoples.
Most believe in preserving parks, wilderness and wildlife. Often times, though, we don't take into account the 'lesser people' in other countries or here in the USA, either. It is not the poor who are stealing habitat, it is the rich. They are taking away the spiritual places that people need to be in to rejuvenate and connect to the Earth, for their own profit and power.
For a long time, people in Africa have seen the western wildlife preservation organizations as part of colonialism. But many love their natural heritage and want to preserve it, as well. This story is a reminder of my disappointment with a number of what I call phony foundations used to hide the money of predators and steal the commons from all of us.
Because we want good things to happen and we sacrifice many things to make that so. They feed on our good intent. They get their lackeys to cut the funding to keep the parks in the USA as a haven for Americans to enjoy, then as they close them, they call them vacant land and give them to their buddies for pennies on the dollar. I've see the non-profits put on the pretty face of doing something good when all they are doing is getting our consent and turning the land over to corporations with no respect for life.
Really, the worth of these lands is beyond the value of money. And they were stolen from the native people, and if the American government cannot afford to maintain them, they should return them, not sell them to destruction. Just a few ideas, not necessarily on point with the article but I feel we need to confront this.
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)3. I thought WWF meant World Wrestling Federation...
And so my reaction to your headline was, "Well, obviously that's true." Then I read the whole post!