Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Ghost Dog

(16,881 posts)
Sun Dec 6, 2015, 07:11 PM Dec 2015

Re: A Spanish ship, carrying 'treasure' from Spain’s then colonies in South America,

sunk by British (formally declared or not so much) naval forces (and salvaged by whoever).

¿How can there be any question about who owns it, today?

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Re: A Spanish ship, carrying 'treasure' from Spain’s then colonies in South America, (Original Post) Ghost Dog Dec 2015 OP
International Maritime Salvage laws apply MohRokTah Dec 2015 #1
Oh, sure, it should be thus. Ghost Dog Dec 2015 #4
International waters and salvaged? linuxman Dec 2015 #2
Uh huh. Without negotiation? Ghost Dog Dec 2015 #3
Here ya go.. X_Digger Dec 2015 #6
Dud link. Ghost Dog Dec 2015 #13
works for me. spanone Dec 2015 #22
you think colonial powers should still have claim to what JI7 Dec 2015 #5
You know, opening a tab and googling takes thirty seconds. LeftyMom Dec 2015 #7
Yes, exactly (from one perspective), thanks. Ghost Dog Dec 2015 #11
Finders, keepers, with a monetary nod to the country wherein found. WinkyDink Dec 2015 #8
Unless this ship was salvaged fron Spanish waters, Snobblevitch Dec 2015 #9
Peruvian descendants of slaves should get it flamingdem Dec 2015 #10
You might well have a very good point there. Ghost Dog Dec 2015 #12
Can you fill me in on which other parties suffered? flamingdem Dec 2015 #14
Working-class Spaniards also. Ghost Dog Dec 2015 #15
Not the same as being tortured and killed flamingdem Dec 2015 #18
Please read more history, in more intimate detail, flamingdem. Ghost Dog Dec 2015 #19
Put yourself in their shoes, what benefit was there to the flamingdem Dec 2015 #20
Personally, I think stolen gold should go back to the original owners... Crystalite Dec 2015 #16
"Stolen treasure": in that case I would mostly agree. Ghost Dog Dec 2015 #17
... SidDithers Dec 2015 #21
 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
1. International Maritime Salvage laws apply
Sun Dec 6, 2015, 07:18 PM
Dec 2015

There are attorneys whose entire practice is nothing but maritime law.

 

linuxman

(2,337 posts)
2. International waters and salvaged?
Sun Dec 6, 2015, 07:21 PM
Dec 2015

Whoever brings it up. Pretty much internationally unanimous and we'll established.

 

Ghost Dog

(16,881 posts)
3. Uh huh. Without negotiation?
Sun Dec 6, 2015, 07:30 PM
Dec 2015

To save me/us some research time, could you please provide some kind of legal foundation to your claim?

 

Ghost Dog

(16,881 posts)
11. Yes, exactly (from one perspective), thanks.
Sun Dec 6, 2015, 07:45 PM
Dec 2015

I quote from your source:

... The process is more Law and Order than Pirates of the Caribbean.

A key question is whether the discovery of goods is deemed salvage or treasure-hunting.

Salvage refers to when someone saves property drifting, lost or abandoned at sea. Under international conventions, the "salvor" is required to return the found goods to the original owner in return for a reward.

Treasure hunting typically means exploration aimed at unearthing antiquities and other valuables from shipwrecks for financial gain.

"Treasure hunting is not necessarily salvage, because salvage is the right to be compensated by the owner where the owner is known and you're in a position to return the property to him," said William Moreira, a Halifax lawyer and former president of the Canadian Maritime Law Association.

"Typically in treasure-hunting cases, that's not so, just because the stuff's been lost for so long that no owner could come forward."..
.

In this case the original owner is clear, is it not? The salvagers should therefore negotiate with the owners, or not?

Snobblevitch

(1,958 posts)
9. Unless this ship was salvaged fron Spanish waters,
Sun Dec 6, 2015, 07:37 PM
Dec 2015

I think it's finders keepers, unless ot was salvaged from the territorial waters of some other nation.

 

Ghost Dog

(16,881 posts)
12. You might well have a very good point there.
Sun Dec 6, 2015, 07:55 PM
Dec 2015

But, ¿do you have any idea just how much hard work and suffering on all sides, over centuries, by 'lowly' people was put into 'extracting' this 'treasure' from those lands?

 

Ghost Dog

(16,881 posts)
15. Working-class Spaniards also.
Sun Dec 6, 2015, 08:52 PM
Dec 2015

Or do you imagine all Spaniards in those days were aristocrats?

Did no European colonists do any hard work, or suffer, while 'settling' in any other of the Americas? Are all their perhaps 'ill-gotten' gains now to be forfeit?

flamingdem

(39,328 posts)
18. Not the same as being tortured and killed
Sun Dec 6, 2015, 09:53 PM
Dec 2015

and forced to work in subhuman conditions.

The Peruvians should get the gold, or show proof that the Spaniards suffered more. Colonizing a land is not the same as being kept as a slave and dying from the sword or disease.

flamingdem

(39,328 posts)
20. Put yourself in their shoes, what benefit was there to the
Sun Dec 6, 2015, 10:02 PM
Dec 2015

Peruvians of the time, nada. All downside. They were being conquered and plundered and now the Amazon that we depend on for survival is being stripped. This is due to the Spanish, their adventures, their greed and the legacy of that unfortunate history.

 

Crystalite

(164 posts)
16. Personally, I think stolen gold should go back to the original owners...
Sun Dec 6, 2015, 08:56 PM
Dec 2015

Most of these instances of treasure that comes from colonies involve theft and near genocide of the original peoples, not international trade.

"Colonies" sounds so civil and nice...

 

Ghost Dog

(16,881 posts)
17. "Stolen treasure": in that case I would mostly agree.
Sun Dec 6, 2015, 09:23 PM
Dec 2015

But in this case, I conjecture, in the late eighteenth, not the early sixteenth, century, we are discussing not 'stolen treasure' but some of the results of two or more centuries of economic activity - hard work exploring, prospecting, mining, refining, transporting, and, yes, settling, defending against rival European interests in the region...

Surely, the modern Spanish State has a well-founded right to stake here its claim, negotiate, and share with both salvagers and other interested parties with a legitimate, under contemporary international mores and law, claim.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Re: A Spanish ship, carry...