Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Newsjock

(11,733 posts)
Tue May 29, 2012, 11:01 PM May 2012

Public-Place Laws Tighten Rein on Sex Offenders

Source: New York Times

... Orange County finds itself at the enter of a new wave of laws restricting the movement of sex offenders. The county government and a dozen cities here have banned sex offenders from even setting foot in public parks, on beaches and at harbors, rendering almost half the parks in Orange County closed to them. Ten more cities are considering similar legislation.

And Orange County is far from alone. In recent years, communities around the country have gone beyond regulating where sex offenders can live and begun banning them outright from a growing list of public places.

From North Carolina to Washington State, communities have designated swimming pools, parks and school bus stops as “child safety zones,” off limits to some sex offenders. They are barred from libraries in half a dozen Massachusetts cities, and from all public facilities in tiny Huachuca City, Ariz.

... Irene Pai, a lawyer with the Orange County public defender’s office, said ... she had a stack of cases involving people who were arrested for urinating in public in the 1970s and pleaded guilty to indecent exposure without realizing they would have to register as sex offenders.

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/30/us/sex-offenders-face-growing-restrictions-on-public-places.html

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Public-Place Laws Tighten Rein on Sex Offenders (Original Post) Newsjock May 2012 OP
The law should distinguish bluestateguy May 2012 #1
I agree. There should be some differentiation based on actual risk to the public. n/t pnwmom May 2012 #2

bluestateguy

(44,173 posts)
1. The law should distinguish
Tue May 29, 2012, 11:04 PM
May 2012

between someone arrested for public urination 30 years ago verses a child molester or a rapist. But maybe that is asking too much of pandering politicians who fear being labeled as soft on crime.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Public-Place Laws Tighten...