General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBob Dole: Obama Is A "Good Man," Cruz Is "So Extreme" And Trump is "Over The Top"
Former U.S. Senator and Republican presidential candidate Bob Dole, like so many other Reagan-era Republicans, has sharply criticized the ignorance, bigotry, and extremism of this years rancid crop of Republican presidential candidates. In an interview on MSNBC today, Dole bemoaned the current state of the Republican party, which he said had become an extreme group on the right. Dole joined the growing chorus of Republicans who have harshly criticized fascist front-runner Donald Trump in the wake of his proposal to ban all Muslims from entering the United States. Dole called Trump over the top and set that he couldnt understand how people supported him.
Dole also had harsh words for the much-hated egomaniac and unabashed religious extremist Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), who pulled into first place in a poll of Iowa Republicans released yesterday, saying Cruz is so extreme, hes not a traditional conservative and roundly criticizing his so-called Senate achievements of shutting down the government twice and calling Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) a liar on the Senate floor. Dole, like many traditional and Reagan-era Republicans, represent an era that modern conservatives constantly idealize but is seriously disillusioned with the current extremism and ignorance of the Republican Party, which hes said is out of ideas. Dole also said that he doubted Ronald Reagan would win the nomination if he ran in the current extremist climate of the Republican Party.
In a refreshing break from the traditional rhetoric of the Republican Party, where acknowledgement of even the slightest positive achievement by President Obama is seen as heretical, Dole also praised the president as a very good man. While saying that he probably wouldnt support Hillary Clinton in a potential general election matchup with Trump or Cruz, Dole suggested that he wouldnt be able to bring himself to vote for either of those Republican demagogues, saying with a laugh that he might oversleep on election day. The Republican Party certainly needs more people like Dole, who, despite their flaws, are at least sensible enough to see and call out blind hatred and extremism when they see it, and who work towards unity and compromise rather than divisiveness and confrontation.
http://www.occupydemocrats.com/bob-dole-obama-is-a-good-man-cruz-is-so-extreme-and-trump-is-over-the-top-2/
liberal N proud
(61,194 posts)This is what they get.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)if he ran his 1996 platform in today's primaries.
underpants
(196,501 posts)Ford
Hell, Nixon too
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)Just saying...
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)I had an hour long discussion with his granddaughter a year and a half ago. http://steveleser.blogspot.com/2013/10/susan-eisenhower-on-gop-and-panel.html?m=1
Eisenhower was VERY big on balanced budgets. It's doubtful in a budget deficit situation like we have now that he would be proposing any kind of social safety net increase. I think the irresponsible budget busting policies of Reagan era Republicans as a big reason the Eisenhower family are now pretty much all Democrats.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)You must admit though, Bush did a great job tackling that $10 trillion surplus that we were supposed to have.
ffr
(23,399 posts)Surpluses as far out as the eye could see. But what did their fiscally conservative candidates do with something that was handed to them on a silver platter, nothing less than squander it.
Enough reason to never elect any Rethug on any level of government. Even the most unknown Democrat has to be better than the most polished Rethug.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)I will have a stroke.
Carter - deficit down
Reagan -deficit up
Bush Sr.-deficit up
Clinton - deficit down and balanced budget
Bush - deficit up dramatically and crash of world economy
Obama - deficit down dramatically
How could anyone see that and vote Republican?
tex-wyo-dem
(3,190 posts)Eisenhower was a supporter of social security and other safety nets, and at the same time very much against the MIC. It's likely the military budget would be reduced to balance the budget, not social programs under Eisenhower.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)and was a very moderate person ideologically.
There isnt much there to suggest he would drastically cut the military to fund social programs.
MoonRiver
(36,975 posts)Is this your take steven?
SusanaMontana41
(3,233 posts)He was in no hurry to enforce Brown.
My apologies to MoonRiver and and Steven for butting in.
SusanaMontana41
(3,233 posts)Count me among your fans. I bookmarked the link.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)Just sayin' as well.
Bill Clinton was the best Repbulican president we had since Eisenhower, but Ike was better.
Adlai Stevenson was more of a Bernie type.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)liberalnarb
(4,532 posts)Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)Not that he was moderate...but compared to the Republicans today? Absolutely.
liberalnarb
(4,532 posts)He was an evangelical right wing asshole with a terrorist vice president. He would fit in just fine with todays Grumpy Old Party
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)Not 2004. Not 2008. Not in between. 2000. His campaign. The one he ran in 2000. Back in 2000. That 2000 campaign was not nearly as crazy as anything we're seeing today. There's a reason I specified 2000 Bush and not Bush in general.
liberalnarb
(4,532 posts)He lost that election. His brother had to steal it for him.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)So, I wouldn't say it was much of a consensus either way. Way less a consensus than Dole's loss four years earlier.
liberalnarb
(4,532 posts)Thats too far. Yes, Bob Dole and Eisenhower would have been torn to shreds by today rethuglican party. But, Ronnie Raygun is the one who created their entire nightmarish economic "policy". Reagan was the original ass hole. I'm sorry, but they still welcome raygon and nixon with open arms. They would still be big enough assholes for that party.
Faryn Balyncd
(5,125 posts)(which bragged about expanding Social Security and workman's compensation, from an administration that had marginal income tax rates on the 1% which were far higher than any current Democrat including Bernie proposes.)
K and R
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)Faryn Balyncd
(5,125 posts)Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)In 2012, when he implored them to ratify the United Nations treaty that would ban discrimination against people with disabilities. He sat there on the Senate floor to support the treaty -- believing, I suspect, that the Republicans would struggle with throwing one of their own under the bus to keep the base happy. No such luck, I'm afraid.
MarianJack
(10,237 posts)...he also knew WHEN to be a prick. I remember him partisanly lashing out at President Clinton before being told that Clinton's mom had passed away that day and reading how he, Dole, immediately called the White House to go to apologize to the President in person. Dole also knew when to be honorable, too.
I'm glad he was never President or VP, but I miss Republicans like him!
PEACE!
TheBlackAdder
(29,981 posts)GusBob
(8,249 posts)and he was so friendly, nice, and personable
And Dave was like: "ya know, if you like this during the election...."
Hekate
(100,133 posts)Beartracks
(14,593 posts)Egnever
(21,506 posts)on a UN treaty for disabled people and they ignored him. That was a stellar day for the republican party.
Dole, who was in wheelchair, came to the floor shortly before senators began to vote. Accompanied by his wife, former Sen. Elizabeth Dole, he listened as Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) made a final push for the treaty.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) walked over to greet Dole, smiling and patting Doles back.
In a touching moment, Rep. Jim Langevin (D-R.I.), who also uses a wheelchair and has publicly urged the Senate to ratify the treaty, joined Dole at one point, holding hands with him as they talked and listened to Kerry.
Dont let Sen. Bob Dole down, Kerry told senators, gesturing toward Dole.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-congress/2012/12/bob-dole-makes-appearance-on-senate-floor-151034#ixzz3u4lBu9Ib
thucythucy
(9,103 posts)and worked with Senator Harkin to make it happen.
I'm glad he wasn't elected president, since his politics generally suck. But by and large he seems to be a decent man, and I wish him well.
SCVDem
(5,103 posts)Is NEVER the option.
That is giving up on our country!
LW1977
(1,611 posts)How the Rethuglican party went off the deep end..
cstanleytech
(28,473 posts)focusing their efforts to gain more power and more seats by using these type of people as their base and now the chickens have come to roost.
Reter
(2,188 posts)He was viewed as a moderate conservative in 1996. Pat Buchanan was far-right, and he's still to the right of Trump.
BlueCheese
(2,522 posts)You could work with Bob Dole-- he wasn't the scorched earth type of Republican we have now.
nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)compared to the likes of Cruz. He may be conservative, but at least he's reasonably sane.
Speaking of Buchanan, I'm surprised his profile is comparatively low these days, considering he'd fit right in with the current GOP. Is he simply feeling the effects of old age?
Reter
(2,188 posts)Even Trump doesn't offend Israel.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)Matariki
(18,775 posts)It's just the end (hopefully the end) result of Reagan era Moral Majority garbage. Which Mr. Dole certainly pandered to in his time.
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)cstanleytech
(28,473 posts)for decades actively courted these types of people and now you cannot understand how they are getting support????
Orsino
(37,428 posts)MariaThinks
(2,495 posts)47of74
(18,470 posts)I probably would have shrugged my shoulders and said meh and figured he wouldn't have hurt the country too badly. Of course I didn't know any better at the time.
Reter
(2,188 posts)Probably no 9/11 under his watch. And if he loses to Gore in 2000, then still no 9/11.
yardwork
(69,364 posts)Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)Dole in 1996 means no Bush in 2000.
But without Clinton's reelection and loss to Dole, there is certainly no Bush in 2000.
tabasco
(22,974 posts)He was a major asshole republican but really not as rotten as the current crop.
BlueCheese
(2,522 posts)But then their successors make them look reasonable. I mean, even George W. Bush, for all of his many faults, made a point of defending Islam as a religion.
nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)Sure he exploited homophobia for political gain - which is reprehensible - but it never seemed to come from any personal bias.
To think I'd ever say (sort of) nice things about Dubya!
yardwork
(69,364 posts)W Bush used homophobia to turn out the vote and steal two elections. Fuck W Bush. I don't care if his best friend is gay.
nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)slightly less repugnant, by comparison.
yardwork
(69,364 posts)Vogon_Glory
(10,297 posts)The fact that even former Senator Dole thinks that the leading Republican presidential candidates are extremists ought to give serious pause to those Republican voters who ignore politics until September of election year and then vote Republican anyway.
Many of those voters, particularly the older ones, are dependent on government programs their party's candidates will be hell-bent on abolishing and will leave them destitute.
Sadly, they aren't paying much more attention than the non-voters and will vote against their interests next fall.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)Your party is full to the brim with extremists. It's the ones who aren't extreme that are rare in your party and that includes everyone who's only political act is to vote.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)
SHRED
(28,136 posts)They set the stage for how his party is now.
They built this.
No sympathy.
No quarter.
happyslug
(14,779 posts)Bob Dole did not make much of the endorsement, how could he? the town has voted Communist ever since 1945 (and was pro communists for decades before hand). Yes, Italian Communist supported Dole for President. How would any of the present GOP Candidates handle such an endorsement?:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/why-the-italians-back-lt-bob-1341763.html
Just a statement that Dole could and did deal with the left, he may oppose the left but he was willing to work with the left. That is NOT true of the GOP of today and that is the main problem with the US today.
bullwinkle428
(20,662 posts)jalan48
(14,914 posts)Because that's what the people want. Right?
swilton
(5,069 posts)The DLC/corporate Democrats have filled up the vacuum once occupied by the mainstream Republicans who have now followed their leaders and the tea-party over the cliff.
kairos12
(13,592 posts)Fearless
(18,458 posts)RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)Because she is most aligned with his politics.