Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Just think... (Original Post) Playinghardball May 2012 OP
14th amendment. No state shall deny to any person the equal protection of the law. TheWraith May 2012 #1
Then one wonders why the 19th was necessary tkmorris May 2012 #2
Probably because Meiko May 2012 #4
Then why isn't gay marriage allowed in all states? sinkingfeeling May 2012 #3
Good question Meiko May 2012 #6
Because the SCOTUS hasn't ruled on it yet. TheWraith May 2012 #8
You just explained why your post #1 was demonstrably incorrect tkmorris May 2012 #11
Section 2. Cerridwen May 2012 #5
Puke Angelshare1 May 2012 #7
Oh look. We have a semi literate troll in our midst DisgustipatedinCA May 2012 #9
Actually, Angelshare has been a member since 2009. CaliforniaPeggy May 2012 #12
I'd like to know how THEY (Angelshare1) know Plucketeer May 2012 #13
He's not technically correct... CaliforniaPeggy May 2012 #14
IS it safe to assume Plucketeer May 2012 #16
It would be for me! CaliforniaPeggy May 2012 #18
kind of like meteors, meteorites, and meteoroids, eh? nt sudopod May 2012 #17
So you're saying that technically Plucketeer May 2012 #19
lolz nt sudopod May 2012 #20
Ummm, no. progressoid May 2012 #10
Guns aren't protected by a constitutional amendment try again. jp11 May 2012 #15

TheWraith

(24,331 posts)
1. 14th amendment. No state shall deny to any person the equal protection of the law.
Wed May 30, 2012, 03:23 PM
May 2012

Any person means any person.

 

Meiko

(1,076 posts)
4. Probably because
Wed May 30, 2012, 03:36 PM
May 2012

up until the 19th amendment was brought in the states made the determination on who could vote and who couldn't. The 19th brought the right under federal protection.

 

Meiko

(1,076 posts)
6. Good question
Wed May 30, 2012, 03:41 PM
May 2012

I wished I had an answer. Maybe some of our DU scholars smarter than me can help you out.

TheWraith

(24,331 posts)
8. Because the SCOTUS hasn't ruled on it yet.
Wed May 30, 2012, 03:49 PM
May 2012

And because laws are invariably bent and shaped by people who want to avoid them. Case in point, it took almost a hundred years between the establishment of the 14th amendment and its actual application to black people.

Cerridwen

(13,252 posts)
5. Section 2.
Wed May 30, 2012, 03:37 PM
May 2012
Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice-President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age,* and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.


That section was used in many states to rescind the franchise that was slowly expanding for women. It was the first use of the word "male" in any piece of the constitution and it was used to justify discrimination against women just as surely as defining slaves as "3/5"ths human would be used against blacks; regardless of their "free" or "slave" state.

I believe this is also the amendment that has been used to justify the "personhood" of the legal contrivance known as "corporation."

 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
9. Oh look. We have a semi literate troll in our midst
Wed May 30, 2012, 03:50 PM
May 2012

Go back and tell them you really had us going. After you're finished with that, start looking up each word in your post until you find the one you weren't able to spell correctly. Run along now, time is wasting.

CaliforniaPeggy

(149,560 posts)
12. Actually, Angelshare has been a member since 2009.
Wed May 30, 2012, 06:04 PM
May 2012

Low post count notwithstanding, this poster is not a troll...

Until proven, anyway.

 

Plucketeer

(12,882 posts)
13. I'd like to know how THEY (Angelshare1) know
Wed May 30, 2012, 06:13 PM
May 2012

I have a "stomache" - that's full of puke - and further, where I might FIND it so I could confirm it's contents!

progressoid

(49,961 posts)
10. Ummm, no.
Wed May 30, 2012, 04:30 PM
May 2012

It's not puke until it exits your stomache (sic) via your mouth.

Hope you are enjoying the interwebs.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Just think...