Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,066 posts)
Thu Dec 17, 2015, 09:19 AM Dec 2015

Pentagon Officers: We Quit if Trump Wins

12.16.15 8:00 PM ET
Pentagon Officers: We Quit if Trump Wins
The plans of the next president are personal to the officers of the Pentagon, who are threatening to quit if The Donald becomes commander-in-chief.


Republican presidential candidate and business mogul Donald Trump has repeatedly vowed to build up the U.S. military if elected president.

But it is not clear he will have the experienced commanders within the ranks to do it.

In the halls of the Pentagon, there is a different plan afoot for the Trump presidency. Here, officers are privately contemplating what they would do should Trump become their commander-in-chief. And more often than not, they proclaim they will leave.

“By 2016 I will have my 20 years in and can get out of here,” one military official said, referring to the amount of time a service member needs to collect retirement pay.

Spend enough time with a service member, and the topic of Trump comes up, always unsolicited. It is far less political than it sounds. Trump’s attack plans for the so-called Islamic State widely known as ISIS—his call to ban Muslims from the United States, his suggestions that cutting off the flow of information through the Internet can protect the homeland—many said, are an affront to the values they vowed to die to defend.

Each one of them took an oath to defend the Constitution, which protects the freedom of speech and gives Congress, not just one person, the power send the nation to war. They also swear to “obey the orders of the president of the United States.”

In other words: The plans of the next president are personal to them.

more...

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/12/16/pentagon-troops-it-s-us-or-trump.html?source=TDB&via=FB_Page

44 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pentagon Officers: We Quit if Trump Wins (Original Post) babylonsister Dec 2015 OP
No coup? That may be preferable to Trump. morningfog Dec 2015 #1
Hillary could lead it , she does have experience. bahrbearian Dec 2015 #4
. FlatBaroque Dec 2015 #6
President H. R. Clinton won't need a coup ToxMarz Dec 2015 #8
I loved that movie "Seven Days in May." Or do I have that wrong? CTyankee Dec 2015 #12
That's the one ornotna Dec 2015 #20
Read the book, myself. malthaussen Dec 2015 #22
I read all of those 60's era genre books also. They were great fun... CTyankee Dec 2015 #42
So how is Trump going to start his new Middle East war withouot an experienced military? MohRokTah Dec 2015 #2
He's got an ankle gun IDemo Dec 2015 #3
Indeed. MynameisBlarney Dec 2015 #11
If the junior officers who'd then replace the ones who quit SheilaT Dec 2015 #31
Trump: "Who cares!" book_worm Dec 2015 #5
Don't worry "his people" can do the job underpants Dec 2015 #7
Trump has his own 'Army' of thugs. PeoViejo Dec 2015 #9
That Didn't Work Out Too Well ProfessorGAC Dec 2015 #27
A slight quibble dumbcat Dec 2015 #10
They dont' have to obey orders if they retire.... ChisolmTrailDem Dec 2015 #23
Nor if they don't dumbcat Dec 2015 #33
There are many in the military salivating over the chance to rise in ranks randr Dec 2015 #13
You just raised every hair on my neck... Betty Karlson Dec 2015 #14
I hope that hair stays at attention randr Dec 2015 #15
Exactly what I was thinking. staggerleem Dec 2015 #30
I place this with 1939 Dec 2015 #44
K&R. Glad to hear it. Overseas Dec 2015 #16
the positive version of "13 days in May". nt Javaman Dec 2015 #17
then trump can fill the ranks with all his brown shirts. nt Javaman Dec 2015 #18
Well, gee, thanks for having our backs, guys. TexasMommaWithAHat Dec 2015 #19
That's a powerful statement. But in making their point and taking a stand ... NurseJackie Dec 2015 #21
I've often thought the fascists would be surprised if they relied on the military malthaussen Dec 2015 #24
Kent State Cyrano Dec 2015 #25
Assuming that Kent State was "following orders" malthaussen Dec 2015 #29
Not to mention, these days all who enlist and commission are given extensive training on how not to stevenleser Dec 2015 #37
The police, on the other hand... malthaussen Dec 2015 #38
I do too. The military fear being court martialed and convicted for wrongdoing. stevenleser Dec 2015 #41
I doubt they will ever have to draft those resignation letters n/t DFW Dec 2015 #26
A reverse coup? jalan48 Dec 2015 #28
I understand the position of these Pentagon officials Gothmog Dec 2015 #32
I hope they feel the same about a Cruz presidency. n/t Kermitt Gribble Dec 2015 #34
Pffft. This won't happen. TwilightGardener Dec 2015 #35
I agree Renew Deal Dec 2015 #40
Oh Puhleeeze RobinA Dec 2015 #36
Did Fiorina put them up to it? Renew Deal Dec 2015 #39
Who sounds intelligent on defense? ilTupe Dec 2015 #43

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
12. I loved that movie "Seven Days in May." Or do I have that wrong?
Thu Dec 17, 2015, 10:50 AM
Dec 2015

anyway, it was about the coup that Burt Lancaster played a general got foiled by a good officer played by Kirk Douglas (IIRC). It was B &W. Great idea and plot...

malthaussen

(17,195 posts)
22. Read the book, myself.
Thu Dec 17, 2015, 11:58 AM
Dec 2015

That one and Night of Camp David are especially interesting, given the time they were written. My favorite part of the latter has to be when the senator and NSA head worry that the President is crazy because he jokes at the gridiron dinner that all phones in the U.S. should be tapped. Ah, the innocent 60's.

-- Mal

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
42. I read all of those 60's era genre books also. They were great fun...
Thu Dec 17, 2015, 01:39 PM
Dec 2015

some still are but I haven't been scouting them out recently...

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
2. So how is Trump going to start his new Middle East war withouot an experienced military?
Thu Dec 17, 2015, 09:34 AM
Dec 2015

This should be publicized far and wide.

MynameisBlarney

(2,979 posts)
11. Indeed.
Thu Dec 17, 2015, 10:44 AM
Dec 2015

Plus, his massive combover can be used in a whip-like fashion, should ISIS prove to be unruly in teh donald's presence.

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
31. If the junior officers who'd then replace the ones who quit
Thu Dec 17, 2015, 12:34 PM
Dec 2015

decide to follow his orders, we'd go to war. Just without experienced commanders at the helm.

Keep in mind that Richard Nixon only had to accept the resignations of two men, Attorney General Elliot Richardson, and Deputy Attorney General William Ruckelshaus to get down the line to Solicitor General Robert Bork to find a man to fire Special Prosecutor Archibald Cox in the Saturday Night Massacre on October 20, 1973. For those of you too young to remember, or old enough but have forgotten just how things played out, here's a link to the Wiki article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturday_Night_Massacre

My point is it might well be possible for a President Trump to go off bombing any place he wants, killing all the supposed members and families of ISIS, rounding up Muslims by executive order, if we actually get a President Trump. Just look at his enthusiastic crowds, who would clearly become our version of the SS and the Brown Shirts, who would happily imprison or kill any and all suspected Muslims.

We can just hope that the Republicans really turn away from him and nominate someone else. Personally, I don't think Trump will actually get the nomination, but perhaps that's just wishful thinking.

ProfessorGAC

(65,042 posts)
27. That Didn't Work Out Too Well
Thu Dec 17, 2015, 12:15 PM
Dec 2015

Night of the Long Knives. The military wouldn't sign on to Hitler unless he did something about the brownshirts.

So, it's really not a similar group, because the SA was never involved in one of Germany's invasions. That was the Wermacht and the Waffen SS.

dumbcat

(2,120 posts)
10. A slight quibble
Thu Dec 17, 2015, 10:40 AM
Dec 2015
Each one of them took an oath to defend the Constitution, which protects the freedom of speech and gives Congress, not just one person, the power send the nation to war. They also swear to “obey the orders of the president of the United States.”


The Officer's oath does not contain the part highlighted. That is in the Enlisted oath. The Officer's oath does not require them to obey the orders of the President of the United States or the officers appointed above them. They are to use their own discretion as to the lawfulness of orders.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Uniformed_Services_Oath_of_Office

dumbcat

(2,120 posts)
33. Nor if they don't
Thu Dec 17, 2015, 12:53 PM
Dec 2015

Actually, a commissioned officer's oath of office is binding and even if retired or having left active duty they can be recalled to active duty until age 65 in an emergency. (Unless they resign their commission, as I did.)

randr

(12,412 posts)
13. There are many in the military salivating over the chance to rise in ranks
Thu Dec 17, 2015, 11:10 AM
Dec 2015

Remember there are plenty of people who would gladly waterboard others; we have already witnessed this.

randr

(12,412 posts)
15. I hope that hair stays at attention
Thu Dec 17, 2015, 11:20 AM
Dec 2015

Our lives on earth are in a very precarious position.
Madness is not an abnormality within the human experience; it is the norm.

 

staggerleem

(469 posts)
30. Exactly what I was thinking.
Thu Dec 17, 2015, 12:31 PM
Dec 2015

What percentage of "Pentagon officers" are we talking about here? What ranks? Will Trump care if a couple dozen brigadier generals & bird colonels jump ship? Doubt it.

IF one could say something like "40% (or more) of Pentagon officers ranked General or above would quit if Trump were elected" THEN we have a story worth telling. As it stands, I'm underwhelmed.

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
21. That's a powerful statement. But in making their point and taking a stand ...
Thu Dec 17, 2015, 11:55 AM
Dec 2015

... would it cause more harm?

malthaussen

(17,195 posts)
24. I've often thought the fascists would be surprised if they relied on the military
Thu Dec 17, 2015, 12:01 PM
Dec 2015

In the scenario where there are mass protesters and demonstrations, and the fascist government decides to use the Army to restore order, I wonder if it is such a certain thing that the troops will follow orders and open up on civilians. This is one reason, I think, that the police are being militarized. Perhaps there is the thought that they can be counted on to mow down their fellow citizens more than the Army can.

-- Mal

malthaussen

(17,195 posts)
29. Assuming that Kent State was "following orders"
Thu Dec 17, 2015, 12:26 PM
Dec 2015

From what I've read of the incident, it appears that the Guard troops were just pissed off and opened up on their own initiative. (Once one cuts through the bullshit, that is)

But even stipulating that there are sufficient enlisted to follow an order to fire on civilians, there is the question whether there are sufficient officers who would give the order. This tantrum from the Pentagon suggests not. Because, contrary to what Mrs Rice argued, the fact that the President ordered it does not make it a legal order.

And there is a difference between waterboarding "terrorist suspects" and shooting your own fellow citizens.

-- Mal

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
37. Not to mention, these days all who enlist and commission are given extensive training on how not to
Thu Dec 17, 2015, 01:13 PM
Dec 2015

follow illegal orders and exactly what constitutes a legal vs an illegal order.

There are always exceptions but as you surmised there would not be many that would obey an illegal order to hurt or kill American civilians.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
41. I do too. The military fear being court martialed and convicted for wrongdoing.
Thu Dec 17, 2015, 01:20 PM
Dec 2015

I am not sure police officers do. They seem to walk on just about anything.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
35. Pffft. This won't happen.
Thu Dec 17, 2015, 01:03 PM
Dec 2015

This sounds like a totally made-up story, in fact. tRump would be a disaster, but most of the military is Republican, and would be inclined to support him.

RobinA

(9,893 posts)
36. Oh Puhleeeze
Thu Dec 17, 2015, 01:06 PM
Dec 2015

Pentagon officers suddenly sounding like ACLU members? Is torture a value they vowed to die to defend? Is lying us into a war with threats of nonexistent weapons of mass destruction a value they vowed to die to defend? What a crock.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Pentagon Officers: We Qui...