Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

betterdemsonly

(1,967 posts)
Sat Dec 19, 2015, 11:27 AM Dec 2015

The Saudi definition of terror, includes Atheism, impugning the state, and questioning state Islam.

They are among 52 similar “terrorists” whose mass execution is expected at any time. Two of them—Ali Mohammed al-Nimr, who was 17 at the time of his arrest, and Abdullah al-Zaher, who was 15—in addition to being sentenced to die by decapitation with a sword, are to be crucified, their headless bodies mounted on crosses in a public space as an example to anyone thinking of defying the House of Saud.

What the Saudi monarchy considers “terrorism,” moreover, was codified into a new law last year. It establishes that terrorism includes “any act” intended to, among other things, “insult the reputation of the state,” “harm public order,” or “shake the security of society.”

Other acts defined as “terrorism” include: “Calling for atheist thought in any form, or calling into question the fundamentals of the Islamic religion on which this country is based,” as well as “Contact or correspondence with any groups, currents [of thought], or individuals hostile to the kingdom.”

The parents of Abdullah al-Zaher, now 19, have come forward to plead for his life. They describe how he was tortured and beaten with iron rods after his arrest until he signed a false confession that he was not even allowed to read

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2015/12/18/pers-d18.html

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Saudi definition of terror, includes Atheism, impugning the state, and questioning state Islam. (Original Post) betterdemsonly Dec 2015 OP
This is why ISIS cannot be beaten back in certain areas. hollowdweller Dec 2015 #1
No. It indicates we aren't really fighting isis at all. Since the Saudis are isis. betterdemsonly Dec 2015 #4
Some Allies cantbeserious Dec 2015 #2
Yeah the saudi's are some sick SAVAGE mofo's...nt Jesus Malverde Dec 2015 #3
Hurry then, let's send them more weapons cpwm17 Dec 2015 #5
 

hollowdweller

(4,229 posts)
1. This is why ISIS cannot be beaten back in certain areas.
Sat Dec 19, 2015, 12:09 PM
Dec 2015

In the areas where ISIS is that are Sunni dominated, most of the population agrees with them.

Like in Iraq we can put our troops in there and beat them back, but soon as our guys leave then they will come back, because the population agrees with them.
 

betterdemsonly

(1,967 posts)
4. No. It indicates we aren't really fighting isis at all. Since the Saudis are isis.
Sat Dec 19, 2015, 03:36 PM
Dec 2015

Yet another indication that we aren't fighting isis is that our other mideast ally Israel is giving medical assistence to them.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Saudi definition of t...