General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWoman who failed FDNY physical test 6 times gets another chance
A woman who six times failed the physical test to become an FDNY firefighter is being given another chance and this time, critics say, the fix is in.
Shell graduate, no question, said an FDNY member. The department doesnt want another black eye.
Wendy Tapia was allowed to conditionally graduate from the Fire Academy on May 17, 2013, even though she had failed the running test.
After swearing her in, the FDNY gave Tapia five more chances to run the required 1.5 miles in 12 minutes or less, but she couldnt do it. She quit never having worked a tour of duty.
http://nypost.com/2015/12/27/unfireable-female-firefighter-returns-to-the-fdny/
I apologize for posting something from the NY Post. However, in spite of the obvious slant of this article, I congratulate Ms. Tapia on getting another chance, and wish her the best of luck. To have only 49 females in a 10,500 member fire department is simply a disgrace.
edhopper
(37,341 posts)sure knows how to color a story.
Yellow journalism at it's finest.
madville
(7,847 posts)In a job where physical strength and endurance are literally a matter of life and death you can either pass the standards or you can't. There has to be some measure of ability.
Response to philosslayer (Original post)
Kingofalldems This message was self-deleted by its author.
PeteSelman
(1,508 posts)You either have what it takes to do the job or you don't. She doesn't, as was proved five times over. All this does is make the department weaker and endanger the other fire fighters.
Stupid.
matt819
(10,749 posts)I couldn't pass this test if my own life depended on it, much less someone who depended on me. And I shouldn't be a firefighter. That's as it should be. You can't pass, you don't get employed. Regardless of gender, race, sexual orientation, etc.
And one in, if you can't keep up with the physical demands - thinking fat cops here - you should find another job. Period.
JudyM
(29,785 posts)Seems like running a mile and a half is not something that would happen in the vast majority of urban fires. A short sprint may be more relevant. If they're trying to test endurance there are other ways.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)It's for tall buildings. When fires occur, the elevators become death traps and nobody uses them. More often they're running up and down stair wells carrying people who can't move due to smoke inhalation.
And that's in Seattle. In New York the number of tall buildings are many times that. Every year they used to take all the firefighters in the region and make them run up the tallest buildings in full gear. It's brutal, which is why most young firefighters are in amazing shape.
The endurance needed to run up 50 storeys in full gear and carry a 150-200lb person down is almost superhuman.
JudyM
(29,785 posts)It's a rare woman who could do what you describe. Does that mean women shouldn't be doing other stuff in the rescue that don't involve feats of strength?
It's like in the military. Put people in positions for which they are qualified, without risking their colleagues' lives. Don't just exclude them from everything, and then without testing them for what's actually needed.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)For the cities that do it.
Waldorf
(654 posts)still couldn't qualify as a firefighter. They should have never given her so many chances. Either you qualify or not.
PeteSelman
(1,508 posts)You need to be able to run up steps in full gear and be able to carry a downed partner. If you can't do it, you can't have the job. In a tight situation, she'd have to leave an injured colleague behind. Unacceptable.
She can go be an EMS or something.
JudyM
(29,785 posts)razorman
(1,644 posts)this test, or guaranteed that he would make it through, no matter what? If she is truly not up to the physical standards, it will very likely cost her life, if not the lives of others. The quals should be set and strict, but anyone who can pass them should be given the chance.
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)she doesn't have what it takes for the physical endurance of a firefighter, and, she quit, is she going to quit when lives are on the line?
edhopper
(37,341 posts)which is biased against her.
She had a foot injury.
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)Her foot should have healed in that 6 months.
I stand by my words, she doesn't have what it takes to be a firefighter on the FDNY.
JustABozoOnThisBus
(24,678 posts)Some take longer to heal. Some tendons can take a while.
LeftyMom
(49,212 posts)I broke a toe in September and I still can't run at all and walk with a slight limp that gets worse after long periods on my feet. And that's just a broken toe. There's no earthly way I could pass a running test in February, even though I'm in good shape. I haven't been able to run in four months, even if I could start again tomorrow it would take me time to rebuild atrophied muscles and I'd have to go slowly to avoid injuring myself in another way.
And I have no earthly idea what was wrong with her foot, but it almost has to be worse than a broken toe because almost anything would be.
blue neen
(12,465 posts)who can diagnose peoples' injuries, sight-unseen, and prognosticate their recovery times.
Amazing.
SickOfTheOnePct
(8,710 posts)Who are you or anyone else here to say she needs more?
Sounds like there are would-be orthopedic surgeons on both sides of the issue here.
blue neen
(12,465 posts)Didn't say more time, didn't say less time...because I don't know the answer, and neither does anyone else here.
---and that's the point----
SickOfTheOnePct
(8,710 posts)as I thought a doc had told her six months - my bad.
I find it pretty funny that in the article, one of her defenders claims she was injured at the academy because "they overtrained her".
That to me says she's unqualified - if she can't make it through the training without being injured, she isn't fit to be a firefighter, IMO.
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)blue neen
(12,465 posts)rather than paying to see my world famous surgeon. It just so happened that he did some groundbreaking surgery that enabled me to walk again. He succeeded where others had failed, but it sounds like you're better. It's a comfort to know.
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)blue neen
(12,465 posts)It was the hospital that made all the money. He's a genius, so it's a shame. This particular hospital system is notorious for overcharging, though.
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)and, because he helped you walk again, then he was underpaid, not by you, but by the hospital.
Glad you're able to walk again.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)I pretend I can diagnosis foot injuries too.
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)while all firefighters must be physically up to the task, there, as always, other things going on...
http://www.womensmediacenter.com/feature/entry/new-yorks-firefighting-women
Written by a retired female firefighter who claims the current standards may not be the best tests for firefighting fitness, and describes historic anti-woman attitudes. Many of these attitudes and actions had been well-publicized over the years.
Note particularly that when women were allowed into the force, the tests got tougher. Why would that be?
Snobblevitch
(1,958 posts)ok maybe 20 years ago, St. Paul decided that they needed more female firefighters. They actively recruited women to apply and take the various tests. It turns out they had few applicants who could pass the physical tests. They changed the trsts by lowering the physical requirements. I remember there were many people who were not pleased with that decision. This would be a better post if I could remember what the final results were in their attempt to get more female firefighters.
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)basic physical fitness for cops and firemen, but real problems, like grabbing the hose if the front guy gets knocked down, what to do with the guy coming at your partner with a lead pipe...
Both can be very difficult and demanding jobs,and it's extremely important to trust the people you work with and who back you up. Not just that they will do the job, but can do the job.
I've been away from it for years, but a lot of the guys I knew had real issues. It's easy to yell "sexism" and there's a lot of it out there, but it's also a tough job with tough calls.
It does look like they're looking for honest solutions, though.
Snobblevitch
(1,958 posts)requirements would be an honest solution.
I know several men who were LEO for 30 years each, they are now retired. Towards the end of their careers, I know they let the young cops do the footchases, just as they did when they were young. Experience goes a long way on the job. (Of the five retired cops I'm thinking of, only two were ever shot at and only one ever returned fire. One of them only unholstered his gun once in his career. Their days were mostly traffic, being seen on the street, and responding to medicals. One of them broke into a burning house and brought out a couple in their 70s. They would not have made it if he had waited for the firefighters to get there. (They teased him about doing their job.)
TeddyR
(2,493 posts)This person needs to be able to perform the tasks necessary to save lives. Her sex has nothing to do with it - if she can't pass the physical test then she isn't qualified. I'd like to think that the people coming to save my family from a fire are physically able to do so.
GummyBearz
(2,931 posts)Perfect skill set. Cant do the job but wont quit. Hurray
SickOfTheOnePct
(8,710 posts)When someone dies because she can't do her job.
GummyBearz
(2,931 posts)Unfortunately