General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFather outraged by TSA pat down of his 10-year-old daughter, shows it in youtube in slow-mo
&feature=autosharehttps://img.washingtonpost.com/wp-apps/imrs.php?src=
&w=1484
But a TSA spokesman said that the pat-down followed agency guidelines.
TSA screening procedures allow for the pat down of a child under certain circumstances, the spokesman said in a statement. The process by which the child was patted down followed approved procedures.
The footage, which has now received wide media attention, shows an agent calmly frisking the girl, who is holding her arms out to the side. Her father films from the other side of a glass partition. Payne annotated the clip, describing the pat down it as invasive, a heinous act that makes me sick to my stomach.
She just had a completely blank stare on her face, Payne told NBCs Today show. I could tell it was very uncomfortable for her.
Payne told ABCs Good Morning America that he plans to file a formal complaint.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)Thanks Dad.
Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)cwydro
(51,308 posts)Sheesh, at least blur her face.
Poor kid.
renate
(13,776 posts)From what I saw on our local news, she had a juice box she wasn't supposed to have. That's a parent's fault, not the TSA's.
And TSA agents know that decoys are often sent through security to check for thoroughness, so however much the agent may have doubted this little girl was one of the bad guys, she still had to do her job.
I hadn't thought about the hypocrisy of his showing the recording to the entire world, though. You are so right.
MADem
(135,425 posts)I felt kind of bad doing it, but I was in no position to refuse (I was traveling as a courier and needed the ride). I successfully managed to smuggle explosive material past a military checkpoint that was set up just the way your average TSA checkpoint is set up. It wasn't that hard.
I gave the stuff to the MAC commanding officer after I passed through into the sterile zone, and boarded my flight.
I often wondered if that poor slob was re-trained or fired.
uppityperson
(116,022 posts)him and that child's safety with a parent that confuses that part down with groping groping groping groping groping groping groping groping groping.
He is seriously wtf creepy.
GreatGazoo
(4,647 posts)Possibly some projection and deflection in his reaction to this pat down.
He seems to easily let his own needs and feelings eclipse, or stand in for, those of his daughter. That he sees this pat down as humiliating and invasive for his daughter (and it IS but no more so than any pat down I have received) and yet puts on YouTube in slow-mo for all to see says something about his capacity for denial. The guilt mechanism in humans often means that the worse something is the greater the need to deny it publicly and in this case that points perhaps to something creepy.
uppityperson
(116,022 posts)yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)What they did to that little 10-year old girl is criminal. A true tragedy in America.
uppityperson
(116,022 posts)
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)Well done.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)Every time I go through the airport you can tell the TSA agents had Wendy's as the last job on their resume.
EdwardBernays
(3,343 posts)Has happened to America.
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)We demanded absolute security. Then we changed our minds and decided only dusky people with beards and hijabs should be hassled. We get what we ask for. If we don't want this, we can disband TSA and let "contractors" wave people through until they see someone who looks middle eastern, at which time they will shoot to kill. If that's what we want. Problem is, everybody wants heavy security imposed on others, but not people like themselves
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)...is that if there was a "no searching kids" rule, then I know where I'm hiding my bomb.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)I feel so much safer with our wonderful TSA.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)Patting down people who obviously couldn't conceivably have a bomb is ridiculous. Especially when they're just add ons to prove we aren't racially profiling, which we obviously are doing.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)as suicide bombers.
We're only including them so that we can pretend we're not racially profiling. Nor are old women in wheel chairs at risk of being recruited.
We might as well admit we're profiling since we're doing it anyway and stop inconveniencing people for appearances.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Any more than it is necessary to "recruit" infants to put cocaine in their diapers.
It is also impossible to slip something into the backpack of a distracted child. Utterly impossible.
philosslayer
(3,076 posts)Please enlighten us as to what Muslims look like. Because certainly, they all look the same, right?
And how do you know here father isn't a teabagger and determined to get an explosive onto a plane?
What a ridiculous post.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)He would probably have changed his name or grown a beard if he were an extremist.
Do teabaggers have a history of suicide bombing? No, so that's why that argument fails.
The profile for suicide bombers is nearly universal. Why pretend it's not? And why pretend this little girl fits any known profile?
We do this to pretend our obvious profiling process isn't based on race and religion, when in fact it is. And it will continue to be regardless of however many random people not fitting the profile we include to pretend we aren't.
philosslayer
(3,076 posts)We all get it.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)draw more scrutiny from the TSA than a 10-year old girl from San Diego on a family vacation that was booked months ago?
I would have to say "yes". Does this make me a despicable profiler and a horrible person in your opinion?
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)I'm in favor of admitting it.
Muslims aren't dumb. They know they're being profiled if you read any account of what they go through at the airport. Single, young Muslim men are nearly always chosen to go through additional screening. I don't see a point in lying to ourselves just so we can feel good.
Profiling doesn't have to just be about race and religion. Age (like this girl's case), nationality, family members and sex are good indicators of potential suicide bombers.
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)Single, young, Muslim men are not frequently selected for additional screening. They are if they are from particular countries. American Muslims are not selected particularly often. Profiling does not work in a country such as ours, where Christians may be dark and swarthy, while Muslims may be blonde and fair.
anigbrowl
(13,889 posts)One, you're looking for something you haven't seen before, two there are lots of other possibilities besides a bomb. A 10 year old might not think anything significant about being asked to carry a parent or sibling's pocketknife, for example. Recall that the 9-11 hijackers used boxcutter knives, nothing elaborate. As for her not being Muslim, I don't think that's the only security risk out there either although it's the one most people are on the lookout for.
I am not a fan of security theater either but don't think this scenario is as inconceivable as you imagine. Terrorists of all nationalities have employed children at times because they're easy to manipulate and less suspect than adults.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)First, ISIS is by no means the only entity that is potentially interested in screwing with airplanes.
Second, it is not necessary to "recruit" a child in order to conceal something on a child. Smugglers use small children and infants all of the time.
The reason she went to secondary was because of a package of Capri Sun in her backpack. I've flown with children a number of times and if Dad had checked her backpack before getting to security, she wouldn't have gone to secondary in the first place.
The domestic terrorists in Oregon have lots of kids and they demonstrated at the original Bundy ranch confrontation that they are perfectly willing to use them. They intentionally moved women and children into what they believed would be the line of fire directed at them. So I don't understand why you think it is impossible for a white child to be used by an ill-intended adult.
Millions of children will board airplanes this year with no incident. I fly about two times a month, and never manage to catch sight of any of these outrageous incidents. No system involving human interaction on that scale is going to be incident free, but I can't figure out how I logged 65,000 miles last year and not once managed to witness any inappropriate behavior by the screeners.
On the other hand, the TSA agent who checks tickets at B concourse at PHL regularly gets a raft of shit from passengers because she wears a hijab.
If this guy wants every pervert on the internet watching his kid being patted down, I guess that's up to him.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Why not just confiscate the Capri Sun?
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)A few weeks ago, an airliner was brought down by a soda.
In the UK, a plot was disrupted that would have used a two-component liquid explosive.
On the way to the checkpoint at every airport there are signs, videos and a disposal bin for liquids.
This might suggest to a passenger, or an adult supervising child passengers, to take a moment to check their carry-on to see if perhaps they contain any liquids.
Having had someone reminded umpteen times not to have any liquids show up at the checkpoint with liquids, you might be inclined to wonder how they missed all that. But, oh, there is a magic aura around "forgotten" ones, which you can immediately look at to determine that it was not put there by an adult for some reason. I'd love to know how you make that objective determination. By skin color?
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)But presumably the TSA inspected the juice box when they confiscated it and determined that it was not, in fact, a bomb, but a perfectly innocent Capri Sun juice box.
Now, would a real terrorist draw attention to themselves by adding a normal juice box to the luggage in which they had planted their deadly weapon? Or to the luggage of the little girl on whose person they had cunningly concealed something nefarious? No way, they would make sure that this luggage would attract as little attention as possible. So if anything, the presence of a cardboard Capri Sun juice box makes it less likely that the little girl was a pawn of the evil terrorists.
TipTok
(2,474 posts)Don't you feel safe...?
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)who take an absolute delight in strutting around, yelling, inconveniencing people, confiscating plastic Buzz Lightyear guns, and patting down grandmothers in wheelchairs.

Assholes.
TipTok
(2,474 posts)... ranking below mall security and meter maids who actually provide a service.
Empowerer
(3,900 posts)Many of the same people who demanded that we tighten security and dismissed anyone who complained with "if you don't have anything to hide, you have nothing to fear" and "we must give up a little freedom in order to protect ourselves" are the ones who scream loudest when THEY are the ones subjected to the scrutiny they claimed was so important and harmless . . .
librechik
(30,957 posts)Since these circumstances are "certain" I would sure like to know what provoked it.
davidn3600
(6,342 posts)That's America now. Get used to it.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)We got security theater.
Hassin Bin Sober
(27,472 posts)She laughed when I commended her for being on duty at O'Hare airport. She said they were just there to put on a show. They had an empty Humvee parked at each terminal entrance and Illinois National Guard people walking around whith, what was later to be exposed, unloaded M-16s.
Logical
(22,457 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)he's looking for his 15 minutes and using his daughter.
anigbrowl
(13,889 posts)If he was really serious he'd take this to a lawyer. His Youtube video is oddly creepy. I feel sorry for the daughter, who is being made into a public spectacle. Apparently it didn't occur to him to blur her face or something even though that's very easy to do and news organizations do it as a matter of course to protect privacy, so it's not a new idea.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Can't be too careful, you know.
Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)I think we can all be thankful of the TSA's tireless work to keep us safe.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)My apologies, I take it all back. I mistakenly thought it was a simple cardboard juice box.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)So, in your capacity as an engineer, you have determined that it is impossible to compromise a juice box along the bottom cardboard seam, remove the contents, substitute the contents with another liquid, and reseal the adhesive at the bottom. It is also impossible to place it into a child's backpack to be combined with other components after the checkpoint!
Ah, yes, it has to be a yellow soda can!
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)and not the elaborately disguised bomb that you are fearful about?
Assuming that they did, what's the point of the full body patdown?
Calista241
(5,633 posts)The girl in this video had nothing like that.
grntuscarora
(1,249 posts)I mistakenly had a jar of green chile sauce in my carry-on, and all they did was confiscate it with a heartfelt apology. No frisking involved.
These pat-down,/gropes seem to be given at random.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)If there was a predictable pattern to searches, what would you do in order to smuggle a weapon?
grntuscarora
(1,249 posts)knowing how random the system is I would think it an invitation to try my luck.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)According to a report based on an internal investigation, "red teams" with the Department of Homeland Security's Office of the Inspector General were able to get banned items through the screening process in 67 out of 70 tests it conducted across the nation.
The test results were first reported by ABC News, and government officials confirmed them to CNN. Mark Hatfield, acting deputy director, will take over for Melvin Carraway until a new acting administrator is appointed. It was not immediately clear Tuesday where Carraway would be reassigned.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/01/politics/tsa-failed-undercover-airport-screening-tests/
But never fear, when it comes to 10-year old girls with juice boxes, they've got it covered.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)grntuscarora
(1,249 posts)or don't frisk any of us.
I had just as much cause to be frisked as that 10 year old kid, but they didn't.
A little consistency, please, is all I request.
kwassa
(23,340 posts)Such girls are obviously innocent.
now, non-whites ....
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Sounds as unconcerning as a quiet, random housewife from San Bernardino.
Can't be too whimsical and fancy free, you know.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)tularetom
(23,664 posts)In other words I am willing to sacrifice somebody else's freedom for my security. My freedom? No, not so much.
I feel sorry for the kid. Partly because the pat down seemed a bit rough, but mostly because she has an asshole for a dad.
tblue37
(68,444 posts)chat with the child to make her feel more comfortable. I bet the agent has kids of her own and was trying to be nice to the kid. In fact, I suspect that she was so focused on trying to help the child feel more at ease that she ended up not paying enough attention to part of the patdown process and that might be why she had to repeat a couple of moves.
These agents' jobs are on the line if a decoy is sent through to test whether they are vigilant enough and following procedure. Those decoys would not be obvious "terrorist" types, but rather people you would never suspect.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)and tell her to have a nice flight, after confiscating the juice box.
Nobody in this thread has yet given a credible explanation about why a cardboard juice box in a backpack necessitates a full body patdown.
Jim Beard
(2,535 posts)Daddy wanted his 15 minutes. TSA had every right to follow procedure.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Go TSA.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)brettdale
(12,748 posts)What would the reaction be here be, if this had of been a african american child or
a muslim child.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)she may not have appreciated you documenting it on a video either.
FLPanhandle
(7,107 posts)If you follow the rules and don't bring anything forbidden through, then it's a breeze.
Also, I'm okay with profiling as it stops some of the silliness of patting down American 10 year old's but people would complain about profiling. So guess what? Everyone gets the same treatment.
phylny
(8,818 posts)as a 57-year-old white woman.
I've been subjected to a pat-down twice. Once, right after breast cancer surgery and I was extremely tender. It was not fun.
I had nothing on me that was prohibited.
vaberella
(24,634 posts)If her pat-down was so objectionable why didn't make a fuss and call someone. Instead he videotaped the whole thing, to exclaim his horror. Not to mention, I thought the TSA was very gentle with the child and it was clear in the video she spoke to the child as she did everything she was supposed to do. So the child wouldn't be shocked or upset by anything. I don't get it.
I remember when this thing first started...only people of color were picked. I should know since I was randomly picked each and every time I was at the airport and the only people being patted down with me had my complexion. I saw white people looking at us in pity. Now that I see this is done to everyone, I hear horror and shame. No one cried for me as I complained about the process and asked quite publicly and loudly why everyone here had a permanent tan and/or black.
There was nothing wrong here and the only issue is the father. He's a moron.
Logical
(22,457 posts)underahedgerow
(1,232 posts)seeing is perhaps a bit of white privilege on the part of the dad.
'My daughter is white, she would never conceal anything on her person'.
Keep in mind they are also screening for contraband trafficking.
Why does this dad think that one set of rules applies to others and not to him or his family. This is routine procedure. If people don't like it, they don't have to fly, they can take a train, a bus or a boat.
Glassunion
(10,201 posts)A criminal conviction for interfering with security screening personnel is punishable by up to ten years in prison and a fine of $250,000.
BadgerKid
(5,017 posts)Thought those were supposed to the alternative to patting down.
Ilsa
(64,429 posts)Especially if they fly frequently; nor do they want strangers looking at pics of their kids with clothing "see-through" imaging.
mnhtnbb
(33,435 posts)although I've been breezing through more often. He gets pulled out every time.
BUT, every time I've been patted down I've been offered the chance to go in
a private area--behind a screen. I suspect they offered that to this little girl,
too.
What's the dad's problem? If you are going to fly with your kids, they are subject to search
the same as anyone else.
I think the dad videotaping it and putting it out there on the internet is creepy. I don't see anything
wrong with the way the pat down was conducted. Years ago--I mean 1986--a guy planted a bomb
in the carry on of his pregnant wife who was flying El Al out of Heathrow. He was willing to blow up his wife!
Who's to say some one of these crazies wouldn't blow up their kid?
Edited to add: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindawi_affair
I remember the 1986 incident because I was pregnant with our first son at the time, and we had plans to go to Europe. Reagan had just bombed Tripoli,
there were anti-American demonstrations going on everywhere in Europe, and I just got a very bad feeling. We ended up getting off the plane (coming from CA) at JFK--
not going on to Europe--and using the time we would have been in Europe to drive down the east coast and visit Civil War battlefields. It turned out to be one of the best "go with my gut" decisions I've ever made. We later found out that if we had continued
our trip as planned, we would have been in Vienna when Chernobyl blew and I would have gotten a pretty good dose of radiation--at 5 months pregnant.
Ilsa
(64,429 posts)Placed in the radiation tube where they can see under our clothes.
betsuni
(29,140 posts)I forgot not to wear an underwire bra and it set off the metal detector, had to go to the Terrorist Corner and wait for a woman agent (this was before the X-rated machines). I told her about the bra. But who believes terrorists? I was wearing tights, a short skirt and a sweater, no pockets or place to hide anything, no jewelry. After fondling me and finding nothing (besides the bra), the agent knew she was dealing with a devious criminal mastermind. Out came the metal detector wand. I had to do invisible Twister positions: legs apart, walk-like-an-Egyptian (repeat on the other side), now on the diagonal, while she spent an embarrassingly long time between my legs (this was in full view of other passengers waiting in line to go through security and they seemed to enjoy the show -- should've gone around with a hat and asked for tips after). I wanted to tell the agent that nothing had been between my legs for months, but luckily stopped myself -- that would be asking for trouble. Finally it was over and she said, "It WAS your underwire bra after all!" Then suddenly I was alone and had to rush around finding my shoes and bags and stuff, like the morning after, then the Walk of Shame to the shuttle bus. I could've sworn people gave me funny looks on the bus because of the Twister Dildo event in the Terrorist Corner, but maybe I was imagining it.
JEB
(4,748 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)complete stranger, with caramel colored skin, wearing hijab, same age, same "too much liquid in a juice box," he'd have NO PROBLEM with it.
Check your kid's shit next time, Pops.
BlueJazz
(25,348 posts)Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)Perhaps, maybe, the agency guidelines are fucked up?
Nah, can't be...
Jake Stern
(3,146 posts)it's inconceivable that a non-Muslim can be used to commit an act of terror google a man named Hindawi.
He snuck an explosive into his pregnant, White, Irish girlfriend's luggage. His target was an El Al flight.from London.
steve2470
(37,481 posts)steve2470
(37,481 posts)If he really loved his daughter, he would have NEVER done that video and just gotten a lawyer. From what people are saying, I don't think he has a case anyway.
I don't like the airport security stuff, but I'd like someone to design the perfect system that absolutely no one complains about. It's impossible. I've had no problems with the TSA and I've been wanded a few times by the agents. Granted, sometimes the agents have fucked up and crossed the line with some people, which is actionable.