Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(118,804 posts)
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 09:59 PM Jan 2016

Clinton proposes a new 4 percent tax on the wealthy

Clinton proposes a new 4 percent tax on the wealthy

by Bernie Becker at Politico

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/01/hillary-clinton-tax-wealthy-217583#.m7moiph:wjrH

"SNIP............

Hillary Clinton today proposed a 4 percent surtax on the highest-earning Americans, as she seeks to boost taxes for the wealthiest Americans.

The proposal, which she announced in Iowa, would raise an estimated $150 billion over a decade, a Clinton aide said, and comes after the Democratic front-runner said that she would build on the so-called Buffett Rule that seeks to ensure that the middle class doesn't pay a higher tax rate than top earners.

The surtax would hit those with annual income of more than $5 million, and would affect roughly 0.02 percent of taxpayers.

Clinton is calling the plan a “fair share surcharge.” The Clinton aide cast the approach as a simple way to raise effective tax rates on the wealthiest, who can rely on tax planning and find ways to game the tax system.


Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/01/hillary-clinton-tax-wealthy-217583#ixzz3wzWZTzgK


..............SNIP"




11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Clinton proposes a new 4 percent tax on the wealthy (Original Post) applegrove Jan 2016 OP
. Wilms Jan 2016 #1
4% -- that stings! Can the wealthy pay 4% income tax in 2018 or later and NCjack Jan 2016 #2
Campaign blather. n/t djean111 Jan 2016 #3
I don't know why any reasonable person would object to this surcharge. pnwmom Jan 2016 #4
Make it 40% hobbit709 Jan 2016 #5
It should be confiscatory on the 0.1% Warpy Jan 2016 #6
4% on all income edhopper Jan 2016 #7
I'd call that a good start gratuitous Jan 2016 #8
I agree. lovemydog Jan 2016 #9
Yeah! "I told them to cut it out" elias49 Jan 2016 #10
A-haw! You so funny gratuitous Jan 2016 #11

pnwmom

(108,995 posts)
4. I don't know why any reasonable person would object to this surcharge.
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 10:07 PM
Jan 2016

But I'm sure the GOP will fight it tooth and nail.

Warpy

(111,355 posts)
6. It should be confiscatory on the 0.1%
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 10:24 PM
Jan 2016

Most of our ancestors fled a European aristocracy. We don't want one here.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
8. I'd call that a good start
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 10:35 PM
Jan 2016

It's time that the people and corporations who have profited so much over the last 35 years should start paying more of their fair share to support the system and the working people who have provided them such a welcoming environment. It's past time for the piper and the other working stiffs to get paid.

 

elias49

(4,259 posts)
10. Yeah! "I told them to cut it out"
Mon Jan 11, 2016, 10:47 PM
Jan 2016

and Hillary man-slaps the profiteers down!
And saves the human race.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Clinton proposes a new 4 ...