General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPorn has ruined my relationships with women
My parents never gave me "the talk" so I learned about sex through pornographic magazines that I found at construction sites left behind by the workers. Of course those images created an idealized unrealistic image of women in my young mind. So much so that I often turned down the advances of females in high school whom I felt didn't live up to that sexy, voluptuous standard. These were women who probably liked me but I rejected them because I felt they were not attractive enough by the standard set by porn.
Something really needs to be done about sex education in this country and the puritanical standards that don't allow people to openly talk about sexual relationships needs to be set aside for a more enlightened approach to this biological issue which is ingrained in us all.
emulatorloo
(46,155 posts)snooper2
(30,151 posts)"pornographic magazines that I found at construction sites left behind by the workers"
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)...in the 70s, mostly in places that were either temporarily or permanently abandoned, even in a dry creek bed. Now that I'm thinking about it for the first time since I was 12, they were most likely left there not by adults but by other kids who had discovered them in their dad's stash and snuck them out to a place where they could...ahem...peruse them and not be discovered by their moms.
It would not surprise me that some of the dads took them to work for the same reason, lol. Now, where or how they would engage the usual activity that is usually paired with the viewing of such content, I do not know.
mythology
(9,527 posts)dry creek bed and porn, but I'm not going to go looking for it.
Adsos Letter
(19,459 posts)Never happened across any porn mags.
EL34x4
(2,003 posts)We didn't have time to look at porn.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)Not the same, but people are people.
Rex
(65,616 posts)read someone claim that porn ruined em. Maybe not as creative.
403Forbidden
(166 posts)...damn I was looking in all the wrong places.
bvf
(6,604 posts)found while working on a paper drive sponsored by a Lutheran church.
MurrayDelph
(5,765 posts)Of course, I was working at a phone sex company that advertised in the back of those magazines.
I used to give them to a buddy of mine whose son is a Lubavitch Rabbi.
ShrimpPoboy
(301 posts)The marketplace/culture at large obviously plays a role too but good parenting can overcome that, IMO. Not saying yours weren't good in other ways (they must have been if you're a Dem
), but you acknowledge they didn't do much in that area at least.
With 3 sons, one of whom is in puberty, teaching them to respect women and developing healthy relationships/ideas about sex and love is a major focus for us. It's a challenge to be sure, but well worth fighting for.
Worthy topic for a thread.
Blue_Adept
(6,500 posts)I have two early/mid teenage girls and I've had the talk with them (they hated the one they got from their mother; she and I are divorced) and I went with the approach of talking about how sex is definitely a great and fun thing, if done right, and they have no reason to be ashamed about wanting it, engaging in it, and enjoying it.
I've ended up with several very repressed and "broken" women over the years when it comes to sex based on the way they were raised about it, thinking it soemthing awful and dirty. I don't want my kids to be that way. I want them to enjoy every minute of it that they want when they're ready and to have the tools necessary to deal with it.
Victor_c3
(3,557 posts)Though they aren't old enough for "the talk" (they are 5 and 7) that is exactly what I'd want my kids to think about sex.
Blue_Adept
(6,500 posts)And the relationship you have with your kids. it worked out well for me as they're very open with me about things, can joke about it (which puts them at ease and is a way of testing the waters), and they'll listen to me more because I was so up front about things at the important age.
Schema Thing
(10,283 posts)your ideas on the female form where just as/more influenced by mainstream magazines/film/tv than by porn. For that matter, the women featured in porn where chosen via the influence of the mainstream female iconography.
And yes, "real" women like doing all the things women do in porn, to varying degrees.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)then you'd have a point.
But unrealistic bodies and personalities are not exclusive to porn. In fact, there's WAY more of it outside porn - Cosmopolitan sells a lot more copies than Playboy. And no porn movie will come close to the viewership of the latest from Hollywood featuring a Manic Pixie Dream Girl.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)then i can see this as an after-effect of porn
many other industries depend on unrealistic beauty standards
saturnsring
(1,832 posts)forest444
(5,902 posts)A failed relationship - even a friendship - can be very painful, and of course can happen for a million different reasons.
When it comes to politics, I say give'em hell. But when it comes to emotional pain, we really should try to be there for one another - or at the very least, say nothing at all but wish each other well.
saturnsring
(1,832 posts)might be something else and that porn is just a scapegoat - people's behavior is complicated and that there might be underlying subconscious reasons (or not subconscious but something s/he doesn't want to face or admit to) for their problem, something more complicated (or not) than just porn.
403Forbidden
(166 posts)...and the women are real....even though they are often times airbrushed.
I found that the personal interaction with those ladies made them real.
Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)Porn hurts my wrist.
tymorial
(3,433 posts)I think I pulled a muscle last time.
KentuckyWoman
(7,411 posts)Next you'll be claiming you've never bought a car because the car sitting on the lot in the dealership had one spot of dust on it rather than the perfection of the TV and magazine adds.
Or you can't eat at any restaurants because the food doesn't look exactly like it does in the pictures.
Response to KentuckyWoman (Reply #11)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
DefenseLawyer
(11,101 posts)I've been happily married for 15 years and have never had any of the "issues" with women that you attribute to looking at Playboy as a teenager.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)Not really. Just kidding.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Codeine
(25,586 posts)are Manhunters.
hunter
(40,814 posts)... sometimes with severe injury.
Although, now that I think of it, sex has sometimes been like that too.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)not many of us look like angelina jolie or salma hayek or jennifer lawrence.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)I look like all 3 at the same time.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)pnwmom
(110,316 posts)hear it, I explained to my sons when they were in high school that real sex with real women would be very different from the online images, which are mostly designed to appeal to male fantasies.
Research also says that watching porn conditions people to expect constant newness. That can interfere with committed relationships with real people.
Thank you for posting about this.
http://www.gq.com/story/10-reasons-why-you-should-quit-watching-porn
emulatorloo
(46,155 posts)And they think they can't please a woman unless they have a 9" penis. That makes them feel very insecure about approaching women. They believe they will be ridiculed.
However once they get a little sexual experience they are able to get past that delusion.
tymorial
(3,433 posts)at a basketball game. God I felt for that dude.
emulatorloo
(46,155 posts)Yeah that's pretty harsh.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Tell them to try watching it on their phones. Then they will think all humans are two inches tall, and they will feel invincible.
emulatorloo
(46,155 posts)Response to pnwmom (Reply #16)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
Blue_Adept
(6,500 posts)You didn't get the guidance you needed.
I end up watching a couple of hours of porn a day through a combination of work and pleasure. Father of two, healthy relationships and friendships, no problems interacting with women as friends and colleagues, etc.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Blue_Adept
(6,500 posts)trotsky
(49,533 posts)Response to Blue_Adept (Reply #21)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
Blue_Adept
(6,500 posts)It's so incredibly consistent that it's like the Super Bowl of DU. But not on primary years. So much of the energy is poured into GDP.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)IIRC that ran to more than 600 posts. Seldom outside of a Repig debate has there been more dumbth gathered in one place.
Response to hifiguy (Reply #135)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
tabasco
(22,974 posts)I had no idea.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)MindPilot
(12,693 posts)pintobean
(18,101 posts)
Response to jberryhill (Reply #34)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
Nay
(12,051 posts)the door buzzard treatment.
Skittles
(172,533 posts)trotsky
(49,533 posts)Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)I feel so dirty.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)You are complaining about porn and then rail against "the puritanical standards" in our society. There's a disconnect there; I'll let you figure it out.
Cassiopeia
(2,603 posts)My guess is the disconnect goes a lot deeper than just those two issues.
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)bemildred
(90,061 posts)mhatrw
(10,786 posts)Doing so is a sure sign that your standards are far too low.
bobthedrummer
(26,083 posts)Chapter 21-Omaha
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1016139460
zazen
(2,978 posts)but I sincerely appreciate your bringing this up.
Please google Robert Jensen (he's a professor at UT Austin), who has some wonderful contemporary work on the effect of pornography on male sexuality (beginning with his own).
JI7
(93,835 posts)To porn was magazines ? Porn is available on the internet. And it's one reason most are going out of business.
MindPilot
(12,693 posts)I almost thought you were serious until I got to that line. Well, except for the part about cruising construction sites for discarded copies of Swank.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)DefenseLawyer
(11,101 posts)
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Merely accurate observation and prophecy.
bdwker
(435 posts)just kidding
Dr. Strange
(26,058 posts)Thanks to that franchise, I'm am completely distrustful of anyone/anything that has traveled here from the future.
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)In fact I did a search for Dr Who on Facebook and Ben Carson came up. Which proves my suspicions ...!
MindPilot
(12,693 posts)Imagine wandering into a police call box and finding Ben Carson?
Now i have to go get my brain washed.
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)MindPilot
(12,693 posts)The Daleks are definitely Republican; you can tell by the way they get all giddy and spin around at the mere mention of death and destruction.
Now that I think about it, Trump is actually running for Emperor Dalek. He's a little too ugly and slimy, but they could accept him as one of their own.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)closeupready
(29,503 posts)Codeine
(25,586 posts)LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)Come back before it's too late.
sarisataka
(22,779 posts)wait a minute. Porn found in construction sites ruined your high school sex life? What age did you start exploring construction sites for porn?
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)I chortled.
H2O Man
(79,202 posts)the movie "The Wizard of Oz" scared me. One day, after consuming a pickled beet on an immature golf course, I swear that I heard "the call of the wild." Yet, looking back from the high hill of my old age, I realize this was no excuse for shop-lifting. Hence, my goal is to appear on Dr. Phil, to discuss if blaming my parents is an acceptable course of action. I mean, I could read yesterday's newspaper, but I'm not confident that "the answer" could be found -- except possibly in the horror-scopes. To this day, I can't drink a bottle of cough syrup without having the number "purple" flash in my mind, like a flashback from watching the Ed Sullivan show.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)tymorial
(3,433 posts)While I agree that sex education ought to be in every school, the rest of this post is odd.
Kaleva
(40,409 posts)CommonSenseDemocrat
(377 posts)I'm not saying you're advocating for that, but I don't want this discussion thread to come to the conclusion that fundamentalists do. Porn has been healthy for my sexuality ... in my situation, alcohol not so much. I personally may now abstain from alcohol, but not porn, you maybe the other way around.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)"the puritanical standards that don't allow people to openly talk about sexual relationships..."
It seems many, many people feel completely free to openly discuss relationships. Additionally, discussions about sexual relationships are produced, marketed, distributed, viewed, downloaded, read, researched, sold, bought, consumed and even collected; so I'm not too sure what leads you to believe we maintain puritanical standards.
Relationship and sex advice/how-to's, along with pornography, are a multi-billion dollar industry.
dorkzilla
(5,141 posts)set an impossibly high standard for the men in my life. If you werent Han Solo I didnt want to date you. I probably rejected really nice guys because they werent Han Solo.
Somebody really needs to tell young women to suck it up and date anyone who wants to date them. Theyre only women after all, amirite?
(did I do that right??)
Hissyspit
(45,790 posts)dorkzilla
(5,141 posts)killbotfactory
(13,566 posts)Chiyo-chichi
(3,985 posts)Response to Chiyo-chichi (Reply #71)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
JHB
(38,303 posts)Makes just as much sense.
JonathanRackham
(1,604 posts)hunter
(40,814 posts)Some of my best stuff!
JonathanRackham
(1,604 posts)hunter
(40,814 posts)JonathanRackham
(1,604 posts)Hissyspit
(45,790 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)It was just the opposite for me, I wanted IN those pants after learning what was in them FROM porno mags!
So I guess it all depends on the individual and how they decide to have relationships with others.
But you can blame whatever it is that makes you feel better inside. When a women turns me down nowadays, I blame the moon.
If only my parents would have sat me down and told me about tidal forces.
RiffRandell
(5,909 posts)Sounds like you sabotaged yourself.
I had fantasy crushes on celebs in HS and still do but if I found a guy attractive which included personality, a sense of humor, things in common and who just happened to be hot that was good enough for me!
This is Leo's year; I just know he will win best actor for The Revenant...should sweep best director and picture, too!
Left2Tackle
(64 posts)"So much so that I often turned down the advances of females in high school whom I felt didn't live up to that sexy, voluptuous standard." ...said no teenage boy ever
pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)RandiFan1290
(6,711 posts)
The obvious trolling is very obvious.
aikoaiko
(34,214 posts)Vive la variation.
TheManInTheMac
(985 posts)Prism
(5,815 posts)My Catholic parents weren't exactly about to explain the choo choo's to their closeted son.
So the early internet was like being given man on man ikea instructions. Sure, sometimes you realize you've slotted something backwards and have to start all over, but it was nice to have a diagram to work from.
Hell, I still get ideas from it. It not only let me know what I might like, it also let me know what I would not. Consequently, I have never inadvertently wandered into a dungeon.
I think.
Because, some nights with the rum . . .
LuvNewcastle
(17,890 posts)I would have gone through a lot of needless trial and error if not for porn. Most of us are raised by straight people, so we have to look for alternative ways to learn what we need to know.
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)steve2470
(37,481 posts)said no heterosexual male teenager EVER. Cool story bro.
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)steve2470
(37,481 posts)Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)My entire high school was devoted to one thing...
"turn down female advances in high school"
Snicker
beevul
(12,194 posts)Would you proceed on advances made by someone that doesn't light your fire, as a teenager?
I never did, and I was as hopped up sexually as any kid that ever walked the face of the planet, and probably way way more. Not every guy is as simple as wanting to 'nail' everything with 2 legs and a heartbeat, hell, I don't even believe most guys are that way.
Now in my 40s, I'd still like 'it' 4-6 times a day, but wouldn't like it at all, or want it, with someone I'm not attracted to. My SO half-jokes with me that I don't have a sex drive, I have a sex overdrive...and while that is more or less true, it is generally nonexistent when it comes to my own personal criteria not being met with a partner, first.
On edit: I'm pretty sure that the moral of the story, is this:
Be acutely aware of what you want and don't want in a partner, and don't shortchange yourself or prospective partners by settling for less, because you'll both end up unhappy sooner or later.
steve2470
(37,481 posts)I know how male heterosexual teens are, and this is not even worth responding to. Ridiculous. Go on with your picky bad self.
beevul
(12,194 posts)You know better than everyone else? Your experiences are more valid than those of others?
Utterly ridiculous.
Good grief. In your view, anyone that doesn't set aside their own criteria for what they look for in a partner is "picky"?
Why should anyone in their right mind do that?
That's just asking for misery for someone, whether its you, or the partner that would be better off with someone who truly appreciates them.
On edit, you never did answer the question:
Would you proceed on advances made by someone that doesn't light your fire, as a teenager?
Put your money where your mouth is.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)Response to chalmers (Original post)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Ah, memories.
Response to jberryhill (Reply #127)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
Depaysement
(1,835 posts)Nothing beats making passionate love to a real woman. Nothing.
Response to Depaysement (Reply #107)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)Response to chalmers (Original post)
ecstatic This message was self-deleted by its author.
PersonNumber503602
(1,134 posts)I grew up in a world in which I had instantaneously access to porn for at least half my life. I can't say I suffer from any of the same ailments. I also know many people around my age and younger who grew up in similar circumstances, and they too have no problem having a healthly view of women. Perhaps porn is awful for you and you cannot handle it, but that's on you more than anything else. You seem to be figuring it out, but I think placing the blame on porn is a bit of a cop out.
As for our views on sex and sex education, I agree with you 100%.
ohnoyoudidnt
(1,858 posts)EVER!
former9thward
(33,424 posts)You win the award for the most fake story on DU today. A teenager wandering around a construction site and finding left over porn.
Marr
(20,317 posts)Evangelicals use this one all the time. They'll claim to have done all sorts of horrible, sinful things before they found Jesus, cleaned up their act, and saw the error of their ways. Then they're free to harangue everyone because they've 'been there' and they're only being honest about it, while you are in denial. They're generally full of shit, of course, and have lived more or less the same way the whole time-- but the conversion story is a always a good sales pitch.
Anyway, I realize you're trying to um... 'start a discussion', but, well...
friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)Bucky
(55,334 posts)I'm just saying steel beams ought to be riveted by men with steady hands, ya know?
Zorra
(27,670 posts)upon the majority of people's consciousness and existence on this planet since the first humans evolved.
Entire societies have been FUBAR since the dawn of human kind because of these egomaniacal charlatans.
uppityperson
(116,023 posts)Response to uppityperson (Reply #131)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
steve2470
(37,481 posts)He would have done far better simply to post an admiring yet critical photo of some supermodel in a news story.
steve2470
(37,481 posts)Coventina
(29,898 posts)Guess it's time to get my eyes checked!!!!
Response to Coventina (Reply #133)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
beevul
(12,194 posts)You're focusing on incidentals, and ignoring reality.
Reality is this:
You like what you like, you're attracted to what you're attracted to, the reasons are generally beside the point.
If you're settling for less than what you like or what you're attracted to, you are doing both yourself and the partner you should never have had a dis-service, and that's on you. All of it.
I've seen similar discussions about relationships where one partner has a super high libido, and one an almost nonexistent libido. So the partner with the high sex drive turns to porn, gets caught watching it by the low drive partner, and gets hit with the 'that's why your drive is so high" accusation, which is equally nonsensical. If you know your partner has a low libido and you marry them, you essentially agreed to be a participant to whatever misery it leads to.
If you're into sex and kink and people with bodies like porn stars, and you settle for less in a relationship, remember: YOU have settled for less. Find someone who fits your attractiveness criteria who likes porn too (yes Virginia, there are women who like porn as much as guys, and sometimes even more), and your problem would seem solved.
Forget porn, relationship troubles would be far far more reduced, if people were better matched libido wise, though I'm not sure how exactly that could be accomplished. "Hi, my name is X and I love to get it on three times a day, once before breakfast, how about you" seems not to be something to say on a first date, though it may be among the most important things to be matched on, in a relationship.