Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 12:32 AM Jan 2016

What's the timeline on this Michigan lead poisoning?

It looks like they switched water supply in 2014?

When did they know there was a problem?
When did he put in those city managers And does it look like he put them in to cover this up?

It seems to have taken a very long time for them to ask for outside help. It looks like they didn't want anyone else in and were hoping to somehow just cover it up or something. To me the crime isn't so much that this happened but that it was allowed to continue just to save his own ass.

Anyone have some simple basics you can share?

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What's the timeline on this Michigan lead poisoning? (Original Post) 2pooped2pop Jan 2016 OP
I googled it for you. I used "Flint water timeline." You can try it. valerief Jan 2016 #1
Incompetence at best. moondust Jan 2016 #2

valerief

(53,235 posts)
1. I googled it for you. I used "Flint water timeline." You can try it.
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 01:45 AM
Jan 2016
http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/flint-water-crisis/bad-decisions-broken-promises-timeline-flint-water-crisis-n499641

After the switch, the corrosive Flint river water totally fucked up the pipes, so the pipes are fucked up even after they switched back to Detroit water.

moondust

(21,286 posts)
2. Incompetence at best.
Wed Jan 20, 2016, 02:15 AM
Jan 2016

Appears to be all about money, which isn't surprising from Republicans. When altering a public utility like a city's water supply affecting thousands of people, I'd think you'd first want to do thorough testing to study the water itself as well as the condition of the pipes, pumps, and other infrastructure. But for that you'd need to use scientists and experts rather than political hacks and profiteers; too bad for anyplace under the control of moneygrubbing Republicans.

I can't imagine anybody would want to shower or bathe in that crap, much less use it for cooking.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What's the timeline on th...