General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsForget Watergate. Did Nixon have a gay affair with a Mafia fixer?
snip
A new biography by Don Fulsom, a veteran Washington reporter who covered the Nixon years, suggests the 37th U.S. President had a serious drink problem, beat his wife and by the time he was inaugurated in 1969 had links going back two decades to the Mafia, including with New Orleans godfather Carlos Marcello, then America's most powerful mobster.
Yet the most extraordinary claim is that the homophobic Nixon may have been gay himself. If true, it would provide a fascinating insight into the motivation and behaviour of a notoriously secretive politician.
Fulsom argues that Nixon may have had an affair with his best friend and confidant, a Mafia connected Florida wheeler-dealer named Charles 'Bebe' Rebozo who was even more crooked than Nixon.
snip
Fulsom uses recently revealed documents and eyewitness interviews including with FBI agents to shed new light on long-standing suspicions among White House insiders that Nixon may have been more than just good buddies with Rebozo.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2078822/Did-Nixon-gay-affair-Mafia-fixer-Forget-Watergate-A-new-book-claims-Americas-corrupt-President-hid-far-personal-scandal-.html#ixzz1hkme50iJ
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Nixon was one of the most uptight people who ever lived.
Rebozo's many Mob connections are pretty well documented in Anthony Summers' Nixon bio "The Arrogance of Power" which I just happen to be currently re-reading. Fascinating stuff.
no_hypocrisy
(54,871 posts)originalpckelly
(24,382 posts)when he procreated he budded off and a new nixon was made.
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)and his own office and a security clearance that allowed him to go in and out without being logged by the secret service. That alone is shocking.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2078822/Did-Nixon-gay-affair-Mafia-fixer-Forget-Watergate-A-new-book-claims-Americas-corrupt-President-hid-far-personal-scandal-.html#ixzz1hkpO4WbE
MorningGlow
(15,758 posts)The more things change blah blah blah...

(I have no idea why Monica is in the title of this graphic.)
Enrique
(27,461 posts)relevant? documented? true? who knows?
Far-fetched? No, imho.
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)would make anyone uptight.
DURHAM D
(33,053 posts)In fact, I remember reading a story about Nixon before he was elected President that he played "drop the soap" with Bebe. That was the first time I ever heard that reference.
And, JFTR - we would like to give Nixon back and trade for a first round draft pick.
comipinko
(541 posts)snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)DURHAM D
(33,053 posts)But I do remember how embarrassed my father was when I asked him (and he answered) what "drop the soap" meant.
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)11 Bravo
(24,305 posts)snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)I can report I'm no longer mystified.
edbermac
(16,439 posts)
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)innuendo so if he was involved with Rebozo I don't think it's far fetched to assume this is why his nickname was Tricky Dick.
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)and exposed a lot of things however Pat Nixon had to deal with Dick in Bed and I think that was enough for all of humanity.
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)was a closeted homosexual and he utterly destroyed his wife emotionally. On the surface an easy going guy, in private a sadistic misogynist. There is nothing humorous about people who use others to achieve their personal ambitions.
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)He was from my era. He was a twisted, petty individual who should have gone to prison. Fulsom was a very good reporter so who knows?
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)of a certain age" wrote a piece about the Velvet (gay) Mafia and its presence in Washington. I believe the contributor handle was Pangreig Pierce. Anyway that piece came to mind when I saw this story.
11 Bravo
(24,305 posts)Nixon would be anathema to the Republican party for being "too liberal"? That's how far to the right those whack jobs have swung!
NYC Liberal
(20,453 posts)war-hawk wing of today's GOP and teabaggers.
I suspect he would be a birther and part of the "Obama is a Muslim" contingent, too. He might be smart enough not to be too overt or public about it, but I have little doubt he'd be on that side.
11 Bravo
(24,305 posts)to establish a negative income tax, his devotion to affirmative action, and the policies of detente with the Soviet Union, and normalization of relations with the PRC would almost certainly have been met with scorn and derision in today's Repuke party.
(Don't get me wrong, Nixon was a prick. My point is that today's Republicans are so far out there that they should not be allowed in public unless they are muzzled and leashed.)
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)
What and who followed was an increasing array of arrogance and lies. .... yea, its gotten very bad when we have Nixon as someone that looks like some of today's moderate politicians.
If Nixon had gone to jail it might have stopped some of the shit and decay we've seen of this nation over the decades.
DURHAM D
(33,053 posts)at the link: http://dirtypolitics.50megs.com/dirty.htm
newspeak
(4,847 posts)the lives he destroyed; only to find out after his death, his little secrets.
xchrom
(108,903 posts)
Liberal Veteran
(22,239 posts)pintobean
(18,101 posts)It's an irrelevant double edged sword.
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)To not see the contemptible duplicitious callous self serving narcissism is shocking.
Dreamer Tatum
(10,996 posts)pintobean
(18,101 posts)newspeak
(4,847 posts)A DU thread some time ago discussed a man in a european prison who claimed the mafia killed JFK. And, ruby was no friend to the kennedys and had mob connections.
Jello Biafra
(439 posts)MineralMan
(151,180 posts)a lot of credence, really. It borders on conspiracy theory garbage, frankly. Anyone can write anything, even frank untruths.
The bottom line is that we are not ever going to find out if this is true or not.
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)MineralMan
(151,180 posts)I'm not someone who takes everything written by a biographer as the truth, necessarily. Why this did not emerge earlier, if it's true, would be one of my primary questions for this biographer. Given the nature of national politics, I'd have thought a story as devastating as this to Nixon would have surfaces long ago, if it was indeed true.
Believing everything written in a biography just isn't a smart thing to do. Unless such blockbuster information is corroborated elsewhere, I'm very skeptical about its truth.
Richard M. Nixon was a horrible little man and a terrible President. That does not mean that I accept everything written about him, especially major disclosures that have not surfaced before.
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)took to surface is not unusal. How many years did Deep Throat wait until he was willijng to go public.
MineralMan
(151,180 posts)However, it would take more information than a biography to convince me of this. Besides, I don't really care about Nixon's sexual activities one bit. They are irrelevant to the issues of his Presidency, to be quite frank.
In any case, if this were true, it would have been used against Nixon long ago, since nothing of this sort can be completely hidden and there's always someone willing to blow the whistle on such a story.
So, yes, I doubt the veracity of the biographer, but would have to read the biography to see how it was framed, and I have no interest whatsoever in a biography of Richard Nixon. I already know more about him than I care to.
newspeak
(4,847 posts)however, I do care more about any mob connection. Now, if nixon was one of today's bogus "family" values repugs, I'd care because of the hypocrisy.
MineralMan
(151,180 posts)time. Bebe Rebozo was an unsavory character, to say the least.
hughee99
(16,113 posts)snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)Fulsom is not a 2 bit hack journalist though I imgine that is the tactic repukes will be using to discredit Fulsom.
hughee99
(16,113 posts)Fulsom may not be a two bit hack, but the story will amount to little more than speculation.
Nixon will be just another in a long line of famous world leaders who had a "secret gay relationship". While it's not necessarily always false, it's virtually always done to sell books.
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)other closeted US presidents had boyfriend's who were mob enforcers, had alcoholic and drug addicted wives who they beat?
hughee99
(16,113 posts)that he was closeted or it was his boyfriend is speculation.
I'll bet his wife wasn't the first addicted to drugs or alcohol, nor was she the first to be beaten.
originalpckelly
(24,382 posts)UTUSN
(77,690 posts)snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)As I mentioned below, I had an uncle who was a closeted homosexual who utterly destroyed his wife. He was unbelievably cruel. His wife who was a devout Catholic confided in her MIL but my grandmother vilified her as did my mohter, my uncle's only sibling. In their minds my aunt was utterly insane. Pat Nixon would not have just been beaten but emotionally tortured as well by the fucker.
UTUSN
(77,690 posts)whether calling it "gossip" (the word does NOT equate with UNtruth) is the syndrome of not wanting to admit the humanity of minority groups (whether Gay, Hispanic, Black, whatever) by acknowledging that nobody is exempt from the despicable end of the spectrum of behavior.
In our Dem confederation of sub-groups, whether of ethnicity or race or social justice or union or whatever, if any of our Dems is guilty of horrendous acts of criminality or breaches against humanity, we Dems should be the first to disown them. They cannot be "saved" by their being members of one of the Dem constituent sub-groups. The label of any sub-group is not a bad word, but membership in that group is not a free pass.
barbtries
(31,298 posts)j edgar hoover, yes. nixon, mmmm....i dunno.
nor, frankly, do i care. watergate was far worse.
but then again, it's not the alleged behavior: it's the HYPOCRISY.
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)who teaches a course about Watergate destroy his reputation by printing unsubstiatiated rumors?
barbtries
(31,298 posts)i'm not familiar with him. maybe it's true.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)"... what's going on with those who are dismissing the story whether calling it "gossip" (the word does NOT equate with UNtruth) is the syndrome of not wanting to admit the humanity of minority groups (whether Gay, Hispanic, Black, whatever) by acknowledging that nobody is exempt from the despicable end of the spectrum of behavior.
In our Dem confederation of sub-groups, whether of ethnicity or race or social justice or union or whatever, if any of our Dems is guilty of horrendous acts of criminality or breaches against humanity, we Dems should be the first to disown them. They cannot be "saved" by their being members of one of the Dem constituent sub-groups. The label of any sub-group is not a bad word, but membership in that group is not a free pass."
valerief
(53,235 posts)WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)and JFK's assassination. Very much an eyeopener.
dflprincess
(29,335 posts)and one of her sisters speculating on this relationship a long time ago.
HillWilliam
(3,310 posts)hit my squick limit. Ew. Just ew.

