Fri Feb 5, 2016, 09:39 AM
MrChuck (279 posts)
A theory on GOP strategy.This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by In_The_Wind (a host of the General Discussion forum). The way it works: Allow Sanders to put up enough of a challenge that all of Clinton's scar tissue stretches to the point of reopening political wounds. Help out by running subtle "proSanders" ads in primary states. The conventional wisdom is still that Sanders shows well but comes up short. When Clinton wins the Dem nomination then lower the boom on an indictment. She's finished. Kapow. Just a theory. I'm not a conspiratologist, just a Democrat who wants to win. Vote Sanders and avoid regret.
|
19 replies, 4115 views
Cannot reply in locked threads
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
MrChuck | Feb 2016 | OP |
randome | Feb 2016 | #1 | |
malaise | Feb 2016 | #2 | |
MrChuck | Feb 2016 | #3 | |
Pakid | Feb 2016 | #15 | |
malaise | Feb 2016 | #17 | |
B Calm | Feb 2016 | #4 | |
MrChuck | Feb 2016 | #5 | |
B Calm | Feb 2016 | #6 | |
MrChuck | Feb 2016 | #7 | |
B Calm | Feb 2016 | #9 | |
MrChuck | Feb 2016 | #12 | |
B Calm | Feb 2016 | #13 | |
MrChuck | Feb 2016 | #14 | |
B Calm | Feb 2016 | #16 | |
emulatorloo | Feb 2016 | #8 | |
MrChuck | Feb 2016 | #10 | |
1939 | Feb 2016 | #18 | |
ladjf | Feb 2016 | #11 | |
In_The_Wind | Feb 2016 | #19 |
Response to MrChuck (Original post)
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 09:41 AM
randome (34,845 posts)
1. "Strategy", did you say? STRATEGY?
![]() ![]() ![]() From the likes of Reince Preibus? ![]() [hr][font color="blue"][center]TECT in the name of the Representative approves of this post.[/center][/font][hr] |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to MrChuck (Original post)
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 09:42 AM
malaise (257,075 posts)
2. Trick and trick and they fail
Last edited Fri Feb 5, 2016, 10:20 AM - Edit history (1) The GOP are irrational and they only fool the most ignorant and gullible.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to malaise (Reply #2)
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 09:45 AM
MrChuck (279 posts)
3. Those are the only ones they have to fool. eom.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to malaise (Reply #2)
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 10:12 AM
Pakid (478 posts)
15. Who seem to also be the one who do most of the voting
since the GOP seem to be winning based on who controls both the house and senate along with a whole bunch of states. Time for us to stop fighting and get together and work to change that.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Pakid (Reply #15)
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 10:22 AM
malaise (257,075 posts)
17. Until gerrymandering
and denying people their right to vote is stopped, they will continue to rig elections.
Start there. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to MrChuck (Original post)
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 09:48 AM
B Calm (28,762 posts)
4. Wrong forum.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to B Calm (Reply #4)
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 09:49 AM
MrChuck (279 posts)
5. Suggest another
Or get lost.
That's pedantry. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to MrChuck (Reply #5)
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 09:50 AM
B Calm (28,762 posts)
6. GDP
But you already should have known that.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to B Calm (Reply #6)
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 09:52 AM
MrChuck (279 posts)
7. Republicans do not run against Dems in a primary.
GOP Strategy against Dems reflects a General Election tactic.
But you already should have known that. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to MrChuck (Reply #7)
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 09:56 AM
B Calm (28,762 posts)
9. You can put republicans in your post, but it's still a divisive post to
divide the Democratic party.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to B Calm (Reply #9)
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 10:04 AM
MrChuck (279 posts)
12. I respectfully disagree
but I sense that you might not care.
Too often DUers are ultra-sensitive to this notion that supporting one primary candidate over another is divisive when, in reality, all of us would like nothing more than for all Democrats to be united. We are all trying to figure out how to win and advance the Progressive agenda, right? |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to MrChuck (Reply #12)
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 10:07 AM
B Calm (28,762 posts)
13. I support Bernie too, but we do have rules for this forum.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to B Calm (Reply #13)
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 10:12 AM
MrChuck (279 posts)
14. What does it serve you or anyone else
to engage in pedantics?
Have the discussion or get lost, with all due respect. Send it to jury if it's a violation. Personally, I think these discussions need to happen between Democrats NOW. You can choose to police this forum or you can have a substantive commentary. Up to you. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to MrChuck (Reply #14)
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 10:12 AM
B Calm (28,762 posts)
16. Okay!
Last edited Fri Feb 5, 2016, 11:16 AM - Edit history (1) Chances are you won't get a hide, but more like a thread lock. I myself think like Bernie I don't give a damn about Hillary's emails!
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to MrChuck (Original post)
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 09:54 AM
emulatorloo (41,937 posts)
8. The Republlican party doesn't have the power to indict anybody.
They are a political party, not a grand jury.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to emulatorloo (Reply #8)
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 09:58 AM
MrChuck (279 posts)
10. Riiiight
Because that's not how things work.
I understand what you're saying and you're not incorrect, you're just wrong. She will be torpedoed in a general. Sanders is less vulnerable. All they can do against him is lie. They can trash Hillary with the truth, or a certain version of it anyway. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to emulatorloo (Reply #8)
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 10:30 AM
1939 (1,683 posts)
18. Loretta Lynch, the AG, is the one who has to indict
Do you see her indicting the Democratic nominee during a general election campaign?
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to MrChuck (Original post)
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 09:59 AM
ladjf (17,320 posts)
11. My opinion is that Sanders and Clinton don't need to go after each
other, any more. They need to concentrate on pointing out the weaknesses of the Republican candidates. Then the Democrats can decide which of the two Dem candidates is doing the best job of pointing out the weaknesses of the Republican Candidates, strategy and history.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to MrChuck (Original post)
Fri Feb 5, 2016, 04:56 PM
In_The_Wind (72,300 posts)
19. Locking
Statement of Purpose
Discuss politics, issues, and current events. Posts about Israel/Palestine, religion, guns, showbiz, or sports are restricted in this forum. Posts about the Democratic primaries, conspiracy theories and disruptive meta-discussion are forbidden. [img] ![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads