General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe SCOTUS Nominee the GOP FEAR the most: Tino Cuellar
[font color="red" size="14"]The GOPs Worst Nightmare SCOTUS Nominee[/font]
Tino Cuellar. California Supreme Court Associate Justice. Mexican-American. Harvard. Yale. Stanford. How many Latino votes you think the GOPd get if they block him?

Yes, yes; Barack Obama should choose the person best qualified for the job with whom he is most intellectually comfortable. But should that person be Mariano Florentino Cuellar, there could be plenty of benefits aside from having a brilliant, young, Latino person on the Court.
Cuellar, 43, is an associate justice on Californias State Supreme Court. He was born in Mexico. He is a naturalized U.S. citizen. He grew up on the border, and his family moved to Californias Imperial Valley when he was a teenager. He was smart and decided he wanted an education. He got one, all right. Get this resume: undergrad, Harvard; law school, Yale; masters and doctoral degrees, Stanford.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/02/15/the-gop-s-worst-nightmare-scotus-nominee.html
Johnyawl
(3,210 posts)Orrex
(67,093 posts)I'm nor familiar with the honorable judge Cuellar, but he sounds like a terrific choice from what I'm now reading.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)This will send the GOPers into complete chaos.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)A solid win for us should President Obama choose him as his nominee. I would love to see how Republicans spin in circles trying to deny him. This should be a high-profile battle so all Mexican-Americans will see how Republicans really think about them.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)I suspect our President is looking at this guy very seriously and probably has already made up his mind.
This could be very very good for us. The GOP will be torn on whether to just go ahead and approve him to make sure this doesnt carry over to the November or to block him and take the consequences. I cannot imagine there will be any sort of consensus on that since its entirely a judgement call.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)for slicing and dicing before being rejected -- all for political maneuvering. Someone that liberal would never be approved, and I've never heard of a name once rejected being re-submitted. But maybe he'd be willing to throw himself on the Judiciary Committee sword anyway.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)We shall see.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)was the best current guess of a writer on Scotusblog for (first) nominee, who would eventually be voted down, then on to "slow-walk" a second second until they could claim it was too late to act on the nomination. Let's hope he's wrong.
LonePirate
(14,367 posts)Cuellar or any female nominee like Kamala Harris would be ideal.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)Barbara Boxer is retiring.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)B Calm
(28,762 posts)BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)B Calm
(28,762 posts)BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)B Calm
(28,762 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)Me too.
flamingdem
(40,885 posts)As President Obama moves to replace the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, the vow by Senate Republicans to block any nominee is providing him with a powerful incentive to focus on more liberal candidates.
Often, particularly when facing a Senate controlled by the other party, a president will seek a nominee who has bipartisan appeal. But if Republicans hold to their position of refusing to confirm anyone before the election, that sort of cross-party appeal has less utility.
With abortion, climate change, gun control, religious liberty and union rights all among the issues that have crowded onto the court's docket of late, the stakes are high. Both sides have begun setting the grounds for an all-out political battle.
Democrats see a chance to have a liberal majority on the high court for the first time in more than four decades. Republicans fear the loss of a court that, despite some left-leaning rulings on issues such as same-sex marriage, has mostly stood as a conservative bulwark.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Justice Cuellar or Justice Goodwin Liu would both be excellent choices.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)But I believe Tino Cuellar would be the one to stop the obstructionism and annihilate Senate Republicans' threat to not allow President Obama to fill Scalia's seat, and this would allow President Obama to get his nominee through since they're terrified of losing the Mexican-American vote for TWO lifetimes.
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)Cuellar would really cancel Roberts. The answer to as who would be the nominee,lies with Al Fromm,and other insiders within the White House. Whom ever we would like or recommend here on DU would not penetrate the centrists within the White House.
SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)...
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Thanks.
NV Whino
(20,886 posts)But he may have Americanized it, so who knows?
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)longship
(40,416 posts)That would be a real rope-a-dope. Plus, undoubtedly would be a great choice.
Both criteria should be considered. We need to win this one.
I like this!
R&
wheniwasincongress
(1,307 posts)As short as this week, or in the coming weeks/months?
phylny
(8,818 posts)I'm not a minority, but a white middle-aged woman. I'm politically aware. I have no way of judging the mindset of Hispanic Americans or any other group, so I'm asking honestly.
WHY do we think the Senate refusing to confirm a nominee such as Justice Cuellar or Loretta Lynch or any person of color would motivate one or more groups? Is there precedent for this? Will people pay attention enough to care?
Thanks for educating me