Founded for the Poor, Mass General Looks to the Wealthy
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/14/your-money/founded-for-the-poor-mass-general-looks-to-the-wealthy.html?ref=health
Can a hospital founded more than 200 years ago to treat the poor also adopt a form of medicine some criticize as health care for the rich?
The answer may come in August, when Massachusetts General Hospital, the third-oldest general hospital in the nation, plans to open a concierge medicine practice.
Based in Boston, the hospital, whose $800 million annual research budget is among the nations biggest, is affiliated with Harvard Medical School and is perennially ranked No. 1 in many categories of U.S. News & World Reports listings of the countrys best hospitals.
Despite its reputation, Mass General as it is known was established in 1811 to care for the citys poor and indigent. Patients in concierge medicine are likely to be anything but that.
The idea of wealthy people paying doctors a retainer for exclusive service is not new. With concierge medicine, which was introduced in the 1990s, patients pay physicians a monthly or annual retainer and expect more personalized care and greater access. A concierge patient who signs up for a practice is not only looking for quality care, they are looking for unfettered access to their provider, said Dr. Michael R. Jaff, the medical director of Mass Generals Center for Specialized Services and a professor at Harvard Medical School.
Comment by Don McCanne of PNHP: Say it isnt true. Mass General? Concierge hospital? Two-tier medicine? Selling the front of the queue to the wealthy?
Is the payment of a bribe to gain better health care access access ethical just because Mass General has given its stamp of approval?
They say the money will help support their mission to the community at large, but how does pushing the entire queue back by giving the wealthy a ticket to butt in in front of everyone else help those with low or moderate incomes?
It gives a new meaning to triage. As we organize the delivery of care based on need and urgency, we now have a new paramount guideline, Let the money in first!
Under a more egalitarian single payer system, at least the bribes would not be so flagrant.