Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"Jesus and me? We go way back!" . . . Please come CAPTION Bill O'Reilly!!!

Bill ("Gumming up the cerebral cortex for over fifty years"
**********************************************************
Above CAPTION based on the following O'Reilly transcript at News Hounds:
http://www.newshounds.us/o_reilly_lectures_the_pope_about_christianity_and_immigration_022216
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Jesus and me? We go way back!" . . . Please come CAPTION Bill O'Reilly!!! (Original Post)
skip fox
Feb 2016
OP
Me sanctimonious? Nah I just include the Pope in my "...and other stuff" file
underpants
Feb 2016
#3
Johonny
(26,183 posts)1. And finally, Satan, I would very much like to speak with him.
Now my next guest needs no introduction, Ted Cruz...
underpants
(196,502 posts)2. Pope says, "Bill, have your people contact Kim Davis's people...
they know how to make things happen"
underpants
(196,502 posts)3. Me sanctimonious? Nah I just include the Pope in my "...and other stuff" file
skip fox
(19,502 posts)4. Bill-o is saying:
"If the Pope wants to see me, I suggest he have his people petition my people for an audience. . . . I can tell you right now I'd be very receptive to the idea."
skip fox
(19,502 posts)5. Bil-O is saying:
"And since we know how Scalia would have voted on all the cases before the court presently, the logical next step would be to allow those cases to be voted on by the surviving members and then accept Scalia's intended vote. . . . In fact, since we know how he would have voted on nearly everything, and realizing he should have lived at least another 20 years, why . . ."