"Health care is not a right"
A doctor said this.
The Republican party is fucking vile.
= new reply since forum marked as read
Historically when we've talked about rights we've talked about preventing another's actions: my right to life means someone can't kill me; my right to speech means a government can't censor me. A right to healthcare implies requiring that a provider provide it. That's the extreme statement of the argument, at least (Rand Paul goes as far as to say it would "enslave doctors"
.
That said, we're fairly comfortable with the idea of a "right to education", which does imply a requirement that educators educate; I think this becomes a political problem with health care because the economics suggest that doctors will end up having to make about what teachers make (and, for that matter, that's pretty much what we see in a lot of European countries -- doctors' and teachers' salaries are comparable, even if doctors make somewhat more). Similarly, we have a "right to counsel" in criminal trials, and that does mean requiring that public defenders defend people, and the results haven't exactly been spectacular.
are natural rights. You can't take them away except by force.
Speech rights, assembly, press, religion. Right to be secure in one's home (no forceful entry without a warrant, for example). No forceful quartering of soldiers (not that we have to worry about that. 
) Right against self incrimination. (You can't be forced by torture, imprisonment, or whatever for failure to incriminate yourself.) Right to private property. Right to self defense. Equality.
You can't take these rights away except by force of one type or another (and I'm sure I'm missing some.)
Obviously, civilized societies declare many other rights for their citizens like education, healthcare, etc., but these rights are paid for by taxation, so if the country goes bankrupt tomorrow, these rights would be in peril, where natural rights shouldn't be.
Peace.
===============
