Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Meldread

(4,213 posts)
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 06:30 PM Feb 2016

Melissa Harris-Perry’s Email to Her Staff (This is Absolutely Shocking)

You can read the e-mail in full here.


...

Some unknown decision-maker, presumably Andy Lack or Phil Griffin, has added my name to this spreadsheet, but nothing has changed in the posture of the MSNBC leadership team toward me or toward our show. Putting me on air seems to be a decision being made solely to save face because there is a growing chorus of questions from our viewers about my notable absence from MSNBC coverage. Social media has noted the dramatic change in editorial tone and racial composition of MSNBC’s on-air coverage. In addition, Dylan Byers of CNN has made repeated inquiries with MSNBC’s leadership and with me about the show and what appears to be its cancellation. I have not responded to reporters or social media inquiries. However, I am not willing to appear on air in order to quell concerns about the disappearance of our show and our voice.

...

The purpose of this decision seems to be to provide cover for MSNBC, not to provide voice for MHP Show. I will not be used as a tool for their purposes. I am not a token, mammy, or little brown bobble head. I am not owned by Lack, Griffin, or MSNBC. I love our show. I want it back. I have wept more tears than I can count and I find this deeply painful, but I don’t want back on air at any cost. I am only willing to return when that return happens under certain terms.

...

I have stayed in the same hotels where MSNBC has been broadcasting in Iowa, in New Hampshire, and in South Carolina, yet I have been shut out from coverage. I have a PhD in political science and have taught American voting and elections at some of the nation’s top universities for nearly two decades, yet I have been deemed less worthy to weigh in than relative novices and certified liars. I have hosted a weekly program on this network for four years and contributed to election coverage on this network for nearly eight years, but no one on the third floor has even returned an email, called me, or initiated or responded to any communication of any kind from me for nearly a month. It is profoundly hurtful to realize that I work for people who find my considerable expertise and editorial judgment valueless to the coverage they are creating.

While MSNBC may believe that I am worthless, I know better. I know who I am. I know why MHP Show is unique and valuable. I will not sell short myself or this show. I am not hungry for empty airtime. I care only about substantive, meaningful, and autonomous work. When we can do that, I will return — not a moment earlier. I am deeply sorry for the ways that this decision makes life harder for all of you. You mean more to me than you can imagine.


Should there be a petition or boycott threatened against MSNBC over this treatment? Should we expand that boycott to be against Joe and Mika for their ass kissing of Trump, and demand for more liberal coverage and hosts throughout the network?
237 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Melissa Harris-Perry’s Email to Her Staff (This is Absolutely Shocking) (Original Post) Meldread Feb 2016 OP
Three words Fairgo Feb 2016 #1
Big charges require big proof. I don't think the "DNC" is pulling the strings at COMCAST. nt MADem Feb 2016 #6
Yeah, the DNC doesn't have that type of clout. Meldread Feb 2016 #15
+1. nt MADem Feb 2016 #27
MSNBC is not liberal. They just have a couple of liberals on it. It's corporate media. bjobotts Feb 2016 #148
We shall see... Fairgo Feb 2016 #29
I would never bet on your silly knee-jerk response to implicate the DNC riversedge Feb 2016 #102
MSNBCDNCCNNRNC Inc. Pablum for the masses Fairgo Feb 2016 #124
DNC? WTF? Have you not paid attention, Comcast has been dismantling the network themaguffin Feb 2016 #107
In the best long con, the Mark gladly hands over the money and cheers for the home team Fairgo Feb 2016 #125
I Agree Liberty Sage Feb 2016 #175
Neither do I. This just goes alone with the overall rightward shift of their coverage . . . brush Feb 2016 #112
How naive to not recognize that the Big Money will buy everything they can to bring down rhett o rick Feb 2016 #141
Executive VP of Comcast is a Hillary bundler/fundraiser CoffeeCat Feb 2016 #157
What a surprise, Not. appalachiablue Feb 2016 #184
Comcast & NBC Universal contribute, along with Kittycat Feb 2016 #202
Thanks for that info Babel_17 Feb 2016 #204
Not strings... but aligned interests.... COMCAST owns MSNBC. The Roberts Family... FighttheFuture Feb 2016 #215
Comcast CEO fundraises for HRC NowSam Feb 2016 #219
Comcast surely sucks but the DNC has nothing to do with their suckage. nt MADem Feb 2016 #220
Just makes it more apparent that the DNC artislife Feb 2016 #36
No mcar Feb 2016 #69
Then why can you not hear what she has to say? Fairgo Feb 2016 #71
One word - COMCAST PatrickforO Feb 2016 #83
No that wouldn't make sense. She is a huge Clinton supporter, the DNC should love her. jillan Feb 2016 #94
More like Larkspur Feb 2016 #176
You are thinking too small. lark Feb 2016 #181
Fuck you msnbc, I may be done with you , i cant say no to Rachel yet, but that day may randys1 Feb 2016 #2
What is particularly disgusting... Meldread Feb 2016 #8
Exactly why I am furious. But Comcast is a rightwing company, so this is no surprise randys1 Feb 2016 #10
So far as the executives are concerned, sulphurdunn Feb 2016 #64
yeah, other than that i thought her reaction was a bit over the top redruddyred Feb 2016 #171
I'm getting close to it. Cleita Feb 2016 #14
I can barely watch Rachel anymore. Blue_In_AK Feb 2016 #65
Hayes is flat-out in Hillary's corner. Bohunk68 Feb 2016 #167
This ⬆️ agracie Feb 2016 #180
I can agree with you that the day of saying "no" to Rachel has not yet arrived. HubertHeaver Feb 2016 #22
Same for me. TryLogic Feb 2016 #52
That day arrived sometime ago for me. agracie Feb 2016 #178
JOE.... MrWendel Feb 2016 #3
Wow, I hope she has another job lined up. BillZBubb Feb 2016 #4
I believe she's a professor at Tulane. LoisB Feb 2016 #66
She's moved from New Orleans to Winston Salem. She teaches at Elon University. nolabear Feb 2016 #91
She's a professor at Wake Forest. Deadshot Feb 2016 #106
She has another job passiveporcupine Feb 2016 #92
She has a professorship at Wake Forest University here in town. Mira Feb 2016 #93
I'm confused ... Fantastic Anarchist Feb 2016 #129
Read her letter. Mira Feb 2016 #134
I did read the letter but was still confused. Fantastic Anarchist Feb 2016 #146
about a month ago i remember catching part of her show questionseverything Feb 2016 #212
Oh, you think she was dropped because criticized Clinton? Fantastic Anarchist Feb 2016 #235
The absence of MHP, and the promotion of Joe Scar, already pretty well "exposed" MH1 Feb 2016 #100
CNN should hire her. nt MADem Feb 2016 #5
Great idea except... DAMANgoldberg Feb 2016 #111
this part is interesting... Enrique Feb 2016 #7
Joe and Mika came to my mind immediately. lamp_shade Feb 2016 #12
Mine too. Meldread Feb 2016 #17
I was thinking Chuck Todd. Nt Fantastic Anarchist Feb 2016 #145
That little pissant wouldn't know what real journalism is Unknown Beatle Feb 2016 #217
There are even more than those two. nt artislife Feb 2016 #38
Must mean L'il Luke Russert. He's a relative AND a novice. Gidney N Cloyd Feb 2016 #18
ha, i like that Enrique Feb 2016 #28
This is more likely than Mika and (gag) Joe OldHippieChick Feb 2016 #47
What he do? Genuinely curious. Fantastic Anarchist Feb 2016 #147
Not sure what "he" you mean OldHippieChick Feb 2016 #196
I was referring to Steve Kornacki ... Fantastic Anarchist Feb 2016 #203
I see what you did there magical thyme Feb 2016 #55
! nt eppur_se_muova Feb 2016 #136
LOL GreenPartyVoter Feb 2016 #211
That stood out to me, too. dmr Feb 2016 #74
I immediately thought of Chris Mathews but all the others mentioned fit too n/t truthseeker1 Feb 2016 #162
Brian Williams SalviaBlue Feb 2016 #207
I didn't think of him until you mentioned him Gore1FL Feb 2016 #225
Yes, exactly. Meldread Feb 2016 #227
She is a treasure. I love MHP and love Nerd Land. myrna minx Feb 2016 #9
I am done with MSNBC, and with Rachel. I am grateful for a lot of good work she has done, however, thereismore Feb 2016 #11
Haven't watched Rachel Maddow's show since mid-January JimDandy Feb 2016 #39
Agreed. Rachel never met a topic that she couldn't beat to death LibDemAlways Feb 2016 #58
My husband and I laughed and laughed over your post! Duval Feb 2016 #67
Let me explain jberryhill Feb 2016 #156
Nailed it. vanlassie Feb 2016 #174
I was barely 2 sentences in when the voice in my head somehow changed to Rachel's. Nicely done! Gidney N Cloyd Feb 2016 #177
She started this the day after Keith Olbermann was discharged. earthshine Feb 2016 #72
Two time winner in 2010 and 2014 of the Golden Poo SwankyXomb Feb 2016 #140
Her commentary goes in more circles ... Fantastic Anarchist Feb 2016 #149
A Box of Cheerios.... LovingA2andMI Feb 2016 #161
Her let me take 12 minutes to give you a minutes worth of news segment stuff is why i don't watch TeamPooka Feb 2016 #78
Now that Obama's almost done MSNBC doesn't need her or Rev. Al anymore. nt TeamPooka Feb 2016 #80
I think she missed her calling. She should've been a preschool teacher. Grab your blankies - it's jillan Feb 2016 #97
I might try watching AC360, too. pacalo Feb 2016 #221
THANK YOU!!! I liked Rachel back when LiberalElite Feb 2016 #115
Rachel has sold her soul MissDeeds Feb 2016 #76
I only watch Rachel on election coverage. grasswire Feb 2016 #84
Good for MHP for standing up for her principles! Dark n Stormy Knight Feb 2016 #13
+100 narnian60 Feb 2016 #19
This is the huge difference for me between 2008 and now artislife Feb 2016 #40
I have to admit that I'm mostly tuning out this election. Dark n Stormy Knight Feb 2016 #49
Have a great week end yourself artislife Feb 2016 #75
All good points there. n/t JimDandy Feb 2016 #120
I agree with you! Fantastic Anarchist Feb 2016 #154
One word: Podcasts Rebkeh Feb 2016 #96
Could you point me toward some media sources and podcasts ? n/t agracie Feb 2016 #194
Here you go Rebkeh Feb 2016 #206
That's a great list, thanks! arikara Feb 2016 #213
Thank you very much. agracie Feb 2016 #222
I hate the Young Turks. I can't stand them. Meldread Feb 2016 #230
i love melissa and hate what the executives have done to her trueblue2007 Feb 2016 #16
Melissa has a solid reputation and credentials. She doesn't need Cleita Feb 2016 #20
well said oldandhappy Feb 2016 #24
Who does she support? passiveporcupine Feb 2016 #89
We never used to have a reason to ask who a news personality supported politically. JimDandy Feb 2016 #121
I personally don't care who she supports, passiveporcupine Feb 2016 #132
That would be a good assumption. JimDandy Feb 2016 #138
What difference would it make? gwheezie Feb 2016 #155
NO, She Was Very Complimentary Toward Hillary When I Last Saw ChiciB1 Feb 2016 #199
"I care only about substantive, meaningful, and autonomous work." OZi Feb 2016 #21
I'm having a fantasy oldandhappy Feb 2016 #23
MSNBC wants Trump on all freaking day. Kingofalldems Feb 2016 #25
The Head OR Heads Of MSNBC Are Big Supporters Of Hillary... ChiciB1 Feb 2016 #109
I watch MSNBC and they are all in for Trump. Kingofalldems Feb 2016 #113
(posted earlier in this thread) The Executive VP of Comcast is a Hillary bundler CoffeeCat Feb 2016 #158
I watch the network. Fundraiser or not Kingofalldems Feb 2016 #169
Thanks For The Links... I Knew I Saw These Somewhere, But ChiciB1 Feb 2016 #185
Ed Schultz is doing news on RT. So is Thom Hartmann. Manifestor_of_Light Feb 2016 #128
I have been watching Al Jazeera more and more. Bohunk68 Feb 2016 #168
Maybe You Might Want To Look At My Last Post Here... ChiciB1 Feb 2016 #190
I love Al Jazeera renate Feb 2016 #216
No. I have Dish TV. Manifestor_of_Light Feb 2016 #234
Yes, I Watch Him On RT, Along Thom Hartman And If ChiciB1 Feb 2016 #188
Fuck M$GOP, it's a propaganda tool. onecaliberal Feb 2016 #26
If Rachel reached out to her, MHP might not say so lostnfound Feb 2016 #31
Rachel has completely sold out to Hillary. IMO that says it all. She stands for nothing. onecaliberal Feb 2016 #32
Rachel Maddow is now a puupet for the execs at MSNBC=COMCAST INdemo Feb 2016 #48
LOL "the Hillary MVP Prize"! n/t JimDandy Feb 2016 #122
I watch her almost every night & that is not my impression whathehell Feb 2016 #163
Each One Of Us May Have Different Impressions, But I Saw It ChiciB1 Feb 2016 #192
That is true... whathehell Feb 2016 #210
Yes it is. Fairgo Feb 2016 #33
^^^^^^^THAT^^^^^^ onecaliberal Feb 2016 #37
So true. MHP has provided a wealth of in-depth stories and viewpoints for 4 years... sorechasm Feb 2016 #63
I knew this crap would happen MFM008 Feb 2016 #30
Follow the money Fairgo Feb 2016 #35
It is reminiscent of when H Post sold to AOL. nt artislife Feb 2016 #44
I dumped MSNBC when they ran off Olbermann Jarqui Feb 2016 #34
I get most of my news online as well... Meldread Feb 2016 #42
Rachel is not been impartial during this election season. She may as well ... agracie Feb 2016 #201
Well, Al Jazeera is going off the air but it's the same station that Cleita Feb 2016 #43
MSNBCDNCCNNRNC Inc. Pablum for the masses Fairgo Feb 2016 #41
I miss Olbermann. Manifestor_of_Light Feb 2016 #236
I hate the direction MSNBC is going aaaaaa5a Feb 2016 #45
The Obama era is ending, and with it..... SoCalDem Feb 2016 #46
MSNBC has been biased in their coverage so I can no longer watch. Sienna86 Feb 2016 #50
I miss her show... OneGrassRoot Feb 2016 #51
and with all respect to rachel DonCoquixote Feb 2016 #53
Melissa Harris-Perry! You are a favorite of mine. erlewyne Feb 2016 #54
Brilliant. zentrum Feb 2016 #56
Did they give a reason why they are shutting her out? Loudestlib Feb 2016 #57
No, she's been trying for a month.... Meldread Feb 2016 #105
Keeping her out of the debate is a way of keeping her numbers low. Loudestlib Feb 2016 #110
MSNBC is garbage. Melissa should start her own internet show it would be 8000 times better. Cheese Sandwich Feb 2016 #59
MSNBC sent a message to its hosts watoos Feb 2016 #60
Not to derail the thread, but to correct the record. LiberalAndProud Feb 2016 #153
a campaign against gagging mhp might be worthwhile barbtries Feb 2016 #61
MHP is the Best and Why MSNBC Loves Trump McKim Feb 2016 #62
Not a Big Melissa Harris Perry Fan BUT.... LovingA2andMI Feb 2016 #68
Wondering how long before Hillary gets blamed for this. How I know. nt Jitter65 Feb 2016 #88
Sure did not take long... LovingA2andMI Feb 2016 #114
You make some very good points... PoiBoy Feb 2016 #116
Rachel Is Not Walking Away For $7 Million Dollars.... LovingA2andMI Feb 2016 #123
They gave Joy her own show and then took it away so maybe MSNBC just has a problem with PoC? jillan Feb 2016 #164
That's about it. LovingA2andMI Feb 2016 #172
I stopped watching you and Msnbc 6 months ago Ernest T Feb 2016 #70
cannot imagine they feel the same way ellennelle Feb 2016 #87
Hence... Ernest T Feb 2016 #139
I am sickened by this, but not surprised. Comcast/right wing nt Duval Feb 2016 #73
Personally I advocate taking a big dump on your bosses desk but if you feel you have to quit tularetom Feb 2016 #77
Comcast is a horrible Tea Party type company that loathes those that would tell the truth. Rex Feb 2016 #79
The ONLY way... americannightmare Feb 2016 #81
Anybody who thinks MSNBC is 'Liberal' has been sold a bill of goods ... Trajan Feb 2016 #82
+1 cui bono Feb 2016 #208
The country is being sold into corporate control houston16revival Feb 2016 #85
He's probably NEGOTIATED with them for good press coverage houston16revival Feb 2016 #98
surprised? ellennelle Feb 2016 #86
GE no longer owns NBC, they sold to Comcast. mr_liberal Feb 2016 #130
You're a little out of date, ownership-wise JHB Feb 2016 #131
"token, mammy or little black bobble head" AngryAmish Feb 2016 #90
MSNBC has truly lost it's soul (as much as any media outlet has one) mmm413 Feb 2016 #95
Don't forget Martin Bashir - he left after being in trouble from the bosses at Comcast for repeating jillan Feb 2016 #101
She is, quite simply, too smart for MSNBC. JDPriestly Feb 2016 #99
MHP, Rachel, Lawrence, Hayes should call them on their bullshit and walk out rurallib Feb 2016 #103
Is MHP a Bernie supporter? mentioned the TPP? What did she do to upset the apple cart? emsimon33 Feb 2016 #104
I am proud to say she's a neighbor of mine. libnnc Feb 2016 #108
Shoot your TV. eom JEB Feb 2016 #117
HUGE K & R !!! - Thank You !!! WillyT Feb 2016 #118
"Certified Liar" must be Brian Williams LyndaG Feb 2016 #119
Yes TuxedoKat Feb 2016 #200
I will totally stand up for MHP . . FairWinds Feb 2016 #126
I'm way out of the loop ... Fantastic Anarchist Feb 2016 #127
Sure sounds like houston16revival Feb 2016 #133
Wow! I hadn't heard about any of this... SoapBox Feb 2016 #135
Selling The News Puppyjive Feb 2016 #137
Remember Punx Feb 2016 #142
Professor Perry defended the Obama Administration . . FairWinds Feb 2016 #143
I have watched MHP on several occasions. She's very academic and knowledgable YOHABLO Feb 2016 #144
I would boycott, but I stopped watching MSNBC and all cable news shows a long time ago. liberal_at_heart Feb 2016 #150
Anyone have the numbers on her show? I can't seem to find any. stevenleser Feb 2016 #151
Just turn MSNBC off! Bernblu Feb 2016 #152
Tweety shadowmayor Feb 2016 #159
"last hired,first fired" DonCoquixote Feb 2016 #160
Releuctantly,I now find myself turning to CNN for news and mfcorey1 Feb 2016 #165
Cutting off Comcast and telling them why could be a start. lovemydog Feb 2016 #166
Before I cut "it" All off fredamae Feb 2016 #179
i think she's overreacting, but i agree her show is an impt voice redruddyred Feb 2016 #170
I'm afraid I'm in the minority here. Vinca Feb 2016 #173
Wasn't Melissa Harris-Perry NobodyHere Feb 2016 #182
I Guess She'll Have the Continuing Influence of Keith Olberman On the Road Feb 2016 #183
Fuck MSNBC and their Mika (bimbo) and their Joe (the dead intern dude). lonestarnot Feb 2016 #186
What is happening to Ms. Harris Perry... gregcrawford Feb 2016 #187
Good Lord, what a whiner lbrtbell Feb 2016 #189
I'm proud of her and her stand against MSTRUMP. book_worm Feb 2016 #191
Clearly she does not want to continue employment with MSNBC Generic Brad Feb 2016 #193
Well... she aired her grievances.... bdwker Feb 2016 #237
I'm about done with the media, period. AngryOldDem Feb 2016 #195
I enjoyed watching Melissa's Sunday morning show. Always a great narrative c588415 Feb 2016 #197
Is Brian Williams looking for a regular time-slot? nt JustABozoOnThisBus Feb 2016 #198
m$nbc is dead to me. spanone Feb 2016 #205
I am realizing that the DNC is bringing MSNBC down. erlewyne Feb 2016 #209
She was my favourite on the channel. lupinella Feb 2016 #214
She should ditch corporate media Don Draper Feb 2016 #218
MSNBC is clearly going to the right. pacalo Feb 2016 #223
Melissa needs to take her show online shireen Feb 2016 #224
I didn't watch MHP. However, I respect her for taking a public stand. I am sure she knows it will merrily Feb 2016 #226
I don't think she favors Hillary. Meldread Feb 2016 #228
I've watched her and I don't think she favors Sanders at all. merrily Feb 2016 #229
Unfortunately... Meldread Feb 2016 #231
Reid not liberal? I don't agree. However, even if she were centrist, she'd be worth hearing out. merrily Feb 2016 #232
Wasn't talking about Reid, sorry. Meldread Feb 2016 #233

Meldread

(4,213 posts)
15. Yeah, the DNC doesn't have that type of clout.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 06:47 PM
Feb 2016

Both party infrastructures are, for all intents and purposes, powerless. Just using the RNC as an example, they are more guided by Fox News than the other way around. The DNC is not guided by MSNBC in the same way, but they have just as much power over MSNBC as the RNC does over Fox News, which is to say: next to none.

Fairgo

(1,571 posts)
29. We shall see...
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 07:05 PM
Feb 2016

...or not. I'm guessing this minor insult will not roil the surface of our TV screens enough to expose the fins beneath. But regardless, the corporate aristocracy is of a cloth, a networked ruling class with media and political arms that respond sympathetically in advancing and securing their caste. No conspiracy needed, just common cause. So no, I do not need linear, causal proof to suspect the connection - just years of observing a complex social system. The proof, such as it is, comes from observing the echoes of this event and the next, and the next, to see if they reveal the synomorphic patterns of inverted totalitarianism, or the bright shining village that Hillary wants to raise your children in.

Interestingly, your response suggests the former, informed or otherwise. But that is one data point in a social sea. I have my predictions for what happens next...

Place your bets.

Fairgo

(1,571 posts)
124. MSNBCDNCCNNRNC Inc. Pablum for the masses
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 10:51 PM
Feb 2016

You are standing too near the puppet show to see the connections

The public is always allowed the patina of dissent. Just enough to make you think you have a voice, vent some of the energy, and keep notes on future propaganda campaigns. The dials are turned up and back constantly and smoothly. Most of the time you don't even notice. Take a real close look at the Shemps that replaced Keith Olberman. It's just that the PTB bumped a switch a bit too hard and got some feedback. Not to worry, she'll disappear soon enough, or come into line. You may return to your regular broadcast viewing...

Fairgo

(1,571 posts)
125. In the best long con, the Mark gladly hands over the money and cheers for the home team
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 10:57 PM
Feb 2016

RNC vs DNC is WWF. The con is at the gate.

Liberty Sage

(14 posts)
175. I Agree
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 09:21 AM
Feb 2016

Party doesn't matter. It's just another way to keep us divided. Follow the money from both sides and I'll wager the same hands are on the strings.

brush

(53,841 posts)
112. Neither do I. This just goes alone with the overall rightward shift of their coverage . . .
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 10:00 PM
Feb 2016

when they ditched all the progressive commentators and went to Trump nearly 24/7.

What a prinicipled stance she takes in the email. She won't go the air and go along with their rightward shift just to keep her paycheck coming in. I respect that.

Too bad Maddow didn't take such a stance. I've lost respect for her.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
141. How naive to not recognize that the Big Money will buy everything they can to bring down
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 12:49 AM
Feb 2016

the progressive candidate. If you approve, you must have decided that all's fair to win for Goldman-Sachs profits. Well you may have the Big Money on your side but we have the People and we will prevail.

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
157. Executive VP of Comcast is a Hillary bundler/fundraiser
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 01:51 AM
Feb 2016

Article detailing that David Cohen, Executive Vice President of Comcast is listed as a "Hillblazer" which is a Clinton campaign bundler who has raised more than $100,000 for Hillary's campaign.

http://variety.com/2015/biz/news/hillary-clinton-hollywood-barbra-streisand-2016-1201541390/

https://www.hillaryclinton.com/about/hillblazers/
------------------------------------------------------------------
Article detailing that Cohen held a private fundraiser for Clinton in his home

David L. Cohen, Comcast’s executive vice president, held a $2,700-a-plate fundraiser for Hillary Clinton in his own home, iOTW Report has learned. Cohen and Comcast CEO Brian Roberts donated heavily to President Obama as well.

http://pingie.com/2015/11/22/comcast-vp-met-with-held-fundraiser-for-hillary/

Babel_17

(5,400 posts)
204. Thanks for that info
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 12:53 PM
Feb 2016

It's hard to remember all the connections that get mentioned, I'm glad people like you are keeping a tally.

 

FighttheFuture

(1,313 posts)
215. Not strings... but aligned interests.... COMCAST owns MSNBC. The Roberts Family...
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 03:49 PM
Feb 2016

...controls 33% of Comcast, so have pretty much say of what goes on there. They contribute to both political parties, and pretty cozy with Hillary and the President. So while the DNC is not "pulling strings" (I do not believe that), it does not mean their interests are not aligned to the centrist corporate friendly Democrats like Obama and Hillary, especially given how noxious the R's have become. This does not help Bernie Sanders, of course.

Do a google search of "Comcast Roberts Family Politics".

Here's a link from The Hill...

Comcast CEO Brian Roberts has donated $76,000 to Democrats since 2006, compared to $13,500 in contributions to Republicans. He’s golfed with Obama on Martha’s Vineyard, served on the president’s Jobs Council, and appeared at a number of White House meetings on business and technology.

But his fundraising efforts were dwarfed by head Comcast lobbyist David Cohen, a Democratic bundler who raised $1.44 million for the president’s reelection campaign in 2011 and 2012, and $2.22 million since 2007, according to internal documents obtained by the New York Times.

mcar

(42,372 posts)
69. No
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 08:14 PM
Feb 2016

This is about MSNBC, not the Dem primary. I love MHP; I support HRC. She is a highly educated professional with experience and a world view I want to hear.

lark

(23,155 posts)
181. You are thinking too small.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 10:31 AM
Feb 2016

It's bigger than the DNC, it's the full blown corporatism at MSNBC that's on display. They cut the Young Turks, and Ed and are now trying to disappear MHP. The only reason they don't cut Rachel is because she's too popular. Of course the hang onto Tweety because he's not too populist and will more closely conform to the model they like. Mike and Joe are doing what the network wants them to do, suck up to the billionaire and rw idiots. I just rarely watch that network except for after 9pm ET and even then not very often anymore.

Meldread

(4,213 posts)
8. What is particularly disgusting...
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 06:44 PM
Feb 2016

...is the fact that executives have refused to respond to her e-mails, her phone calls, and her other messages FOR OVER A MONTH. They haven't even given her the decency of explaining what they plan to do with her show. They put her up in hotels with the other hosts, but haven't allowed her to go on air. Like she said, she's a fucking political scholar. In her own words, "I have a PhD in political science and have taught American voting and elections at some of the nation’s top universities for nearly two decades, yet I have been deemed less worthy to weigh in than relative novices and certified liars."

It's hard to see these decisions not just as politically motivated, but also motivated by gender and race as well. Could you imagine top executives NOT responding to e-mails and messages from Chris Matthews or Joe Scarborough? Not conceivable. They'd have responses within 5 hours max on a busy day.

 

sulphurdunn

(6,891 posts)
64. So far as the executives are concerned,
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 08:08 PM
Feb 2016

she is only an employee who forgot her place and is now smarting for it.

 

redruddyred

(1,615 posts)
171. yeah, other than that i thought her reaction was a bit over the top
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 08:54 AM
Feb 2016

that's some pretty rude shit man

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
14. I'm getting close to it.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 06:46 PM
Feb 2016

Rachel Maddow has been trying to be all things to everyone and it's not working. She needs to take a page from her old buddy Keith Olbermann's playbook and take a stand for journalistic integrity or she's going to end up on Fox News alongside Greta Van Susteren as another token librul covering the latest Chandra Levy endlessly or whatever bright news scandal bauble that appears over the horizon.

Blue_In_AK

(46,436 posts)
65. I can barely watch Rachel anymore.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 08:10 PM
Feb 2016

I still tune in to Chris Hayes fairly often, but all Trump all the time does get old.

Bohunk68

(1,364 posts)
167. Hayes is flat-out in Hillary's corner.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 08:06 AM
Feb 2016

I love MHP and have gotten a lot of understanding from her telecasts. Have been hugely disappointed with Rachel. The rest of them are worth a warm bucket of spit.

HubertHeaver

(2,522 posts)
22. I can agree with you that the day of saying "no" to Rachel has not yet arrived.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 06:52 PM
Feb 2016

However, it is on the horizon.

MrWendel

(1,881 posts)
3. JOE....
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 06:37 PM
Feb 2016

has all sorts of cache with the new boss, this is a result of it. That block of shows that were canceled, extended Morning JoKe and pushing MHP out it's not a surprise the direction that is the new MSNBC.

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
4. Wow, I hope she has another job lined up.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 06:37 PM
Feb 2016

The network people she called out might make nice to cool things down, but then when no one is looking, they'll drop the ax on Ms. Harris-Perry. That type of person won't let being exposed like this go unpunished.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
92. She has another job
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 09:05 PM
Feb 2016
Harris-Perry, who is also a professor at Wake Forest University, is the only tenured professor with a regularly scheduled cable news program.

Mira

(22,380 posts)
93. She has a professorship at Wake Forest University here in town.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 09:07 PM
Feb 2016

A highly respected job.
She lives about a block from me, and I drove by her house on my way home a few minutes ago. Usually on Fri nights there is little activity, this night it is all lit up and I hope she is enjoying a weekend at home with her family.
I laud her courage to speak up, I think it is a powerful example to others not to lie down and be a doormat.
I suspect she is doing what needs to be done in a public way and I am not worried about her future.

Fantastic Anarchist

(7,309 posts)
129. I'm confused ...
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 11:39 PM
Feb 2016

...did she do something to be dropped off the air? This is the first I'm hearing of this.

Mira

(22,380 posts)
134. Read her letter.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 11:59 PM
Feb 2016

It's my best answer. She has been preempted and ignored and not utilized, and her time slot has been used for some more of the vacuous repetitive election coverage instead of allowing her show to go on.

questionseverything

(9,657 posts)
212. about a month ago i remember catching part of her show
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 03:23 PM
Feb 2016

she mentioned the "super predator" remarks."welfare queen" remarks...which kind of surprised me

i have no clue if that was part of it or not

MH1

(17,600 posts)
100. The absence of MHP, and the promotion of Joe Scar, already pretty well "exposed"
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 09:23 PM
Feb 2016

that there is some serious bullshit going on an MSNBC.

I miss the days when Up with Chris Hayes was on the weekend and showed what a great political show could be. Hayes' weeknight show is barely a shadow of what Up was, and unfortunately Kornacki never pulled off what Chris did. MHP was a bright spot in an ever darkening pool.

Sigh.

DAMANgoldberg

(1,278 posts)
111. Great idea except...
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 10:00 PM
Feb 2016

The non-compete would probably kick in, and if she is on HRC team, that means their contributor pool is almost all HRC and that would lack balance. In the business, it's called "on the beach/bench" where she can't appear anywhere else. Broadcasting companies do this regularly for people they want to punish.

Enrique

(27,461 posts)
7. this part is interesting...
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 06:41 PM
Feb 2016
yet I have been deemed less worthy to weigh in than relative novices and certified liars.

Unknown Beatle

(2,672 posts)
217. That little pissant wouldn't know what real journalism is
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 04:04 PM
Feb 2016

if it slapped him in the face and pissed on his leg. For Toad to hold such a position at MSNBC is telling what the network is all about, and that is to slant the news with a conservative bias while pretending to be liberal.

OldHippieChick

(2,434 posts)
47. This is more likely than Mika and (gag) Joe
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 07:27 PM
Feb 2016

I cannot fathom why they give him so much air time - other than this father. He does not deserve this and MHP definitely deserves more air time. 'Course I'm still a bit pissed about Steve Kornacki.

OldHippieChick

(2,434 posts)
196. Not sure what "he" you mean
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 12:01 PM
Feb 2016

Steve Kornacki got bumped from his weekend show. Luke Russert has been promoted simply because he is Tim Russert's son, not because he's very good at his job. MHP is better than Luke and much more knowledgeable. Kornacki is still around, but no longer has his own show.

dmr

(28,349 posts)
74. That stood out to me, too.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 08:27 PM
Feb 2016

I'm sure there are plenty of liars there, on and off the air.

I wonder what specifically those lies are. I can't imagine what those are. Melissa seems to be a stand-up person in life, so those lies have to be whoppers.

MSNBC is ruining the network themselves. I like the liberal voice. What I like more is truth and facts; and they usually have a liberal bent. Liberals have no reason to bend anything.

The Right Wing, however, notoriously lies, distorts, misrepresent, tells tall tales out of context, .... so and so forth. They do it on the news, in town halls, on the campaign trail, in their debates, on the Congressional floor, and their investigation hearings. They also waste a lot of taxpayer money on witch hunts. That is shameful.

News organizations breaches the public trust given to them for dismissing the above, and for not providing a credible response on ALL issues.

Rachel is what keeps me tuned in each night, and then Lawrence O'Donnell. If Rachel goes, so do I.

Gore1FL

(21,151 posts)
225. I didn't think of him until you mentioned him
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 06:15 PM
Feb 2016

That's absolutely the best fit of the "certified liar" description.

Meldread

(4,213 posts)
227. Yes, exactly.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 07:13 PM
Feb 2016

I am pretty confident that she is talking about Brian Williams (the "certified liar&quot and Luke Russert (the "novice&quot . She was contrasting herself with them, as a host who has a strong record, and someone who has a Ph.D. in political science. Not to mention, although she didn't mention this part, the fact that there is a heavy focus on issues impacting the black community as coverage moved into South Carolina which is more-or-less her specific wheelhouse. Therefore, it is shocking that MSNBC wouldn't be putting her on the air to do her coverage. After all, it's not like she would be ignoring what is going on with the election coverage.

Though, what I think stings the most is not any of that. It's the fact that they took her off air without comment, and then refused to respond to her in any way. Then, in order to avoid answering questions, they attempted to put her back on air, but only after they attempted to seize editorial control over her by basically telling her "just read what we put into your teleprompter like a good talking head." That's where she drew the line, and the reason she sent the letter out to members of her staff.

myrna minx

(22,772 posts)
9. She is a treasure. I love MHP and love Nerd Land.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 06:44 PM
Feb 2016

This is terrible. MSNBC has deviled into The Joe and Trump sideshow.

thereismore

(13,326 posts)
11. I am done with MSNBC, and with Rachel. I am grateful for a lot of good work she has done, however,
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 06:46 PM
Feb 2016

it is clear the "culture" of MSNBC is affecting her too.

JimDandy

(7,318 posts)
39. Haven't watched Rachel Maddow's show since mid-January
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 07:11 PM
Feb 2016

when it became clear she is in the tank with Hillary (compare her Jan 16th interview of Hillary to her Jan 18th interview of Bernie-same questions, very different treatment) It's always been really difficult to watch her show anyway, due to her irritating use of repetitiveness. Zero reason now to put up with it.

LibDemAlways

(15,139 posts)
58. Agreed. Rachel never met a topic that she couldn't beat to death
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 07:56 PM
Feb 2016

with mind-numbing repetition. Beyond annoying. Get to the point already, and quit wasting the viewers' time.

 

Duval

(4,280 posts)
67. My husband and I laughed and laughed over your post!
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 08:11 PM
Feb 2016

Many thanks. And by the way, we're delighted because we noticed the same thing!


 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
156. Let me explain
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 01:47 AM
Feb 2016

Do you know what this is:



That's a plow. That's the kind of thing you used to hitch up to a horse or ox, and then cut furrows into the ground to plant crops.

In the early 1900's a boy was plowing a field on the Farnsworth family farm. As he went back and forth with the plow and the horse, he got the idea that he could use that back and forth action to draw a picture in the field by adjusting the plow along the furrows. Decades later, that boy, a boy named Philo, who was using a plow like that on the farm, Philo T. Farnsworth would become the inventor of the cathode ray tube - the picture tube that used to be the front screen of television sets.

After television sets were invented, the broadcasters came up with the idea to have regularly scheduled programs called "shows" on them.

Well, tonight, you are going to watch, on your television, a show. It's a show on MSNBC starring - a woman! On the show, a woman is going to talk about politics, on your very own television, thanks to Philo Farnsworth who figured out how to transmit signals as pictures to television sets by plowing a field as a boy.

The woman, on the show, on your television, is named Rachel, and she's going to be talking about politics, and sometimes about boys plowing fields on this show. They even named the show after her. They call it the "Rachel Maddow Show" and it is a show on MSNBC which you can watch on your television, and the woman, whose name is Rachel Maddow, is going to talk about politics on the Rachel Maddow Show!

 

earthshine

(1,642 posts)
72. She started this the day after Keith Olbermann was discharged.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 08:22 PM
Feb 2016

The format of her show changed from news to extended commentary, and not for the better.

Talking in circles. Repeating the same exact statement over and over again, ostensibly to fill an hour's worth of programming.

(Maybe Rubio took lessons from her.)

Someone on DU once described it as like she's trying to explain things to deaf children.

Didn't a Comcast exec hold a fundraiser for Hillary?

One of my favorite people in netcasting, Leo Laporte (who is a god to us techies), described Comcast as the worst company in the world.



TeamPooka

(24,252 posts)
78. Her let me take 12 minutes to give you a minutes worth of news segment stuff is why i don't watch
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 08:36 PM
Feb 2016

her anymore

jillan

(39,451 posts)
97. I think she missed her calling. She should've been a preschool teacher. Grab your blankies - it's
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 09:15 PM
Feb 2016

storytime!

She even put on a play that one night.

And at the end of the week we she even has a quiz to see if you've been a good listener!

Been watching AC360 instead - at least there I can get some news.

LiberalElite

(14,691 posts)
115. THANK YOU!!! I liked Rachel back when
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 10:11 PM
Feb 2016

she had 10 minutes on Olbermann's program. Once they gave her a whole hour - OMG I would be yelling at the TV WHAT? WHAT? WILL YOU GET TO THE POINT?!?!?!!!?

And - when she'd begin every night with 'THANK YOU FOR STAYING" (paraphrased?) - I thought that was a tad presumptuous. I was only watching to see what was going to be covered. If I wasn't interested in the topic - click!

To Rachel: It could be, dear, that some who still have MNSBC on when your program starts just aren't quick with the remote.

 

MissDeeds

(7,499 posts)
76. Rachel has sold her soul
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 08:31 PM
Feb 2016

to the corporate handlers of MSNBC. I used to admire her, but now she shouts at viewers, imploring them to "see it my way!". I am offended by her lecturing, scolding delivery. Tell me the facts; I can draw my own conclusions.

Dark n Stormy Knight

(9,771 posts)
13. Good for MHP for standing up for her principles!
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 06:46 PM
Feb 2016

I don't watch MSNBC any more, having cut the cable and not bothering with streaming it. But I thought she was good. And this makes me like her even more.

 

artislife

(9,497 posts)
40. This is the huge difference for me between 2008 and now
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 07:13 PM
Feb 2016

I didn't have cable then and still don't. But I am not streaming hours of shows off the internet like I did.

The msn hasn't factored into much in this election. A few videos here and there.

It is sad, though. We have lost almost all the liberal voices and maybe we have alreadylost them all, by the sounds of it.

Dark n Stormy Knight

(9,771 posts)
49. I have to admit that I'm mostly tuning out this election.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 07:40 PM
Feb 2016

I'm voting for Bernie, and honestly don't know if I'll bother to vote if Hillary is the Dem in the general. I check in to DU now and then just to keep somewhat informed, but almost every time I do, I regret it.

For one thing, usually the only replies I get are from people who really, vehemently disagree with me and are nasty about it. I tend to respond to nasty with more nasty, then feel bad about it. It was nice today that almost every reply I received was one of camaraderie and/or humor.

Overall, I think I just need a break from politics. The inherent dishonestly, the money, the corporate media control of the story (that's where a great many US citizens still get their info). The fact the Donald Trump is so popular. Seeing DU take a such rightward turn.

Even worse, the level of discussion just seems to have sunk. Poor logical thinking skills run rampant. Many people are responding to arguments for and against candidates by taking offense at "being told how to vote." Last time I checked, discussing politics--the raison d'etre for DU--naturally involves a lot of saying why voting for particular candidates is a good or bad idea. Don't participate in a political discussion board if that offends you.

Sorry, I seem to be ranting and rambling. Time to go do something else! Have a great weekend.

Rebkeh

(2,450 posts)
96. One word: Podcasts
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 09:15 PM
Feb 2016

Explore the world of podcasts, there are many liberal voices out there doing excellent work. I gave up on msnbc when they canceled The Reid Report, that was the final straw for me. Since then I've been using podcasts and some Free Speech TV as my media sources, in addition to online publications.

Rebkeh

(2,450 posts)
206. Here you go
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 12:59 PM
Feb 2016

Amy Goodman and Democracy Now

http://m.democracynow.org/

Thom Hartmann

http://www.thomhartmann.com/

The Majority Report

http://majority.fm/report/

The Best of the Left

http://www.bestoftheleft.com/

Benjamin Dixon Show (I'm still new to this one but I like it so far)

http://www.spreaker.com/user/thebenjamindixonshow

Also,

Free Speech TV
https://t.freespeech.org/

RT America
https://m.youtube.com/user/RTAmerica

The Young Turks
https://www.tytnetwork.com/

If you have iTunes, there's a big world of podcasts there too. If no iTunes, find Stitcher podcasts (or something like that) - google it

And if you have Sirius XM (I don't), John Fugelsang has a show. He's reliably left. I hear XM has a bunch of liberal voices but I can't say for sure.

Joe Madison - The Black Eagle is another but I don't listen to it personally.

We definitely need more women and poc political podcasters. Stephanie Miller is popular but I don't know, haven't listened yet. Someone named Randi Rhodes is coming back but I'm unfamiliar with her.

Air America died but a lot of the people from then are still around. There are also many read only online publications.

There's hope yet, corporate media is not the only game in town.

Meldread

(4,213 posts)
230. I hate the Young Turks. I can't stand them.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 07:27 PM
Feb 2016

...well, mostly, I can't stand Cenk Uygur. Cenk never has anything insightful or intelligent to say. He sounds, looks, and acts like an aged frat boy. He seems to only understand very simple concepts, and once things start to get sort of complex he begins to lose the plot and wants to dumb everything down.

I only really like two people on TYT, those two individuals being Ana Kasparian and John Iadarola.

trueblue2007

(17,237 posts)
16. i love melissa and hate what the executives have done to her
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 06:48 PM
Feb 2016

they men in the tower are racist pieces of crap

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
20. Melissa has a solid reputation and credentials. She doesn't need
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 06:50 PM
Feb 2016

M$NBComcast tarnishing it. I think she should walk away. It will be one less show I watch and it's getting very close to none. There are plenty of streams and podcasts out there with quality content for everyone. No one needs to listen to or watch lying propaganda anymore.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
89. Who does she support?
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 09:03 PM
Feb 2016
Harris-Perry said that MSNBC decided to put her back on the air this weekend in part because CNNMoney "made repeated inquiries" to both Harris-Perry and NBC last week to ask if the show had been canceled. NBC spokespeople said the show had not been canceled, but did not explain the pre-emptions.

http://money.cnn.com/2016/02/26/media/melissa-harris-perry-msnbc/

they got the message but she's standing her ground. Good for her.

Does anyone know who she supports in this primary? If it's Bernie, that would explain this.

JimDandy

(7,318 posts)
121. We never used to have a reason to ask who a news personality supported politically.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 10:48 PM
Feb 2016

They did their job and for the most part reported both sides of the story. Now none of them are objective and there is spin on every little thing. Can't have us using our own critical thinking skills to evaluate issues.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
132. I personally don't care who she supports,
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 11:44 PM
Feb 2016

But it may have a lot to do with why Comcast (MSNBC) dropped her show.

ChiciB1

(15,435 posts)
199. NO, She Was Very Complimentary Toward Hillary When I Last Saw
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 12:12 PM
Feb 2016

her. I checked in several times to get an opinion. I did hear her talking about Hillary and her support for woman and for people of color. But, I feel that they HAVE ignored her and used her. I'm thinking they wanted her presence this week end because she is a black woman. I myself would have been highly offended because they really haven't included in "the group" when the bigger names are front and center.

Tweety has ALWAYS been Numero Uno there and when the brought Ed Schultz back I heard he was quite upset that he took his slot when they had his SECOND viewing of his show.

There's no doubt that it's very much Joey Scar & Tweety. I used to gag when I saw how Mika looked so adoringly at Joey Scar. I know her father was Defense Secretary for Carter, but I suppose he's become part of what our Democratic Party has become. DLC/Third Way.

Because of my interest in tennis I belong to a closed group of fans and there are many members from many countries and I've had discussions with them about how the perceive this country. Generally the comments are made through messaging, and while I expected their views could be negative, I have to say I was unaware of how many countries feel this way. Even the comments from people from the UK.

But, unless we do something about it their opinion is what it is. Most feel that we've used our power in ways that make us look like "the Bullies" of the world. But, since we're known as a SUPER POWER and have the Military Might to do what we do they feel our people are just as much to blame. Our love and use of guns and lack of health care are big issues they talk about.

I do appreciate their input.

OZi

(155 posts)
21. "I care only about substantive, meaningful, and autonomous work."
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 06:51 PM
Feb 2016

That directly conflicts with the narrative and agenda of the network I'm sure.

oldandhappy

(6,719 posts)
23. I'm having a fantasy
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 06:55 PM
Feb 2016

that MSNBC completes their transition to the RW and Fox hires Melissa for special election coverage. Ah well, she deserves respect and viewers deserve the best in TV commentary. We shall see.

Kingofalldems

(38,470 posts)
25. MSNBC wants Trump on all freaking day.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 06:57 PM
Feb 2016

BTW, how can anyone say (or post) with a straight face that Hillary had anything to do with this?

Nonsense--cable news is all in for Trump.

ChiciB1

(15,435 posts)
109. The Head OR Heads Of MSNBC Are Big Supporters Of Hillary...
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 09:57 PM
Feb 2016

They've donated to her more than once. I don't have the link, but I know it exists. I STOPPED watching MSNBC FINALLY after they canned Ed Schultz! I was hanging on because of him as I already saw Rachel changing in front of my eyes. I've watched documentaries where Chris Hayes was talking about his liberal beliefs because I have ROKU, but I'm sure since he's a new father he probably doesn't want to have to look for another job.

Anyone who saw Joey Scar & Mika the other day should have NO DOUBT that there IS an Agenda at MSNBC. Tweety has gushed about Hillary for over a year now and constantly corrected anyone who talked about Bernie as being a Democrat WITHOUT him making sure to add "SOCIALIST" for added emphasis.

You have TWO New York candidates who have been given preferential treatment all along. The reason they had Bernie on with Tweety was they were hoping he could "trip" him up in some way, but it backfired. Anyone who listens to "Alternative News" will find these things discussed on various channels.

There are also many live streaming channels that I've found since I invested in my ROKU! I feel much more well informed because of it.

Whether anyone here believes me or not doesn't concern me, but I do think MOST OF US have seen what MSM has become. For me it reports some news, but so much is also INFOTAINMENT. And along with all that is bias and a SHIT LOAD of money!

Believe what you want. There are so many people that once worked there who have told their stories from where they work now. Cent Uger is ONE really big name these days and he will give you an ear full. But so many have been give the AX that it's been evident to me for a very long time.

And should ANYONE dare speak about TPP, well they can pack their bags!

CoffeeCat

(24,411 posts)
158. (posted earlier in this thread) The Executive VP of Comcast is a Hillary bundler
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 01:57 AM
Feb 2016

Article detailing that David Cohen, Executive Vice President of Comcast is listed as a "Hillblazer" which is a Clinton campaign bundler who has raised more than $100,000 for Hillary's campaign.

http://variety.com/2015/biz/news/hillary-clinton-hollywood-barbra-streisand-2016-1201541390/

https://www.hillaryclinton.com/about/hillblazers/
------------------------------------------------------------------
Article detailing that Cohen held a private fundraiser for Clinton in his home

David L. Cohen, Comcast’s executive vice president, held a $2,700-a-plate fundraiser for Hillary Clinton in his own home, iOTW Report has learned. Cohen and Comcast CEO Brian Roberts donated heavily to President Obama as well.

http://pingie.com/2015/11/22/comcast-vp-met-with-held-fundraiser-for-hillary/

ChiciB1

(15,435 posts)
185. Thanks For The Links... I Knew I Saw These Somewhere, But
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 11:17 AM
Feb 2016

wasn't sure if it was at this site or not. Thanks for people like you who are soooooo helpful with these things. I post, but have some family concerns that need more attention for health reasons. Elderly care for loved ones can pop up all the time. But, we do what we can do, so I rely on ask many others for the GREAT research they do.

Thanks again...

 

Manifestor_of_Light

(21,046 posts)
128. Ed Schultz is doing news on RT. So is Thom Hartmann.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 11:27 PM
Feb 2016

John Siegenthaler, formerly of NBC, is reporting news on Al Jazeera.

Bohunk68

(1,364 posts)
168. I have been watching Al Jazeera more and more.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 08:21 AM
Feb 2016

Got tired of the wall-to-wall Trump crap and Hillary promoting from MSNBC. AJ has more international news and more in depth reporting. The various shows on AJ with commentators from around the world are very good.

ChiciB1

(15,435 posts)
190. Maybe You Might Want To Look At My Last Post Here...
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 11:38 AM
Feb 2016

What I like about FSTV is that people call in with their opinions. With RT they don't have people calling in that I've found, but they do have some interesting guests and panels. You can get the cheapest ROKU for around $40.00, but they have newer models that have much more. I did buy the stick ROKU first, but upgraded a little.

Gee, maybe they should contact me to advertise for them??? LOL!

renate

(13,776 posts)
216. I love Al Jazeera
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 03:51 PM
Feb 2016

And I'm still holding out hope that somehow they will stay on the air past April. (Or... [eyes light up with hope]... have you found a way to watch Al Jazeera English on TV rather than Al Jazeera America? Because I would LOVE that!)

ChiciB1

(15,435 posts)
188. Yes, I Watch Him On RT, Along Thom Hartman And If
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 11:30 AM
Feb 2016

I if I don't watch them in real time, I can always live stream or watch previous shows through my ROKU. I recently found so many live streaming channels offered by ROKU that I never knew existed. So glad I bought it.

I sometimes wonder how long it will be before I'm going to have to pay for the FREE channels I use now. I know ROKU does charge for some of them, but so far I'm happy with all my FREE viewing options.

I no longer rely on any MSM for news, it actually DEPRESSES me and ruins my day. RT has some really great economic news shows and I LOVE Lee Camp! He's the John Oliver of RT, that's how they define his show. A lot like Jon Stewart w/o advertisement per se.

Personally I think we all would be better off switching to these channels for NEWS and so much more. Al Jazeera has been cancelled, just don't know when the last show will be, OAM (One America) is OK, but not crazy about it.

Thanks for bringing this up.

onecaliberal

(32,888 posts)
26. Fuck M$GOP, it's a propaganda tool.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 06:58 PM
Feb 2016

The fact that Rachel hasn't reached out to her only serves to confirm what I've come to believe about her. Fucking pathetic.

I love love love Melissa and I know there is a voice for her somewhere. Keep the faith.

lostnfound

(16,189 posts)
31. If Rachel reached out to her, MHP might not say so
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 07:06 PM
Feb 2016

It's a big decision to throw in the towel on the network. Rachel does good, important work when they let her. MHP has another job already.
Rachel could possibly support her, but weighing her options.

onecaliberal

(32,888 posts)
32. Rachel has completely sold out to Hillary. IMO that says it all. She stands for nothing.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 07:08 PM
Feb 2016

Rachel could leave that joke of a network and get another job easily just as MHP did, but she chooses to stay, knowing she lies by omission on her show every single day.

INdemo

(6,994 posts)
48. Rachel Maddow is now a puupet for the execs at MSNBC=COMCAST
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 07:35 PM
Feb 2016

she is so in the tank for Hillary it is debatable which host will get the Hillary MVP Prize,
Her or Chris Mathews.

whathehell

(29,090 posts)
163. I watch her almost every night & that is not my impression
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 04:41 AM
Feb 2016

In fact, I've been trying to discern her preference. to no avail, and yes, I am a Bernie supporter.

ChiciB1

(15,435 posts)
192. Each One Of Us May Have Different Impressions, But I Saw It
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 11:47 AM
Feb 2016

some time ago. I think my FIRST incident of MSNBC culling their hosts was quite some time ago with David Schuster (Al Jazeera) then it was Dylan Ratigan, Keith Olbermann, Martin Bashir and the list keeps getting longer. I heard last night that MHP is being replaced by some RW radio show host. Didn't catch his name.

Not sure what's up with Steve Kornacki (sp) but here he's does some reporting for MSNBC still. Sorry about the spelling, haven't watched in a while.

Wish Chris Hayes would do something like what MHP has done. But I'm sure since he won an award they'll offer him $$$$ to stay. Rachel's popularity may be slipping because I know some of my friends have decided not to watch her anymore. It's been a while since I checked the shows they now air. Only what I hear here.

whathehell

(29,090 posts)
210. That is true...
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 02:50 PM
Feb 2016

I'm certainly with you on the 'culling' at MSNBC...I was really pissed when they threw Ed Schultz off...They're not going to do well being 'just another news station" IMO...They were filling a definite need when they were more 'liberal'.

Fairgo

(1,571 posts)
33. Yes it is.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 07:09 PM
Feb 2016

And the behaviour of Rachel in the aftermath of this will be quite revealing, one way or the other. Melissa deserves better. Her observations are clear and her hypotheses sound. She deserves an answer from her friends.

onecaliberal

(32,888 posts)
37. ^^^^^^^THAT^^^^^^
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 07:10 PM
Feb 2016

Exactly, or is money more important to them as well! Great point. Thank you for saying it.

sorechasm

(631 posts)
63. So true. MHP has provided a wealth of in-depth stories and viewpoints for 4 years...
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 08:05 PM
Feb 2016

...MSNBC doesn't even have the decency to return her phone calls? They're obviously afraid of her.

I love Melissa, and she deserves so much better.

MFM008

(19,818 posts)
30. I knew this crap would happen
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 07:06 PM
Feb 2016

when Comcast took over. Lousey bastards. Ruined MSNBC.
^&%4^#%$3252$#@!!##^%&$^$#!!!

Jarqui

(10,130 posts)
34. I dumped MSNBC when they ran off Olbermann
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 07:09 PM
Feb 2016

Just go to the MSNBC site or Youtube and pick which segments you want to watch on line.

I get my news faster and better online. Just pop through a list of your favorite news sites and you can get very quickly informed. You don't have to sit through garbage you're not interested in. (I do listen to and read some of the other side so I don't get too far left - a healthy left favored balance)

Chris Matthews - some people are down on him now but honestly, he was not the sharpest knife in the drawer for years. His mouth gets ahead of what brains he has.

The one on MSNBC that I thought the most of for years was Rachel. But something is going on. They got to her. Something's up.

The reason for the change? No question that Comcast's fingerprints are all over this.

Now is maybe the time for something like Al Gore's Current TV.

Meldread

(4,213 posts)
42. I get most of my news online as well...
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 07:16 PM
Feb 2016

I don't watch MSNBC's daily line up. When I watch MSNBC it is usually Chris Hayes, Rachel, and Melissa. I usually watch them for news stories that I might have missed or analysis. I get a lot of my news from Vox.com, which is run by Ezra Kline. I like Vox because they are usually detail heavy, and while they clearly are left leaning, they are--like Rachel--impartial toward candidates and parties. They are more loyal to the left as a cause than individuals and political groups. This means that sometimes my assumptions about things might get challenged, which I find important.

agracie

(950 posts)
201. Rachel is not been impartial during this election season. She may as well ...
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 12:21 PM
Feb 2016

be wearing a Hillary T-shirt.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
43. Well, Al Jazeera is going off the air but it's the same station that
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 07:17 PM
Feb 2016

was Current TV. It's the cable channel itself that doesn't reach a wide audience like Fuxup News does.

Fairgo

(1,571 posts)
41. MSNBCDNCCNNRNC Inc. Pablum for the masses
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 07:14 PM
Feb 2016

The public is always allowed the patina of dissent. Just enough to make you think you have a voice, vent some of the energy, and keep notes on future propaganda campaigns. The dials are turned up and back constantly and smoothly. Most of the time you don't even notice. Take a real close look at the Shemps that replaced Keith Olberman. It's just that the PTB bumped a switch a bit too hard and got some feedback. Not to worry, she'll disappear soon enough, or come into line. You may return to your regular broadcast viewing...

 

Manifestor_of_Light

(21,046 posts)
236. I miss Olbermann.
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 01:08 AM
Feb 2016

He explained stochastic terrorism and the Overton window. That's the range of minor dissent allowed. Easy on the eyes too.

aaaaaa5a

(4,667 posts)
45. I hate the direction MSNBC is going
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 07:21 PM
Feb 2016

But I still don't get the hype for MHP. I thought her show was largely terrible. Her show won't be missed.

SoCalDem

(103,856 posts)
46. The Obama era is ending, and with it.....
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 07:24 PM
Feb 2016

the "need" for "diversity"..

There is a move back to the old and familiar...white...

I will miss Melissa.. I always enjoyed her show..

Sienna86

(2,149 posts)
50. MSNBC has been biased in their coverage so I can no longer watch.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 07:41 PM
Feb 2016

This is the last straw. And I was a daily consumer of Chris Hayes and Maddow.

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
53. and with all respect to rachel
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 07:48 PM
Feb 2016

What does it say about MSNBC that the one person they sacrifice is the AA with an opinion and knowledge to back it up? Yet Mika can play Vanna White to Joe Scab?

erlewyne

(1,115 posts)
54. Melissa Harris-Perry! You are a favorite of mine.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 07:48 PM
Feb 2016

I will watch for you on the Internet and be sure to
read about you. Thanks Meldread!

zentrum

(9,865 posts)
56. Brilliant.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 07:51 PM
Feb 2016

She's also Brave. Have been going on and on about the Clintons in the 90's and how racist these Bill were.


And now there's a brilliant video about it.

It should be posted everywhere.

Thank you Ashley Williams.

Meldread

(4,213 posts)
105. No, she's been trying for a month....
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 09:33 PM
Feb 2016

She's been trying for a month to figure out what is going on. The executives won't return her e-mails or phone calls. They wouldn't tell her what is going on, and when another news agency (CNN) started to inquire as to whether or not the show had been cancelled, they attempted to put her back on. However, they only wanted her to read what they put in the teleprompter. That's where she drew the line, and what she meant about "losing editorial control."

That's why she sent the e-mail out to her staff, to let them know that she won't be sitting in that chair and reading what they're telling her to read. She wants her show back, or at least a respectful answer as to whether or not she's been cancelled.

They've even had her fly out to places like Iowa, New Hampshire, and South Carolina. She stayed in the same hotel as the other hosts, but they didn't let her on air. As she points out, this is despite the fact that she has a PhD in Political Science, and has been teaching the subject for two decades. She's perhaps one of the most qualified people to speak, but she's been effectively shut out completely. And, once again, they aren't responding to her e-mails and phone calls.

Loudestlib

(980 posts)
110. Keeping her out of the debate is a way of keeping her numbers low.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 09:58 PM
Feb 2016

It sounds like they are trying to push her out. I hope she comes out of this ok.

 

watoos

(7,142 posts)
60. MSNBC sent a message to its hosts
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 07:57 PM
Feb 2016

when it fired Ed Schultz for backing Bernie. Shortly after that Rachel and the rest heeled the line.

When Tweety tried to take down Bernie yesterday, at the town hall in Chicago,if I were Bernie I would have jumped Tweety about being wrong about the Iraq war, about maybe he should have been fired instead of Phil Donahue, but that would have ended Bernie's air time on msnbc, but what's the difference, they are #1 in trying to bring down Bernie.

LiberalAndProud

(12,799 posts)
153. Not to derail the thread, but to correct the record.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 01:27 AM
Feb 2016

Phil Donahue quit. He wasn't cancelled.

?t=23m48s

barbtries

(28,811 posts)
61. a campaign against gagging mhp might be worthwhile
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 07:58 PM
Feb 2016

But no point in demanding they be more liberal imo. Better to say more balanced and honest, if they were to do that their coverage would automatically be more liberal.

McKim

(2,412 posts)
62. MHP is the Best and Why MSNBC Loves Trump
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 07:59 PM
Feb 2016

I am so going to miss MHP. She is so great. She is one of the best things in TV Lane.

I think I figured out why MSNBC is giving Trump so much free air time and helping him. They really want Hillary and they think if
Trump is the Republican candidate, then voters will be so scared, they will run to Hillary just to keep the nation from the disaster that is Trump. This way Senator Sanders would fail. This does explain things in a coherent frame. I could be wrong, but it is worth considering the idea.

LovingA2andMI

(7,006 posts)
68. Not a Big Melissa Harris Perry Fan BUT....
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 08:12 PM
Feb 2016

I knew or felt this would happen to her. She is not the Black Face that MSNBC wanted this year. Joy Ann Reid is. Her Face is Blacker and She is Willing to STILL play the game. Along with Rachel Maddow for that matter. MSNBC is no longer a "Liberal" or "Progressive" Network. That is why Ed Schultz was shown the door and Melissa Harris Perry is being shown the door as we speak.

Plus, if Melissa Harris Perry would dare question ANY of the materials that Black Lives Matters Activist Ashley Williams has put out on Hillary Clinton -- that would be MORE of a reason to not let her at the mic. This is MHP's style -- to question police, law enforcement, policy and ethnic relations as it relates to African-Americans and/or Minorities in Particular. Knowing that - she would have Ashley Williams on her show AND give her a fair interview. Debbie Wasserman Schultz or Hillary Clinton will not allow that to happen -- thus she is silenced.

Rachel Maddow meanwhile knows where her bread is buttered. Maddow never did shit to stop Keith Olbermann's boot from the Network even though SHE WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN on MSNBC without him. Neither will she stand up for MHP despite the FACT MHP have on many occassions Co-Hosted her show. It is a case of whose ice water is colder here.

The best thing MHP can do is ride out her Contract with Comcast/NBC Universal. With Barack Obama leaving in January 2017 -- MSNBC do not have to "play nice" to any more "Black Folks" or need "Black Folks That Don't Play Ball" on their So-Called Liberal Network. That is the way it is.

I MIGHT feel worse for MHP if she would have stood up when folks in Detroit was BEGGING HER to cover the Water Shut Offs in 2013-2014 -- but she ignored it and the story -- but she's no novice. MHP knows how the game is played and know full well her time is almost up.

Maybe RT (Russia Today) will take her. Maybe Not. Either way, she better start seeking her next gig on TV outside of teaching as the bell is about to tow on her show and MSNBC.

Maybe she should call Goldie Taylor to find out how to survive after being dumped by the so-called "Liberal" Network.

PoiBoy

(1,542 posts)
116. You make some very good points...
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 10:12 PM
Feb 2016

Ironically, this is what TPTB @ MSNBC had to say about MHP back in 2011...

http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/08/02/maddow-agrees-to-a-new-contract-with-msnbc/#

(end of the article)

BTW... Rachel makes about $7 million a year.. kinda hard to walk away from a payday like that I guess...











LovingA2andMI

(7,006 posts)
123. Rachel Is Not Walking Away For $7 Million Dollars....
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 10:50 PM
Feb 2016

Or Standing up for MHP Either. MHP is on her own....

jillan

(39,451 posts)
164. They gave Joy her own show and then took it away so maybe MSNBC just has a problem with PoC?
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 05:24 AM
Feb 2016

The only person of color that still has a show is Tamron Hall? Is that right?

I think there is a guy named Melvin on earlier in the day.

Trying to think of others, but I can't.

LovingA2andMI

(7,006 posts)
172. That's about it.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 08:57 AM
Feb 2016

As for Tamron, she's safe for now because she is also on the Today Show -- thus is on more than one channel -- making it harder but not impossible, to give Tamron the axe.

Melvin is just a fill in reporter. He can go at anytime he does not tap dance MSNBC's tune.

 

Ernest T

(7 posts)
70. I stopped watching you and Msnbc 6 months ago
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 08:16 PM
Feb 2016

The way MHP feels is probably the same way Bernie feels. Being ignored and shut out. That's what MHP did to Bernie, so stop complaining Melissa.

ellennelle

(614 posts)
87. cannot imagine they feel the same way
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 08:54 PM
Feb 2016

MHP said she cried tons of tears. bernie has not and will not shed a-one. he does not take it personally enough to cry over it; he simply recognizes the travesty it represents.

so much for a 'free press' - bought and paid for by the establishment.

tularetom

(23,664 posts)
77. Personally I advocate taking a big dump on your bosses desk but if you feel you have to quit
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 08:34 PM
Feb 2016

This is probably a classier way to do it.

Go ahead and boycott MSNBC, Comcast doesn't care. This was a show that aired on weekends, before most people even got out of bed. It wasn't a bad show, but very few people watched it. You want to make a point, discontinue your cable service. If enough people do that, they might notice.

I've now been without cable for 11 months. I haven't regretted for a second my decision to discontinue service.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
79. Comcast is a horrible Tea Party type company that loathes those that would tell the truth.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 08:37 PM
Feb 2016

How pathetic is it that stations have to become minions to their owner companies? Funny, how the RW agenda must be protected at all costs...even at the point of ruining a few stations. Oh well, the RWing depends on their supporters like Comcast.

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
208. +1
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 01:11 PM
Feb 2016

That word is so misused and misapplied. Anyone who thinks MSNBC is liberal probably also thinks Obama and Hillary are liberal.

They just don't know what liberal actually is.

.

houston16revival

(953 posts)
85. The country is being sold into corporate control
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 08:49 PM
Feb 2016

so the corporations are supporting the corporate leader, Trump

I doubt anybody could do much about it.

houston16revival

(953 posts)
98. He's probably NEGOTIATED with them for good press coverage
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 09:17 PM
Feb 2016

and today he said he would loosen libel laws so he can sue and
make a lot of money

So either the press has been cowed and is afraid, or there is a DEAL behind
the scenes and this bluster is to give them cover for their biased reporting

ellennelle

(614 posts)
86. surprised?
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 08:50 PM
Feb 2016

msnbc is owned by nbc and microsoft, all owned by GE. yeah, that GE; you know, the war outfit.

this was so predictable. remember? they only recently offloaded ed schultz when he gave too much coverage to bernie and the TPP.

folks, here is THE ONLY SOLUTION TO THE PROBLEM OF BEING MANIPULATED AND RULED BY THE PLUTOCRACY:

CUT THE CABLE!!!

seriously. just cut the cable. stop watching that crap. buy books. listen to music.

if you want to keep up with the news, you can always get it online.

i am so not kidding. the peaceful bliss of not having a TV in your house is exquisite. it's like kicking out that domineering and mind-numbingly dumb big brother who chatters nonstop about nothing important, and never ever listens to anybody.

MHP should not shed a tear over this. msnbc's behavior was just totally predictable. they're toxic; she's far better off without them. and she will no doubt land on her feet. she's remarkably talented.

JHB

(37,161 posts)
131. You're a little out of date, ownership-wise
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 11:41 PM
Feb 2016

Microsoft & GE sold off their stakes years ago. It's a Comcast baby now.

Not that that's any improvement.

mmm413

(185 posts)
95. MSNBC has truly lost it's soul (as much as any media outlet has one)
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 09:14 PM
Feb 2016

First Phil Donohue because he was against the Iraq war.
Then Keith Olbermann (who was instrumental getting me through the Bush years).
Then, I believe Ed Schultz because he was against Keystone and TPP.
Then we see Joy Reid go. The Cycle go. Who else?
Oh, yes. Rev. Al.
Now, MHP?
But by golly, Joe and Mika are now on FOUR hours a day!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Welcome to Fox Lite. Move over CNN. MSNBC now has your slot.

jillan

(39,451 posts)
101. Don't forget Martin Bashir - he left after being in trouble from the bosses at Comcast for repeating
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 09:23 PM
Feb 2016

Palin's own words in a rant on his show to make a point of how disgusting and hateful Palin is.

He was my fav.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
99. She is, quite simply, too smart for MSNBC.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 09:22 PM
Feb 2016

One of the best.

MSNBC is quickly becoming just another second-rate TV cable channels.

I will say no more. She is one of the best if not THE BEST on cable.

I remember how I reacted the first time I saw her. She is over-educated for MSNBC.

That's why we don't subscribe to cable.

Cable is geared to the lowest common denominator in terms of intelligence. There are occasional moments of intelligence.

If you want good, solid research and information, try Pacifica.

Ian Masters, Democracy Now, and the crew are just great sources of intelligent discussion and information.

RealNews has been good too.

rurallib

(62,445 posts)
103. MHP, Rachel, Lawrence, Hayes should call them on their bullshit and walk out
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 09:28 PM
Feb 2016

they will all get jobs. Maybe not as well paying, but they still have to live with themselves.

They could invite Tweety to join them but they'd have to pull his head out of his ass first.

emsimon33

(3,128 posts)
104. Is MHP a Bernie supporter? mentioned the TPP? What did she do to upset the apple cart?
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 09:32 PM
Feb 2016

I am getting more and more fed up with MSNBC. Twiddy's interview with Bernie was laughable. So,. let me see if I understand: Bernie will need 60 votes to pass anything but Hillary will only need 60 votes!?!?

libnnc

(9,996 posts)
108. I am proud to say she's a neighbor of mine.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 09:45 PM
Feb 2016

Winston-Salem, NC is a better place with her here.

She rocks.

LyndaG

(683 posts)
119. "Certified Liar" must be Brian Williams
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 10:29 PM
Feb 2016

He's terrible doing the election coverage - Boring, and repeats hackneyed talking points.

Hate to see Melissa go.

TuxedoKat

(3,818 posts)
200. Yes
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 12:20 PM
Feb 2016

I noticed he never seems to add much analysis to the conversation. Mostly he the one who cuts to the breaks or talks first after the commercials to sum up what they were talking about previously or what they will discuss next. He's made to look like he's in control but he rarely says much of substance.

houston16revival

(953 posts)
133. Sure sounds like
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 11:57 PM
Feb 2016

she'll be fired this week

Not doing her job the way her bosses want it done

She says they should stand up and cancel the show in lieu of
cancellation by attrition

But she is quitting by attrition instead of just resigning

I'm not disagreeing with her point of view though I see it as
having an element of drama

Of course it's nothing the Senate majority isn't doing - you know,

refusing to do their job because they don't like the choices

Maybe that's the norm this year

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)
135. Wow! I hadn't heard about any of this...
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 12:00 AM
Feb 2016

I stopped watching the channel altogether.

Didn't have any idea that their incompetent management had trashed her too.

Puppyjive

(506 posts)
137. Selling The News
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 12:12 AM
Feb 2016

NBC is worried about a Bernie Sanders presidency. They have continually removed hosts who actually make a difference by enlightening their audience with facts and not fiction. You cannot trust the news anymore, especially NBC, or MSNBC. Look at their advertising base. Big Pharma and Wall Street. Bernie is a big threat to their bottom line. We hate those pharmaceutical commercials and we hate Wall Street commercials, two entities that have destroyed our country right before our eyes. Melissa, save your dignity and run, run, run. You are much too intelligent for the network. Those people will sell their sole to the devil. Fame, fortune and glamour is just not impressive anymore.

Punx

(446 posts)
142. Remember
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 12:55 AM
Feb 2016

Their job is to entertain (make money) not inform. They are (and less and less so lately) the Democrat side of the "Theater" between the two parties the elites use to keep us distracted. A lot of good people at MSNBC have gone because of being too "Informative" or not willing to bs there viewers.

I really like Rachel as a person and her decency shines through, but I've been disappointed with her at times in the last few months.

The problem they are going to have is that liberals are not as easily misled as the conservative crowd.

 

FairWinds

(1,717 posts)
143. Professor Perry defended the Obama Administration . .
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 01:06 AM
Feb 2016

from any and all critiques from the progressive movement.

i.e., Tavis Smiley, Cornel West, etc.

And she never even took the trouble to address the substance on their analysis . .

Oh no, they were "jealous" or "felt left out" or some lame thing . .

She was all about the personal attacks.

You'll notice in her email she makes no claim at all to be a progressive.

I'll get behind the Big Ed, the Turk and . . . um, who was that great MSNBC afternoon progressive guy?

but Melissa, not so much.

 

YOHABLO

(7,358 posts)
144. I have watched MHP on several occasions. She's very academic and knowledgable
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 01:09 AM
Feb 2016

Sometimes that might be a problem for some in that you really have to listen well to get everything in she's saying. Her mind goes 1000 miles a minute. Rachael is very academic, if not nerdy herself and holds a PhD in Sociology. But I think Madow and MHP draw needed attention to issues that otherwise would not be addressed or even known to the public. It would be a disservice not to have MHP back on the air, but this is corporate media and they don't like 'them there liberuls'. How they allow even a modicum of left-of-center point of view on MSNBC is beyond me. But then they only allow so much. They canned Donahue, Olberman, Shultz, (that cute Ronan Farrow), Rev.Al, and now MHP. Somebody at the top is saying ''get those f...ing lefties off the air!"

I watch and listen to Hartmann, Democracy Now, Ring of Fire and more. I get what I need but I know that the majority of people out there are getting only right wing hate radio .. and of course all the corporate news from the talking heads on FOX, CNN, NBC, CBS etc.. Funny though, I have been told that WE own the airwaves, yet we don't have any say over the propaganda.

Why do we even have Schools of Journalism at Universities anymore?

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
150. I would boycott, but I stopped watching MSNBC and all cable news shows a long time ago.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 01:23 AM
Feb 2016

They are all owned by greedy billionaires.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
151. Anyone have the numbers on her show? I can't seem to find any.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 01:24 AM
Feb 2016

I like MHP and I enjoyed her show, but if folks weren't watching, they weren't watching.

shadowmayor

(1,325 posts)
159. Tweety
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 03:01 AM
Feb 2016

Yes Comcast is a monster corporation, but I think Tweety has a lot more pull behind the scenes than we are aware. Dr. Perry should check the knife stuck in her back for fingerprints - I'm guessing Tweety's prints are all over it.

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
160. "last hired,first fired"
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 03:04 AM
Feb 2016

That was saying about African american jobs in the 50's, and it is true today. Never mind the whole Mika and Joe Clown show, where Mika pretends to be some indignant centrist heroine being tied to the tracks by that evil villain Joe "I killed my intern and got away with it" Scab. Never mind Rachel "I used to have cred, but I know where my bread is buttered" Maddow. Above all, never mind Chris "Tweety: Matthews. At least Rachel, Joe and Chris did something once that could be argued was credible.

However, perry has been lopped by the likes of Luke Russert, SE CUPP, and MTP was given to...Chuck Todd. Now,I am one of those Gen Xers that the Boomers like to yell at, however, when you see these folks, and know they do NOT have any skills to back what they have been given, you smell a rat. Hell, even the Young Turks could show you that they had insight, or at least guts, but the people I mentioned seem to think Journalism is sipping around bullshitting like Baristas at a Starbucks. No, let me rephrase that, I have heard better researched, and better argued, and much more passionate political discussion at many a Starbucks. I WISH that was a joke, but the fact is, it is not. You can go to many a Starbucks and find a barista working there that has a Master's degree, which is more than many of these Journalists have. So, why the Bloody hell did these young twerps (as opposed to young turks) get the job and spotlight they would not even give to an old sportscaster like Keith Olbermann? Because they are the pretty suburban class meant to appeal to the pretty suburban class; the class that enjoys the privilege of knowing they will never have to be smarter or braver or work as hard as anyone else, especially that poor black lady with all the PHD's.

I hope RT has an opening. Yeah, I know it is Putin's propaganda arm, but Perry owes this nations nothing. NOTHING.

mfcorey1

(11,001 posts)
165. Releuctantly,I now find myself turning to CNN for news and
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 06:19 AM
Feb 2016

discussion. Can someone please help me solve my addiction to electronic news?

lovemydog

(11,833 posts)
166. Cutting off Comcast and telling them why could be a start.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 07:36 AM
Feb 2016

Another possibility is watching C-Span. I prefer it for debates & speeches & stuff like that. I can't stand the 'pundits' on other channels. It could help you slow the addiction. Another may be getting news from reading. TV News doesn't really provide much news at all. I think it's more a 'shock and awe' strategy to get the viewer to be full of anxiety and then get the viewer to be more receptive to products that supposedly make you 'happy' or relieve the anxiety you have from watching all that depressing garbage. Sorry I don't mean to sound condescending. I know a lot of people love tv and I don't mean to denigrate it too much. Oh, another one is having the mute button handy. I hit mute during all the commercials, lol.

fredamae

(4,458 posts)
179. Before I cut "it" All off
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 09:58 AM
Feb 2016

I asked myself: What did you learn of substance today? Did they discuss Or conduct Any Investigation into issues important to All like TPP? Net Neutrality? The real Health Care Crises? Widespread contamination of our drinking water and Why regulations are being Cut and Who is behind it? Poverty? Why banksters are Not prosecuted but kids caught with a Joint are? Do they express extreme political biases? Do you feel manipulated and distracted after viewing these scripted skits? On and on and on. Do you consider the media gruel we're served satisfies you as far as Full Investigative reporting on actual issues With follow up?
If you come up empty......there Is your answer.

We have to accept what "news" has become and stop hoping for it to be what it once was.

 

redruddyred

(1,615 posts)
170. i think she's overreacting, but i agree her show is an impt voice
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 08:52 AM
Feb 2016

i'm sad to see her go, she made msnbc look good.
the "not responding to emails" bit is kinda ridiculous, so maybe she has right to be offended.

Vinca

(50,303 posts)
173. I'm afraid I'm in the minority here.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 08:59 AM
Feb 2016

While I'm not a fan of MSNBC anymore, I never was much of a fan of MHP either. In fact, she's the only talking head I've ever sent an email to. I suggested she empower people by encouraging voting and involvement rather than dwell on victimization. Needless to say, I didn't get a response. Not sorry she's gone.

 

NobodyHere

(2,810 posts)
182. Wasn't Melissa Harris-Perry
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 10:33 AM
Feb 2016

the one who mocked Romney's adopted baby for being the wrong color?

Disgusting.

gregcrawford

(2,382 posts)
187. What is happening to Ms. Harris Perry...
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 11:28 AM
Feb 2016

... is an obscenity. But, as we become distracted by looking at this through a kaleidoscope of corruption, we are missing the larger issue that rules every breath of business in this country, and indeed, the world: CORPORATISM. It is the most evil socioeconomic and political phenomenon in human history. Like every cancer, it is intent on destroying its host, and it must be excised by whatever means necessary; we are running out of time.

But its proponents and apologists must be exposed and discredited with FACTS, not fabrications. We cannot allow the billionaires at the top of the food chain to influence the education of our children though indoctrination or misrepresentation. As George Carlin observed decades ago, they do not want intelligent, independent critical thinkers, they want obedient drones, or words to that effect.

Comcast is only one of thousands of companies that systematically crush independent voices. They all know that resentment and resistance is growing; just look at Bernie's success. And that is one of the reasons they are so determined to throttle the only method of free and open communication left to us: The Internet. If they control that, they kill us. Do not let them kill us.

Thus endeth my rant. I need more coffee.

lbrtbell

(2,389 posts)
189. Good Lord, what a whiner
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 11:37 AM
Feb 2016

Phil Donahue, Keith Olbermann, Ed Schultz, and many more (who were far better at their jobs than Melissa) have been down this road before her.

Did she think she was somehow a special snowflake that would survive MSNBC's longtime silencing of liberal voices? Or was she honestly stupid enough to think that MSNBC wasn't getting marching orders from their owners?

Either way, she's a fool. Anyone who's been watching MSNBC for all these years knows what's been happening: That they only toss liberals a few crumbs, to make it look as if they're the alternative to Fox News. The only way to make it on MSNBC is to be like Rachel Maddow: Toe the line and be a good little obedient liberal.

Generic Brad

(14,275 posts)
193. Clearly she does not want to continue employment with MSNBC
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 11:52 AM
Feb 2016

She does not have any negotiating leverage here. While her complaints may be legitimate, the fact that she is airing her grievances publicly makes the cancellation of her show a foregone conclusion. Within a week I predict MHP will go the way of the Yelp employee who criticized her CEO.

AngryOldDem

(14,061 posts)
195. I'm about done with the media, period.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 12:00 PM
Feb 2016

They, and their corporate masters, are a big reason why this country is in the mess that it's in.

I've been wondering where MHP has been lately. I kind of figured that this was what was going on.

Maddow's days are numbered, and I suspect Lawrence O'Donnell won't be far behind.

Meanwhile, that journalistic fraud Brian Williams is taking over, along with Scarborough and his legion of GOP ass-kissers.

Done with it.

erlewyne

(1,115 posts)
209. I am realizing that the DNC is bringing MSNBC down.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 01:38 PM
Feb 2016

MSNBC is catering to the DNC and the Democrats of old
are dumping MSNBC. I am an old time Democrat, but I thought
I was a loner ... but no ... the DNC is in trouble.

The only thing going for the DNC is the tea party.


Oh, I dumped MSNBC.

lupinella

(365 posts)
214. She was my favourite on the channel.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 03:27 PM
Feb 2016

So sad that we have lost her voice on MSNBC. Can't wait to see what she does next. As always, am thrilled by her passion and intelligence & her contempt for b.s.

pacalo

(24,721 posts)
223. MSNBC is clearly going to the right.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 05:21 PM
Feb 2016

Rightwinger guests can be seen on any given night on their evening shows, for those who care to watch, that is. Not I.

It breaks my heart how Melissa has been treated.

shireen

(8,333 posts)
224. Melissa needs to take her show online
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 06:14 PM
Feb 2016

Cable tv news is getting increasingly irrelevant. All she needs to do is set up live streaming for at a particular time so we can tune in. We use social media to spread the message about her show. I like her 10-12 weekend slot--it's nice to have her on tv when i'm puttering around the house.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
226. I didn't watch MHP. However, I respect her for taking a public stand. I am sure she knows it will
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 06:32 PM
Feb 2016

do her career no favors, whether with MSNBC or with a future broadcast employer. But she is taking a stand and pointing to racism. if MSNBC lets her go, I hope her stand that will, at a minimum, coerce MSNBC to hire an African American to replace her. They have a brilliant African American woman right on their staff now. She used to have her own show, but they took it away from her.

Maybe she was too brainy and not flashy, but she's soooo intelligent and soooo worth hearing out. (Joy-Ann Reid, in case anyone missed it.) Actually, maybe they should even put her in the head office. She's probably light years smarter than anyone at NBC News certainly light years ahead of the likes of a Dick Gregory or Chuck Todd I think she, too, favors Hillary, but I would watch her. It's more about ethics and intelligence that who some babbling fool favors.

Meldread

(4,213 posts)
228. I don't think she favors Hillary.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 07:22 PM
Feb 2016

I know MHP was pretty anti-Hillary for awhile, and was practically begging Joe Biden to run against Hillary. She was clearly on Team Joe. However, after Joe refused to run I don't know where she stood between Bernie and Hillary.

Listening to her, I think her primary concern was two fold: who is the most liberal person who can be elected, and who is going to do the best job upholding Obama's legacy as President? She clearly thought that person was his Vice President, Joe Biden, but... does she view Hillary that way? I don't know. I do know, just listening to her talk on her show, that she wasn't a huge Hillary fan though she never explicitly stated it.

My guess is that after Joe refused to run she probably leaned toward Sanders, but she could have leaned toward Hillary if she didn't think Sanders could win in a general election. Either case, I don't think anyone could question her credentials as a liberal.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
229. I've watched her and I don't think she favors Sanders at all.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 07:25 PM
Feb 2016
Either case, I don't think anyone could question her credentials as a liberal.


No one did.

Meldread

(4,213 posts)
231. Unfortunately...
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 07:30 PM
Feb 2016

....some people up-thread are.


I know you didn't. I didn't mean to imply that you did.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
232. Reid not liberal? I don't agree. However, even if she were centrist, she'd be worth hearing out.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 07:33 PM
Feb 2016

She's just that good, IMO.

Meldread

(4,213 posts)
233. Wasn't talking about Reid, sorry.
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 07:46 PM
Feb 2016

I was talking about MHP.

Reid, as you said, seems to definitely be in favor of Hillary. However, like you also said, I believe she is very intelligent, gives good analysis, and thus is always worth hearing out.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Melissa Harris-Perry’s Em...