Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
46 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rachel Maddow, still here for us (Original Post) kpete Feb 2016 OP
She's under my bus for her constant Hillary cheerleading. 2pooped2pop Feb 2016 #1
I will gladly help you shove her under. What a disappoint she has been. agracie Feb 2016 #2
Yeah... the convenience of throwing people under the bus for disagreeing LanternWaste Feb 2016 #3
I'm not throwing them under the bus anymore 2pooped2pop Feb 2016 #7
I'm not against Rachel (or Joy Reid) for rooting for Hillary MurrayDelph Feb 2016 #20
You are right, pretending to be impartial is worse. But it's too late. I already threw her under the GoneFishin Mar 2016 #37
OFFS! She's had Bernie on over and over again! longship Feb 2016 #13
She is not an ally 2pooped2pop Feb 2016 #14
I got it. longship Feb 2016 #17
Its not about my opinion 2pooped2pop Feb 2016 #25
Well, that's your opinion. longship Mar 2016 #40
Typical 2pooped2pop Mar 2016 #44
Unlike the atypical of wanting to over the cliff those who disagree. longship Mar 2016 #45
She loves Bernie too. Wow. bettyellen Feb 2016 #18
I'll be watching The Young Turks and Democracy Now RandiFan1290 Feb 2016 #4
I can't believe she's not coming back until July. She needs a bit more money to achieve that. Liberal_Stalwart71 Feb 2016 #23
Rachel Maddow, here for Hillary. n/t PonyUp Feb 2016 #5
She anywhere else besides MSNBC? Iggo Feb 2016 #6
Piss off, Bernie Acolytes. Rachel is more valuable than ever. (nt) Paladin Feb 2016 #8
This place is awesome during election years. geomon666 Feb 2016 #9
Well, her ratings are extremely high, so Hortensis Feb 2016 #10
You can download the show as a podcast mythology Feb 2016 #27
Thanks, Mythology. I really should get the codes Hortensis Mar 2016 #43
That's why we get leaders like we do. Wilms Feb 2016 #11
Yeah for Rachel Gothmog Feb 2016 #12
In all honesty, if even Rachel Maddow pisses you off ... LannyDeVaney Feb 2016 #15
She has been a hillary cheerleader, not a journalist. But I understand her wanting a woman president Logical Feb 2016 #19
Tonights show she did a segment on Sanders big money balance, pointing out it was non-Super Pac ... LannyDeVaney Feb 2016 #21
Yea she is. I said she was. I am agreeing with you. nt Logical Feb 2016 #24
And the complete missing of the irony mythology Feb 2016 #32
She is a journalist. therefore her personal preference is... agracie Feb 2016 #35
She clearly clicked a couple of notches toward the right when she got her own TV show. I loved her GoneFishin Mar 2016 #38
Great segment on Trumpkkk flamingdem Feb 2016 #16
I love her commentary tonight. Loving it. And I totally forgot about Jeff Sessions's past. Liberal_Stalwart71 Feb 2016 #22
Did Rachel ask Tulsi if she was pressured to leave the DNC? leveymg Feb 2016 #26
No, that I heard. LannyDeVaney Feb 2016 #28
That answers it. Purged. leveymg Feb 2016 #31
Wow, I guess we'll just have to disagree on that quality of the interview ... LannyDeVaney Feb 2016 #33
yup. rachel spun hopemountain Mar 2016 #41
She is the only journalist on MSNBC I still enjoy watching. Agnosticsherbet Feb 2016 #29
I am very curious to know what her ratings are these days. jillan Feb 2016 #30
Beautifully said! I don't care what people in here say about Rachel Maddow. I really like her. Nt AgadorSparticus Feb 2016 #34
By not disclosing the truth and outright lying she is assisting is the destruction of onecaliberal Feb 2016 #36
and by not correcting the untruths hopemountain Mar 2016 #42
Can't agree with you on this one Kpete. She's a cheerleader for a warmonger and bankster apologist GoneFishin Mar 2016 #39
Not only beltanefauve Mar 2016 #46
 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
1. She's under my bus for her constant Hillary cheerleading.
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 04:03 PM
Feb 2016

I can't forgive anyone that would help give us that disaster. Loading up my bus and pushing it over the cliff to save America. Fortunately its a very big bus.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
3. Yeah... the convenience of throwing people under the bus for disagreeing
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 04:24 PM
Feb 2016

Yeah... the convenience of throwing people under the bus for disagreeing with us is legend. We may not care to state why we support someone, but it's fun and entertaining as hell to state (over and over again) why we hate "them." And as long as we deny ourselves that that is part and parcel of the problem, we can maintain our pretense of righteous progressiveness.

 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
7. I'm not throwing them under the bus anymore
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 04:34 PM
Feb 2016

I've decided to put them on the bus and push it over a cliff. And its not for disagreeing with me but for helping to destroy what is left of this country.

MurrayDelph

(5,752 posts)
20. I'm not against Rachel (or Joy Reid) for rooting for Hillary
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 10:34 PM
Feb 2016

This is America, they, like you and I, have the right to support whomever we like
(as long as we are willing to vote for our second choice if our preferred candidate doesn't become the nominee).

What I'm against is showing a marked favoritism while simultaneously claiming impartiality.

GoneFishin

(5,217 posts)
37. You are right, pretending to be impartial is worse. But it's too late. I already threw her under the
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 12:06 AM
Mar 2016

bus when it became clear that she has become more corporatist since she has had her own TV show, and presumably makes more money.

longship

(40,416 posts)
13. OFFS! She's had Bernie on over and over again!
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 09:53 PM
Feb 2016

And this Bernie voter loves Rachel.

BTW. With the number of people being flung under the bus, how do one plan on accomplishing anything politically when one keeps flinging allies under the freaking bus?

 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
14. She is not an ally
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 10:17 PM
Feb 2016

Not since her Hillary cheer leading started. You have not been paying attention if you do not know this. My bus is very big and they don't go under it anymore. They go on it. Then they are pushed over the cliff. So OFFS that. We have empty seats left if you want a lift.

longship

(40,416 posts)
17. I got it.
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 10:23 PM
Feb 2016

If they don't agree with your opinion or present any opinion counter to it, over the cliff they go.

Well, I wish you luck with that.

Regards to you.

 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
25. Its not about my opinion
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 11:11 PM
Feb 2016

It's about saving the country from the disaster that is Hillary. Anyone helping to unleash a Clinton onto the American people goes on my bus.

But really why do you give a fuck who goes on my bus? There's still seats left if you are interested though.

longship

(40,416 posts)
45. Unlike the atypical of wanting to over the cliff those who disagree.
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 02:38 PM
Mar 2016

Last edited Tue Mar 1, 2016, 03:26 PM - Edit history (2)


 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
23. I can't believe she's not coming back until July. She needs a bit more money to achieve that.
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 10:48 PM
Feb 2016

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
10. Well, her ratings are extremely high, so
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 05:13 PM
Feb 2016

we should have her for some while. We don't do cable down here on the marsh, and if I could have one cable show it'd be hers, but we'll be home again in the late spring.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
43. Thanks, Mythology. I really should get the codes
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 06:23 AM
Mar 2016

that would allow me to set that up from my husband when he's not out fishing or something. We have electronics we've never used, literally.

 

Wilms

(26,795 posts)
11. That's why we get leaders like we do.
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 06:27 PM
Feb 2016

ohhhhh. She called the republicans, er, republicans. That is sooooo awesome. She should be paid millions and have her taxes kept low by the Third Way.

Sorry, kpete. No sale.

 

LannyDeVaney

(1,033 posts)
15. In all honesty, if even Rachel Maddow pisses you off ...
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 10:21 PM
Feb 2016

then DU is probably not the forum for you.

I mean that with true sincerity. It can't be an ideological reason - it comes down to hatred for a candidate she supports (allegedly - I've never actually heard her claim a preference of Clinton or Sanders), and we're talking about a pool of candidates in the Democratic party, then DU is truly not the site for you.

Peace.

 

Logical

(22,457 posts)
19. She has been a hillary cheerleader, not a journalist. But I understand her wanting a woman president
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 10:29 PM
Feb 2016
 

LannyDeVaney

(1,033 posts)
21. Tonights show she did a segment on Sanders big money balance, pointing out it was non-Super Pac ...
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 10:45 PM
Feb 2016

and now she is interviewing Rep. Gabbard.

So, yeah, totally in the bag for Clinton.

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
32. And the complete missing of the irony
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 11:36 PM
Feb 2016

Is why I don't take it seriously when people claim Maddow is biased.

agracie

(950 posts)
35. She is a journalist. therefore her personal preference is...
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 11:46 PM
Feb 2016

immaterial. Her bias toward Hillary and her dismissive tone toward Bernie is hard to miss. Used to watch her frequently, but no more.

GoneFishin

(5,217 posts)
38. She clearly clicked a couple of notches toward the right when she got her own TV show. I loved her
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 12:10 AM
Mar 2016

on radio. She is not the same, and I can only assume it is a combination of more money and pressure from the network head cheese balls.

flamingdem

(40,898 posts)
16. Great segment on Trumpkkk
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 10:22 PM
Feb 2016

She's not in the tank for Hillary, she's in the tank for justice.

 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
22. I love her commentary tonight. Loving it. And I totally forgot about Jeff Sessions's past.
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 10:46 PM
Feb 2016

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
26. Did Rachel ask Tulsi if she was pressured to leave the DNC?
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 11:18 PM
Feb 2016

I really would like to know.

 

LannyDeVaney

(1,033 posts)
28. No, that I heard.
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 11:23 PM
Feb 2016

Since you asked ... the DNC never came up. She was drawing contrasts between her beliefs and Clinton's foreign policy, and she clearly outlined why she was supporting Senator Sanders.

It was a good interview about real issues, and not gossip or finger-pointing.



leveymg

(36,418 posts)
31. That answers it. Purged.
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 11:33 PM
Feb 2016

This was like one of those old Larry King softball interviews agreed to by both sides in a celebrity divorce settlement. Satisfied the immediate curiosity of the rabble while the real issues go unspoken.

hopemountain

(3,919 posts)
41. yup. rachel spun
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 05:35 AM
Mar 2016

the reason for tulsi leaving because the senator was endorsing sanders. not one word about the debate issue - which was included in gabbard's reason for leaving.

however, the info about clinton's war hawk actions is very important and as rachel said "focused".

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
29. She is the only journalist on MSNBC I still enjoy watching.
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 11:26 PM
Feb 2016

She doesn't support Clinton or Sanders. The problem people have is that she did not openly push Sanders.

jillan

(39,451 posts)
30. I am very curious to know what her ratings are these days.
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 11:29 PM
Feb 2016


I miss the Rachel I fell in love with on Air America. She was fascinating.

AgadorSparticus

(7,963 posts)
34. Beautifully said! I don't care what people in here say about Rachel Maddow. I really like her. Nt
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 11:41 PM
Feb 2016
 

onecaliberal

(36,594 posts)
36. By not disclosing the truth and outright lying she is assisting is the destruction of
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 11:55 PM
Feb 2016

Democracy. It is not the job of the fourth estate to protect a corporate media conglomerate. Real journalism is dead in this country.

hopemountain

(3,919 posts)
42. and by not correcting the untruths
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 05:42 AM
Mar 2016

when there is data to back it up - just letting the information hang out there. rachel had done this several times. and, she outright lied when releasing a ridiculous poll favoring hillary for super tuesday so heavily it was outrageously skewed - but, hey, rachel literally laughed that it was the only poll she could get because her phone wasn't working for some reason. she was reporting from south carolina.

i just never figured her for loosing her professional journalist integrity and high standards for objectivity. this is what is so disappointing about her giddy behavior for hillary.

GoneFishin

(5,217 posts)
39. Can't agree with you on this one Kpete. She's a cheerleader for a warmonger and bankster apologist
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 12:13 AM
Mar 2016

Sorry.

beltanefauve

(1,784 posts)
46. Not only
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 02:46 PM
Mar 2016

is she in the tank for Hillary, she spends waaay too much time talking about Trump. In fact, MSNBC seems to be all Trump all the time.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rachel Maddow, still here...