General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRachel Maddow, still here for us

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/what-does-it-say-about-the-gop-that-trump-is-the-white-supremacists-candidate/2016/02/28/0d5d0b12-dcbe-11e5-891a-4ed04f4213e8_story.html?tid=sm_tw
Thanks, we need you more than ever,
and peace to you and yours,
kp
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)I can't forgive anyone that would help give us that disaster. Loading up my bus and pushing it over the cliff to save America. Fortunately its a very big bus.
agracie
(950 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Yeah... the convenience of throwing people under the bus for disagreeing with us is legend. We may not care to state why we support someone, but it's fun and entertaining as hell to state (over and over again) why we hate "them." And as long as we deny ourselves that that is part and parcel of the problem, we can maintain our pretense of righteous progressiveness.
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)I've decided to put them on the bus and push it over a cliff. And its not for disagreeing with me but for helping to destroy what is left of this country.
MurrayDelph
(5,752 posts)This is America, they, like you and I, have the right to support whomever we like
(as long as we are willing to vote for our second choice if our preferred candidate doesn't become the nominee).
What I'm against is showing a marked favoritism while simultaneously claiming impartiality.
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)bus when it became clear that she has become more corporatist since she has had her own TV show, and presumably makes more money.
longship
(40,416 posts)And this Bernie voter loves Rachel.
BTW. With the number of people being flung under the bus, how do one plan on accomplishing anything politically when one keeps flinging allies under the freaking bus?
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)Not since her Hillary cheer leading started. You have not been paying attention if you do not know this. My bus is very big and they don't go under it anymore. They go on it. Then they are pushed over the cliff. So OFFS that. We have empty seats left if you want a lift.
longship
(40,416 posts)If they don't agree with your opinion or present any opinion counter to it, over the cliff they go.
Well, I wish you luck with that.
Regards to you.
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)It's about saving the country from the disaster that is Hillary. Anyone helping to unleash a Clinton onto the American people goes on my bus.
But really why do you give a fuck who goes on my bus? There's still seats left if you are interested though.
longship
(40,416 posts)2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)longship
(40,416 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)RandiFan1290
(6,710 posts)While waiting for Randi to come back
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)PonyUp
(1,680 posts)Iggo
(49,928 posts)Paladin
(32,354 posts)geomon666
(7,519 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)we should have her for some while. We don't do cable down here on the marsh, and if I could have one cable show it'd be hers, but we'll be home again in the late spring.
mythology
(9,527 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)that would allow me to set that up from my husband when he's not out fishing or something. We have electronics we've never used, literally.
Wilms
(26,795 posts)ohhhhh. She called the republicans, er, republicans. That is sooooo awesome. She should be paid millions and have her taxes kept low by the Third Way.
Sorry, kpete. No sale.
Gothmog
(179,870 posts)LannyDeVaney
(1,033 posts)then DU is probably not the forum for you.
I mean that with true sincerity. It can't be an ideological reason - it comes down to hatred for a candidate she supports (allegedly - I've never actually heard her claim a preference of Clinton or Sanders), and we're talking about a pool of candidates in the Democratic party, then DU is truly not the site for you.
Peace.
Logical
(22,457 posts)LannyDeVaney
(1,033 posts)and now she is interviewing Rep. Gabbard.
So, yeah, totally in the bag for Clinton.
Logical
(22,457 posts)mythology
(9,527 posts)Is why I don't take it seriously when people claim Maddow is biased.
agracie
(950 posts)immaterial. Her bias toward Hillary and her dismissive tone toward Bernie is hard to miss. Used to watch her frequently, but no more.
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)on radio. She is not the same, and I can only assume it is a combination of more money and pressure from the network head cheese balls.
flamingdem
(40,898 posts)She's not in the tank for Hillary, she's in the tank for justice.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)leveymg
(36,418 posts)I really would like to know.
LannyDeVaney
(1,033 posts)Since you asked ... the DNC never came up. She was drawing contrasts between her beliefs and Clinton's foreign policy, and she clearly outlined why she was supporting Senator Sanders.
It was a good interview about real issues, and not gossip or finger-pointing.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)This was like one of those old Larry King softball interviews agreed to by both sides in a celebrity divorce settlement. Satisfied the immediate curiosity of the rabble while the real issues go unspoken.
LannyDeVaney
(1,033 posts)Yikes.
hopemountain
(3,919 posts)the reason for tulsi leaving because the senator was endorsing sanders. not one word about the debate issue - which was included in gabbard's reason for leaving.
however, the info about clinton's war hawk actions is very important and as rachel said "focused".
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)She doesn't support Clinton or Sanders. The problem people have is that she did not openly push Sanders.
jillan
(39,451 posts)I miss the Rachel I fell in love with on Air America. She was fascinating.
AgadorSparticus
(7,963 posts)onecaliberal
(36,594 posts)Democracy. It is not the job of the fourth estate to protect a corporate media conglomerate. Real journalism is dead in this country.
hopemountain
(3,919 posts)when there is data to back it up - just letting the information hang out there. rachel had done this several times. and, she outright lied when releasing a ridiculous poll favoring hillary for super tuesday so heavily it was outrageously skewed - but, hey, rachel literally laughed that it was the only poll she could get because her phone wasn't working for some reason. she was reporting from south carolina.
i just never figured her for loosing her professional journalist integrity and high standards for objectivity. this is what is so disappointing about her giddy behavior for hillary.
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)Sorry.
beltanefauve
(1,784 posts)is she in the tank for Hillary, she spends waaay too much time talking about Trump. In fact, MSNBC seems to be all Trump all the time.