Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 12:13 PM Mar 2016

And Elizabeth Warren goes under the bus

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by cyberswede (a host of the General Discussion forum).

http://www.rawstory.com/2016/03/elizabeth-warren-fails-to-endorse-bernie-and-his-fans-freak-the-hell-out-on-her-facebook-page/

Elizabeth Warren fails to endorse Bernie and his fans freak the hell out on her Facebook page:

And rant they did, ripping into the implicit heresy of Warren’s failure to endorse Sanders by letting her know in no uncertain terms that they are really really really REALLY disappointed. And worse.

As in:

Your unwillingness to endorse Bernie prior to Super Tuesday indicates to me that your fear of pressure from Hillary friends on Capitol Hill “trumps” your commitment to the progressive cause. I have lost faith in you and the DNC.

Elizabeth – is there ANY reason on God’s green earth that you’re sitting quiet in the corner while Bernie is awaiting your endorsement? Am I missing something here???

Is she really part of the establishment? How can she, as a representative of the people, as a self proclaimed progressive, not publicly endorse Bernie Sanders? Do you think she owes Clinton some political favors? hmmmm.

With every day that passes without your endorsement of Sanders, Wall Street rejoices, and the corporate owned Hillary Clinton is validated. Shame on you.

Sen Warren let all of the progressives down and the country by not endorsing us before Super Tuesday. With her help, we could have and should have won Mass. Why and what does she have up her sleeve???

Karl Rove’s money? Are you smoking crack? I love Elizabeth and would have supported her over Bernie had she chose to run, but I am deeply disappointed in her for not supporting Bernie when it mattered. She will lose ALL credibility if she supports Hillary at any point as Shillary is tied to Wall Street.

You have let all progressives down. Sanders can still win, but if he doesn’t that’s on you. And when Trump defeats Clinton that will be on you too. You’re a sellout. Your endorsement will not save Clinton and we will not vote for her. It’s worthless now.

Warren is a wuss. Her silence will not be forgotten.

Senator Warren: I will no longer support or contribute to you or your campaigns. I think it unconscionable that you can continue to condone the corruption in Washington by NOT endorsing Bernie Sanders. I am actually shocked that you would leave a fellow progressive twisting in the wind, as the Clinton Circus rolls into your state and cheats her way to a very narrow win. You’ve made it very clear: you’re only interested in your political career, not showing solidarity to the people promoting the important causes that you apparently only pay lip service to.#FeelTheBern

I sincerely hope that another progressive runs against Warren so that she can be voted out of office as a reward for her cowardice. I understand Warren is in a difficult position, but this is a time for courage.

46 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
And Elizabeth Warren goes under the bus (Original Post) leftynyc Mar 2016 OP
berniacs are our t-party saturnsring Mar 2016 #1
That's what Bubba calls us anyway...who's classy? haikugal Mar 2016 #7
not those bernie supporters that's for sure and by the you are our little t-party saturnsring Mar 2016 #9
It's nasty and uncalled for. Divisive and counter productive. haikugal Mar 2016 #14
your correct the actions of the bernie supporters are nasty and uncalled for why dont you behave saturnsring Mar 2016 #18
Turn out is low because it's being suppressed...the old thumb on the scale. haikugal Mar 2016 #27
Classy with a k LW1977 Mar 2016 #2
I think they're putting too much stock octoberlib Mar 2016 #3
Under the bus, under the bus, under the bus... HassleCat Mar 2016 #4
Is that not what the leftynyc Mar 2016 #6
Let me explain HassleCat Mar 2016 #25
Disagree leftynyc Mar 2016 #31
They got off the bus. HassleCat Mar 2016 #41
Bullshit...this is propaganda. haikugal Mar 2016 #5
You think I made up those leftynyc Mar 2016 #8
Anyone could have made them up. I don't believe it because I've seen no evidence of this. haikugal Mar 2016 #10
Then you haven't been paying attention leftynyc Mar 2016 #11
I've seen how words are twisted to cast aspersions and call good people racists yes. haikugal Mar 2016 #15
Unless they were all mass leftynyc Mar 2016 #16
Were? haikugal Mar 2016 #17
Don't understand your question leftynyc Mar 2016 #20
Some people prove themselves to be little more tha trolls...I put them on ignore, it saves time. haikugal Mar 2016 #21
Do you think those Facebook posts represent me? Octafish Mar 2016 #36
Haikugal, by FAR most of Bernie supporters are Hortensis Mar 2016 #19
Hortensis, with due respect. That is not what is being flogged with this article. haikugal Mar 2016 #23
Spare me the conspiracy bullshit leftynyc Mar 2016 #33
Let me guess...there is no third way right? haikugal Mar 2016 #37
I can entirely believe Brock would make the Hortensis Mar 2016 #42
Agreed. artislife Mar 2016 #34
It's not even entertaining! haikugal Mar 2016 #39
I love Senator Elizabeth Warren, I can't understand why she should give either one a leg up. Stellar Mar 2016 #12
Agree (n/t) leftynyc Mar 2016 #13
My version is, she gave them both an enormous Hortensis Mar 2016 #22
Agreed. She doesn't have to endorse anyone. haikugal Mar 2016 #24
Yes! Thank you. oldandhappy Mar 2016 #28
I don't think she gave them a boost...she just told them where to start. (to the left, to the left). Stellar Mar 2016 #32
This belongs in the primary forum. cwydro Mar 2016 #26
I used to pay attention to that leftynyc Mar 2016 #35
More divide & conquer Hillarian bullshit. The stench is palpable. nt 99th_Monkey Mar 2016 #29
We will end up leaving the pile behind. nt artislife Mar 2016 #38
Aw, the Meme of the Day! This is tiresome. Kip Humphrey Mar 2016 #30
The link to the article is in the OP leftynyc Mar 2016 #40
Proof that those are Bernie supporters? I looked at a few FB profiles there . Autumn Mar 2016 #44
parcel of nonsense yourpaljoey Mar 2016 #43
Oh, for fuck's sake! Give it up. djean111 Mar 2016 #45
Locking... cyberswede Mar 2016 #46
 

saturnsring

(1,832 posts)
1. berniacs are our t-party
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 12:14 PM
Mar 2016

as they go screaming for the alert button, truth hurts

"I will no longer support or contribute to you or your campaigns". just pathetic

haikugal

(6,476 posts)
7. That's what Bubba calls us anyway...who's classy?
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 12:18 PM
Mar 2016
 

saturnsring

(1,832 posts)
9. not those bernie supporters that's for sure and by the you are our little t-party
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 12:20 PM
Mar 2016

btw not you specifically unless you are

haikugal

(6,476 posts)
14. It's nasty and uncalled for. Divisive and counter productive.
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 12:34 PM
Mar 2016

Our turnout is extremely low. Ask yourself why and what that means for a Clinton victory in the GE.

I deal in reality...this story is highly suspect.

 

saturnsring

(1,832 posts)
18. your correct the actions of the bernie supporters are nasty and uncalled for why dont you behave
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 12:43 PM
Mar 2016

better - turn out is low because it is a primary and many dems would be happy with either candidate. this story may or may not be true but it wouldn't be the first time the Bernie supporters attacked another democrat

haikugal

(6,476 posts)
27. Turn out is low because it's being suppressed...the old thumb on the scale.
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 01:05 PM
Mar 2016

Why can't we have a clean, fair primary? Hell the Clintons don't even honor the election laws. They have complete disregard for the voters other than what the voters can do for them.

 

LW1977

(1,611 posts)
2. Classy with a k
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 12:16 PM
Mar 2016

Actually class without the c and l

octoberlib

(14,971 posts)
3. I think they're putting too much stock
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 12:16 PM
Mar 2016

in endorsements.

 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
4. Under the bus, under the bus, under the bus...
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 12:17 PM
Mar 2016

As a former professional bus driver, I wish people would learn to use this phrase correctly.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
6. Is that not what the
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 12:18 PM
Mar 2016

thread title says? Under the bus. What are you talking about?

 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
25. Let me explain
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 01:01 PM
Mar 2016

To throw someone under the bus, you have to be on the bus with that person in the first place. The phrase means you are back-stabbing someone who was a loyal friend, a trusted associate, etc. When a department head blames a subordinate for a management failure, the subordinate is being thrown under the bus. If Bernie Sanders rebuked Elizabeth Warren for not being progressive, or not supporting hum, that might be an instance of "under the bus." But even that would be a stretch, because Sanders and Warren are congressional colleagues, not running mates or something such as that. If Warren were a big Sanders supporter, involved with his campaign, etc. then she could be thrown under the bus by Sanders. A bunch of tweets from people claiming to be Sanders supporters does not relate to "under the bus" in any way.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
31. Disagree
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 01:15 PM
Mar 2016

Elizabeth Warren has been (rightly) embraced by liberals (despite being a former republican) but this isn't the first time I've seen the supporters of Sen Sanders go after her for not endorsing him. It's just the latest example. All these supposed liberals were on the bus with Sen Warren - until recently.

 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
41. They got off the bus.
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 01:26 PM
Mar 2016

In no way are they driving the bus. They're just passengers. Of course they are not "the supporters" of Sanders. They are "some supporters" or "a few supporters." They are a handful of people who are much too excitable. If they're even real.

haikugal

(6,476 posts)
5. Bullshit...this is propaganda.
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 12:17 PM
Mar 2016

Bernie supporters are 100% behind Warren unlike the head of the DNC. Who's throwing Warren under the bus? Not us...FAIL!!!

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
8. You think I made up those
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 12:19 PM
Mar 2016

facebook posts? Is that what you're accusing me of? After what happened to John Lewis and Jim Clyburn? Really?

haikugal

(6,476 posts)
10. Anyone could have made them up. I don't believe it because I've seen no evidence of this.
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 12:29 PM
Mar 2016

I trust my eyes...

The civil rights icons received criticism for making rediculous statements that cast aspersions on Sanders civil rights chops. That was extremely disturbing and sad.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
11. Then you haven't been paying attention
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 12:33 PM
Mar 2016

to DU lately. Or are you just ignoring how African Americans have been called too stupid to vote in their best interests?

haikugal

(6,476 posts)
15. I've seen how words are twisted to cast aspersions and call good people racists yes.
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 12:35 PM
Mar 2016

I consider the source when I see such things and most of those people, if not outright banned, are on ignore.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
16. Unless they were all mass
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 12:37 PM
Mar 2016

banned YESTERDAY, it's all there for anyone who wants to look and it's fucking ugly.

haikugal

(6,476 posts)
17. Were?
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 12:38 PM
Mar 2016
 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
20. Don't understand your question
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 12:47 PM
Mar 2016

my point is all the disgusting remarks are still here, whether you've ignored the posters or not - they've OBVIOUSLY not been banned.

haikugal

(6,476 posts)
21. Some people prove themselves to be little more tha trolls...I put them on ignore, it saves time.
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 12:55 PM
Mar 2016

It' why we have that ability here. I don't understand your point.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
36. Do you think those Facebook posts represent me?
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 01:23 PM
Mar 2016

I support Bernie and Elizabeth Warren. I even support Hillary Clinton.

Why do you want to make it out I'm for throwing Warren under the bus?

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
19. Haikugal, by FAR most of Bernie supporters are
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 12:46 PM
Mar 2016

just liberals and Democrats who want stronger, more leftward change than Hillary offers. For them buses are for riding, they don't throw anyone under them.

But, as our farthest left candidate, Bernie is also attracting some from the far left with extremist tendencies, and reportedly a few from the far right he's been courting. You surely must see how easily any reverse causes them to burst into flame and look for someone to attack.

Not only is this believable, but many similar aggressive behaviors have occurred before, making this actually entirely predictable. Again, they are small in numbers, but we know a lot about them here because DU's become a gathering place for some of them. It may be well be study site for professional observers.

haikugal

(6,476 posts)
23. Hortensis, with due respect. That is not what is being flogged with this article.
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 12:59 PM
Mar 2016

This is another attack on 'those radical Bernie supporters' who aren't real Democrats. We Bernie supporters have been attacked for damned near everything you can think of. It's a Brock operation to discredit Bernie that has nothing to do with his proposals or policy. It's dirty.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
33. Spare me the conspiracy bullshit
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 01:20 PM
Mar 2016

and the no true scottsman fallacy. I don't like far left purists any more than I like far right ones. They're unreasonable, reactionary, and far too willing to trash ANYONE who doesn't believe the same way they do. And now with the conspiracy theories. It's fucking madness.

haikugal

(6,476 posts)
37. Let me guess...there is no third way right?
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 01:23 PM
Mar 2016

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
42. I can entirely believe Brock would make the
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 01:26 PM
Mar 2016

most out of nothing in one of his slimy projects. I don't care how long he is "reformed," I don't give this scorpion a ride across the stream.

I have just assumed this was happening in large numbers as reported on a few minor sites without checking myself. This activity is occurring, but you're right in that reporting of the volume could be greatly inflated for partisan reasons. I'll wait as I should have in the first place.

 

artislife

(9,497 posts)
34. Agreed.
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 01:22 PM
Mar 2016

This poster is pretty prolific in fantasy writing.

haikugal

(6,476 posts)
39. It's not even entertaining!
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 01:24 PM
Mar 2016

Stellar

(5,644 posts)
12. I love Senator Elizabeth Warren, I can't understand why she should give either one a leg up.
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 12:33 PM
Mar 2016

It their race to win or lose.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
13. Agree (n/t)
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 12:33 PM
Mar 2016

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
22. My version is, she gave them both an enormous
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 12:57 PM
Mar 2016

boost already. She was the one who really excited so many of us in the first place.

She may have a preference between two acceptable candidates, but the race that must be won is against the GOP, and if I were her all my strategies would be formulated to give our nominee the best chance possible there. My assumption is she is husbanding her stature and ability to affect the GE.

haikugal

(6,476 posts)
24. Agreed. She doesn't have to endorse anyone.
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 01:00 PM
Mar 2016

oldandhappy

(6,719 posts)
28. Yes! Thank you.
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 01:06 PM
Mar 2016

Stellar

(5,644 posts)
32. I don't think she gave them a boost...she just told them where to start. (to the left, to the left).
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 01:15 PM
Mar 2016

when you hear the bell, they should come out swinging. And may the best man win.

 

cwydro

(51,308 posts)
26. This belongs in the primary forum.
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 01:02 PM
Mar 2016

Is it really possible to not see the giant red stop sign when you go to post an op?

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
35. I used to pay attention to that
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 01:22 PM
Mar 2016

AND complain until I was basically told to shut up about it.

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
29. More divide & conquer Hillarian bullshit. The stench is palpable. nt
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 01:07 PM
Mar 2016
 

artislife

(9,497 posts)
38. We will end up leaving the pile behind. nt
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 01:23 PM
Mar 2016

Kip Humphrey

(4,753 posts)
30. Aw, the Meme of the Day! This is tiresome.
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 01:12 PM
Mar 2016

There has been no evidence brought forward identifying the originators of this attack on E.Warren being Bernie supporters. Link to the Facebook pages so they can be examined and investigated. No? Can't or won't do?

Then to put it in the vernacular perpetrators of this meme seem to understand,

"CUT IT OUT!"

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
40. The link to the article is in the OP
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 01:26 PM
Mar 2016

which give you the link to the facebook page. Don't be lazy.

Autumn

(48,962 posts)
44. Proof that those are Bernie supporters? I looked at a few FB profiles there .
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 01:49 PM
Mar 2016

Nothing there on their FB pages, not even friends. Smells like brockshit to me.

yourpaljoey

(2,166 posts)
43. parcel of nonsense
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 01:32 PM
Mar 2016
 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
45. Oh, for fuck's sake! Give it up.
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 02:02 PM
Mar 2016

What is your point, anyway? I don't see this as having any bearing whatsoever on who to support, unless one is so shallow that they vote based on endorsements or supporters, and not on records, deeds, and issues.

cyberswede

(26,117 posts)
46. Locking...
Thu Mar 3, 2016, 02:14 PM
Mar 2016

This topic belongs in GDP.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»And Elizabeth Warren goes...