Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Navy Thinks This New $7 Billion Ship Is The Answer To All Its Chinese Concerns
http://www.businessinsider.com/the-uss-zumwalt-ddg-1000-a-silver-bullet-of-stealth-2012-06The Navy Thinks This New $7 Billion Ship Is The Answer To All Its Chinese Concerns
Robert Johnson | Jun. 4, 2012, 6:56 AM
Looking a bit like an old Civil War Ironclad, the $7 billion DDG 1000 USS Zumwalt will focus on land attacks, relying heavily on its advanced stealth technology to slip in close to shore before unleashing its massive onboard arsenal.
A new take on the Zumwalt was published today by the Eric Talmadge at the Associated Press who points out that in addition to the ship's wide array of conventional weapons the Zumwalt will eventually carry the Navy's much anticipated "railgun".
The railgun is an electrically powered artillery weapon that launches massive projectiles at high speeds without the use of gunpowder or explosives. Instead, an electric current is run through the artillery shell, the current interacts with the magnetic fields in the rails and pounds the shell from the barrel.
~snip~
The Zumwalt was originally estimated to cost about $3.8 billion, but so much technology crammed on board that its cost has nearly doubled, and after the first three are built, production will stop. Including the exhaustive research and development required by each vessel to total cost jumps to $7 billion apiece.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
13 replies, 2307 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
13 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Navy Thinks This New $7 Billion Ship Is The Answer To All Its Chinese Concerns (Original Post)
unhappycamper
Jun 2012
OP
Another useless toy built to fight a war from 25 years ago. There is absolutely no need for this
Egalitarian Thug
Jun 2012
#2
We are running out of money to deal with the ones we have. Hence this symbol of retro warpower.
leveymg
Jun 2012
#7
If they piss China off they won't get any spare parts for their new ship.
Hubert Flottz
Jun 2012
#10
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)1. The only concern is that 600% profit ,MIC
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)3. 600%? You're being way too conservative. n/t
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)2. Another useless toy built to fight a war from 25 years ago. There is absolutely no need for this
kind of platform any longer. Combat surface ships are just big fat missile targets in a traditional war, and next to useless in the kinds of war we are most likely to face in the foreseeable future.
OTOH, this is likely just a feint. A gigantic waste of money that they can drop in the budget negotiations so everyone can go to the sheeple and tell them how much they cut.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)4. It's just the thing we might need to enforce a blockade of Hampton Roads, VA
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)8. Now that was cutting edge technology !
KG
(28,751 posts)5. why is china a 'concern'?
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)6. We are running out of other concerns.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)7. We are running out of money to deal with the ones we have. Hence this symbol of retro warpower.
If we could just continue throwing money at the problem, we'd build another 20 nuclear carriers and support flotillas.
DCKit
(18,541 posts)12. Shuddup. As if they need an intelligent person weighing in. nt
leveymg
(36,418 posts)13. I hope you know this will go down on your p-e-r-m-a-n-e-n-t record!
Lyrics:
I need someone,
A person to talk to,
Someone who'd care to love.
Could it be you?
Could it be you?
Situation gets rough then I start to panic,
It's not enough,
It's just a habit.
Hey kid you're sick,
Well darling this is it.
You can all just kiss off into the air,
Behind my back I can see them stare.
They'll hurt me bad but I won't mind,
They'll hurt me bad,
They do it all the time.
Yeah, yeah they do it all the time.
Yeah, yeah they do it all the time.
Yeah, yeah they do it all the time.
Yeah, yeah they do it all the time.
I hope you know this will go down on your permanent record.
. . . etc.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)9. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Hubert Flottz
(37,726 posts)10. If they piss China off they won't get any spare parts for their new ship.
Or any tennis shoes of uniforms for the sailors aboard her.
DCKit
(18,541 posts)11. Hey dumbasses, the same $75K missile that can take out you cheapest, oldest plane...
can take out your $3 billion air craft carrier and your $420 million joint strike fighter.
The MICC is totally out of control.
"The bigger they are, the harder they fall." I think Jesus said that.