Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSenate chair reaffirms pledge to block an Obama nominee to the supreme court
Source: The Guardian
Senate chair reaffirms pledge to block an Obama nominee to the supreme court
Jamiles Lartey
Thursday 10 March 2016 19.46 GMT
The Senate judiciary committee chairman on Thursday reaffirmed his pledge not to consider an Obama nomination for the open seat on the supreme court, adding calls for a hearing were a charade and absurd.
In case there is any confusion over whether this obvious political ploy would work, let me be crystal clear: it wont, Chuck Grassley said during a committee business meeting. Were not going to drop any nominee into that election-year cauldron.
He is trying to protect this person from the hot boiling cauldron of this committee, responded Senator Dick Durban of Illinois, adding: Well, who is turning up the heat?
The vacancy created by the the death of Antonin Scalia has been the subject of fierce political debate that began just hours after the senior justice died unexpectedly in February. By successfully appointing a more liberal nominee to replace the stalwart conservative Scalia, Obama would likely shift the balance of the court that often comes to 5-4 rulings. Since 1925, it has been common practice for nominees to be vetted by the judiciary committee before receiving a hearing before the full Senate.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Jamiles Lartey
Thursday 10 March 2016 19.46 GMT
The Senate judiciary committee chairman on Thursday reaffirmed his pledge not to consider an Obama nomination for the open seat on the supreme court, adding calls for a hearing were a charade and absurd.
In case there is any confusion over whether this obvious political ploy would work, let me be crystal clear: it wont, Chuck Grassley said during a committee business meeting. Were not going to drop any nominee into that election-year cauldron.
He is trying to protect this person from the hot boiling cauldron of this committee, responded Senator Dick Durban of Illinois, adding: Well, who is turning up the heat?
The vacancy created by the the death of Antonin Scalia has been the subject of fierce political debate that began just hours after the senior justice died unexpectedly in February. By successfully appointing a more liberal nominee to replace the stalwart conservative Scalia, Obama would likely shift the balance of the court that often comes to 5-4 rulings. Since 1925, it has been common practice for nominees to be vetted by the judiciary committee before receiving a hearing before the full Senate.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/law/2016/mar/10/supreme-court-obama-nomination-senate-chuck-grassley
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Senate chair reaffirms pledge to block an Obama nominee to the supreme court (Original Post)
Eugene
Mar 2016
OP
Nominate somebody already. You can't complain about their obstinance till you start.
highprincipleswork
Mar 2016
#2
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)1. Looks like Chuckie is worried about being Reelected.
And with the present mood of our Nation,he should be.
highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)2. Nominate somebody already. You can't complain about their obstinance till you start.
