Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eridani

(51,907 posts)
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 06:31 AM Mar 2016

The “Cadillac Tax” on Health Benefits in the United States Will Hit the Middle Class Hardest

http://joh.sagepub.com/content/early/2016/03/08/0020731416637163.abstract

PNHP press release: http://www.pnhp.org/news/2016/march/‘cadillac-tax’-on-health-benefits-will-hit-middle-class-hardest-study

U.S. employment-based health benefits are exempt from income and payroll taxes, an exemption that provided tax subsidies of $326.2 billion in 2015. Both liberal and conservative economists have denounced these subsidies as “regressive” and lauded a provision of the Affordable Care Act — the Cadillac Tax — that would curtail them. The claim that the subsidies are regressive rests on estimates showing that the affluent receive the largest subsidies in absolute dollars. But this claim ignores the standard definition of regressivity, which is based on the share of income paid by the wealthy versus the poor, rather than on dollar amounts. In this study, we calculate the value of tax subsidies in 2009 as a share of income for each income quintile and for the wealthiest Americans. In absolute dollars, tax subsidies were highest for families between the 80th and 95th percentiles of family income and lowest for the poorest 20%. However, as shares of income, subsidies were largest for the middle and fourth income quintiles and smallest for the wealthiest 0.5% of Americans. We conclude that the tax subsidy to employment-based insurance is neither markedly regressive, nor progressive. The Cadillac Tax will disproportionately harm families with (2009) incomes between $38,550 and $100,000, while sparing the wealthy.


Comment by Don McCanne of PNHP: The “Cadillac tax” is an excise tax on premiums of more expensive employer-sponsored health plans. It was included in the Affordable Care Act partly as a revenue source to help pay for ACA, partly to offset the tax subsidies for employer-sponsored insurance that were more generous for higher income individuals, and partly to reduce the incentive to purchase more insurance than necessary under the theory that making patients more sensitive to health care costs will prevent spending on supposedly excessive health care services (certainly a contentious point).

Because of the high costs of health care, we do need funding mechanisms that result in a transfer to those less able to pay. The Cadillac tax is a problem because, instead of disproportionately assessing the very wealthy, it impacts primarily working families. Not only is the tax unfair, the health plans will likely have their benefits reduced in an effort to escape the taxes.

In a PNHP press release (link above), Steffie Woolhandler, one of the co-authors of the report, stated, “Taxpayers should be paying directly for health care through Medicare-for-All, not indirectly through tax subsidies to private insurance. However, removing the tax subsidies – as Obamacare will do – without setting Medicare-for-All in place is a step backwards. It’s shameful that economists have provided cover for this tax that will hit middle-class families and largely spare the wealthy.”

The Cadillac tax is just one more example of the flawed policy patches required simply because the architects of reform decided to build on our current dysfunctional, fragmented financing system instead of replacing it with a more efficient, effective and equitable single payer Medicare-for-all program. That doesn’t mean that we have to live with our highly flawed system. We can still change it.

My comment: Do you know what they call "Cadillac plans" in other developed countries? Just plain old "health care."




3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The “Cadillac Tax” on Health Benefits in the United States Will Hit the Middle Class Hardest (Original Post) eridani Mar 2016 OP
Your comment is insightful TubbersUK Mar 2016 #1
So it's not really a Cadillac tax. It's more of a Chevrolet tax. raging moderate Mar 2016 #2
My company healthcare plan has become a disgrace since heritage care took effect. Doctor_J Mar 2016 #3

TubbersUK

(1,439 posts)
1. Your comment is insightful
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 06:58 AM
Mar 2016
My comment: Do you know what they call "Cadillac plans" in other developed countries? Just plain old "health care."


Sums it up nicely.

raging moderate

(4,292 posts)
2. So it's not really a Cadillac tax. It's more of a Chevrolet tax.
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 08:08 AM
Mar 2016

If this is the best we can do right now, so be it! I know how to economize and how to restrain my greed. Apparently most rich people do not. I can only hope that they will someday finish growing up and shoulder their responsibilities. Pay your taxes, Preppy boys! The world was not created exclusively for you, nor does it actually revolve around you.

Meanwhile, I remember being very poor as a child. It was middle class people who covertly waived our doctor bills, and middle class people who sent Boy Scouts in with Thanksgiving turkeys and boxes of food and clothing. I am grateful to this day. You should have seen us laughing and laughing with joy over these gifts. Not out of disdain but with hysterical relief. Remember: If they seem to be laughing at you, it is not you they are laughing at, it is the specter of want that is slinking away behind you.






 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
3. My company healthcare plan has become a disgrace since heritage care took effect.
Sun Mar 13, 2016, 09:26 AM
Mar 2016

New teachers with a family could have to pay as much as 40% of their take home pay in deductibles and co pays, on top of the premiums. And as Hillary Clinton so happily and emphatically puts it, we will never, ever get rid of it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The “Cadillac Tax” on Hea...