General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums147 DUers liked a post that turned out to be false. Do the right thing, DU. Fix it.
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by In_The_Wind (a host of the General Discussion forum).
Last edited Mon Mar 14, 2016, 03:56 AM - Edit history (2)
We should expect DUers to do the right thing, even when it goes against preconceptions.
Come on, DU. Don't let emotion stop you from doing the right thing.
Well, I guess doing the right thing doesn't matter to folks, any more.
revbones
(3,660 posts)Unless I'm reading that wrong. What's the "right thing"?
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)This is basic stuff.
revbones
(3,660 posts)HuckleB
(35,773 posts)Last edited Sun Mar 13, 2016, 11:33 PM - Edit history (1)
If you bad propaganda about bees earlier today, the let's talk.
revbones
(3,660 posts)And you didn't explain it at all, so many like myself thought it was something else.
revbones
(3,660 posts)HuckleB
(35,773 posts)Try again.
Lancero
(3,276 posts)Rather then taking five seconds to edit his post to include the topic he's referring to, he'd rather attack people because they can't read his mind.
Though, I suppose a more accurate description would be to call it a trollish response.
I know the reality of DU.
I've paid the price.
chillfactor
(7,694 posts)and you were very rude to the other person who asked you.
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)Why would you bother to respond then ...?
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)
djean111
(14,255 posts)NO more loyalty demands, please.
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)pintobean
(18,101 posts)Avalux
(35,015 posts)I'm not into blind commitments with no explanation of exactly what I'm being asked to do.
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)Iggo
(49,928 posts)HuckleB
(35,773 posts)HuckleB
(35,773 posts)Last edited Mon Mar 14, 2016, 03:07 AM - Edit history (1)
So you're fine with people who spread fictions.
Ok, then.
Iggo
(49,928 posts)X_Digger
(18,585 posts)(I voted to leave.)
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)... We all might be something or another.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)HuckleB
(35,773 posts)I'm going to get at least two against.
Partly because I've been a jerk in the past, but mostly because standing up for science comes with consequences at DU.
Logical
(22,457 posts)HuckleB
(35,773 posts)I've learned my lessons at DU.
Logical
(22,457 posts)liberalhistorian
(20,905 posts)exactly you're talking about. Maybe even a simple link to the thread itself? Otherwise, most of us don't know what you're talking about.
This is driving me crazy, people posting these two or three line OP's that don't explain anything, expecting everyone to know just exactly what they're talking about.
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)ScreamingMeemie
(68,918 posts)It's not our job to "figure it out." If people are that upset about something, link to it or sit down.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)At the hospital with my mom, si no time or inclination to ferret out the mystery behind this op.
Silly.
tkmorris
(11,138 posts)At least, a quick perusal of the thread didn't help me any. I see that Snopes judged it to be "unproven" which isn't the same, but that is all. Can you offer any help in that regard?
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)The reality is in multiple posts in that thread. In fact, it's shown quite obviously, over and over again.
Or are you just pretending for kicks?
tkmorris
(11,138 posts)And no, a quick Google did not show anything that would count as a refutation.
You are being borderline rude.
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)And we both know that.
tkmorris
(11,138 posts)Are you serious?
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)HuckleB only posts in favor of GMOs and against alternative medicines, etc., so it's probably something along that line.
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)That's a problem.
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)I merely pointed out what I have observed to be the usual topics of your posts. I was trying to be helpful to the people wondering what this current post was about.
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)If it's not true, then show that.
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)but you probably don't believe in that. LOL.
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)HuckleB
(35,773 posts)Not always, but ...
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)and not static. What is scientific gospel in one year winds up in the dustbin of history the next. I just try to keep an open mind.
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)Thanks for the clarification.
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)HuckleB
(35,773 posts)Awesome.
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)Am I to do some "Hail Marys"?
I see you're having issues with some others here, so you and I can call it a night. Peace out.
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)Reality is your friend.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)HuckleB
(35,773 posts)sense
(1,219 posts)And he always pretends that it's the rest of us who just don't get science.
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)Personal attacks are meaningless, if you can't support them.
sense
(1,219 posts)I don't have to prove a thing. You've outed yourself over and over and over. Done.
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)Try again.
Texasgal
(17,240 posts)on a this website?
Seriously! This is not REAL life here!
NBachers
(19,438 posts)Please point me to the original post so I can be "Like" #99.
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)Lancero
(3,276 posts)HuckleB
(35,773 posts)You don't know?
Lancero
(3,276 posts)HuckleB
(35,773 posts)Lancero
(3,276 posts)Perhaps not the one you were hoping for, but it is a answer.
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)And you and I both know better.
Lancero
(3,276 posts)And I can point out quite a few posts in this topic that support it.
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)Lancero
(3,276 posts)...In this topic asked you to do the same thing in regards to your complaints.
You know what my support is? Every post you made whenever someone asked you what this topic was about. Every post where you refused, and outright attacked, people who were simply wanting to know what you were talking about.
People asked what claim you were talking about in this topic. You could have easily, easily, edited your post to add in the topic you were referring to. Rather then that, you decide to bait countless people, and to imply that some were idiots because they didn't know exactly what you were complaining about.
If you act like a jerk, people are going to treat you like a jerk. You say you've learned reality at DU and paid the price, but it's blatantly apparent that you haven't learnt that little bit of reality. Many of the people that you decry for 'attacking' you over your supporting science aren't 'attacking' you because of that, they're 'attacking' you choose to act like a jerk while doing so.
So, as I said earlier. You've already revealed why you are being vague in post 25, but you incorrectly label it as a thing of the past.
Dorian Gray
(13,850 posts)winter is coming
(11,785 posts)If you want people to take you seriously, tell them what the fuck you're talking about.
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)That's so cool.
ScreamingMeemie
(68,918 posts)HuckleB
(35,773 posts)Oh, wait.
ScreamingMeemie
(68,918 posts)spend every second scouring threads and I never use the Greatest Page. Which should be so very hard to understand.
It was really irritating and to be so dismissive is really unbecoming. Have a nice night.
Cowpunk
(833 posts)Either your view is more unpopular than Al From, or no one knows what the F*** you're ranting about.
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)So even though I don't agree with it, I recc'd it and I might kick it later just cuz I can.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)HuckleB
(35,773 posts)donco
(1,548 posts)be mind readers?WTF are you talking about?
cui bono
(19,926 posts)Is that you Seinfeld?
.
Still behind the fiction-based thread that led to this one.
ronnie624
(5,764 posts)I simply cannot see you as a champion of truth and justice.
Sorry.
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)That sucks.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)HuckleB
(35,773 posts)Orrex
(67,111 posts)B Calm
(28,762 posts)Do you need a tissue?
IdaBriggs
(10,559 posts)From your post, I have no idea what DU post you are talking about, when it was made or why it was "proven" to be false. Even the "Rec" number you provide only adds to the mystery as presumably anyone psychic enough to find the object of your ire and act on your entreaties is going to lower the number of "wrong" people.
Adding fuel to the fires of irritation are the numerous requests from others to link or otherwise identify your subject matter, and your subsequent incredibly rude/snide/insulting remarks.
I scanned through replies looking for a link - any link! - that matched your non-existent description, but nothing with 147 RECS was to be found, and the people posting links admitted they were speculating.
I have a number of people on Ignore (a recent decision which is making DU a much more enjoyable experience!) so maybe I am missing details in unseeable sub-threads.
For me, this has become a lesson in "bad posts which do not inform". If you provide a reasonable response (I suggest notification about an edit that contains an apology and link would be a great way to begin), I will consider it to be a simple aberration. If not, my "ignore" list can grow by one more under the "who wants to play hide-and-seek with information requests"?
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)djean111
(14,255 posts)
Kilgore
(1,819 posts)Iggo
(49,928 posts)Got him a shitload of attention, though.
How and why this post didn't get locked as Meta, I'm not sure. Maybe none of the seven thousand hosts were around on a Sunday night...lol.
In_The_Wind
(72,300 posts)Discuss politics, issues, and current events. Posts about Israel/Palestine, religion, guns, showbiz, or sports are restricted in this forum. Posts about the Democratic primaries, conspiracy theories and disruptive meta-discussion are forbidden.
[img]
[/img]