Wed Mar 23, 2016, 04:35 PM
ViseGrip (3,133 posts)
The Clinton's and Trump's are good friends. Is this all a hoax?This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by one_voice (a host of the General Discussion forum). Because the media and corporations are involved, in creating Trump the front runner it smacks of a real conspiracy. Because of ALL of the media, print, TV, radio, and zero candidates on the republican side, this smells like one big game for them. Powers to be like Goldman Sachs said they'd be happy with Hillary or Jeb. Jeb doesn't want to be the prez, so it's Hillary. Trump is there to protect her. Say whatever you want, this is how I see this race. The funny thing, is they may get what they didn't expect.
|
32 replies, 2895 views
Cannot reply in locked threads
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
ViseGrip | Mar 2016 | OP |
brooklynite | Mar 2016 | #1 | |
Electric Monk | Mar 2016 | #4 | |
leftynyc | Mar 2016 | #7 | |
mac56 | Mar 2016 | #10 | |
leftynyc | Mar 2016 | #13 | |
mac56 | Mar 2016 | #15 | |
ThePhilosopher04 | Mar 2016 | #31 | |
brooklynite | Mar 2016 | #17 | |
lpbk2713 | Mar 2016 | #22 | |
ViseGrip | Mar 2016 | #6 | |
astrophuss42 | Mar 2016 | #2 | |
Buns_of_Fire | Mar 2016 | #24 | |
Kelvin Mace | Mar 2016 | #3 | |
ViseGrip | Mar 2016 | #9 | |
WDIM | Mar 2016 | #5 | |
JustABozoOnThisBus | Mar 2016 | #8 | |
ViseGrip | Mar 2016 | #11 | |
mac56 | Mar 2016 | #12 | |
OriginalGeek | Mar 2016 | #16 | |
mac56 | Mar 2016 | #18 | |
OriginalGeek | Mar 2016 | #19 | |
Lorien | Mar 2016 | #14 | |
ViseGrip | Mar 2016 | #20 | |
Lorien | Mar 2016 | #28 | |
hollowdweller | Mar 2016 | #21 | |
Hekate | Mar 2016 | #23 | |
Vincardog | Mar 2016 | #25 | |
ViseGrip | Mar 2016 | #27 | |
Vincardog | Mar 2016 | #29 | |
Cheese Sandwich | Mar 2016 | #30 | |
Renew Deal | Mar 2016 | #26 | |
one_voice | Mar 2016 | #32 |
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 04:36 PM
brooklynite (89,798 posts)
1. Who has ever said they're good friends?
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to brooklynite (Reply #1)
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 04:43 PM
Electric Monk (13,869 posts)
4. You're trying to allege they aren't?
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Electric Monk (Reply #4)
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 04:48 PM
leftynyc (26,060 posts)
7. There were 500 people at that wedding
are they all his bestest friends? (I can't believe this is even an issue - a very rich man invited HIS SENATOR to his wedding and I'm supposed to go crazy?)
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to leftynyc (Reply #7)
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 04:50 PM
mac56 (17,503 posts)
10. Short-Fingers Don and his lovely wife staged a photo op with Bill and Hill.
It subsequently hit the MSM.
Do you imagine he did the same with each and every guest? |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to mac56 (Reply #10)
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 04:54 PM
leftynyc (26,060 posts)
13. Yes, I do
Simon freeking Cowel was there also. Katie Couric. This whole conversation is fucking insane.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to leftynyc (Reply #13)
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 04:55 PM
mac56 (17,503 posts)
15. One side of it, certainly.
![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to leftynyc (Reply #13)
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 05:39 PM
ThePhilosopher04 (1,732 posts)
31. Birds of a feather ...
everybody knows they are friends. Its no secret.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Electric Monk (Reply #4)
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 04:56 PM
brooklynite (89,798 posts)
17. A society wedding? And a bunch of politicians playing golf? That's your evidence?
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to brooklynite (Reply #17)
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 05:19 PM
lpbk2713 (42,334 posts)
22. It MUST be true.
I done seen it on the innernets. ![]() ![]() ![]() OMFG |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to brooklynite (Reply #1)
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 04:46 PM
ViseGrip (3,133 posts)
6. All of them involved! They attend family weddings, etc., Trump supported
them for years! Along with many other democrats. So what's the come to republican jesus moment with Trump? The media could have gotten rid of him before Iowa! Who own who here? I see right through this. The big don has no intention of being preznit. He'd hate every minute of it, being run all day long with handlers telling him what he's doing, and when's he doing it every damn day. Trump could never ever accept that. This is a hoax. Another reason Clinton, any Clinton will ever again get my vote. I've seen enough!
https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=Trump+supported+Hillary+in+2008%3F |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 04:40 PM
astrophuss42 (290 posts)
2. I do wonder about the alleged phone call
Between Bill and Trump. Apparently Bill gave his blessing.... Even that seems convenient.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to astrophuss42 (Reply #2)
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 05:22 PM
Buns_of_Fire (16,703 posts)
24. "And we would have gotten away with it, too, if those pesky voters hadn't gotten in the way."
![]() I admit, I've wondered the same thing, too. I'm just having fun with it. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 04:40 PM
Kelvin Mace (17,469 posts)
3. This question has been asked a number of times
My question is will Trump pull off his mask and and show us he is really Andy Kaufman?
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Kelvin Mace (Reply #3)
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 04:49 PM
ViseGrip (3,133 posts)
9. As soon as his friend Hilllary and Bill wins! He'll happily lose.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 04:45 PM
WDIM (1,662 posts)
5. Trump had to pay them to come to his wedding.
I wouldnt say they are good friends
co-conspirators possibly. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to WDIM (Reply #5)
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 04:49 PM
JustABozoOnThisBus (23,059 posts)
8. If true, that's pathetic.
Who would attend a wedding because they were paid to?
The band? The waiters? The priest? The Clintons? |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to JustABozoOnThisBus (Reply #8)
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 04:50 PM
ViseGrip (3,133 posts)
11. now that's funny!
![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to JustABozoOnThisBus (Reply #8)
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 04:51 PM
mac56 (17,503 posts)
12. Good point.
If Bill and Hill accepted money to attend this wedding, that doesn't speak well of them at all.
Release the transcripts! |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to JustABozoOnThisBus (Reply #8)
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 04:56 PM
OriginalGeek (12,132 posts)
16. I will happily accept money to attend weddings
Feed me, pay me, let me dance a little. I will assume the bar is free.
I'm not cheap but I will provide drunken antics and take home left-overs so they won't have to be thrown away. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to OriginalGeek (Reply #16)
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 05:01 PM
mac56 (17,503 posts)
18. And you're running for.. which office?
![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to mac56 (Reply #18)
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 05:06 PM
OriginalGeek (12,132 posts)
19. tax collector, dog-catcher, councilperson...
whatever gets me more wedding appearance fees!
and cake. I love cake. |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 04:54 PM
Lorien (31,935 posts)
14. Of course it is. Trump is the boogyman the DNC and MSM are using
to drive reluctant voters to Hillary.
Bill Clinton urged Trump to run (a move that DU's Hillary faithful call "Genius" ![]() http://inequalityreport.org/2015/08/09/hillary-clinton-donald-trump-black-lives-matter-the-theft-of-an-election/ |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Lorien (Reply #14)
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 05:15 PM
ViseGrip (3,133 posts)
20. This is the story to get out there and neuter the msm.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to ViseGrip (Reply #20)
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 05:30 PM
Lorien (31,935 posts)
28. The MSM is obviously complicit
they called Arizona for Clinton AND Trump with only ONE PERCENT of votes tallied while voters were still in line and election fraud was being reported. They've never done such a thing before, so why now? Because their heist won't work without Trump; they need to keep the focus on him until the end. Look for his statements to get crazier and crazier as NY and CA begin voting. He's our own electorial 9/11.
![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 05:17 PM
hollowdweller (4,229 posts)
21. Hypothetical Clinton Trump conversation
BC: The republicans love Putin Don, they are racist and angry, they would vote for Adolph Hitler if he was a republican. They love an angry rude bully. Look at Rush. DT: No way. The business arm of the party would put their foot down if the candidate was too extreme. Rush is just a paid actor to get the crazies to the poll to give them the winning margin. They are a minority in the party. BC: They might TRY Don, but the crazies have taken over the party. We have the internet now and the media is too diffuse for them to control the message. The grassroots is in control now. They have for years managed to get them to vote their fears and prejudices rather than their pocketbooks. DT: You are nuts bill. Tell ya what. I'll run on that and watch me go down. I'll say some of the most angry racist stuff I can and I'll dangerously swagger on military issues a la Putin, and I'll lose. Bet you a thousand. Bill: You're on. But give me one handicap. DT: What's that? Bill: Let me prove to you that it's all about race and hatred and not about policy. You pimp some semi democratic economic positions. If you allow them to vote their pocketbooks AND their prejudices you will for sure win. DT: Oh I'll take that! That will be sure to cause me to lose! |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 05:20 PM
Hekate (86,595 posts)
23. Clinton Derangement Syndrome is insidious, but I understand Obamacare has a treatment for it.
Best of luck.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 05:28 PM
Vincardog (20,234 posts)
25. Agreed Trump's job this cycle is to make HRC the "reasonable/realastic" choice
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Vincardog (Reply #25)
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 05:29 PM
ViseGrip (3,133 posts)
27. If this is true, neither one deserves to be ANYWHERE near the white house.
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to ViseGrip (Reply #27)
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 05:30 PM
Vincardog (20,234 posts)
29. agreed
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to Vincardog (Reply #25)
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 05:33 PM
Cheese Sandwich (9,086 posts)
30. yep. Terrify America into voting for the Wall St. Democrat by posing a fascist as the alternative
I don't think they realized Trump could actually win the GOP nomination though. He was just supposed to drag them to the right, the bigoted, terrifying right. It's a very dangerous game being played.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 05:29 PM
Renew Deal (81,388 posts)
26. You forgot something
![]() |
Cannot reply in locked threads
Response to ViseGrip (Original post)
Wed Mar 23, 2016, 06:03 PM
one_voice (20,043 posts)
32. Locking...
Doesn't meet SoP for GD. Better suited for GDP. Please re-post there. Thanks.
|
Cannot reply in locked threads