General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAre GMO food products responsible for the degenerate state of the Republican party?
It's obvious that the entire Republican party has degenerated into vile, mechanistic, opportunistic, mysogynistic, racist, homophobic, anti-intellectual, corporate-toady, fear-driven cohort of misaligned sheeple.
Top expositors on DU and elsewhere have noted that this widespread degeneration (see photographic evidence below) has corresponded closely in time with the infestation of the food chain with food products rolled off the GMO chemical pharmaceutical industry assembly line, Inc. (R).
Correlation is not causation, of course, but EXPERTS AGREE that this disastrous state of affairs is worthy of a massive, rigorous non-industry-funded independent research project.

TexasProgresive
(12,715 posts)There are valid arguments for and against GMO foods but this one needs more than innuendo to mean anything. Personally I think GMO foods is a potential danger to the food chain that we depend upon. I could be wrong but if I am correct and it is way in the future it could spell real disaster. I don't believe that GMO foods are of immediate danger, my worry is the extreme narrowing of food crops gene pool.
As to whether GMO foods cause degeneration of mental faculties, ethics, intelligence and aggression; who knows? That would take really extensive studies, both statistical and controlled.
AxionExcel
(755 posts)What did the Bundy-RepbuliBagger Malcontents crave when they took over the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge?
Why GMO infested snacks, of course. Issue settled. Debate over.

womanofthehills
(10,927 posts)they were negotiating and Sandy (Sean's wife) asked if they could stop by the McDonald's drive in - I assume on the way to jail. Then, David Fry, last man standing, was crying to the FBI he wanted pizza and weed!!!
At one point, Sean was on camera telling David - sorry I'm eating your pop tarts.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)MisterP
(23,730 posts)people sick, that is!
Rex
(65,616 posts)Who could have realized that a stalk of modified corn could be turned into the GOP candidates! Well, some of us were suspicious from the beginning...I mean COME ON...Rand looks like a head of corn! Rubio? Rubio needing to be watered constantly.
Then there was the mystery disease that grew on them...took weeks before we realized it was Trump and not a new kind of fungus amungus!
womanofthehills
(10,927 posts)
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)Or so I have heard.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corn_smut
Smut feeds on the corn plant and decreases the yield. Smut-infected crops are often destroyed, although some farmers use them to prepare silage. The smut is a delicacy in Mexico, where it is known as huitlacoche, even being preserved and sold for a significantly higher price than uninfected corn. The consumption of corn smut originates from Aztec cuisine. For culinary use, the galls are harvested while still immature fully mature galls are dry and almost entirely spore-filled. The immature galls, gathered two to three weeks after an ear of corn is infected, still retain moisture and, when cooked, have a flavor described as mushroom-like, sweet, savory, woody, and earthy. Flavor compounds include sotolon and vanillin, as well as the sugar glucose.
The fungus has had difficulty entering into the American and European diets as most farmers see it as blight, despite attempts by government and high profile chefs to introduce it. In the mid-1990s, due to demand created by high-end restaurants, Pennsylvania and Florida farms were allowed by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) to intentionally infect corn with huitlacoche. Most observers consider the program to have had little impact,[citation needed] although the initiative is still in progress. The cursory show of interest is significant because the USDA has spent a considerable amount of time and money trying to eradicate corn smut in the United States. Moreover, in 1989, the James Beard Foundation held a high-profile huitlacoche dinner, prepared by Josefina Howard, chef at Rosa Mexicano restaurant. This dinner tried to get Americans to eat more of it by renaming it the Mexican truffle and it is often compared to truffles in food articles describing its taste and texture.
I actually was going to try it a few years ago when Mom came out for a visit and we went to SF, but we never made it to the Mexican place I had in mind that serves it.
Archae
(47,245 posts)Or do you believe in those too?
AxionExcel
(755 posts)There's now mounting evidence that GMOs & glyphosate cause damage to the funny bone, as well.
*

womanofthehills
(10,927 posts)
UTUSN
(77,544 posts)AxionExcel
(755 posts)Glad to see DUers who get it, and who are not drinking the endless supply of kool aid that comes with the regularly scheduled DU attacks on clean, wholesome food unadulterated by synthetic chemicals and mechanistic, profit-driven GMO substances.
petronius
(26,695 posts)...much too hard.
(I'm sure there's a gif for that sentiment, but I'm too lazy to look for it. Probably because GMOs have sapped my motivation and creativity.)
AxionExcel
(755 posts)...the systematic, regularly scheduled attacks on clean organic food that infest these pages or the ongoing systematic campaign to prevent people from knowing what synthetic man-made substances may be infesting the food they feed their families
No matter how hard anyone tries, that stuff just ain't funny.
Major Nikon
(36,925 posts)§205.601 Synthetic substances allowed for use in organic crop production.

This official USDA-AMS logo is a marketing signal to consumers. It is backed by federal law and enforced by the USDA. Farmers using this symbol must closely follow the rules of the National Organic Program (NOP). The
NOP is a marketing program, not a nutrition nor a food safety program, such as Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs).
The Allowed* Use of Commercial Fertilizers, Pesticides, and Synthetic Substances on U.S. Farms Under the USDA National Organic Program

yawnmaster
(2,812 posts)harmless compounds.
Major Nikon
(36,925 posts)Synthetic substances tend to break down into more harmless compounds because they are specifically engineered to do so. Copper sulfate, which is inorganic but nonetheless approved under the National Organic Program, is highly toxic to people and animals and tends to accumulate in the soil and groundwater where it causes all sorts of environmental problems.
http://pmep.cce.cornell.edu/profiles/extoxnet/carbaryl-dicrotophos/copper-sulfate-ext.html
If one is truly concerned about the environment, sustainability, and food safety, then the most effective and least evasive product should be used when necessary. Assuming the best product is always "organic" is nothing more than an appeal to nature fallacy. That's why the NOP is managed under the USDA's marketing branch, and discloses specifically that its regulations do not address nutrition or safety.
yawnmaster
(2,812 posts)womanofthehills
(10,927 posts)They have to work for the chemical companies to be so obsessed about it.
Major Nikon
(36,925 posts)Are those who are actually so deep into the conspiracy theory they think anyone who disagrees with them is part of the conspiracy.
malaise
(295,237 posts)because
Dr. Strange
(26,058 posts)It's the vaccines.
Major Nikon
(36,925 posts)Dr. Strange
(26,058 posts)before vaccines, people never saw chem trails in the sky. Think about that.
Major Nikon
(36,925 posts)Chemtrails are far more efficient.
AxionExcel
(755 posts)Last edited Mon Mar 28, 2016, 06:51 PM - Edit history (1)
Please consider reading a book or two on this subject. Knowledge is power.
Be careful or some mean-spirited, pea-brained jerk will ALERT on you for bringing up a FORBIDDEN topic. Ch*mtrails - you should learn - are not to be spoken of, thought about, or investigated.

Major Nikon
(36,925 posts)Noun
1) The intellectual gap between the person who makes a sarcastic joke and those who don't get it.
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)Major Nikon
(36,925 posts)It's not as if there isn't a distinguished list of repeat customer woo mongers who have been unable to confine themselves to the CS group.
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)I hadn't checked CS to see who posts there in years. Wow! That was informative.
Major Nikon
(36,925 posts)The video & multimedia forum is a good place for the "climate engineering", aka Chemtrail threads. Recently there was a pretty good thread in GD about government sponsored mind control that included links to an anti-Semitic web site. I do kinda miss the electromagnetic hypersensitivity threads although one occassionally does manage to pop up now and again.

HuckleB
(35,773 posts)Oh, DU, we have to talk.
L. Coyote
(51,134 posts)Now I recommend testing the politicians.
Deadshot
(384 posts)Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)Major Nikon
(36,925 posts)AxionExcel
(755 posts)
Free clue for those who require one:
AxionExcel
(755 posts)They unanimously agree, the dumbest things on this website are actually:
A. The relentless systematic posting of threads promoting ignorance. You know, the ones that want to kiss off the preference of 92% of Americans who would like labels so they know what's in the food they feed their families, and instead argue that knowledge, democracy are stupid, and that IGNORANCE must be maintained by continuing to block information.
B. The relentless systematic posting of threads damning clean food free of synthetic manufactured chemicals as some kind of a hoax, while promoting more more more hazardous industrial chemical systems of growing food - ignoring the fact that" Tests for a hundred particularly hazardous substances have revealed that on average we each harbour 27 of them in our blood, though the chemical cocktail varies from person to person.
When you consider how these toxic industrial ag chemicals are linked to the HUGE increase in chronic diseases (such as diabetes, obesity, lipoprotein metabolism disorder, Alzheimers, senile dementia, Parkinsons, multiple sclerosis and autism), you can readily appreciate why 'experts agree' that the "organic hoax" threads are actually THE DUMBEST THINGS ON THIS WEBSITE.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/countryside/8985039/Human-bodies-contain-too-many-damaging-chemicals.html
http://sustainablepulse.com/2014/11/07/new-study-huge-increase-us-chronic-diseases-linked-glyphosate-herbicides/#.Vvk9aGOXd0d
Deadshot
(384 posts)So what is the label going to tell them? Their food has GMOs? Then what?
Why not go further and make them put farm(s) the food came from, the latitude/longitude of that farm in degrees, minutes, and seconds; the address/owner of that farm, and the date of harvest.
AxionExcel
(755 posts)The vast 92% of US Citizens know that Donald Trump (R) and the Puny Minority Elitist 8% like to call us STUPID because we want knowledge, for ourselves and our families, and because we feel democracy is important. Pretty damn strange, eh?
Now corporations are realizing that the customers are right. As usual. Took long enough.
The Puny 8% Elite Minority - and their role model Donald "You-are-all-STUPID" Trump - are just going to have to lump it and find a way to tolerate Democracy, and you'll have to claim the ignorance you seek by averting your eyes from the labels. That shouldn't be to hard to do. Good luck.

Person 2713
(3,263 posts)crap junk food consistently
I have a feeling that is not the easy link although I have read glysophate.can lead to agrees ion in children
