Ted Cruz - ‘Religious Liberty’ Plan - Okay to Discriminate Against LGBT Community

[TomCADem]

So long as you claim you are discriminating based on your religious beliefs, then it is okay.

http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2016/03/25/3763293/ted-cruz-religious-liberty/

his bid for the presidency, Ted Cruz (R) has consistently surrounded himself with some of the most extreme social conservatives in the country. In addition to appearing beside these individuals at various events, he also recruited a Religious Liberty Advisory Council — what Fox News’ Todd Starnes calls a “faith-based Justice League.”

Through Starnes, Cruz unveiled this week just what kind of ideas this council has developed to protect “religious liberty.” Given the fact that his council consisted of representatives from only the most conservative iterations of Christianity, the 15-point list is unsurprisingly dedicated to privileging Christian beliefs and enabling discrimination against the LGBT community and women.

For example, one of the recommendations is to “rescind Executive Order 13672 – an order that requires certain federal contractors to not discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity.” This order, which Obama first issued back in 2014, requires companies that contract with the federal government to have a policy against discriminating against LGBT people. By vowing to rescind it, Cruz is blatantly endorsing such discrimination and promising to subsidize it with taxpayer funding.

The council also recommends that Cruz “direct all federal agencies to stop interpreting ‘sex’ to include ‘sexual orientation’ and/or ‘gender identity.'” This would gut essential protections that LGBT people — and particularly members of the transgender community — are relying on. Victims of discrimination in employment and education have successfully found relief based on these interpretations of the law, and that protection would be eviscerated.

[Jackie Wilson Said]

1. Good thing there is virtually NO difference between Ted and Hillary, though, right?

Not directing this at the OP but those who will sit out the election and allow rights to be lost.

[shenmue]

3. Yes

[Bluenorthwest]

5. It demonstrates that Bernie is the better choice because LGBT rights are not yet secure and risking

those rights by placing the protection of them in the hands of a politician who spent years opposing them in lurid and exacting detail which leaned heavily on her own religious objections to LGBT rights is not acceptable. There is much difference between them but also too much common ground, both have openly declared that religion has the right to discriminate against LGBT.

[Jenny_92808]

2. How evil of him

I was just hidden because i spoke out to say that RW speakers are harming us. We are being infiltrated by paid posters who disparage us.

[TomCADem]

4. Think Progress Is Not A RW Site

Unless we are going up is down these days.