General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThis message was self-deleted by its author
This message was self-deleted by its author (gsb54) on Sat Apr 2, 2016, 01:04 PM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Sure she hold positions I hate, but that doesn't mean she's evil. Nice lady, really.
HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)"The warning signs have been there for years. As co-chair of the "Red to Blue" campaign to help increase Democratic seats in the House, she refused to support the Democrats running against three potentially vulnerable Florida Republicans - Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, Lincoln Diaz-Balart and Mario Diaz-Balart - because of her friendship with those Republicans".
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)She LOST the house and senate. And you support that? This has to be about corruption. There is no other explanation. The emporer wears no clothes. I prefer a party head that wins elections.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)Local and National organizations are two different balls of wax. Debbie done great job with National elections
redruddyred
(1,615 posts)whether or not they're "democrats" is debateable
highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)I'm really wondering when folks will wake up to the fact that these leaders of our party do not represent the average American, Black or White or any flavor, anymore. It is increasingly just so shockingly obvious.
If we don't wake up, and come together around someone with a plan to fix this, we are really going to be drowning, each and every one of us, from the most unfortunate all the way through the middle class.
They are Corporatacrats. They work for the corporations and the elites. They do not work for us, even when they pretend to.
Oh, they may throw a crumb from time to time. That's another thing they will do, to keep us believing and hooked.
But,
Who is going to fight Climate Change, like the end of the world scenario it is quickly becoming?
Who is going to really fight for some kind of economic prosperity for all Americans, not just the few?
Who is going to keep us from our usual interventionist ways in too much war?
Who is really going to be steadfast in fighting racial injustice?
I know my answer, and I remain confident (through his actions and words over so many years) that he will remain true to all these causes.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)She's not a loyal Democrat; she's actively working to undermine traditional Democratic issues and positions and candidates who stand up for them.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)That is why I said she hold positions I hate. But she is a party loyalist
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)gsb54
(89 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)The rest of us ard just well talking.
gsb54
(89 posts)I understand what your point is. Yet, I 1000's of people in this country are in the democratic party of which she leads. She does answer to all of us in that respect.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)scscholar
(2,902 posts)By trying to force them to do otherwise is to subvert democracy.
TDale313
(7,822 posts)So not really a surprise. But disappointing.
desmiller
(747 posts)billhicks76
(5,082 posts)It was about Hillary from the get go. Can anyone defend this? Unbelievable. No wonder people are fed up with democrats as much as rethugs.
http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/nov/27/hillary-clinton-charged-300k-for-ucla-speech-deman/
jwirr
(39,215 posts)to get Hillary to finally concede? Was she promised it would be her turn?
floriduck
(2,262 posts)so many Senate, a House and State seats, hold its leader responsible. Even a major league sports team would have dumped her years ago. What exactly IS her primary function as Chairperson for the Democratic National Committee?!
"The Democratic National Committee (DNC) is the formal governing body for the United States Democratic Party. The Committee coordinates strategy to Democratic Party candidates throughout the country for local, state, and national office."
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_National_Committee
MisterP
(23,730 posts)but it's the VOTERS' fault
floriduck
(2,262 posts)It's very disappointing from someone I voted for twice.
MADem
(135,425 posts)We don't teach civics in school anymore, either....
I vote. I don't miss an election, even when my state holds them at stupid times.
TDale313
(7,822 posts)Everything else is window dressing.
She'll help him get it passed this November.
LuvLoogie
(8,815 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)the job she is doing.
As for her work as a representative, that will be the decision of the people in her district--not people who don't live in her district.
Challenger notwithstanding, I think she'll win handily. Her constituent services are pretty good.
Joe Biden has been stumping for Alan Grayson's opponent down in FL, too. I wonder if he'll find time to help her raise a few bucks?
Why would Obama want to talk to you? Or any of the people in the big Dem tent who have been calling him names for the last eight years? He knows his own mind. All the people he likes, you want to toss out. There's nothing, really, to discuss.
GummyBearz
(2,931 posts)"The Democratic National Committee (DNC) is the formal governing body for the United States Democratic Party. The Committee coordinates strategy to Democratic Party candidates throughout the country for local, state, and national office."
D's have lost 900+ of these local, state, and national offices. Great job eh?
MADem
(135,425 posts)He (not you) hires the chair of the Democratic NATIONAL committee.
So no--I'm not out of touch.
Here ya go:
http://www.politico.com/story/2011/04/wasserman-schultz-to-lead-dnc-052605
President Barack Obama has chosen Florida Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz as the incoming chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee, the party announced late Tuesday.
Wasserman Schultz, 44, was chosen for her strength as a fundraiser and as a television messenger and for her clout in the crucial swing state of Florida, the sources said.
Story Continued Below
She will succeed Tim Kaine, who announced earlier Tuesday that he will run for U.S. Senate from Virginia.
The committee announced the choice in an email to members from Vice President Joe Biden.
In selecting Debbie to lead our party, President Obama noted her tenacity, her strength, her fighting spirit and her ability to overcome adversity, Biden wrote.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2011/04/wasserman-schultz-to-lead-dnc-052605#ixzz44GYQVtN3![]()
GummyBearz
(2,931 posts)Now, given how poorly DWS has performed, shouldn't the person who hired her also fire her?
MADem
(135,425 posts)billhicks76
(5,082 posts)She's a complete failure. Bush also gave the Medal of Honor to Rumsfeld etc. This is no different. It's about cover. I really have to question people's intelligence not seeing this.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Else You Are Mad
(3,040 posts)Nor is Obama. They are the new breed of what the media calls 'progressive democrats.' In reality, they are corporatist moderates that aren't warmongering neocons.
dogman
(6,073 posts)She is therefore an experienced team player. Not at all surprising.
SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)she must see trouble ahead
Response to gsb54 (Original post)
CommonSenseDemocrat This message was self-deleted by its author.
Duckfan
(1,268 posts)..in Florida.
DINO: Democrat In Name Only!
And for the record, I think the people in her district would be happy to have Tim representing them instead of DINO Debbie.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)tells me all I need to know abt her. Prez got it right!
Omaha Steve
(109,225 posts)Donate to Democratic Underground for Tim Canova FL-23 here: https://secure.actblue.com/contribute/page/du4timcanova

Duppers
(28,469 posts)davidthegnome
(2,983 posts)I have pretty much always liked Obama - he's made some decisions that pissed me off, that I criticized him for, but I never really disliked him. This though, strikes me as beyond out of touch, I think it's entirely possible that he's simply thumbing his nose at those of us who are really angry with what Dear Sweet Debbie has been up to. In other words, he's giving us the finger.
While I do like Obama... his associations with the likes of Tim Geithner, Arne Duncan, Rahm Emanuel and others... has, at times, made me think to myself... WTF? It should be considered that his endorsement of DWS is not a sort of behavior that is uncommon for him, nor has he actually proven tough on corporate or Wall Street corruption, financial regulation - and so on and so forth. I voted for Obama because he denounced the Iraq war from the start, because I thought he had some great ideas about getting health insurance for everyone. There were a lot of questions though, that were never really answered - and a lot of campaign promises that I pretty much knew were just fluff.
I can't say I'm terribly shocked by this. I was shocked when Howard Dean had some pretty interesting things to say about unions... I was shocked when I learned what his current line of work is and what his current affiliations are - I always thought he was different, a kind of progressive champion. To be proven wrong on that one was really disappointing. Obama though? Not so shocked, we have example after example of some very questionable political appointments... and in the case of DWS and even Obama... they are not of the 99%. They will retire with everything they ever wanted or dreamed of. Millions of dollars for themselves and their descendants. Some of the greatest benefits available anywhere on earth - with lots and lots of awesome, easy, cushy job prospects going forward.
They do not live in the same world as most of the rest of us - not even remotely.
JohnnyRingo
(20,870 posts)Schultz is the head of the Democratic National Committee.
Your shock that there's a connection between the two is surprising, almost unbelievable.
6000eliot
(5,643 posts)Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)corporate candidate.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)has lost since you placed her at the head of the DNC? You got the blame for those loses because the propaganda said you were doing a poor job. But I think it was the other way around. DWS and the DNC did not back you once you were in the WH.
Worried senior
(1,328 posts)on Twitter for saying I didn't care for her.
They talk about Bernie supporters being mean, these were no better and in an election year we should never criticize anyone leading our party.
Should we all walk lockstep, criticism is what makes things better.
I did block one that was going off on this, have seen many other remarks from her and the hateful way she speaks about Bernie is too much. Don't like, don't agree with him but don't be hateful like the repubs are.