Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

SHRED

(28,136 posts)
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 05:30 PM Mar 2016

Does Obamacare really care?

I really love the removal of pre-exisiting conditions that allow us access to insurance coverage but here's the deal...


I am 59 and my wife is 55.
Our AGI is around $55K.
We are retired.

We have the Blue Shield PPO under the Covered California Silver plan. This plan retails for about $1,300 per month. We are paying $650 per month (based on our income).

In 2014, when we add up all of our healthcare costs (we itemized), the total was $14,000.
Last year it was $10,000+ in health care costs total.
These costs were incurred via premiums, copays, services not fully covered, and deductibles.

What is "affordable" about this?



WE NEED A UNIVERSAL HEALTH PLAN FOR OUR COUNTRY NOW!!!

--

81 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Does Obamacare really care? (Original Post) SHRED Mar 2016 OP
Agreed, but Obamacare didnt make your situation worse, it made it better. Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #1
I think further sticker shocks are yet to come SHRED Mar 2016 #2
Probably, but because we are allowing for profit company to interfere between Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #5
Affordable is part of the name of the bill. US trade policy is against new services Baobab Mar 2016 #33
Yes. Obama cares and works lewebley3 Mar 2016 #43
Obamacare is working alright... SHRED Mar 2016 #52
if i had to make a semi-educated guess redruddyred Mar 2016 #60
like Mary Mac Mar 2016 #75
Is that an EPO or a PPO? flamingdem Mar 2016 #3
PPO...it's mentioned in my OP SHRED Mar 2016 #4
You might get a lower price with an EPO flamingdem Mar 2016 #13
We travel so we have to have a PPO SHRED Mar 2016 #20
I heard about that - Blue Shield Blue Card? flamingdem Mar 2016 #22
29 million without healthcare at all onecaliberal Mar 2016 #6
How much due to no Medicaid expansion in redneck states? SHRED Mar 2016 #7
Some but not all by no means onecaliberal Mar 2016 #8
we need something better SHRED Mar 2016 #9
Yes, we do. Healthcare should NOT be a profit making endeavor for anyone. onecaliberal Mar 2016 #37
2.9 million or 1 in 10, so not really that many out of the total. former9thward Mar 2016 #19
Interesting SHRED Mar 2016 #21
The real measure of success will be whether the ACA reduces the number of medical bankruptcies. Maedhros Mar 2016 #10
well President Obama offered to pay Hunter Biden's cancer expenses magical thyme Mar 2016 #32
The Covered California Silver Plan has plenty of LibDemAlways Mar 2016 #39
What are they? I should know since I'm on Anthem Silver flamingdem Mar 2016 #58
I am talking specifically about the Covered California LibDemAlways Mar 2016 #61
Wow, but that doesn't sound correct to me because out of pocket maximums are less flamingdem Mar 2016 #62
Not every expense counts toward out-of-pocket SHRED Mar 2016 #64
Can you mention an example? flamingdem Mar 2016 #68
Sorry SHRED Mar 2016 #69
The out of pocket max. is only for the services LibDemAlways Mar 2016 #66
Ugh. Thanks because I'm about to have procedures flamingdem Mar 2016 #67
Thanks for explaining SHRED Mar 2016 #74
Not so much. Dont call me Shirley Mar 2016 #11
when i checked out plans questionseverything Mar 2016 #12
I can't put my life's savings in jeopardy SHRED Mar 2016 #17
i understand, we have no major savings but i also would hate to lose the equity in our home to questionseverything Mar 2016 #25
if the grandkids lose their medicaid, i gotta believe mopinko Mar 2016 #28
i am illinois...caseworker said it was aca...because we do take them off our taxes questionseverything Mar 2016 #53
i doubt it was aca. mopinko Mar 2016 #73
i know you are illinois i followed your farm stuff with interest questionseverything Mar 2016 #76
yeesh. mopinko Mar 2016 #78
Medicare for All, including dental, optical, hearing aids and mental health services. Scuba Mar 2016 #14
It's equivalent to the care you're gonna get with the TPP. (nt) So Far From Heaven Mar 2016 #15
We're about $5,000 ahead of you in income... Contrary1 Mar 2016 #16
Ouch SHRED Mar 2016 #18
I just looked at the plans available to us in NY as we will have to purchase come May 1. redwitch Mar 2016 #23
My question is: after paying the penalty Mike__M Mar 2016 #24
The honest truth is, and it's true for me too, we don't make enough to retire. Hoyt Mar 2016 #26
Obamacare is going to be a failure down the line. jalan48 Mar 2016 #27
Obama Care didn't Cryptoad Mar 2016 #29
We looked at all the levels SHRED Mar 2016 #30
not assuming nothing Cryptoad Mar 2016 #40
What have we overlooked? SHRED Mar 2016 #41
too harsh a tone, Cryptoad Skittles Mar 2016 #48
Now that I'm on my computer... SHRED Mar 2016 #51
Aaaaa...I think they all pretty much have high deductibles. peace13 Mar 2016 #71
I agree. smiley Mar 2016 #31
You are a good person to think this way SHRED Mar 2016 #34
I agree, but... Motown_Johnny Mar 2016 #35
We did. SHRED Mar 2016 #36
Sorry you're having a bad experience having insurance Politicub Mar 2016 #38
Think about this SHRED Mar 2016 #42
That doesn't have anything to do with the ACA ConservativeDemocrat Mar 2016 #44
I realize a bit off topic SHRED Mar 2016 #45
Public option is a public INSURANCE option... ConservativeDemocrat Mar 2016 #54
I think overall, that he believed that was the best deal he could broker for the American people. Rex Mar 2016 #46
Similar situation. We paid in over 1/3rd of our gross income in medical premiums last year. Turn CO Blue Mar 2016 #47
honestly i have wondered if that wasn't the plan,pretty sure that accounts for the high suicide rate questionseverything Mar 2016 #77
Nonsense, just about any program including the ACA can be fixed but it would take a Congress cstanleytech Apr 2016 #80
I'm a huge fan of President Obama.. one_voice Mar 2016 #49
I think the insurance companies planned this to happen SHRED Mar 2016 #50
It gets us in the door (provided we can cover the co-pay for the visit). ScreamingMeemie Mar 2016 #55
Exacty, I didn't see doctors for years because even paying $360 a month I had a 6500 deductible flamingdem Mar 2016 #59
It's not affordable.. Texasgal Mar 2016 #56
I understand SHRED Mar 2016 #57
There's only one PPO left in N. TX snot Mar 2016 #63
Ugh...where are the priorities? SHRED Mar 2016 #65
In a word, NO. I still can't get coverage, the penalty cost go up every year. It's a fucking failure Umbral18 Mar 2016 #70
This Jan. my deductible and co-pay doubled Number9Dream Mar 2016 #72
Post removed Post removed Apr 2016 #79
We need single payer, but... HuckleB Apr 2016 #81

Jackie Wilson Said

(4,176 posts)
1. Agreed, but Obamacare didnt make your situation worse, it made it better.
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 05:33 PM
Mar 2016

So now our job is to go to the next step.

Jackie Wilson Said

(4,176 posts)
5. Probably, but because we are allowing for profit company to interfere between
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 05:40 PM
Mar 2016

patient and provider.

It is absurd we still have health insurance companies.

Baobab

(4,667 posts)
33. Affordable is part of the name of the bill. US trade policy is against new services
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 07:11 PM
Mar 2016

We have spent 22 years and a huge amount of work to make new public healthcare FTA-illegal, not just here but all around the world.

 

redruddyred

(1,615 posts)
60. if i had to make a semi-educated guess
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 12:58 AM
Mar 2016

these patients are unnecessarily sick after having had their preventable health needs ignored for years

flamingdem

(39,308 posts)
3. Is that an EPO or a PPO?
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 05:38 PM
Mar 2016

PPO is a very good plan since you can access a wider network than EPO - but it all depends on who the providers are in your city.

The critical comparison here is your deductible. If you're not paying one you're doing fairly well compared to many people. I was paying over 350 dollars to Anthem before ACA and my deductible was $6500.

So that was way worse than what I have now which is Silver EPO with a very low deductible and copay, but I know what you mean even a low copay can add up.

We are paying for our health here in the USA. This is not free health care by any means. In my case I have much, much more affordable access to care though, and the best care since I can access UCLA. Before I simply didn't use my insurance and it cost more and excluded many things. Before I felt like I was dealing with the mafia, things have improved but I'd like it to be cheaper.

Let's not forget Medicare comes with costs as well, it's never going to be free imo in the USA.

flamingdem

(39,308 posts)
13. You might get a lower price with an EPO
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 05:48 PM
Mar 2016

That's the case with Anthem in LA anyway.

At first it was a problem, doctors were hesitant to sign up since the EPO pays them less but Anthem got most UCLA doctors and many others to sign up.

Starting in August the system was pretty flooded due to people signing up for ACA. I'm glad I got set up with doctors sooner because now what's on offer is often an intern unless you can wait or if you're smart about calling for cancellations. Like I said elsewhere I am willing to pay to get quality care and imagine if it was free it would be more flooded.

flamingdem

(39,308 posts)
22. I heard about that - Blue Shield Blue Card?
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 06:06 PM
Mar 2016

Does that work okay? I could see that being important since EPO is no good for other locations. Another failing of the system - in fact one that would keep me home. Plus, it would be nice to have two cities to chose from if I was a part timer somewhere.

former9thward

(31,930 posts)
19. 2.9 million or 1 in 10, so not really that many out of the total.
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 06:02 PM
Mar 2016
?w=735&h=551&crop=1

As of the beginning of 2015, 32.3 million nonelderly people lacked health coverage in the U.S. Nationally, we estimate that nearly half (15.9 million, or 49%) of this population is eligible for financial assistance to gain coverage through either Medicaid or subsidized Marketplace coverage (Figure 1). More than a quarter are either adults eligible for Medicaid (5.7 million, or 18%) or children eligible for Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) (3.2 million, or 10%). Those who are Medicaid eligible include people who were previously eligible as well as those newly eligible under the ACA. About one in five (7.0 million, or 22%) of the nonelderly uninsured are eligible for premium tax credits to purchase coverage through the Marketplace.

Nearly one in ten uninsured people (2.9 million) fall into the coverage gap due to their state’s decision not to expand Medicaid, and 15% of the uninsured (4.9 million) are undocumented immigrants who are ineligible for ACA coverage under federal law.

The remainder of the uninsured either has an offer of ESI (4.9 million, or 15%) or has an income above the limit for premium tax credits but could purchase unsubsidized Marketplace coverage (3.7 million, or 12%). We cannot determine from available survey data if the offer of ESI would be considered affordable under the law, which would make the individual ineligible for a Marketplace premium subsidy.


http://kff.org/health-reform/issue-brief/new-estimates-of-eligibility-for-aca-coverage-among-the-uninsured/
 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
10. The real measure of success will be whether the ACA reduces the number of medical bankruptcies.
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 05:43 PM
Mar 2016

Sure, more people are covered, but can people afford to pay for actual care?

 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
32. well President Obama offered to pay Hunter Biden's cancer expenses
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 07:11 PM
Mar 2016

so the Biden's wouldn't have to sell their house to pay them.

So I'd be inclined to say no.

LibDemAlways

(15,139 posts)
39. The Covered California Silver Plan has plenty of
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 07:59 PM
Mar 2016

Last edited Thu Mar 31, 2016, 01:25 AM - Edit history (1)

exclusions, which puts the ball squarely in the patient's court -- this after extremely high premiums, co-pays, and deductibles. It's a massive insurance company ripoff.

flamingdem

(39,308 posts)
58. What are they? I should know since I'm on Anthem Silver
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 12:51 AM
Mar 2016

but so far haven't run into them.

I don't appreciate the coinsurance, it's going to cost me this year. However it was way worse before when I had to pay more for what was essentially catastrophic insurance for $360 a month and 6500 deductible. At least I use this insurance.

LibDemAlways

(15,139 posts)
61. I am talking specifically about the Covered California
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 01:43 AM
Mar 2016

Silver Plan through Blue Shield. I do not believe it's an Anthem Plan. My mom has Anthem Blue Shield and it's good coverage. The Covered California plan is crap. A relative who signed up for it ended up heavily in debt when he had a medical emergency. $5000 out of pocket for a few hours in the ER was just the start. They used every excuse in the book to get out of paying. He owed 20K by the time they got through with him.

flamingdem

(39,308 posts)
62. Wow, but that doesn't sound correct to me because out of pocket maximums are less
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 01:50 AM
Mar 2016

than 20k for most of the plans - not saying it's not possible though but I haven't seen this.

My out of pocket max is around 2800 - but I'm not sure if emergency is excluded, if so that seems wrong.

I've heard that people are still getting billed for out of network docs when it's not like they can ask them if they are in network when they are in an ER! I am guessing this might have happened. Gov. Brown has a bill on his desk to disallow this practice.

flamingdem

(39,308 posts)
68. Can you mention an example?
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 02:24 AM
Mar 2016

I'm having to do procedures, I thought it was just a percent that I'll pay but sounds like I don't know the whole story.

LibDemAlways

(15,139 posts)
66. The out of pocket max. is only for the services
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 02:16 AM
Mar 2016

they claim to cover. The reality is that there are big co-pays and deductibles for just about every covered service and many services they simply disallow. Plus, under the plan they only cover many services at 70%, so the patient is automatically stuck with the balance. It's a racket.

flamingdem

(39,308 posts)
67. Ugh. Thanks because I'm about to have procedures
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 02:23 AM
Mar 2016

Was meaning to call for the codes this week. I wonder what they won't tell me and I'll find out later.

questionseverything

(9,645 posts)
12. when i checked out plans
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 05:44 PM
Mar 2016

it was 8% of our agi plus 6 grand out of pocket each

which would be 30% of our income so we pay the penalty instead and pay for treatment as needed

sigh

we voted obama but got hillarycare instead

btw we will never be able to retire and are raising grandkids who used to get medicaid but that may change because of the aca

we need national healthcare NOW

questionseverything

(9,645 posts)
25. i understand, we have no major savings but i also would hate to lose the equity in our home to
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 06:22 PM
Mar 2016

medical bills but

i don't have 30% disposable either

when everything in 08 crashed our income was cut by about 2/3, we now about up to half, trouble is very few of the expenses we had before 08 are things we can discontinue (we long ago sold off anything extra)

being self employed bernie's plan would cost us 8.4% of our income , for us it would be a god send

mopinko

(69,984 posts)
28. if the grandkids lose their medicaid, i gotta believe
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 06:37 PM
Mar 2016

that that is your governor, not the aca. aca expanded medicaid in all the states that accepted it.
i know walker not only rejected the money, he cut badgercare.

questionseverything

(9,645 posts)
53. i am illinois...caseworker said it was aca...because we do take them off our taxes
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 09:46 PM
Mar 2016

i don't know for sure that they will lose it, waiting but i had to do an income thing and i never had to before

January income low so maybe ok

mopinko

(69,984 posts)
73. i doubt it was aca.
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 08:35 AM
Mar 2016

medicaid has it's own rules. aca did nothing but expand medicaid afaik.
i am in illinois as well. smells like rauner to me.
a friend up here had case worker just close up her file while she was trying to get surgery on a broken foot. (she couldnt work for 3 months) closed her kids cases, too.

if you find out, i would be curious to know.

questionseverything

(9,645 posts)
76. i know you are illinois i followed your farm stuff with interest
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 12:01 PM
Mar 2016

the aca had 2000 pages of "details", we are just finding out about

my tax gal agreed with the case worker on it so who knows

one thing i should mention is...we only had to provide income for a one month period and January is usually horrible for construction
so the kids medical should be fine

still it is a change

one thing that i think hurts us with the whole "calculation" thing is even tho we are supporting 5 peops, since only 2 are applying for insurance they seem to figure the cost as if our income only had to support 2

does that make sense?

we have so many reoccurring medical expenses that would not be covered under aca, chiropractor, eye glasses and dental that 30% on top of those is just not doable

long as i am whining (lol)..basically by the time i even know what my income was for last year(hopefully managed to pay my taxes) and have a decent guess at this year,,,the enrollment period is over BUT i do have to calculate and include my next years penalty in my tax quarters

i am saving the state over 1200 bucks a month by not letting my grands be in the foster care system but i was a foster parent and i have seen both sides and i do not trust that system

i guess what i am trying to say is, not every case fits into a neat little box

btw i still support the aca for the good things it does for some people, i just want to be included

rauner is an ass so who knows what will be left when he gets done with us

about your friend getting kicked off

caseworkers have entirely too much power

when i first applied for the kids medical that went thru easily but i also asked about receiving monthly money (other grandparents in my grands raising grand support group told me about)

the caseworker said no, when i asked why (since they have no income and others with way more grandparent income were getting) she just said,don't question me or i will deny their medical too

<shrugs>

it is what it is

mopinko

(69,984 posts)
78. yeesh.
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 04:21 PM
Mar 2016

yeah, caseworkers. luckily my friend had the social worker at the hospital helping her.

best of luck to your grands. you are a good soul to that them on.

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
14. Medicare for All, including dental, optical, hearing aids and mental health services.
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 05:49 PM
Mar 2016

And yes, we can afford it.

Contrary1

(12,629 posts)
16. We're about $5,000 ahead of you in income...
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 05:57 PM
Mar 2016

My premium is $965. just for me, no dental. Almost 25% of our income goes to healthcare costs.

First time ever as an adult that I'm anxious to hit 65.

redwitch

(14,940 posts)
23. I just looked at the plans available to us in NY as we will have to purchase come May 1.
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 06:06 PM
Mar 2016

Hubby and me, not yet retired. Cheapest plan we can afford will cost us $211 per month ( after the subsidized amount kicks in) and we each will have a deductible of $6800. Add in co pays for everything and cost of our prescriptions and it is going to be no great bargain. We don't make a lot of money, this is based on $50000 a year total.

Mike__M

(1,052 posts)
24. My question is: after paying the penalty
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 06:10 PM
Mar 2016

Could I walk into an IRS office and present my colon for an exam, or do I need an appointment?

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
26. The honest truth is, and it's true for me too, we don't make enough to retire.
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 06:30 PM
Mar 2016

I'm older than you, and I will he working pretty much full-time for quite awhile.

jalan48

(13,840 posts)
27. Obamacare is going to be a failure down the line.
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 06:34 PM
Mar 2016

Thinking that the insurance industry is the answer was a huge mistake, though lucrative for the insurance companies I'm sure.

Cryptoad

(8,254 posts)
29. Obama Care didn't
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 06:38 PM
Mar 2016

force u to purchase a policy with high out of pocket cost,,,, at ur age no a wise move.

 

SHRED

(28,136 posts)
30. We looked at all the levels
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 06:40 PM
Mar 2016

The one we chose was the best cost wise for us.

We looked at ALL of them available in Covered California.
My wife is a former software engineer so yeah...she knows math.
Your assumption-based victim blaming is offensive to me.

Cryptoad

(8,254 posts)
40. not assuming nothing
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 08:04 PM
Mar 2016

I know fromm working to sign people up,,,, the silver plan has lots of out of pocket cost and not a wise choice for someone yall's age. but it seems u have it all figured out...

thx, tells me all i need to know

Skittles

(153,111 posts)
48. too harsh a tone, Cryptoad
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 09:07 PM
Mar 2016

they're just very worried....you sound like you are in the know - how about offering them some real advice regarding how to proceed

smiley

(1,432 posts)
31. I agree.
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 07:10 PM
Mar 2016

There's nothing affordable about the Affordable Care Act.

I managed most of my 20-some adult years without health insurance. When I needed to see a doctor for minor colds and accidents, I paid out of pocket. The costs were higher, but I was lucky enough to never need major medical care. I now get healthcare through my employer. $200 a month deducted, which covers only me. I'm glad more people are getting the care they need, but if I'm going to pay this kind of money a month, I'd rather it go towards government healthcare, not to an insurance company. Somehow that just makes sense to me.


 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
35. I agree, but...
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 07:48 PM
Mar 2016

it has been my experience that Blue Care sucks.

Not all silver plans are alike.


You may need to do a better job comparing plans.




Politicub

(12,165 posts)
38. Sorry you're having a bad experience having insurance
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 07:58 PM
Mar 2016

I consider Obamacare to be an imperfect miracle. It freed me from needing a job for insurance alone. I was able to start my own business.

 

SHRED

(28,136 posts)
42. Think about this
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 08:13 PM
Mar 2016

The poorest and also the very costly 65 years and older people are not a burden (cost) to the private health insurance industry yet they are still screwing us.

A big chunk of their potential risk pool isn't there and they still raise rates every year.

ConservativeDemocrat

(2,720 posts)
44. That doesn't have anything to do with the ACA
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 08:41 PM
Mar 2016

It has much more to do with fee for service medicine in the US, and hospitals banding together to apply collective bargaining power for the providers. Not much the ACA can do about that. It would take an entirely different law.

- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community

ConservativeDemocrat

(2,720 posts)
54. Public option is a public INSURANCE option...
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 10:43 PM
Mar 2016

It still wouldn't affect what the providers themselves charge.

I mean sure. Insurance companies can have up to 15% overhead (it's typically much lower), whereas Medicare runs at about 3.5%-5%, depending on where you ask, but basically that's at most a 10% reduction. So even ideally, instead of $10,000, you'd be paying $9,000.

The real cost drivers these days are: 1) No limits on drug prices and artificial monopolies, 2) Absurdly high price and restrictions on medical schools restricting doctors, 3) "Cadillac" bargaining when covered by insurance, 4) Intense expense near the end of life when people are in a death spiral anyway (instead of health activities younger on). Medicare is at this point basically a charity for most doctors - it's basically not worth it, and many don't take patients due to it.

(Had a friend in Britain say all his doctor families moved to the US because salaries were 3 times higher. We pay that. And no, insurance companies, evil boo hiss, don't control that)

- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
46. I think overall, that he believed that was the best deal he could broker for the American people.
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 08:48 PM
Mar 2016

We need to do away with health insurance and make it health care. Forcing all insurance companies to go non-profit would help a lot, but that will never happen.

Turn CO Blue

(4,221 posts)
47. Similar situation. We paid in over 1/3rd of our gross income in medical premiums last year.
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 09:02 PM
Mar 2016

We are 54 and 50.

We pay in about $1500 a month.

The average 55 year old couple pays $2000 per month.

The costs for the ACA (and for all those newly insured) is carried entirely on the backs of 50-65 year olds.

The ACA is overshadowed by the 800 pound gorilla - which is that it is bankrupting an entire generation right before they will need to retire -- and it will lead to the homelessness and poverty of every single person who is now 45-65 years old.

The ACA cannot be fixed.

questionseverything

(9,645 posts)
77. honestly i have wondered if that wasn't the plan,pretty sure that accounts for the high suicide rate
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 12:24 PM
Mar 2016

who the heck would think that people would have 30 plus percent of their income available for medical?

certainly no "regular person"

it would be one thing if we had known our whole lives, when you hit a certain age you got to pay triple..it wouldn't be fair but at least we could of tried to plan for it

cstanleytech

(26,224 posts)
80. Nonsense, just about any program including the ACA can be fixed but it would take a Congress
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 08:15 PM
Apr 2016

with ethics that isnt beholden to the wealthy to do it.

one_voice

(20,043 posts)
49. I'm a huge fan of President Obama..
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 09:21 PM
Mar 2016

and I think Obamacare has made some very important strides forward. No preexisting conditions, no lifetime limits, kids can stay on till 26 and more. More people are covered than before.

That being said, it didn't go far and while the cost improved for many it's did become very expensive for far too many.

Friend of mine makes 75,000 a year. They went on the marketplace. Silver plan costs them $900 dollars--they get no subsidies. They called and that was the right amount. The Bronze wasn't much lower, it was just about $800 for the shittiest plan.

That's a mortgage payment.

They made a great analogy--if they went to a bank and tried to get a mortgage for a second home they'd be laughed out of the bank. Their income wouldn't justify it. But they're expected to pay this or pay a penalty. I don't know what they're going to do. They have a car payment and a mortgage.

Some families fall into this 'hole'. I hope whoever is elected addresses it. I also hope that they improve upon what we have for our seniors.

 

SHRED

(28,136 posts)
50. I think the insurance companies planned this to happen
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 09:27 PM
Mar 2016

Our representatives are suppose to protect us from abuses from the private sector.
Especially when we are legally bound to buy their product.

ScreamingMeemie

(68,918 posts)
55. It gets us in the door (provided we can cover the co-pay for the visit).
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 10:46 PM
Mar 2016

That is something over what I had.

flamingdem

(39,308 posts)
59. Exacty, I didn't see doctors for years because even paying $360 a month I had a 6500 deductible
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 12:54 AM
Mar 2016

So I paid cash usually.

That was horrible. Now with the same company Anthem CA I have cheap copays and low deductible but still have to pay coinsurance. Still it's a tremendous relief to have decent insurance.

Texasgal

(17,037 posts)
56. It's not affordable..
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 10:55 PM
Mar 2016

But it is a godsend for people like my husband that is critically ill.

We'd never be able to get coverage no matter what the price without Obama Care.

snot

(10,496 posts)
63. There's only one PPO left in N. TX
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 02:01 AM
Mar 2016

and they have only 3 gynecologists in-network within 50 mis. of the largest city there.

 

SHRED

(28,136 posts)
65. Ugh...where are the priorities?
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 02:14 AM
Mar 2016

Oh...that's right...regime change and the war machine getting hungry.

Number9Dream

(1,560 posts)
72. This Jan. my deductible and co-pay doubled
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 08:22 AM
Mar 2016

Capital Blue Cross (PA) - Company partially pays for. Our deductible went from $1,500 to $3000. Our copay, for all but GP, went from $30 to $65. I'm not seeing any help from ACA. Hope I can make it to Medicare in a few years. Not holding my breath for national one-payer, though it would have to be better.

Response to SHRED (Original post)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Does Obamacare really car...