General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWho was the most disappointing president from 1950-current?
It has to be a president you had some/many expectations for and/or a president who you thought would be mediocre but turned out to be a failure?
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)granted, I expected him to be a fucking disaster who would bring our nation to the brink of ruin... but the fact that he met my expectations disqualifies him from being a "disappointment," at least in the technical sense?
It's a layered question.
underpants
(196,390 posts)I know you asked about "disappointing" but by any measure W was easily the worse President of the Nuclear Age and amongst the worst 5 in history. We weren't expecting much but they found new and unexpected ways to not just fail but fail to a greater extent and in inventive ways that experts in an array of areas never saw coming.
Fresh_Start
(11,365 posts)wasn't old enough to vote for him, but despised everything about him
annabanana
(52,804 posts)He was the one who introduced our overlord's favorite, destructive idea:
The Government (that's OUR Government, made up of Americans, charged with doing the work of the American people, in community).. is EVIL
lame54
(39,714 posts)W sucked like we thought he would - no disappointment there
BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)Just because of expectations, I'd have to say Obama. They were way too high and he was against a wall of republican deception and obstructionism. He's not blameless and could have fought more, but I certainly don't view him as a failure. In his second term, he finally caught on to the republicans game. That was about 3 years too late. He's made a lot of progress since using executive power and bypassing the right.
To me the gap between expectations and results was the widest. That's the only reason.
shenmue
(38,597 posts)TeddyR
(2,493 posts)But Nixon. Bush was in over his head. Reagan was a disaster in many ways, primarily on social issues. Frankly think Reagan did more harm than Bush.
without any doubt. Had he not been President, we would not have had GW or W.
sharp_stick
(14,400 posts)I was just a kid in Canada but I really thought he was going to be good.
Never trusted a Republican again.
Fresh_Start
(11,365 posts)...when he ran for reelection.
My family was completely apolitical...so voting was a radical idea.
Gidney N Cloyd
(19,847 posts)We all knew he'd be awful but I never, never would have imagined he'd be as bad as he was.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)He reached depths of awfulness previously unimagined.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)mentalsolstice
(4,653 posts)edhopper
(37,340 posts)First, let me say he is one of the best Presidents, as good as Carter or Clinton.
But you said disappointing not bad.
But he could have been transformative.
He could have been FDR, and marginalization the GOP.
Instead he let them steal the anger of the people and kept trying to reach across to them a let them get back in 20190.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)Obama is a beautiful man. Gracious, kind, compassionate, and so on. But I don't think he was prepared for the fighting, and I believe his Hawaiian background is too congenial and cooperative to allow him to resist Republicans. He is a lovely man with a lovely family. But we needed someone who understands a brawl, not a community organizer.
anamnua
(1,510 posts)First Speaker
(4,858 posts)...the expectations for him were sky-high in 1976. Watergate demoralized the GOP, and we had been out of office for eight years...race and Vietnam had shattered the Dems. Carter was this empathic Southerner who seemed to embody the "New South", accepted the Civil Rights movement, and was ready to lead the country forward. Four years later, he was rejected by the country as emphatically as Herbert Hoover had been, and left us Reagan, and the right-wing reaction that's dominated US politics ever since. Yes, Carter did some good things, and obviously he's a great and good man. He's been the best ex-President since John Quincy Adams, at least. But his Presidency was a political failure, and no one in 1980 could believe that the hopes of 1976 had been fulfilled...
virgogal
(10,178 posts)Terrible years.
EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)Raine
(31,174 posts)expectations that Poppy with his "kinder gentler America" might actually not be so bad. What a disappointment, he even got us into a war and his failure set us up for his stupid son W wanting to take up where pop left off!
So Far From Heaven
(354 posts)Your set of rules are:
"It has to be a president you had some/many expectations for and/or a president who you thought would be mediocre but turned out to be a failure? "
Name one that didn't fit your criteria. That's why nobody votes anymore. They come out for hope and change, get slapped in the face with failure and lies, then don't vote again.
RepubliCON-Watch
(559 posts)robertgodardfromnj
(67 posts)A drunken monkey could have done a better job at running the country. What a buffoon. And to think Americans elected this guy TWICE.
libodem
(19,288 posts)RandySF
(83,978 posts)Blue Meany
(1,947 posts)He ran as a Democrat and governed as a Republican, and initiated the party's shift to the right.