Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 02:13 PM Apr 2016

I am deeply suspicious of people posting the article on Obama's criticism of BLM

either on DU or on other social media (facebook, twitter etc.)


Obama is black and has suffered from institutionalized racism. He has black kids and black nieces and nephews, and other family. When he criticizes BLM, one can safely assume he is talking about strategies that work and strategies that don't work. He is coming from a place of actual concern.

When non-black people start parroting these concern, one wonders if they are concern trolling. Do you only care about their strategies in as much as in affects your candidate (Bill, Hillary, Bernie, Jeb, Trump etc.)?

It's hard to say if you actually value black lives, or whether you are concern trolling because this movement is inconveniently timed for you.

57 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I am deeply suspicious of people posting the article on Obama's criticism of BLM (Original Post) La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 OP
Do you only care in as much as it affects your candidate (Hillary) ? Electric Monk Apr 2016 #1
I put Bill in there because he was the one who reacted poorly to the BLM movement most recently La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #2
Would you also be deeply suspicious if were Ben Carson who was criticizing Black Lives Matter? bjo59 Apr 2016 #3
yes and no. really would depend on what he said. however, i think La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #5
I really don't understand the point you are trying to make TeddyR Apr 2016 #4
when you criticize something your intent matters. La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #6
But you always try to claim all LGBT for Hillary and you criticize those of us who refuse to agree Bluenorthwest Apr 2016 #7
i know you want to attack me, but at least make sense when you do. La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #9
Post removed Post removed Apr 2016 #10
i mock and dismiss you, because you make up lies about what i have and have not said. nt La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #13
Hey . . . Major Hogwash Apr 2016 #33
BLM has serious issues... TipTok Apr 2016 #24
And many critics have serious issues. LanternWaste Apr 2016 #53
I am really impressed... TipTok Apr 2016 #56
Who cares who you are suspicious of? I am suspicious of you. BillZBubb Apr 2016 #8
I like how your post doesn't come across as petty or childish at all Orrex Apr 2016 #11
thanks! BillZBubb Apr 2016 #12
lol La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #14
Everyone responding LanternWaste Apr 2016 #54
i agree . it has happened for a long time JI7 Apr 2016 #15
yup. La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #16
K and r. cwydro Apr 2016 #17
You are a bit biased, aren't you? Albertoo Apr 2016 #18
Lol. La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #21
thank you! Demonaut Apr 2016 #19
A matter of semantics DeltaLitProf Apr 2016 #20
Race in this has a much richer history and more salience La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #22
So we're trolling if we agree with him... TipTok Apr 2016 #23
You say nerve like it's real brave to stand up La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #25
You're the one claiming that we have the 'nerve' to comment... TipTok Apr 2016 #27
You might want to re-read this bit and apply it to your own life, LLP Scootaloo Apr 2016 #26
i have a long record of speaking for and support racial equality La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #30
I'm certainly not wrong. Scootaloo Apr 2016 #32
No, you really don't. You hope that by implying La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #34
Actually I was alluding to your concern trolling. But now that you bring it up... Scootaloo Apr 2016 #39
+1, perfect. Marr Apr 2016 #55
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2016 #28
No, it's not Scootaloo Apr 2016 #29
The entire movement is? That's news to me La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #31
I didn't realize that the President had been Boudica the Lyoness Apr 2016 #35
Beer summit Scootaloo Apr 2016 #41
Here is one reason La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #42
I have been married twice Boudica the Lyoness Apr 2016 #45
You know just discussing race and racism isn't race baiting La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #49
Except that you're pre-emptively accusing people of racism Scootaloo Apr 2016 #51
Why concern yourself with other people's opinions? romanic Apr 2016 #36
If I didn't care about other people's opinions La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #37
So put them on your ignore list, then it's like they don't exist. Nye Bevan Apr 2016 #38
I could but I could also opine about them La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #40
OK, so you enjoy opining about them or engaging with them. Nye Bevan Apr 2016 #43
His comments were correct. The whole point should be getting people to the table to talk Lucinda Apr 2016 #44
5th Rec Hekate Apr 2016 #46
Many DUers are "suspicious" of anyone who disagrees with them Democat Apr 2016 #47
This is not posted in lbn. It doesn't have to be news. La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #50
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2016 #52
What a bunch of horseshit melman Apr 2016 #48
Another piece of pretzel logic, explaining why people shouldn't comment on a story you can't spin. Marr Apr 2016 #57
 

Electric Monk

(13,869 posts)
1. Do you only care in as much as it affects your candidate (Hillary) ?
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 02:16 PM
Apr 2016

You forgot one.

Thank you for YOUR concern, too, speaking of concern trolling, because Barack's comments are inconvenient to you.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
2. I put Bill in there because he was the one who reacted poorly to the BLM movement most recently
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 02:17 PM
Apr 2016

so no, you are wrong.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
5. yes and no. really would depend on what he said. however, i think
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 02:20 PM
Apr 2016

he too has more of a right to criticize something that directly affects his life and that of his family, then random non black people do.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
7. But you always try to claim all LGBT for Hillary and you criticize those of us who refuse to agree
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 02:26 PM
Apr 2016

with her that the Reagans were the AIDS Heroes and your intentions seem suspect as fried fuck as well.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
9. i know you want to attack me, but at least make sense when you do.
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 02:27 PM
Apr 2016

I have never claimed all LGBT are for Hillary. All LGBT aren't even Democrats.

Response to La Lioness Priyanka (Reply #9)

Major Hogwash

(17,656 posts)
33. Hey . . .
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 12:57 AM
Apr 2016

I read what you wrote in your post that was hidden, and I agree with you.
But, you should just ignore her from now on.
You're not going to change her mind that Hillary is a warmonger.

I'm jus saying . . .

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
53. And many critics have serious issues.
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 11:56 AM
Apr 2016

"And anyone and everyone should feel free to point then out..."

No more and no less than everyone should feel free to examine the biases of those who "feel free to point it out..."

Six of one, half a dozen of the other. Insert pretense of objectivity below...

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
8. Who cares who you are suspicious of? I am suspicious of you.
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 02:26 PM
Apr 2016

It is a strange world you live in where only people of a certain race are allowed to criticize people of that race.

Orrex

(63,172 posts)
11. I like how your post doesn't come across as petty or childish at all
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 02:32 PM
Apr 2016

Well done, brave soldier. Well done.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
54. Everyone responding
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 11:57 AM
Apr 2016

"Who cares who you are suspicious of?"

Everyone responding; though the rationalizations to the contrary will be both creative and imaginative.

JI7

(89,240 posts)
15. i agree . it has happened for a long time
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 04:46 PM
Apr 2016

When people try to disassociate him from the general black population for their own fake concerns .


It's like when republicans bring up black babies when they try to make anti choice points .

 

Albertoo

(2,016 posts)
18. You are a bit biased, aren't you?
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 09:36 PM
Apr 2016
Obama is black and has suffered from institutionalized racism. He has black kids

Who says Obama is black? he's half black. His kids are 3/4rs black. Which is good.
Helps get rid of superiority/victimization clichés, one mixed marriage at a time.

DeltaLitProf

(767 posts)
20. A matter of semantics
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 09:49 PM
Apr 2016

Isn't every kind of political statement about an ongoing movement that isn't blind praise concern trolling?

It's just like in my field, when someone might call an author self-indulgent. Isn't every piece of writing self-indulgent?

The question is whether the concern trolling is legitimate criticism, not whether it can be called concern trolling and therefore dismissed.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
22. Race in this has a much richer history and more salience
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 10:53 PM
Apr 2016

Than the mere self indulgence of writers. In my experience and in the literature, everybody claims they are not prejudiced, yet institutionalized racism and interpersonal prejudice seems to continue. People too easily claim that they are not racist at all.

You can legitimately criticize blm or anything else, but I'd like to see how many of these legitimate critics have spent any time or energy trying to create racial justice. If you have not, I have every right to think that you do not really care about the ways racial justice could be achieved, you just do not like blm because it bothers you in some regard.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
25. You say nerve like it's real brave to stand up
Sun Apr 24, 2016, 11:52 PM
Apr 2016

Against an oppressed minority. Sounds a lot like trumps anti political correctness battle cry.

 

TipTok

(2,474 posts)
27. You're the one claiming that we have the 'nerve' to comment...
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 12:22 AM
Apr 2016

... Even though we lack the appropriate amount of melanin.

I consider it to be like any other conversation adults would have.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
26. You might want to re-read this bit and apply it to your own life, LLP
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 12:14 AM
Apr 2016
When non-black people start parroting these concern, one wonders if they are concern trolling. Do you only care about their strategies in as much as in affects your candidate (Bill, Hillary, Bernie, Jeb, Trump etc.)?

It's hard to say if you actually value black lives, or whether you are concern trolling because this movement is inconveniently timed for you.


 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
30. i have a long record of speaking for and support racial equality
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 12:51 AM
Apr 2016

I am a strongly ally to black people and a POC. I am not criticizing a racial justice movement to further my own agenda. Notice how I added the clintons in along with Bernie and the republicans when speaking to this issue.

So no, whatever shitty thing you're trying to imply about me, you're wrong.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
32. I'm certainly not wrong.
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 12:55 AM
Apr 2016

I don't know who or what you are, or claim to be, or other people think you are or aren't. I do know what you're doing though.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
34. No, you really don't. You hope that by implying
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 01:02 AM
Apr 2016

That I'm using black people to further some nefarious agenda, you can discredit me or my argument but you are wrong.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
39. Actually I was alluding to your concern trolling. But now that you bring it up...
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 01:38 AM
Apr 2016

Your whole premise here is that anyone talking about a news article must be using black people, must be some sort of racist, must have some nefarious agenda.

The irony is that clinton people have been using both BLM and barack obama as shields for their candidate for the entire campaign. So when the two butt up against each other, it appears to cause some real cognitive dissonance among clinton people whose only interest in either is how to use them for the benefit of candidate Clinton. Which side to take? Who's right? Oh no!

Your solution appears to be an attempt to smother the story by asserting that anyone who talks about it must be a bad person, unless they pass your personal paper bag test. Don't talk about it at all, be silent, let it sink away, else LLP will imply mean things about you! Which I'll grant is probably a better solution than even attempting to address the actual topic, at least from your position. But it's still not a very graceful solution, and it's pretty obvious what you're doing.Especially when you go and break out your "black people cred" like anyone cares.

Like I said, I don't know who you are, what you claim to be, what other people think you are.

I also don't really care.

As far as I'm concerned, you're someone on the internet with too much free time, trying to construct a narrative for why peopel should pay no mind to a news story you don't know how to approach, and how you will say mean things about htem if they don't follow your demands.

So with that in mind.

“You can’t just keep on yelling at them and you can’t refuse to meet because that might compromise the purity of your position,” Obama said. “The value of social movements and activism is to get you at the table, get you in the room and then start trying to figure out how is this problem going to be solved. You then have a responsibility to prepare an agenda that is achievable —that can institutionalize the changes you seek and to engage the other side.”

Obama brought up compromise often in his speech, imploring youth activists and political hopefuls to learn how to compromise and to not see opponents or those on the other side of the aisle as enemies.

"If you spend time with people who just agree with you on any particular issue, you become even more extreme in your convictions because you're never contradicted and everyone just mutually reinforces their perspective," he said. "That's why I think it is so important for all the young people here to seek out people who don't agree with you.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/obama-blm-compromise-youth-speech


Enoy the read, and good night. Feel free to say nasty things behind my back.

Response to La Lioness Priyanka (Original post)

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
29. No, it's not
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 12:50 AM
Apr 2016

Some frauds who are tagging along for the ride certainly are, but every movement attracts some assholes.

 

Boudica the Lyoness

(2,899 posts)
35. I didn't realize that the President had been
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 01:19 AM
Apr 2016

subject to institutionalized racism. Could you please give me the details.
Thank you.

 

Boudica the Lyoness

(2,899 posts)
45. I have been married twice
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 01:35 AM
Apr 2016

First husband was black and the second one white. My first husband and I were never pulled over by the police. He recently told me that he has only been pulled over once by the police and that was when he was drunk and the young white cop told him to sleep it off before driving further. First husband now in mid-60's btw.

On the other hand my white husband was been stopped by the police on two occasions when he was not violating any laws and didn't receive any citations/tickets. On one occasion I think the small town cop was bored. The second occasion was when we were leaving our business building at an industrial park one evening. The cop said he was taking down my husband's details because if anything was later to be found amiss at the building, our building, he knew where to come looking!! We were two middle aged white people, in a minivan with our 13 year old son. Imagine if my white husband had been black and the cop said that to him! In fact if you're white, imagine you are black and go through your day imagining every slight is because you're black. You develop a chip on your shoulder pretty quickly.

My black son, now in his 40's, has never been pulled over and he's driven all over he U.S.

Race baiting for votes is going to come back and bite us all and it's too bad because we'd all come a long way. After 45 of never experiencing racism, except in a black neighborhood and by a couple of black students at a historical black university, I'm very tired of this wave of race baiting.

lol I see how institutionalized racism held Obama back. Didn't he become the President or something?

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
49. You know just discussing race and racism isn't race baiting
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 09:08 AM
Apr 2016

That's a very Right-wing way of looking at Race.

Also, Obama has achieved a lot but people who've been discriminated against sometimes do achieve things, but there path is harder. these things are not mutually exclusive

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
51. Except that you're pre-emptively accusing people of racism
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 10:29 AM
Apr 2016

Your entire point is, "if you are discussing a news article, and are not black enough for my personal paper-bag test, you're a racist with an ulterior motive!"

When called on that, you try to back off and whimper about being a victim. You talk about all your black friends. And how "it's just an opinion."

Now I see you've scurried off to the AA group to put on another tearful martyr act.

Funny thing is, you're trying to accuse another poster of being right-wing, buuuuuut you're doing exactly what right-wingers do on discussion boards. They launch a broad attack against liberals. They then try to "defend" their attack by acting like they're the one being attacked - that glenbeckian "I'm just asking questions!" or of course, "I thought liberals were for free speech!" And then when that fails, they run back to 'home base" to talk about how they've "proved" liberals are the "real haters."

Seriously. Maybe don't do that? Maybe just acknowledge that your attempt at smearing people and smothering a story was a bad idea, and move on, instead of just trying to dig the hole deeper? You're not going to find gold down there, LLP

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
43. OK, so you enjoy opining about them or engaging with them.
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 01:43 AM
Apr 2016

Great! All part of the rich tapestry of this political discussion board!

Lucinda

(31,170 posts)
44. His comments were correct. The whole point should be getting people to the table to talk
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 04:54 AM
Apr 2016

and make the changes you are protesting about. That applies to ANY group protesting. Unless, of course, your protest isn't really about change, but the intention was to get media attention and/or embarrass someone.

I fail to see how supporting common sense becomes an issue about skin color.

Response to La Lioness Priyanka (Reply #50)

 

Marr

(20,317 posts)
57. Another piece of pretzel logic, explaining why people shouldn't comment on a story you can't spin.
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 12:07 PM
Apr 2016

You projected way too hard in the third paragraph. Rarely have I seen a more transparent piece of concern trolling to simply deflect a story that casts your candidate in a bad light, and it really does put your real priority into sharp focus.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I am deeply suspicious of...