Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NWCorona

(8,541 posts)
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 03:02 PM Apr 2016

4,800-year-old fossil of mother cradling baby found in Taiwan

"Archaeologists in Taiwan have found a 4,800-year-old human fossil of a mother holding an infant child in her arms, museum officials said on Tuesday.

The 48 sets of remains unearthed in graves in the Taichung area are the earliest trace of human activity found in central Taiwan. The most striking discovery among them was the skeleton of a young mother looking down at a child cradled in her arms.

“When it was unearthed, all of the archaeologists and staff members were shocked. Why? Because the mother was looking down at the baby in her hands,” said Chu Whei-lee, a curator in the Anthropology Department at Taiwan’s National Museum of Natural Science.""


http://m.hindustantimes.com/world/4-800-year-old-fossil-of-mother-cradling-baby-found-in-taiwan/story-DeZ2JSZIsPiPpBmMm0EWrO.html

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
4,800-year-old fossil of mother cradling baby found in Taiwan (Original Post) NWCorona Apr 2016 OP
Wow. warrprayer Apr 2016 #1
Awesome! AZ Mike Apr 2016 #2
Interesting 2naSalit Apr 2016 #3
I wonder too and that picture of her looking down on her baby NWCorona Apr 2016 #4
I was curious if it said it was a newborn or not. Arugula Latte Apr 2016 #5
Good point 2naSalit Apr 2016 #9
fossilized in 4800 years??? Demonaut Apr 2016 #6
Wow, what a great find! CaliforniaPeggy Apr 2016 #7
Incredible and very sad, too...knr joeybee12 Apr 2016 #8

2naSalit

(86,308 posts)
3. Interesting
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 03:45 PM
Apr 2016

Not a lot of info there at the article but the three pictures are interesting. I wonder what killed them.

NWCorona

(8,541 posts)
4. I wonder too and that picture of her looking down on her baby
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 03:52 PM
Apr 2016

Is both beautiful and morbid.

There's so much under our feet that we don't realize.

 

Arugula Latte

(50,566 posts)
5. I was curious if it said it was a newborn or not.
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 04:35 PM
Apr 2016

If so, maybe they both died during the birth.

Just speculation.

2naSalit

(86,308 posts)
9. Good point
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 08:06 PM
Apr 2016

I really wonder about it. The article said there were other children at the site. Maybe it was a grave site area for children and mothers who passed at birth. That's probably a more realistic speculation than many.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»4,800-year-old fossil of ...