Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Miles Archer

(18,837 posts)
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 12:51 PM Apr 2016

The government will get a $150 to $250 million payday from Prince's estate

Both the federal government and Minnesota’s state government will assess so-called “death taxes” or estate taxes on Prince’s assets, taking away more than half his estate. Between his physical assets—cash, investments, home, etc.—and his future royalties, Prince’s estate has been estimated to be between $300 and $500 million.

If Prince were married, he could have passed on the entirety of his estate to his spouse tax free. However, without a spouse, only $1.6 million of Prince’s estate will be free from Minnesota’s death tax and only $5.45 million will escape the federal death tax.

The combination of Minnesota’s top death tax rate of 16 percent, plus the federal government’s 40 percent rate, means that over 50 percent of Prince’s estate will go to the government.

Had Prince known ahead of time that he would die at such a young age, he may have been able to reduce the government’s reach into his estate through tax planning, but with a fortune as large as his, the government’s claim to his estate was inevitable.

http://dailysignal.com/2016/04/29/why-over-half-of-princes-estate-will-go-to-the-government/
37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The government will get a $150 to $250 million payday from Prince's estate (Original Post) Miles Archer Apr 2016 OP
I believe Sherman A1 Apr 2016 #1
+1 2naSalit Apr 2016 #2
This is Also a Ted Misleading Stallion Apr 2016 #11
It is a tax for dying... scscholar Apr 2016 #28
The use of death tax is a Right Wing meme they love to use rather than an estate tax. YOHABLO Apr 2016 #29
The term "death tax" is widely taken Igel Apr 2016 #33
If he were married the estate would still be taxed at the Yupster Apr 2016 #3
Then again, with a will, some lawyer would have gotten rich shielding the estate from taxes Hoyt Apr 2016 #5
He should have had trusts set up Yupster Apr 2016 #6
Exactly. He had no wife. He had no children. EL34x4 Apr 2016 #23
Your advice is so sound. And it does not just apply to the jwirr Apr 2016 #7
That living will and DNR was the first thing we did after the Shaivo case. leftofcool Apr 2016 #31
dog whistles and that left wing website the Daily Signal... nice.... nt. winstars Apr 2016 #4
Facts are facts pintobean Apr 2016 #8
"death tax" is a whistle hfojvt Apr 2016 #16
And there is something wrong with this? n2doc Apr 2016 #9
A "payday" basselope Apr 2016 #10
Did you read the full title of my post, or did you stop at the word "payday?" Miles Archer Apr 2016 #13
Your post doesn't have a point. basselope Apr 2016 #22
As it should be... except for the portion that will pay for wars and war machines. hunter Apr 2016 #12
That was my reaction... Miles Archer Apr 2016 #14
...Or He Could Have Made a Will With a Charitable Bequest Stallion May 2016 #35
It's a little late for regrets. hunter May 2016 #36
if I had my way the government would get even more hfojvt Apr 2016 #15
Why do you think he didn't give enough away? philosslayer Apr 2016 #25
"Government payday" is a derogatory republican term for taxes. RiverLover Apr 2016 #17
Federal Tax Exemption in 2016 will be aVery Generous $5.45 Million(10.9 Million) for Married Couples Stallion Apr 2016 #18
He refused to make a will or do any estate planning. davepc Apr 2016 #19
It's too bad he didn't make a will, but maybe he wanted it this way. Starry Messenger Apr 2016 #20
Thank you Prince for paying your fair share eShirl Apr 2016 #21
if you're going to post Heritage Foundation propaganda Enrique Apr 2016 #24
Good. Iggo Apr 2016 #26
That does not make me sad. HassleCat Apr 2016 #27
I fully support the "death tax". cheapdate Apr 2016 #30
Good.. sendero Apr 2016 #32
If I died rich, with no heirs, that would be fine with me bhikkhu Apr 2016 #34
Daily Signal? Seriously?! ButterflyBlood May 2016 #37

Sherman A1

(38,958 posts)
1. I believe
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 12:55 PM
Apr 2016

that the term inheritance tax is more appropriate. "Death Tax" is a term as I recall is something that our esteemed friends in the GOP.

In any event the heirs will still come out rather nicely and whomever ends up with the rights to the music will undoubtedly do rather well.

Stallion

(6,474 posts)
11. This is Also a Ted Misleading
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 03:06 PM
Apr 2016

"If Prince were married, he could have passed on the entirety of his estate to his spouse tax free."

The assets would still be taxed at his spouse's death-which at least should have been mentioned

 

YOHABLO

(7,358 posts)
29. The use of death tax is a Right Wing meme they love to use rather than an estate tax.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 07:23 PM
Apr 2016

I think it's so unfortunate that the government takes so much of someone's hard earned money. But of course that's why people who are extremely wealthy hire fat cat lawyers. Prince should have taken measures to avoid this from happening. Who ever lays claim to his fortune will still make out well.

Igel

(35,296 posts)
33. The term "death tax" is widely taken
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 10:30 PM
Apr 2016

left of center to come from the GOP because it was discussed as such in the '00s.

The term's been around for at least a decade before the GOP started to use it and before those left of center decided that the GOP must have coined it.

It was used in the tax planning industry, right and left, in the '90s and "we" didn't bother to notice it until it became used by our domestic foes. First attestation is more important than first notice by a subgroup. It was certainly used by opponents.

http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2010/12/16/132031116/a-history-of-how-we-got-from-estate-tax-to-death-tax says that it was used (first?) in the 1940s by opponents. I suspect it was lurking in unwritten language for a while before first attestation (that's typically how things work).

The wiki article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estate_tax_in_the_United_States#The_term_.22death_tax.22 says that the language or similar language actually appeared in the legislation in the '50s and carried into at least the '80s.

Of course, Lakoff finds that it's a neologism used in framing in the recent past. That's Lakoff, making a certain species of linguistic thought serve a higher, or at least a political, end. Advocacy research sux.

As an aside, Prince was clearly in the 1%, and those who say that behind every great fortune there's a great crime either must really dislike his music or fall silent before the self-serving inaccuracy of their quote.

Yupster

(14,308 posts)
3. If he were married the estate would still be taxed at the
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 01:17 PM
Apr 2016

second death.

It was being said that Prince had no will. Haven't heard if that had been updated.

A lesson for us all though. If you don't have a will, then get one, especially if you have minor children. Without a will, some lawyers are going to get rich administering the dispositions of his estate.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
5. Then again, with a will, some lawyer would have gotten rich shielding the estate from taxes
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 01:36 PM
Apr 2016

not to mention fighting attacks on the will's provisions by family, etc., after death. Sounds like Prince just didn't want to hassle with it, knowing his family would be taken care of even if they had to fight for a share. He certainly had attorneys he could have turned writing a will over to if he cared.

Yupster

(14,308 posts)
6. He should have had trusts set up
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 01:50 PM
Apr 2016

That's too much money to have in your own name.

On the other hand, what difference does it make to him now who gets it.

 

EL34x4

(2,003 posts)
23. Exactly. He had no wife. He had no children.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 06:50 PM
Apr 2016

He had nobody depending upon him for financial security.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
7. Your advice is so sound. And it does not just apply to the
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 02:04 PM
Apr 2016

traditional will regarding property. There are other wills just as important - living wills that apply to healthcare and end of life decisions.

Life and death can and do come at anytime. You can walk out the door and face death at anytime in your life. As a social worker for Developmentally Disabled children and adults one of the first things we did as case managers is get those papers into effect. Guardians and parents are encouraged to put their wishes down so that they are there when needed.

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
16. "death tax" is a whistle
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 03:44 PM
Apr 2016

and not a fact.

All of us will die, most of us will not pay a "death tax" although I have been told that even for a small estate, like mine, there is a 15% probate fee. Hence, for all my CDs and things I make them "payable on death" to avoid those fees.

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
9. And there is something wrong with this?
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 02:25 PM
Apr 2016

I'll bet when it is all said and done the Lawyers for the various people trying to get a cut of his estate will get more.

Frankly this country would be far better of with at least a 50% tax on all large estates. We don't need to support a stinking oligarchy here.

 

basselope

(2,565 posts)
10. A "payday"
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 02:36 PM
Apr 2016

What a weird way to refer to it.

It's an estate tax not a "death tax".

And is 150 million not enough for someone?

In short, the beneficiaries of Prince's estate will live in comfort for generations.

Miles Archer

(18,837 posts)
13. Did you read the full title of my post, or did you stop at the word "payday?"
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 03:33 PM
Apr 2016

Half of the estate is a payday for the government.

And is 150 million not enough for someone?

In short, the beneficiaries of Prince's estate will live in comfort for generations.

That's not the point of the article or the post. Prince had nothing in writing so the government takes half. Sorry that wasn't clear to you.

As far as "death tax" versus "estate tax," you can take that up with the author of the article.

 

basselope

(2,565 posts)
22. Your post doesn't have a point.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 06:46 PM
Apr 2016

Having "something in writing" doesn't change that the government takes half, you realize that, right?

Even if he had a will with every dollar bequeathed, it would STILL be subject to the estate tax.

The way to AVOID estate taxes, if you choose, is to A) Be married so everything automatically passes to your spouse. B) Own properly jointly with another person or entity such that the property automatically transfers upon death.

hunter

(38,309 posts)
12. As it should be... except for the portion that will pay for wars and war machines.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 03:18 PM
Apr 2016

Planes like the F-35 are useless, new aircraft carriers are useless, humvees dropped from airplanes are useless.

Prince was a pacifist.

Wouldn't it be cool if his estate taxes could be used to help people who he would have helped?

Miles Archer

(18,837 posts)
14. That was my reaction...
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 03:36 PM
Apr 2016

...if he had any thoughts about how the money was to be spent, it probably wouldn't have been thoughts of warfare.

hunter

(38,309 posts)
36. It's a little late for regrets.
Sun May 1, 2016, 12:49 PM
May 2016

I'm pretty sure wealth will never be a problem I have to worry about. I'm never far removed from the dumpster-diving kid who was living in his broken car in a church parking lot, and I don't buy lottery tickets.





hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
15. if I had my way the government would get even more
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 03:41 PM
Apr 2016

Does that make a difference to him now? He could have given a lot of money away when he was alive, and probably he should have (maybe he did, but apparently not enough)

RiverLover

(7,830 posts)
17. "Government payday" is a derogatory republican term for taxes.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 05:10 PM
Apr 2016

Um, (cough) Democratic poster, we sort of need taxes to pay for our USDA, FDA, FCC, roads, military, health dept, etc. You know, those things that make US a civilized society?

WTH?

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
20. It's too bad he didn't make a will, but maybe he wanted it this way.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 05:38 PM
Apr 2016

I'd like to think some of the money will go to public schools, maybe music programs.

eShirl

(18,490 posts)
21. Thank you Prince for paying your fair share
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 05:44 PM
Apr 2016

and not trying to get out of it by taking advantage of tax loopholes as if they were mandatory.

Enrique

(27,461 posts)
24. if you're going to post Heritage Foundation propaganda
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 07:10 PM
Apr 2016

at least disclose that's what it is, and give a reason why you're posting it.

 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
27. That does not make me sad.
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 07:21 PM
Apr 2016

A wealthy person dies. He has no children depending on him. Any money he leaves behind is simply a windfall for relatives, etc. If the government gets half, that still leaves half for people who don't need it in the first place.

cheapdate

(3,811 posts)
30. I fully support the "death tax".
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 07:44 PM
Apr 2016

Only, I would prefer to structure it to take more of large estates.

We instituted "death taxes" because Americans wanted to avoid the creation of a landed aristocracy, like in old Europe.

If $5 million tax-free and then 40% on the amount above that isn't enough to live, then sell some land or property.

sendero

(28,552 posts)
32. Good..
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 08:25 PM
Apr 2016

.... the "death tax" sometimes keeps some money from going to people who simply did nothing to earn it and I am fine with that.

bhikkhu

(10,714 posts)
34. If I died rich, with no heirs, that would be fine with me
Sat Apr 30, 2016, 10:50 PM
Apr 2016

In any case, I think Prince cared more that people would continue to enjoy his music. I'm not surprised that he didn't squirrel his monetary assets away somehow, what would be the point?

Estate taxes, btw, are one of the best means government has to reduce wealth inequality and support social mobility.

ButterflyBlood

(12,644 posts)
37. Daily Signal? Seriously?!
Sun May 1, 2016, 01:14 PM
May 2016

Why on Earth are we just parroting right wing whining from that far right site here?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The government will get a...